Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

英特尔HD Graphics是一个集成的图形卡,代号为Ivy Bridge的处理器(Celeron和Pentium)。它继承了英特尔HD Graphics2000年的Sandy Bridge处理器岁之间的HD 2000和3000 GPU执行。到更快的高清显卡4000相比,HD图形功能的执行单元(6和16)和只有一个纹理采样器。因此,表现显然差,只适合低苛刻的游戏。英特尔一个高10%至15%的性能相比老的Sandy Bridge HD显卡2000。因此,只有低需求的休闲游戏播放。集成视频解码器称为多格式编解码器引擎(MFX)也得到了改善和4K应该允许甚至simultaneus的视频解码。 DXVAChecker列表MPEG2,VC1,WMV9,H264支持的编解码器。 QuickSync快速转码的视频进行了优化,以更高的性能和更好的图像质量。另一项新功能是支持多达3个独立的显示器(也许只有一个DisplayPort)为AMD提供了与他们的Eyefinity技术支持(最多6个显示器)。由于3D三栅极的22nm生产工艺,应该是比较低的功耗(每瓦特性能)的发展重点。

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameIvy Bridge GT1
ArchitectureGen. 7 Ivy Bridge
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 11.0, Shader 5.0
technology22 nm
Date of Announcement01.10.2012
CPU in HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium 2030M2 x 2500 MHz, 35 W650 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Pentium 2020M2 x 2400 MHz, 35 W650 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Celeron 1020E2 x 2200 MHz, 35 W650 MHz1000 MHz
min. - max.350 - 650 MHz800 - 1100 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.1 pt (0%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -49%
...
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.06581 -48%
0.0848 -33%
0.09629 -24%
0.09894 -22%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.09938 -21%
AMD Radeon HD 8210
0.1003 -20%
AMD Radeon HD 8250
0.112 -11%
0.1124 -11%
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
0.1153 -9%
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
0.1261
AMD Radeon HD 8240
0.1292 2%
0.1405 11%
0.1444 15%
AMD Radeon HD 8280
0.1449 15%
0.1515 20%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
0.155 23%
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
0.1601 27%
0.1601 27%
0.1647 31%
...
20.4 16078%
max:
33.3 26308%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1478     avg: 1898     median: 1906.5 (2%)     max: 2207 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2116     avg: 2283     median: 2286 (1%)     max: 2470 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 208     avg: 253.6     median: 254.5 (0%)     max: 275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 248     avg: 286.2     median: 285.5 (0%)     max: 305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 22834     avg: 24734     median: 24209.5 (3%)     max: 29149 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 258     avg: 363.3     median: 370.5 (0%)     max: 413 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 218     avg: 310.6     median: 315 (0%)     max: 352 Points
171.8 -45%
179 -42%
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
192.1 -38%
206 -34%
232.3 -25%
251.8 -19%
AMD Radeon HD 8180
268 -14%
301 -3%
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
310.6
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
319.9 3%
330.4 6%
341.1 10%
AMD Radeon HD 8210
344.5 11%
349 12%
379 22%
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
389.9 26%
415 34%
415.3 34%
...
59943 19199%
max:
104201 33448%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 930     avg: 1465     median: 1491 (0%)     max: 1691 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 728     avg: 1186     median: 1213 (1%)     max: 1360 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -95%
...
972 -18%
997 -16%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
1027 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
1054 -11%
1072 -10%
1090 -8%
1091 -8%
AMD Radeon HD 8250
1113 -6%
1144 -4%
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
1186
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
1192 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
1247 5%
1282 8%
1295 9%
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
1328 12%
1331 12%
1369 15%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
1379 16%
1380 16%
...
132443 11067%
max:
170928 14312%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 8075     avg: 9212     median: 9212 (10%)     max: 10349 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5909     avg: 7584     median: 7434 (4%)     max: 10124 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3839     avg: 5085     median: 5186 (6%)     max: 6252 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -97%
...
4294 -16%
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
4296 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
4412 -13%
4451 -12%
4515 -11%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
4527 -11%
4691 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
4909 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
5000 -2%
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
5085
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
5113 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
5118 1%
5194 2%
5470 8%
5509 8%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
5598 10%
ATI Mobility Radeon X1800
5600 10%
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
5766 13%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
5802 14%
...
68064 1239%
max:
87172 1614%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 2186     avg: 2949     median: 2930 (4%)     max: 3573 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 0.75     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.87 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 1.31     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (1%)     max: 1.66 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 4.68     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 5.88 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.91     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.19 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 8.71     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (7%)     max: 8.93 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 7.83     avg: 8.9     median: 8.9 (10%)     max: 10.03 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 1.27     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (1%)     max: 1.51 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.2 Points (78%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.6     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (59%)     max: 4.7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2410     avg: 3337     median: 3382 (2%)     max: 4037 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 6.62     avg: 9.1     median: 9.2 (3%)     max: 11.32 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
27 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 27     avg: 38.3     median: 44 (0%)     max: 44 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
44 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 190     avg: 266.4     median: 275 (0%)     max: 290 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
5.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
3.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
med. 1366x768
54.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
18.4 30.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.2 24.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
27.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
10.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16 16.4 19.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8.6 8.9 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
80.8 112 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3 24 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.8 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
8.8 16.1 18.6 20.1 21.5 21.5 22.5 22.7 23.1 23.6 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.7 9.4 10.5 10.8 11 11 11.1 11.4 11.7 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5.1 7.4 7.6 8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
18 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14 15.2 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
18.3 52 69.7 90 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.2 32.8 42.7 54 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6 20.9 23 29 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
20 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
37  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
33.3 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.2 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
11.1 23.1 26 26.5 27.6 27.8 28.4 28.5 37.1 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5.5 11.2 11.4 11.5 11.7 11.9 13 15.4 16.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.1 7.1 7.5 9.2 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.7 16.9 17.4 18.3 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.3 9.4 9.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
med. 1024x768
55.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
41.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
16.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
90  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
20.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
78.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
28.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Elder Scrolls Online34.514.38.6
Thief5.93.6
X-Plane 10.25157.6
F1 20132014
Fifa 1454.432
Dota 22416
GRID 227.5412.8412.5
Metro: Last Light10.528.094.35
BioShock Infinite1797.72
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm9622134
Tomb Raider20117
Dead Space 34217126
Hitman: Absolution13114
Dishonored1915
Fifa 1358362013
F1 201223191612
Guild Wars 23085
Counter-Strike: GO372011
Dirt Showdown3613
Diablo III29.217.514.6
Anno 207026128
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim1694.55
Fifa 1255.821.2
Deus Ex Human Revolution25.411.4
Dirt 341.416.5
Trackmania Nations Forever9020.7
World of Warcraft78.328.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
15
6
3
20
4

18
1

6








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 03:28:56

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:43:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.034s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#28 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.034s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 3563 +0.03s ... 0.064s

#30 got single benchmarks 3563 +0.038s ... 0.102s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.361s ... 0.462s

#33 min, max, avg, median took s +0.127s ... 0.589s

#34 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.589s

#35 Got 143 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.602s

#36 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.602s

#37 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.016s ... 0.618s

#38 benchmarks composed for output. +0.739s ... 1.357s

#39 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.36s

#40 return log +0s ... 1.36s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) graphics card

 

富士通LifeBook AH502笔记本测评

便宜和磨砂.富士通LIFEBOOK AH系列是专为那些想省钱的人。现在那些寻找一个雾面显示屏还可以得到他们的钱的价值。我们探讨什么的LifeBook AH502功能。...
Intel Pentium 2020M | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
 

联想G500s-59367693笔记本测评

便宜的办公笔记本. 新车型的联想G500s系列尤其是比以前系列的机型更薄。我们的测试样机的规格都正确:奔腾处理器,500 GB硬盘驱动器,Windows 8中,399欧元(约$527)。测试揭示是否只的情况下,缩减或如果用户拥有与其他削减生活。...
Intel Pentium 2020M | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.5 kg
 

东芝Satellite C850-1LX笔记本测评

添加一些对比的办公室.赛扬双核处理器Ivy Bridge的新一代权力这款东芝笔记本电脑。该处理器加入部队有一个15.6英寸的显示屏,大量的硬盘空间和Windows8。在纸面上,电脑声称满足大多数用户的需求。无论在实践中,这是真实的,是我们的评论来回答的问题。...
Intel Celeron 1000M | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.3 kg

Zoostorm 7270-9013: Intel Celeron 1037U, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Zoostorm 7270-9013

Acer Aspire E1-531-20204G50Mnks: Intel Pentium 2020M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E1-531-20204G50Mnks

Lenovo G700: Intel Pentium 2020M, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo G700

Asus K450CA-BH21T: Intel Pentium 2117U, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus K450CA-BH21T

HP Pavilion 14-c001ef: Intel Celeron 847, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-c001ef

Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A-1MM: Intel Celeron 1005M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A-1MM

Acer Aspire V5-132P: Intel Pentium 2129Y, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V5-132P

Asus Transformer Book T100-DK002H: Intel Atom Z3740, 10.10", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book T100-DK002H

Asus X551MA-SX036D: Intel Celeron N2815, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus X551MA-SX036D

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 20-core GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)