Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

英特尔HD Graphics(家庭)是在便宜的赛扬和奔腾模型的Sandy Bridge代的处理器集成的图形卡。这是一个类似英特尔高清显卡2000,而不是上了年纪的Arrandale双核心处理器(带有相同的名称)的处理器的图形。根据不同的处理器,高清显卡提供了不同的基础和Turbo Boost时钟速度。目前,有三种不同的模式:节电,如赛扬847:800MHzCeleron例如,涡轮增压基地350MHz的赛扬B810涡轮增压950MHzPentium,例如:基本650MHz的,睿频1100MHz可奔腾B950基地650MHz的,此外,某些型号的CPU性能缓慢可能会影响游戏。例如,虽然GPU不同的赛扬B710没有太大的奔腾B950,游戏性能显然差很多游戏无法播放。由于英特尔HD Graphics 3000和2000年,该处理器的图形卡是可以使用的最后一级缓存的处理器(2MB通常为入门级CPU)的一部分。这可以被看作是一个小的量的非常快的专用存储器。 Altought2X抗锯齿(AA)的支持,该芯片是渲染时4节AA一样快。的Unigine谷基准类似的HD 3000酷睿i7-2637M例如达到同样的比分2节AA电池,4节AA。的功能集高清显卡3000相比也减少了在这些入门级的CPU。例如英特尔快速同步(去和编码的高清视频),Clear Video高清在超铀3D,通常停用。

HD Graphics Series

HD Graphics P530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5600 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 6000 48 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4600 20 @ 0.2 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5500 24 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5000 40 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4400 20 @ 0.2 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 5300 24 @ 0.1 - 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4000 16 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Broadwell) 12 @ 0.1 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 4200 20 @ 0.2 - 0.85 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Skylake) 12 @ 0.3 - 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Braswell) 16 @ 0.32 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) 12 @ 0.32 - 0.64 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Haswell) 10 @ 0.2 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) 16 @ 0.2 - 0.6 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 3000 12 @ 0.35 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2500 6 @ 0.65 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 2000 6 @ 0.85 - 1.35 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) 6 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics (Bay Trail) 4 @ 0.31 - 0.9 GHz32/64/128 Bit
CodenameSandy Bridge
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge
Pipelines6 - unified
Core Speed350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology32 nm
Date of Announcement01.05.2011
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com
CPU in HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium G8602 x 3000 MHz, 65 W650 MHz1100 MHz
Intel Pentium B9802 x 2400 MHz, 35 W650 - 1100 MHz? MHz
Intel Pentium B9702 x 2300 MHz, 35 W650 MHz1150 MHz
min. - max.350 - 650 - 1100 MHz800 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1386     avg: 1452     median: 1451.5 (1%)     max: 1517 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 1389     avg: 1405     median: 1404.5 (0%)     max: 1420 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 13132     avg: 13747     median: 13746.5 (2%)     max: 14361 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 737     avg: 932     median: 976 (0%)     max: 1057 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 581     avg: 736     median: 767.5 (0%)     max: 831 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -92%
...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530
560 -24%
564 -23%
584 -21%
622 -15%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
635 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
646 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
690 -6%
695 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 8180
695 -6%
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
736
739 0%
750 2%
769 4%
782 6%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
803 9%
806 10%
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
843 15%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
853 16%
865 18%
...
132443 17895%
max:
170928 23124%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 9769     avg: 11443     median: 11429.5 (12%)     max: 13145 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 2701     avg: 6189     median: 6390 (3%)     max: 7772 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2000     avg: 4691     median: 4768 (5%)     max: 5917 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -97%
...
ATI Mobility Radeon X2500
4202 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
4214 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7700
4239 -10%
4294 -8%
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
4296 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS
4412 -6%
4451 -5%
4515 -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 Hybrid X2
4527 -3%
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
4691
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
4909 5%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
5000 7%
5085 8%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
5113 9%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
5118 9%
5194 11%
5470 17%
5509 17%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
5598 19%
...
68064 1351%
max:
87172 1758%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 2365     avg: 2618     median: 2438 (3%)     max: 3050 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 +
3DMark 06
3002 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 1027     avg: 2435     median: 2509 (3%)     max: 3230 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
2433 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 +
3DMark 06
3530 Points (5%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 5.3     avg: 5.7     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 7 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
0.1 fps (0%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
0.1 fps (0%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
0.3 fps (0%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
0.1 fps (0%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 5.4     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (72%)     max: 5.8 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.8     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (57%)     max: 5.1 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1030     avg: 2571     median: 2577 (2%)     max: 3508 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 2.68     avg: 6.3     median: 6.6 (2%)     max: 7.93 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
15316 points (4%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
3.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
41.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
100  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
13 14.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
6.9 19.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
14.8 43.8 55 65.9 66.2 68.3 76.2 80.6 84 96 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.1 35 36.2 39.6 41.2 43.9 44.5 51 52 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2 17.2 17.5 19.1 19.4 22.9 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 12.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23 23.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.8 12 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9 11 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8.8 11 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15 16.3 16.7 22 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
18 18.9 19.8 21 21.7 22 22 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8 8 8 9 9.4 9.5 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
5.8 13.7 15.2 15.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
4.7 7.7 7.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22 44 45 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13 23 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
7 9.1 9.6 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
27 (!) 56 68.7 76.4 94 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
16 38.3 43.4 50 51 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
11.1 21.4 30 30 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
20 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
7.2 19 20.1 24.3 26 26 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
48.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
39.5 43.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
68.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
39.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
14.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
9.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
7.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27 38 41 60.1 64.2 65.4 76 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
3.7 8 10 11.6 12 12.4 12.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
7 8 8.3 8.6 8.7 10 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
11.5 26 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
6.5 9.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
27 27 35 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
11.2 11.6 13 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
20.1 43.8 44.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
10.3 15.3 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 7 7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
13.8 24.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
23.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
75.6 135 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
22 36.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 (!) 12.2 (!) ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
46.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
22.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
15.9 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
12.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
23.7 33.7 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
12.1 14.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
35 58 83 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
10 17 25 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
6 9 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
43.2 95 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
54 120 123 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
27 31 31 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
9 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
41 86 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
32 44.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
32 43.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 800x600
30.5 42.9 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
27.9 40.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
214  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 10.2511.86.93.42.5
F1 20132416
Fifa 1494522412
Dota 241.224.28.9
GRID 22916
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm10016.99.52.8
SimCity9.7
Tomb Raider14.67.9
Dead Space 332.213.39.4
Call of Duty: Black Ops 214
Medal of Honor: Warfighter9.56.5
Dishonored1315.113.3
World of Tanks v844.411.89.1
Fifa 1365422012
F1 2012241512
Guild Wars 22362
Counter-Strike: GO6030.318.89.7
The Secret World11
Dirt Showdown2713.48.65
Diablo III231398
Risen 2: Dark Waters10
Mass Effect 318
Anno 207021984
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim137
CoD: Modern Warfare 3372011
Battlefield 39
Batman: Arkham City2418
Fifa 1264402318
F1 20112112
Deus Ex Human Revolution20
Dirt 348.721.0313.2
Total War: Shogun 241
Fifa 1168.539.920
Mafia 214.79.47.44.3
StarCraft 253108
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising198
Battlefield: Bad Company 22616
Risen3012
Resident Evil 536146
Colin McRae: DIRT 21915.512.710.7
F.E.A.R. 27221
Racedriver: GRID23.3
Trackmania Nations Forever1052910
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare46.722.5
Supreme Commander - FA Bench191512.5
Crysis - GPU Benchmark2913
World in Conflict - Benchmark591783
Call of Juarez Benchmark6.2
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark69
World of Warcraft99309
Counter-Strike Source64
Doom 338383734
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo214
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
28
12
9
30
7

26
1
2
1
16
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 03:35:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:43:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.158s ... 0.16s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.16s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.16s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.161s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.161s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.161s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.161s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.162s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.162s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.162s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.162s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.162s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.163s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.163s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.163s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.163s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.163s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.164s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.164s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.164s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.165s

#25 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.165s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.165s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.165s

#28 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.165s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 2679 +0.047s ... 0.212s

#30 got single benchmarks 2679 +0.228s ... 0.44s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.44s

#32 min, max, avg, median took s +1.401s ... 1.841s

#33 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.842s

#34 Got 263 rows for game benchmarks. +0.418s ... 2.26s

#35 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.26s

#36 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.067s ... 2.327s

#37 benchmarks composed for output. +8.929s ... 11.256s

#38 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.022s ... 11.277s

#39 return log +0s ... 11.277s

Notebook reviews with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) graphics card

 

华硕的F75A-TY089H笔记本测评

经济实惠的17.3英寸笔记本电脑. 随着F75A,华硕提供了一个简单的办公笔记本,约为480元。其17.3英寸的屏幕,500 GB硬盘,奔腾处理器和Windows8应该是足以满足大多数用户。我们的检讨会显示是否满足这种说法是。 ...
Intel Pentium B980 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 17.30" | 3 kg
 

华硕 X201E 小型笔记本测评

薄得像一个Ultrabook的,负担得起的上网本 - 必须在开发这款11.6英寸的亚笔记本是华硕的目标。低的价格为350欧元(〜$470)到21.7毫米(0.85英寸)厚的底盘,让华硕收拾足够的性能呢?...
Intel Celeron 847 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 11.60" | 1.3 kg
 

联想 IdeaPad G580 笔记本测评

能源效率低下. 联想提供了一个简单的办公笔记本采用了奔腾双核处理器为339欧元(约425美元)。操作系统必须选择有没有。我们的测试将显示,是否联想提供了一个廉价的办公笔记本电脑或弱的低价笔记本电脑的IdeaPad G580-MBBG3GE。...
Intel Pentium B960 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.6 kg
 

三星 550C22-H01US Chromebook 测评

可靠的上班族. Chrome OS是非常有限的范围内,还年轻,但已经擅长于它的设计做的一切。这是第二代的Chromebook三星上的去商业和办公用户值得一试吗?...
Intel Celeron 867 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 12.10" | 1.4 kg
 

联想 B570e-N2F23GE 笔记本测评

价格便宜,安静,高效. 联想B570e-N2F23GE的是一个没有废话的笔记本电脑,专为家庭办公用户。在Windows 7系统采用了双核CPU,零售价在400欧元。我们研究其长处和短处。...
Intel Pentium B960 | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | 15.60" | 2.7 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E130 NZU5FGE: Intel Pentium 977, 11.60", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想 ThinkPad Edge E130 NZU5FGE 小型笔记本电脑

Lenovo IdeaPad N581-MBA4YGE: Intel Pentium B970, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad N581 笔记本测评

Acer Aspire E1-531-B9606G50Mnks: Intel Pentium B960, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » 宏基 Aspire E1-531 笔记本测评

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 20-core GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)