Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel Ultra 9 185H

英特尔酷睿至尊 9 185H是流星湖系列的顶级芯片，于 2023 年 12 月首次亮相。这款第 1 代酷睿 Ultra 处理器将取代第 13 代酷睿芯片；它拥有 16 个内核（6 + 8 + 2）和 22 个线程。其中 6 个高性能内核支持 SMT 技术，主频最高可达 5.1 GHz，而 10 个高效内核（8 个主内核和 2 个低功耗岛内的额外内核）的主频最高可达 3.8 GHz。8 核 Arc GPU 8 核 Arc GPU作为集成图形适配器，它的运行频率高达 2.35 GHz，同时还提供了大量其他全新技术，如集成的 AI Boost NPU，带有两个用于硬件 AI 工作负载加速的第 3 代引擎。

架构与功能

Meteor Lake 是英特尔向 AMD 抛出一切（包括厨房水槽），看看能粘住什么。通过这个产品系列，英特尔打算提供比 Raptor Lake 芯片更高的 CPU 性能、更高的 GPU 性能、更高的硬件 AI 工作负载加速率和更长的电池续航时间。算一算，这简直是一石四鸟。

这一代英特尔酷睿处理器采用了红木架构 P 核心和 Crestwood 架构 E 核心。两者在架构上分别比 Raptor Cove 和 Gracemont 略有改进，每时钟性能略有提高；有趣的是，在 10 个 E 核心中，有两个实际上是位于英特尔所谓的 "低功耗岛 "上的独立集群。从本质上讲，后者是 SoC 中的 SoC，英特尔希望它能在低负载时提供前所未有的低功耗数据，从而延长采用 Meteor Lake 技术的笔记本电脑和平板电脑的电池寿命。

英特尔采用 Foveros 技术（将多个芯片堆叠在一起）来制造 Meteor Lake 芯片。这主要是为了降低成本，因为用几种不同的工艺制造几个小芯片要比制造一个巨大的单个芯片，并希望其中没有缺陷而需要禁用其中的某些部分便宜得多。

其他方面，Core Ultra 9 185H 配备了 24 MB 三级缓存和适量的 PCIe 5 和 PCIe 4 通道，NVMe SSD 速度最高可达 15.7 GB/s。它支持运行频率高达 7467 MHz 的内存（具体为 DDR5-5600、LPDDR5-7467、LPDDR5x-7467，与 8040 系列 Ryzen 芯片的性能相当）。当然，该芯片还内置了 Thunderbolt 4 支持和英特尔 CNVi Wi-Fi 支持；有趣的是，英特尔选择保留原生 SATA III 支持，而 AMD 早在不久前就取消了对 Ryzen 处理器的支持。

185H 兼容 64 位 Windows 10、64 位 Windows 11 和许多 Linux 发行版。

性能

如果选择相信英特尔的官方性能，那么 185H 的速度并不比 Ryzen 9 6900HX(Zen 3 Plus，8 核、16 线程，主频高达 4.9GHz）的多线程性能相比，185H 并没有快多少。这并不是一个突破性的结果，但我们还是等待内部测试结果吧，不要妄下结论。

无论如何，芯片的实际性能可能会有很大差异，这取决于 CPU 的功耗限制有多高以及系统的散热解决方案有多好。

图形

图形处理器 8 核 Arc GPU运行频率高达 2.35 GHz，有望成为 强大的 Radeon 780M.其速度与 GTX 1650（笔记本电脑）和 RTX 2050（笔记本电脑）的速度一样快，代表着比 老旧的 Xe 系列集成 GPU.如果人们选择相信英特尔的说法的话。

作为一款真正的 DX12 Ultimate 图形适配器，Arc 对光线追踪和包括人工智能帧生成（XeSS）在内的其他现代技术并不陌生。它最多可连接四台 SUHD 4320p 显示器，并能以快速高效的方式对最广泛使用的视频编解码器（包括 AVC、HEVC 和 AV1）进行 HW-encode 和 HW-encode。

您的使用情况可能会有所不同，这取决于 CPU 的功耗限制有多高、系统的散热解决方案有多强、系统的内存速度有多快。后者非常重要；英特尔强调，要让 Arc 提供最佳效果，必须配置多通道内存。

功耗

这款强大的酷睿 Ultra 9 系列处理器的 "基本 "功耗为 45 W，而 Turbo 功耗不应超过 115 W。

185H 由五个小型芯片（"芯片组"）组成，它们通过英特尔的 Foveros 技术连接在一起。包含主 CPU 内核的芯片采用英特尔最新的 7 纳米工艺制造，市场上称为英特尔 4，而其他大多数芯片（iGPU、I/O 芯片......）则采用台积电的 N5 和 N6 工艺制造。基础芯片采用老式英特尔 22FFL 工艺制造。

SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-H
CodenameMeteor Lake-H

Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock Rate3800 - 5100 MHz
Level 3 Cache24 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology7 nm
Max. Temperature110 °C
SocketBGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date12/14/2023
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
39.3 pt (65%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
38.6 -2%
Intel Core i5-13500HX
38.6 -2%
Intel Core i7-12800H
38.7 -2%
Intel Core i7-13620H
38.7 -2%
Intel Core i7-12850HX
38.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
38.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
38.9 -1%
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.2 0%
Intel Core i7-1370P
39.3 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
39.3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
39.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
39.4 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
39.4 0%
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39.4 0%
Intel Core i7-13700H
39.5 1%
Intel Core i7-12800HX
39.5 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
39.8 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
40.2 2%
Intel Core i7-13650HX
40.3 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 21%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 53%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 107.9     median: 107.5 (60%)     max: 112.2 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 1001     median: 1021 (19%)     max: 1096 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 17954     median: 18338 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1823     median: 1825 (78%)     max: 1912 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 704     median: 708 (78%)     max: 735 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6919     median: 7192 (18%)     max: 7651 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2747     median: 2809 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
01603204806408009601120128014401600176019202080224024002560272028803040Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 266.8     median: 268 (75%)     max: 281 Points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 33.95     avg: 34.7     median: 34.6 (45%)     max: 35.55 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.11     avg: 3.2     median: 3.1 (75%)     max: 3.27 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9719     avg: 9994     median: 9977.5 (60%)     max: 10300 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 59935     avg: 63422     median: 63273.5 (46%)     max: 67204 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 88902     avg: 90904     median: 91265.5 (58%)     max: 92183 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13892     avg: 14147     median: 14161 (17%)     max: 14374 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 87.408     avg: 215.6     median: 165.1 (2%)     max: 441.275 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 4.3     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6724     avg: 9769     median: 7940 (13%)     max: 17856 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 69756     median: 71752 (41%)     max: 76331 MIPS
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5472     median: 5560 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 153.6     avg: 159.7     median: 159.9 (53%)     max: 165.6 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 300.5     avg: 322.4     median: 326.3 (75%)     max: 336.5 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 20.1     median: 20.7 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (32%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (31%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 10.8     median: 11.3 (29%)     max: 12.1 GB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 334.5     median: 306 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 190.1     median: 177 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4313     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 13153     median: 13074 (28%)     max: 15529 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 7.256 s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.786     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 15.15 s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 304.446     avg: 358     median: 366.9 (2%)     max: 402.742 s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 73186     avg: 76512     median: 75742.5 (58%)     max: 80494 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 21136     median: 21998 (56%)     max: 24629 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 74638     avg: 82141     median: 75716 (62%)     max: 100241 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73618     avg: 82055     median: 75494 (61%)     max: 100192 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 89559     median: 91059 (76%)     max: 102469 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16393     avg: 19172     median: 18896 (48%)     max: 21267 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 27867     median: 28582 (51%)     max: 30623 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10888     median: 11454.5 (48%)     max: 12209 Points
+ 20 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2487     median: 2500 (64%)     max: 2573 points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13800     median: 13972 (55%)     max: 14540 points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1834     median: 1856 (73%)     max: 1902 points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13288     median: 13496 (24%)     max: 14230 points
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1695     avg: 1788     median: 1799 (8%)     max: 1830 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13612     median: 13736 (43%)     max: 13972 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7040     avg: 7372     median: 7422 (74%)     max: 7602 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47960     avg: 49362     median: 49781.5 (50%)     max: 49924 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 521     median: 520 (1%)     max: 594 ms
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 95362     median: 96090 (80%)     max: 98144 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 260     median: 263.3 (74%)     max: 271 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 279.6     median: 286.5 (53%)     max: 301 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1774     median: 1772 (68%)     max: 1971 Points
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 115.6     median: 124.6 (21%)     max: 176.1 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 129.8     median: 122.3 (22%)     max: 171.8 Watt
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.1     avg: 11.9     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 21.4 Watt
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.18     avg: 13.3     median: 11.7 (13%)     max: 28.8 Watt
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 27.8     median: 24.2 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
+ 11 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 16. 10:15:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:31:01 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.017s ... 0.018s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.02s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.019s ... 0.038s

#11 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.066s ... 0.105s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.071s ... 1.176s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.001s ... 1.177s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.177s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H processor

Geekom GT1 Mega 回顾

Geekom GT1 Mega 评测：Geekom 的首款 AI 迷你 PC 在各方面都不尽如人意

Geekom GT1 Mega 承诺在迷你 PC 外形中提供强大的性能，面向在最小空间内需要大量性能的用户。Geekom GT1 Mega 配备了英特尔酷睿超 9 185H，首次安装了带有专用 NPU 的流星湖处理器。在本次测试中，我们将从功能、性能和散热等多个方面来了解 Geekom GT1 Mega 是否令人信服。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 693 g
联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 评测：90 WGeForce RTX 4050 几乎与 RTX 4060 不相上下

联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 评测：90 WGeForce RTX 4050 几乎与 RTX 4060 不相上下

如果配置独立 GPU 选项，ideaPad Pro 5 16 G9 可以做到这一切。不过，与其他许多超薄多媒体产品相比，它的缺点是声音较大，系统温度较高。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2 kg
宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 (2024) 评测：超长运行时间的便携式 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

宏碁掠夺者 Helios Neo 14 (2024) 评测：超长运行时间的便携式 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑

小巧的 Predator Helios Neo 14 旨在吸引创意人士和游戏玩家。它的先决条件是：酷睿 Ultra 9 185H、GeForce RTX 4070、32 GB 内存、14.5 英寸面板（3k、sRGB、165 Hz、G-Sync）（16:10 长宽比）、雷电 4。此外，电池续航时间也不错。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 14.50" | 1.9 kg
华硕 ROG NUC 游戏迷你 PC 评测：英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的 2.5 升机箱

华硕 ROG NUC 游戏迷你 PC 评测：英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 185H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的 2.5 升机箱

华硕 ROG NUC 是一款极其小巧的动力装置，主要面向游戏玩家。Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 和 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的组合给我们带来了很多惊喜。我们通过大量的测量和基准测试来分析这款紧凑型游戏电脑的预期性能水平以及在测试过程中的表现。...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg
华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 笔记本电脑评测--搭载 RTX 4090 的超薄游戏本，潜力尚未发挥

华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 笔记本电脑评测--搭载 RTX 4090 的超薄游戏本，潜力尚未发挥

华硕只为最强大的 ROG Zephyrus G16 型号配备了蒸汽腔冷却系统。我们对配备酷睿至尊 9 185H 和GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的高端型号进行了评测。然而，这种散热方式真的比 RTX 4070 的散热方式更好吗？...
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.9 kg

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 笔记本电脑评测：75 WGeForce RTX 4050 性能超群

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.20", 1 kg
  Review » 华为 MateBook X Pro 2024 笔记本电脑评测--980 克重的镁合金超极本，令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板

Alienware x16 R2 P120F: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  Review » Alienware x16 R2 笔记本电脑评测：比 x16 R1 更进一步

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 0.9 kg
  Review » Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti 与 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H 评测：配备触摸显示屏、摄像头和 OCuLink 的 AI 迷你 PC

Dell Precision 5690: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » 戴尔Precision 5690 工作站评测：为人工智能革命做好准备

Dell Precision 5000 5490: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 戴尔Precision 5490 工作站评测：现在配备 Intel Meteor Lake-H vPro

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » 联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16 G9 笔记本电脑评测：配备 1200 尼特和酷睿 9 处理器的 MiniLED 笔记本电脑

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED (2024) 可折叠本评测：配备酷睿 Ultra 9 的多任务处理冠军

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51, RTX 4060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51, RTX 4060

MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1VIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1VIG

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16IMH G9 RTX 4050

Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024): NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024)

MSI Creator 16 AI Studio A1VIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator 16 AI Studio A1VIG

MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1VGG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1VGG

Dell Precision 5000 5490: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5000 5490

MSI Stealth 18 AI Studio A1VIG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 AI Studio A1VIG

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51, RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51, RTX 4070

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, Ultra 9 185H RTX 4060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.50", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9, Ultra 9 185H RTX 4060

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9, RTX 4060: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9, RTX 4060

Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 16 OLED SFG16-72

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9, RTX 4050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9, RTX 4050

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MV: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MV

Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 13x IMH G4, Ultra 9 185H

MSI Stealth 18 A1VHG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 18.40", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 18 A1VHG

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050

MSI Pulse 16 AI C1VGKG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Pulse 16 AI C1VGKG

Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 9: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA, Ultra 9

Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 9 185H: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED S5406MA, Ultra 9 185H

MSI Stealth 14 AI Studio A1VGG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 14 AI Studio A1VGG

Dell Precision 5690: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 5690

Alienware x16 R2 P120F: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware x16 R2 P120F

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.20", 1 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024

Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 9: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72, Ultra 9

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra, RTX 4070: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra, RTX 4070

MSI Prestige 16 AI Studio B1VFG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 16 AI Studio B1VFG

Alienware x16 R2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Alienware x16 R2

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MI, Ultra 9 185H: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MI, Ultra 9 185H

MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1VHG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1VHG

MSI Sword 16 HX B14VFKG: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Sword 16 HX B14VFKG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MZ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MZ

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9

HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0000ng: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 14-fb0000ng

Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED N6506: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED N6506

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA

Minisforum AtomMan X7 Ti: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 0.9 kg
   » Minisforum 曝光支持 OCuLink、液冷和高达 64 GB 内存的 AMD AtomMan X7 Pt

   » Minisforum 推出全 AMD AtomMan G7 Pt 迷你 PC，配备 16 核 Ryzen 9、RX 7600M XT 独立 GPU 和高达 96 GB 内存

Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA: Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » 华硕 Zenbook Duo OLED（2024）目前是市场上最好的多屏设备

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Meteor Lake-H

» Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 135H
   14x 3.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
   14x 3.6 GHz - 4.5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-14650HX
   16x 1.6 GHz - 5.2 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-13700HX
   16x 1.5 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
   12x
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
   16x - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Apple M3 Max 14-Core
   14x 2.75 GHz - 4.06 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
   16x 3.8 GHz - 5 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Intel Meteor Lake-H Ultra 9 185H 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-12-14)