Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K

Intel i9-14900K

英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K是一款基于 Raptor Lake 架构的高端处理器，与去年的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 类似。基础主频为 3.2 GHz，在最佳状态下最高可达 6 GHz。总共 32 个线程仍分为 8 个 P 核心和 16 个 E 核心。8 个性能核心（P 核心）还提供超线程功能，这意味着总共 32 个线程可与 16 个高能效 E 核心同时处理。和以前一样，K 型号继续提供可自由选择的倍频，从而简化了超频。英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 使用与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 相同的 CPU 插座（LGA 1700）。这意味着你不一定需要新的主板，因为 600 系列芯片组在 BIOS 更新后就能支持新的处理器。此外，还可以选择使用 DDR4 内存。

性能

与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 相比，酷睿 i9-14900K 仍提供 8 个 P 核心，并通过 16 个额外的 E 核心来缓解苛刻应用的需求，从而确保极高的多线程性能。不过，相比之下，英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 只能略胜一筹。E 核心主要负责后台应用。混合架构依靠英特尔线程管理器（Thread Director）负责任务的正确分配。同时，IPC 只能略有提高。作为英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 的一项创新，制造商越来越多地依赖人工智能，它也被用于超频。只需点击一下英特尔极速实用程序，该工具就能检查整个系统并进行必要的设置。

图形单元

与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 一样，英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 也提供集成图形单元。英特尔 Iris Xe 架构仍是其基础。不过，在性能方面，IntelUHD Graphics 770 没有任何变化。

功耗

英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 的 TDP 值为 125 瓦，相当于 PL1 值。在 Boost 模式下，处理器的性能最高可达 253 瓦（PL2）。不过，这需要非常好的散热。与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 处理器相比，如果遵守限制，指定功耗不会增加。如果取消限制，情况就不同了。由于该值取决于整个系统，我们无法对此做出准确的判断。

SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-R
CodenameRaptor Lake

Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake

Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock Rate3200 - 6000 MHz
Level 2 Cache32 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)125 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Die Size257 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$589 U.S.
Announcement Date10/17/2023
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
51.2 pt (85%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
47.3 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 -7%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
47.5 -7%
Intel Core i7-14700K
47.6 -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
48.1 -6%
Intel Core i9-13900K
49 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
49.2 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
50 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
50.4 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900K
51.2
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
51.6 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
52 2%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 17%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (77%)     max: 138 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i7-13700K
30745 -22%
Intel Core i9-14900
31070 -21%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
32172 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -17%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33437 -15%
Intel Core i7-14700K
33441 -15%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
34133 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
36291 -8%
Intel Core i9-13900K
37310 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900K
39400
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
40924 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
42614 8%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
42744 8%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
61102 55%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 173%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (96%)     max: 2351 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
2132 -6%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2159 -5%
Intel Core i7-14700K
2160 -5%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
2184 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
2202 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
2211 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900
2212 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900K
2238 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
2253 0%
Intel Core i9-14900K
2263
Apple M4 (10 cores)
2269 0%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2348 4%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-14900
4793 -21%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
4818 -21%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
5008 -18%
Intel Core i7-14700K
5035 -17%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5396 -12%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
5563 -9%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 -8%
Intel Core i9-13900K
5798 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
5974 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900K
6103
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
6335 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
6492 6%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
7053 16%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
9706 59%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 160%
0%
100%
03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (91%)     max: 332 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
Intel Core i7-14700K
313.5 -3%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
313.7 -3%
Intel Core i9-13900K
314.1 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
315 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
315 -3%
Intel Core i9-14900
315 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
316 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
322 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
322.2 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900K
324.5
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
326 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
328 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
342 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
344 6%
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
346 7%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
353 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 10%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (93%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 points (76%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (92%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 points (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (61%)     max: 286.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (82%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22302     median: 22772.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 96701     median: 112087 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28587     avg: 31537     median: 31559 (80%)     max: 32853 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 105084     median: 105990 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 105171     median: 105495 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 105824     median: 106746 (89%)     max: 110670 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 29146     median: 29339 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 53741     median: 53853 (96%)     max: 56087 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22412     median: 22707 (96%)     max: 23721 Points
+ 19 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (83%)     max: 3294 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (84%)     max: 21790 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
491 -98%
...
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17457 -18%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
17564 -18%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
17575 -18%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
18074 -15%
Intel Core i7-14700K
19147 -10%
Intel Core i7-13700K
19249 -10%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
19688 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
20380 -4%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21254 0%
Intel Core i9-14900K
21326
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
21383 0%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
21598 1%
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
22527 6%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
25365 19%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (93%)     max: 2370 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 points
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (88%)     max: 91119 points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (94%)     max: 338 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (71%)     max: 410 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (99%)     max: 2611 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.4     avg: 83.6     median: 77.9 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
+ 32 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 20. 09:10:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.011s

#9 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.014s ... 0.026s

#12 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.067s ... 0.093s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.981s ... 1.074s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.075s

#16 return log +0s ... 1.075s

Reviews for the Intel Core i9-14900K processor

曜越 TH420 V2 Ultra EX ARGB AiO 散热器评测

曜越TH420 V2 Ultra EX ARGB AiO评测：为发烧级 PC 打造无节流散热性能，无需破费

曜越TH420 V2 Ultra EX ARGB旨在以合理的价格提供出色的散热性能。这款 AiO 液体冷却器还配备了大尺寸 LCD 和 MagForce 2.0 接口，可串联强大的 CT 140 EX ARGB 风扇。在这次评测中，我们将考察 TH420 V2 Ultra EX 在控制英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 时...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | 28.00"
Alienware AW2725DF QHD 360 Hz QD-OLED 游戏显示器评测

Alienware AW2725DF QD-OLED 游戏显示器评测：快如闪电的 QHD 360 Hz，带来竞争优势

Alienware AW2725DF 的 QHD 360 Hz 第 3 代三星 QD-OLED 面板给人留下了深刻印象，其极快的响应时间一定会让竞技游戏玩家满意。AW2725DF 将生动的视觉效果与快速的游戏性能有效地结合在一起，但价格也与之相匹配，同时也有一些注意事项。...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 | 27.00" | 10 kg
华硕 TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC 评测：NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Super 的有力挑战者，售价不到 600 欧元？

华硕 TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC 评测：NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Super 的有力挑战者，售价不到 600 欧元？

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 配备了一些 RDNA 3 基因，目前正在与 Nvidia 的 RTX 4070 型号竞争。在 VRAM 方面，AMD 以 16 GB 领先。但在性能方面是否也是如此，我们使用华硕 TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC 进行了分析。我们通过大量基准测试...
Intel Core i9-14900K | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Sparkle 英特尔 Arc A380 Elf 台式机显卡评测--英特尔 129 欧元的经济型 GPU 能带给您什么？

Sparkle 英特尔 Arc A380 Elf 台式机显卡评测--英特尔 129 欧元的经济型 GPU 能带给您什么？

对于那些敢于给英特尔作为台式机 GPU 制造商一个机会的人来说，现在有了英特尔 Arc A380。你只需支付相对较低的价格，就能获得一块小型显卡和 6GB 的 VRAM，不过你不应该对游戏性能抱太高的期望。我们对这款价格实惠的英特尔显卡 Sparkle Arc A380 Elf 的性能进行了仔细研究，并通过大量基准测试...
Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Arc A380 | 415 g
华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 台式机显卡评测--英特尔预算内 GPU，支持 1080p 游戏，售价低于 200 美元

华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 台式机显卡评测--英特尔预算内 GPU，支持 1080p 游戏，售价低于 200 美元

英特尔的 Arc A580 旨在成为 Arc A700 GPU 的经济型替代产品。当然，作为一款售价低于 200 美元的组件，它的性能并不尽如人意。在本次评测中，我们将以华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 为例，来看看英特尔 Arc A580 在运行当前游戏和旧版游戏时的性能表现。...
Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Arc A580 | 807 g

XFX Radeon RX 7900 XTX Merc 310 Black Edition: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, 0.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB VRAM 评论：售价已低于 1000 欧元

  Review » KFA2GeForce RTX 4080 超级 SG 评测：巨大的 Nvidia 桌面显卡可使用四个风扇散热

  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 Super 16 GB 评测：用同样的钱提高性能 - 承诺，承诺...

  Review » 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 和英特尔酷睿 i5-14600K 评测--与 AMD X3D 处理器的 6 GHz 开箱频率对决

   » 英特尔新显卡驱动程序将 Lunar Lake 和 Arc GPU 的游戏性能提升达 24

   » 英特尔新显卡驱动程序将 Lunar Lake 和 Arc GPU 的游戏性能提升达 24

   » 华硕 TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7800 XT OC 对决 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Super

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-R

» Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
» Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core i9-14900
   24x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14600K
   14x 3.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14500
   14x 2.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14500T
   14x 1.7 GHz - 4.8 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
   96x 2.5 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
   64x 2.7 GHz - 4.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
   16x 4.3 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
   12x 4.4 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Raptor Lake-R i9-14900K 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-01- 9)