Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel i9-13900K

英特尔酷睿i9-13900K是猛禽湖系列的快速、高端桌面处理器。它的特点是处理器核心采用混合架构,有24个核心和32个线程组合。八个快速的猛禽湖性能核心(P-cores)带有超线程,时钟速度为3-5.8GHz,十六个Gracemont效率核心没有超线程,时钟速度为2.2-4.3GHz。

由于更快的P核和更多的E核,i9-13900K明显比以前的i9-12900K快(特别是在多线程工作负载中)。与拉斐尔AMD Ryzen 9 7950X(Zen 4)相比,13900K的多线程性能略好,单核性能略差。在游戏方面,英特尔处理器目前是明显的赢家(在7950X宣布时)。

13900K的基本功率为125瓦TDP(PL1),涡轮功率为253瓦(PL2),比旧的i9-12900K略高。

CodenameRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-S

Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake

Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock Rate3000 - 5800 MHz
Level 2 Cache32 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)125 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Die Size257 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$589 U.S.
Announcement Date10/20/2022
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
49 pt (82%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -95%
...
46.1 -6%
46.7 -5%
47.1 -4%
Intel Core i9-14900
47.2 -4%
47.3 -3%
47.4 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
47.5 -3%
47.6 -3%
48.1 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900K
49
49.2 0%
50 2%
50.4 3%
51.2 4%
51.6 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
52 6%
60.1 23%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
30428 -18%
30745 -18%
Intel Core i9-14900
31070 -17%
32172 -14%
32782 -12%
33437 -10%
33441 -10%
34133 -9%
36291 -3%
Intel Core i9-13900K
37310
39400 6%
40924 10%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
42614 14%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
42744 15%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
61102 64%
107681 189%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
2151 -4%
2160 -3%
2172 -3%
2184 -2%
2202 -2%
2209 -1%
2211 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900
2212 -1%
2221 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900K
2238
2253 1%
2263 1%
2270 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2348 5%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
4565 -21%
4724 -19%
Intel Core i9-14900
4793 -17%
4818 -17%
5008 -14%
5035 -13%
5396 -7%
5563 -4%
5600 -3%
Intel Core i9-13900K
5798
5974 3%
6103 5%
6335 9%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
6492 12%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
7053 22%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
9706 67%
15842 173%
0%
100%
03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (89%)     max: 328 Points
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
303.6 -3%
305.1 -3%
305.6 -3%
305.9 -3%
307 -2%
308 -2%
311 -1%
313.5 0%
313.7 0%
Intel Core i9-13900K
314.1
Intel Core i9-14900
315 0%
315 0%
315 0%
316 1%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
322 3%
322.2 3%
324.5 3%
326 4%
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
328 4%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
355.5 13%
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (87%)     max: 70.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (92%)     max: 3.93 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (85%)     max: 138969 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (86%)     max: 7539 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (89%)     max: 269 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (85%)     max: 3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (74%)     max: 112434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (79%)     max: 33181 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (81%)     max: 105981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (89%)     max: 2290 points
58 -97%
...
2138 -4%
Intel Core i9-14900
2140 -4%
2147 -4%
2161 -3%
2203 -2%
2212 -1%
2218 -1%
2219 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
2224 -1%
Intel Core i9-13900K
2237
2290 2%
2311 3%
2316 4%
2325 4%
2327 4%
2327 4%
2331 4%
2347 5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2388 7%
...
2555 14%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (85%)     max: 86695 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (89%)     max: 335 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (68%)     max: 382 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (99%)     max: 2589 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.8     avg: 91.7     median: 94.4 (62%)     max: 138.2 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 21. 12:07:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:30:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.009s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.019s ... 0.028s

#11 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.053s ... 0.081s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.081s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +1.101s ... 1.182s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.183s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.183s

Reviews for the Intel Core i9-13900K processor

技嘉GeForce RTX 4080 超级游戏 OC 评测

技嘉GeForce RTX 4080 超级游戏 OC 16G 评测:与RX 7900 XTX一较高下,比RTX 4080非超级版便宜200美元

技嘉GeForce RTX 4080 超级游戏 OC 完全取代了 RTX 4080 非超级版,并提供了一些可能值得比 Founders Edition 高出 50 美元的特权。RTX 4080 超级游戏 OC 从 RTX 4080 非超级版手中夺走了主流游戏的桂冠,但在与 AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX ...
Intel Core i9-13900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
华硕 TUF GamingGeForce RTX 4070 Ti 超级版评测

华硕 TUF GamingGeForce RTX 4070 Ti 超级评测:AD103 中端游戏机,挑战 RX 7900 XT 并取代 RTX 3090 Ti,售价低 300 美元

华硕 TUF GamingGeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 现在获得了 AD103 的支持,CUDA 核心数增加了 10%,256 位 16 GB GDDR6X VRAM 也得到了大幅提升。华硕最新推出的入门级 RTX 4070 Ti Super SKU 不仅拥有 TUF GPU 的所有优势,还能以相...
Intel Core i9-13900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 28.00"
技嘉GeForce RTX 4070 超级游戏 OC 12G 评测

技嘉GeForce RTX 4070 超级游戏 OC 12G 评测:击败 RTX 3090 和 RX 7800 XT,比 Founders Edition 高出 50 美元

技嘉GeForce RTX 4070 Super Gaming OC 采用了更快的 AD104 芯片和更好的散热系统,与 Founders Edition 显卡完全不同。与 RTX 3090 和 AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 相比,RTX 4070 Super Gaming OC 的优势显而易见。我们的评...
Intel Core i9-13900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
技嘉 Aorus Waterforce X II 360 AiO 液体冷却器评测

技嘉 Aorus Waterforce X II 360 AiO 评测:无与伦比的狂热 CPU 冷却系统

技嘉最近推出了 Waterforce X II 360,作为广受好评的 Waterforce X 的继任者。虽然 Waterforce X II 360 在冷却英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 方面表现出色,但这次的改进,如为 AMD Threadripper CPU 配备更大的水泵、可定制的 LCD 和磁性菊花链 FD...
Intel Core i9-13900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | 28.00"
NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 超级创始人版评测

NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 超级创始人版评测:1440p 100帧游戏,比Radeon RX 7800 XT高出100美元

NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Super 的原价与 RTX 4070 相同,都是 599 美元,但着色器数量增加了近 21%。我们将评估与其他显卡相比,特别是与 Team Red 的产品(如售价低 100 美元的 Radeon RX 7800 XT)相比,该显卡在合成基准测试和游戏中的优势。...
Intel Core i9-13900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 28.00"

Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, 28.00"
  Review » Zotac GamingGeForce RTX 4070 AMP Airo评论:RTX 3080的性能,比RTX 3070高出200美元

SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
  Review » XMG SECTOR高端台式电脑,配备英特尔酷睿i9-13900K和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090评测

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, 28.00"
  Review » Gigabyte AorusGeForce RTX 4070 Ti Master 12G评论。RTX 3090 Ti的挑战者,增加了1,000美元的闪光点

Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, 28.00"
  Review » 华硕TUF游戏GeForce RTX 4070 Ti评论。具有RTX 3090 Ti性能的Ada中端机,比AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT低50美元

Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
  Review » 英特尔NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon迷你电脑与Core i9-13900K和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti在审查中

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, 28.00"
  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition评论。4K性能和效率冠军,配得上1000美元以下的定价

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 28.00"
  Review » NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition评论。无与伦比的4K 100帧巨兽,比RTX 3090 Ti便宜400美元

Intel Core i9-13900K: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, 0.00"
  Review » 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K和英特尔酷睿i5-13600K回顾。猛禽湖的更多核心和更高的时钟速度

  Review » 英特尔酷睿i9-13900K和英特尔酷睿i5-13600K回顾。猛禽湖的更多核心和更高的时钟速度

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 28.00"
   » 售价 76 美元的 Thermal Grizzly 小工具有望让您的昂贵 GPU 免于熔毁

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, 28.00"
   » 第一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080创始版的基准测试。轻松超越RTX 3090 Ti和RX 6950 XT

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-S

» Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13700K
   16x 3.4 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13600K
   14x 3.5 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13700
   16x 2.1 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13500
   14x 2.5 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13400F
   10x 2.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13400
   10x 2.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13500T
   14x 1.6 GHz - 4.6 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
   64x 2.7 GHz - 4.2 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
   16x 4.3 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
+ Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
   12x 4.4 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
   12x 4.7 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- Intel Core i7-13700K
   16x 3.4 GHz - 5.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-12-31)