Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics 770

Intel UHD Graphics 770

UHD Graphics 770是Alder Lake SoC中的集成显卡(IGP,GT1),提供32个执行单元(EUs)和高达1.55 GHz的时钟速度(取决于CPU型号)。

性能取决于它所集成的CPU型号和使用的内存。游戏性能即使在快速模型上也只适合于720p和低细节设置的低要求游戏。更高要求的游戏,如《赛博朋克2077》或《毁灭之光2》(见下面的基准测试)在我们的测试中运行得并不好。

该GPU通过eDP 1.4b(5k120)、DisplayPort 1.4a(8k60)和HDMI 2.1(4k60)支持多达4台显示器。 

Alder Lake SoC是以 "英特尔7 "命名的工艺制造的(英特尔的增强型10纳米)。

Gen. 12 / xG Series

UHD Graphics 770 32/ cores @ 0.3 - 1.55 GHz
UHD Graphics 750
CodenameAlder Lake xG
ArchitectureAlder Lake
Pipelines32 / Pixel- / Vertexshader
TMUs16
ROPs8
Core Speed300 - 1550 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
Power Consumption15 Watt
technology10 nm
Date of Announcement04.01.2022
CPU in UHD Graphics 770GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i9-14900K24 x 3200 MHz, 125 W300 MHz1650 MHz
Intel Core i9-13900K24 x 3000 MHz, 125 W300 MHz1650 MHz
Intel Core i7-14700K20 x 2500 MHz, 125 W300 MHz1600 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1350 - 1650 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.2 pt (4%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -95%
...
1.036 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce 845M
1.043 -11%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
1.052 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
1.068 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
1.073 -9%
1.077 -8%
1.09 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
1.095 -7%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1.102 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
1.173
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.18 1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.212 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
1.232 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
1.234 5%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
1.235 5%
1.236 5%
1.25 7%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
1.259 7%
AMD FirePro W5170M
1.285 10%
...
20.4 1639%
max:
33.3 2739%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 768     avg: 863     median: 856 (2%)     max: 930 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 666     avg: 744     median: 738 (2%)     max: 798 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -85%
...
577 -22%
614 -17%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
631 -15%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
639 -14%
650 -13%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
670 -10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
673 -10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
724 -3%
733 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
744
758 2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
763 3%
787 6%
AMD Radeon 540X
797 7%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
811 9%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
820 10%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
821 10%
862 16%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
872 17%
...
19434 2512%
max:
36259 4774%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 116280     avg: 139293     median: 119185 (12%)     max: 179804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 46258     avg: 54274     median: 52927 (6%)     max: 61769 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14271     avg: 16270     median: 16618 (16%)     max: 17404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 14455     avg: 16122     median: 16443 (4%)     max: 16983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2163     avg: 2518     median: 2494.5 (4%)     max: 2790 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2363     avg: 2664     median: 2655 (3%)     max: 2900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 58760     avg: 76751     median: 78188 (9%)     max: 89577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7086 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1891 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
12747 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
12097 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3665     avg: 3969     median: 3957 (5%)     max: 4181 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3268     avg: 3445     median: 3428 (3%)     max: 3591 Points
171.8 -95%
...
3238 -6%
3249 -6%
3261 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
3288 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
3310 -4%
3313 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M375
3314 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
3392 -2%
3392 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
3445
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
3447 0%
3466 1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
3483 1%
3535 3%
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
3553 3%
3581 4%
3587 4%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
3588 4%
3616 5%
...
59943 1640%
max:
104201 2925%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 12664     avg: 14563     median: 14821 (4%)     max: 15865 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 10089     avg: 11562     median: 11740 (6%)     max: 12456 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
10755 -7%
10861 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
10953 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
10958 -5%
11019 -5%
11047 -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
11100 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
11255 -3%
11385 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
11562
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
11600 0%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
11620 1%
12199 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
12290 6%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
12567 9%
12606 9%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
12634 9%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
12715 10%
12907 12%
...
132443 1046%
max:
170928 1378%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 27996     avg: 31647     median: 32024.5 (35%)     max: 34544 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -100%
...
27877 -12%
28423 -10%
28941 -9%
29052 -8%
29194 -8%
29690 -6%
29851 -6%
30785 -3%
31017 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
31647
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
31699 0%
32434 2%
33386 5%
35662 13%
36523 15%
AMD Radeon 610M
36628 16%
36878 17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
37669 19%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
38073 20%
...
68064 115%
max:
87172 175%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 20029     avg: 21659     median: 21770 (28%)     max: 23428 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 6.8     avg: 8.9     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 11 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
34.9 fps (12%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
38.5 fps (17%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
48.3 fps (9%)
0.6 -99%
...
43.3 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
43.95 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
44.6 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
45.1 -7%
45.2 -6%
47.2 -2%
47.6 -1%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
47.7 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
48.15 0%
Intel UHD Graphics 770
48.3
48.5 0%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
51.3 6%
53 10%
54.2 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
56.1 16%
56.6 17%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
56.7 17%
57.1 18%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
58.2 20%
...
532 1001%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 35.6     avg: 38.4     median: 38.4 (10%)     max: 41.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 3.2     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (0%)     max: 3.45 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 8.53     avg: 10     median: 10 (2%)     max: 11.5 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 4.98     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (1%)     max: 5.18 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 19.7     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (6%)     max: 25.1 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.19     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 15.4     avg: 16.1     median: 16.1 (6%)     max: 16.7 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 20.8     avg: 22.1     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23.4 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 24.7     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (5%)     max: 29.8 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 43.3     avg: 46.5     median: 46.5 (12%)     max: 49.7 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 5.77     avg: 6     median: 6 (1%)     max: 6.2 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 8.53     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (2%)     max: 11.6 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 5.46     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 5.57 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 27.4     avg: 31     median: 31 (4%)     max: 34.6 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 22.5     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (3%)     max: 24.6 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 30.5     avg: 32.2     median: 32.2 (4%)     max: 33.8 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 24.3     avg: 27     median: 27 (5%)     max: 29.7 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 5.83     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (1%)     max: 6.56 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 3.5     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (2%)     max: 3.54 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 34.5     avg: 41.2     median: 43 (5%)     max: 44.4 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (1%)     max: 1.4 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 14.1     avg: 14.8     median: 15 (7%)     max: 15.1 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 7.92     avg: 8.9     median: 9.2 (6%)     max: 9.36 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 9.43     avg: 10.7     median: 11.1 (3%)     max: 11.3 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 1.32     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.35 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 12.2     avg: 15.1     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.3 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 0.76     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.51 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 7.73     avg: 8.8     median: 9.1 (4%)     max: 9.17 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 4.61     avg: 5.3     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 5.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 5.53     avg: 6.4     median: 6.6 (3%)     max: 6.69 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 14423     avg: 14758     median: 14633.5 (10%)     max: 15343 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 77.93     avg: 87     median: 89.4 (29%)     max: 91.49 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 77.94     avg: 86.3     median: 86.9 (5%)     max: 94.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11.1 fps (5%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
27 fps (5%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
76.8 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
86.4 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
161.8 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
236.1 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
118.7 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 7482     avg: 7843     median: 7796 (2%)     max: 8346 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 8422     avg: 8874     median: 8988 (3%)     max: 9023 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 356     avg: 470.8     median: 487 (2%)     max: 663 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 1086     avg: 1217     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1293 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1432     avg: 1546     median: 1543 (2%)     max: 1667 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.3     avg: 40.4     median: 40.6 (6%)     max: 41.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
77.1 Watt (11%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
77.1 Watt (17%)
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49     avg: 63.3     median: 65.3 (8%)     max: 73.8 Watt
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
42.6 dB(A) (68%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
19.8 21.1 21.2 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 18 18.1 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2 12.8 12.9 12.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.3
low 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
69.2
low 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
23
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
22.8
med. 1920x1080
89.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45.4
low 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
21.8
low 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
70.5
low 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
20
low 1920x1080
51.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
79
low 1920x1080
8 8.8 9.1 9.3 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.1 6.8 7 7.1 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.3 5.9 6.1 6.1 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 5.2 5.2 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
16.7
13.5
15.1
15.4
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
5.2
4.5
5.2
5
low 1920x1080
8.2 8.9 9.7 10.2 10.8 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7 7.5 7.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.1 6.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
18.9
16.6
13.1
16.9
14.4
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.3
low 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
34.4
low 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
20.2
low 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
11.5
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
45.9
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45.8
low 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
12.1
low 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
19.8
low 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
15.4
low 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.6
low 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
17.1
low 1920x1080
7.8 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
12.6 (!)
low 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
36.5
low 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
31.8
low 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
20.3
low 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.5
low 1920x1080
14.3 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
21.4 (!)
low 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
26
low 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
9.9
low 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
13.4
low 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
10.8
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
26.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
49.4
low 1920x1080
16.4 17.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
33
31.3
low 1920x1080
10.2 11.8 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
22.2
18.6
low 1920x1080
39.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
63.7
low 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.8
low 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
18.7
low 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
45
low 1280x720
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
19.2
low 1280x720
43  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
24
low 1280x720
34.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
23
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
31.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
17.4
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
70.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
70.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
49  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
27.4
low 1280x720
26 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 (!)  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
28.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
13.2
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
59.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
74.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
38.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
61.4 66.1 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.6 23.1 27.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2 17.7 21.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.6 15.9 17.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
19
low 1280x720
28.5 51.4 53.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.7 32.7 33.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.8 29.7 30.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
21.3 24.2 26.2 26.3 27.2 28.2 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.3 12.9 13.3 14.3 14.6 14.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.9 10.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
102.4 105.8 153.1 154.6 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
74.4 78.4 95.4 96.1 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38 43 43.9 44.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.4 40 40.7 40.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
41.8 53.5 54.1 58 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
34.2 37.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.5 17.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
25
25
16.6
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
95 102.4 125 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.7 90.8 99.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 12.3 16.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3 7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
62.2
53.9
50.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
53.9
50.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 24211813
Alone in the Dark31.221.516.713.6
Last Epoch28.122.618.912.6
Helldivers 213.610
Palworld118.84
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown89.658.653.6
Ready or Not25.520.219.4
The Finals2416.514.3
EA Sports WRC10.4
Total War Pharaoh39.729.618.916.6
Assassin's Creed Mirage13
Counter-Strike 251.73417.6
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty9765
Baldur's Gate 31077
Lies of P11.49.97
Armored Core 621.816.914.2
Atlas Fallen11
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart8.4
F1 2322.920.613.8
Diablo 424.620.916.6
The Last of Us7.1
Resident Evil 4 Remake12.4
Sons of the Forest9.64
Atomic Heart15.210.9
Hogwarts Legacy11.1
Dead Space Remake7.79
The Witcher 3 v4.0021.316.7
High On Life20.512.7
The Callisto Protocol11.98.2
Need for Speed Unbound13.211
Spider-Man Miles Morales14.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 20221711
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection7.17
A Plague Tale Requiem8.79
The Quarry8.05
F1 2226.723.817.113
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands1713.78.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6119.7
GRID Legends39.933.428.117.7
Elden Ring20.61916
Dying Light 211.3
Rainbow Six Extraction221616
Battlefield 204233.915.7
Forza Horizon 5431816
Back 4 Blood34.717.413.4
Far Cry 631.113.811.2
F1 202170.329.92415.2
Mass Effect Legendary Edition70.933.6
Hitman 3491915.7
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla2613
Dirt 528.511.99.7
Crysis Remastered51.423.36.37
Flight Simulator 202019.6
Horizon Zero Dawn281411
Death Stranding27.315.614.914.3
F1 202059.127.22012.4
Gears Tactics74.426.916.912.4
Doom Eternal32.415.914.5
Hunt Showdown40.716.1
Control38.111
The Division 24117
Metro Exodus31.213.6
Strange Brigade64231816
Far Cry 537171614
X-Plane 11.1144292612
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark26149
Dota 2 Reborn12986423914.2
The Witcher 35236188.61
GTA V10792136
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
43
19
5
1
47
3
3
35
2

14
3




2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 22. 05:41:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:32:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10972 +0.034s ... 0.064s

#9 got single benchmarks 10972 +0.027s ... 0.09s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +1.184s ... 1.275s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.275s

#13 Got 258 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 1.292s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.292s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.044s ... 1.336s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +1.61s ... 2.946s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.951s

#18 return log +0s ... 2.951s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics 770 graphics card

惠普 Pro Mini 400 G9 迷你电脑评测:紧凑型工作站因英特尔酷睿 i5-14500T 的出色性能而令人印象深刻

惠普 Pro Mini 400 G9 迷你电脑评测:紧凑型工作站因英特尔酷睿 i5-14500T 的出色性能而令人印象深刻

惠普的 Pro Mini 400 G9 系列产品是一款可处理各种任务的小型工作站。模块化设计实现了多种不同的基本配置。在本测试中,我们将对基于英特尔酷睿 i5-14500T 的惠普 Pro Mini 400 G9 进行测试,评估其日常性能,并仔细研究其效率。...
Intel Core i5-14500T | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg
惠普精英迷你 800 G9 评测:配备英特尔酷睿 i5-14500、DDR5 内存和模块化设计的静音 NUC 迷你电脑

惠普精英迷你 800 G9 评测:配备英特尔酷睿 i5-14500、DDR5 内存和模块化设计的静音 NUC 迷你电脑

惠普最新的 Elite Mini 800 G9 系列机型的 CPU 已升级。我们在测试过程中对这款适用于各种办公任务的迷你电脑进行了测试。我们分析了英特尔酷睿 i5-14500 和 DDR5 内存的性能,并考察了配置的效率。...
Intel Core i5-14500 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg
HP Pro Mini 400 G9

惠普 Pro Mini 400 G9 迷你 PC 评测:采用英特尔酷睿 i5-13500T 和模块化设计的 NUC PC 性能卓越

惠普推出 Pro Mini 400 G9,作为 Elite Mini 800 G9 的廉价替代品。制造商依然坚持模块化设计,并采用特殊的节能型处理器。我们对这款基于英特尔酷睿 i5-13500T 处理器的迷你电脑进行了日常性能和效率评估。...
Intel Core i5-13500T | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg
惠普 Elite Mini 800 G9 迷你 PC 评测 - 配备英特尔酷睿 i5-13500、16 GB DDR5 内存和静音冷却系统的模块化 NUC PC

惠普 Elite Mini 800 G9 迷你 PC 评测 - 配备英特尔酷睿 i5-13500、16 GB DDR5 内存和静音冷却系统的模块化 NUC PC

通过 Elite Mini 800 G9,惠普销售了适用于多种办公任务的紧凑型 PC。我们对这款基于英特尔酷睿 i5-13500 处理器和 16GB 内存的迷你电脑进行了深入了解。在这篇详细的评测中,我们将分析传统台式机处理器能否跟上移动处理器的步伐。...
Intel Core i5-13500 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.3 kg
戴尔 OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 评测:迷你 PC 中的台式机酷睿 i7-13700

戴尔 OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 评测:迷你 PC 中的台式机酷睿 i7-13700

如果你想最大限度地提高处理器性能,同时又想最小化外形尺寸,那么 OptiPlex Micro Plus 7010 就能满足你的要求。至少可以说,它的运行温度有点高,但这比任何极端的节流措施都要好。...
Intel Core i7-13700 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | 1.2 kg
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

NVIDIA RTX A6000 Desktop
Radeon Pro W6800 Desktop
NVIDIA Titan RTX Desktop
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Desktop
M4 40-core GPU *
Radeon RX 6750 XT Desktop
Radeon RX 6700 XT Desktop
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Desktop
Radeon RX 6650 XT Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Desktop
Titan X Pascal Desktop
Radeon VII Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop) Desktop
M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) Desktop
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop) Desktop
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 5700M *
RX Vega 64 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
RX Vega 56 Desktop
Quadro P5200
Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop) Desktop
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Pro Vega 56 Desktop
Quadro P4200
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) Desktop
RTX A2000 Desktop
M4 16-core GPU * Desktop
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) Desktop
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) Desktop
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
Radeon R9 Fury Desktop
Radeon R9 Nano Desktop
Radeon RX 580 Desktop
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop) Desktop
Radeon RX 570 Desktop
Quadro P4000
Radeon RX 480 Desktop
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Arc A380 Desktop
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
GeForce GTX 970 Desktop
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
T1000 Desktop
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 960 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R7 370 Desktop
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 950 Desktop
T600 Desktop
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs * Desktop
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
FirePro W4100 Desktop
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics P630 Desktop
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 630 Desktop
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
FirePro W2100 Desktop
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) Desktop
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) Desktop
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter