Notebookcheck Logo

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

英特尔 UHD 图形 16 EU(Jasper Lake,第 11 代)是 Jasper Lake Celeron SoC 的集成显卡,适用于笔记本电脑和小型台式机。 这是Jasper Lake系列(Celeron双核)的低端GPU版本,32个EU(执行单元/着色器块)中只有16个。 没有专用图形内存,时钟速率因处理器型号而异。 上市时,Celeron型号为350~有2种(6W N4500和10W N4505),时钟为750MHz。

随着体系结构的改进和欧盟数量的增加,UHD显卡明显比旧的Gemini Lake SoC(例如UHD显卡 600)更快。

Gen11显卡的新特点是新的Variable Rate Shading(VRS;可变速率阴影)支持。 使用此功能,您可以以较低的分辨率(最多 4x4 块使用一个源)确定阴影时间和阴影对象(例如,背景或雾后)。 使用此技术的早期结果,Unreal Engine POC 性能最高可达 1.3 倍,Civ 6 速度最高可达 1.2 倍。到目前为止,VRS仅支持新的 Nvidia Turing 体系结构(GTX 1650 或更高版本)。

另一个改进的硬件是内置视频解码器和编码器,英特尔大幅改进。 虽然未指定详细内容,但上一代使用专用硬件,以 10 位颜色深度解码主 10 配置文件的 VP9 和 H.265/HEVC。

Jasper Lake SoCs 和集成 GPU 在 Intel 的 10nm 工艺(如 Ice Lake)中制造,与 TSMC 的 7nm 工艺相当。

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameGen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11
Pipelines24 - unified
Core Speed350 - 800 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5, OpenCL 1.2
Power Consumption4.8 - 10 Watt
technology10 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement11.01.2021
PredecessorUHD Graphics 600
CPU in UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron N5095A4 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N50954 x 2000 MHz, 15 W450 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N62112 x 1200 MHz, 6.5 W250 MHz750 MHz
min. - max.250 - 450 MHz750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.3 pt (1%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -78%
...
Intel HD Graphics 4400
0.2513 -12%
0.2513 -12%
0.2526 -11%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
0.2575 -10%
0.2672 -6%
0.2683 -6%
Intel HD Graphics 510
0.2743 -4%
0.2752 -3%
0.2807 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
0.2849
0.2928 3%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
0.2928 3%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
0.2931 3%
Intel HD Graphics 515
0.3054 7%
0.3109 9%
Intel HD Graphics 5000
0.316 11%
0.3162 11%
0.3176 11%
0.3224 13%
...
20.4 7060%
max:
33.3 11588%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 145     avg: 192.4     median: 203 (1%)     max: 210 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 129     avg: 168.2     median: 178 (0%)     max: 182 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -33%
...
101.5 -40%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
107.5 -36%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -33%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
168.2
Intel UHD Graphics 610
194 15%
194.5 16%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
205 22%
Intel HD Graphics 530
235 40%
243.7 45%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
244.7 45%
254.5 51%
255 52%
Intel HD Graphics 520
263 56%
...
19434 11454%
max:
36259 21457%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 43067     avg: 44131     median: 43609.5 (4%)     max: 46236 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 15477     avg: 18377     median: 17921 (2%)     max: 22189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3022     avg: 4251     median: 4596.5 (4%)     max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 4210     avg: 4863     median: 4910.5 (1%)     max: 5217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 378     avg: 595     median: 626 (1%)     max: 658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 392     avg: 613     median: 645 (1%)     max: 679 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 23782     avg: 32522     median: 35101 (4%)     max: 38682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
2356 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
2842 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
1952 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
2129 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 591     avg: 935     median: 975.5 (1%)     max: 1028 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 554     avg: 819     median: 854 (1%)     max: 894 Points
171.8 -79%
...
721 -12%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
731 -11%
743 -9%
753 -8%
Intel HD Graphics 4400
755 -8%
756 -8%
757 -8%
777 -5%
799 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
819
825 1%
841 3%
Intel HD Graphics 510
847 3%
856 5%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
861 5%
868 6%
887 8%
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
889 9%
892 9%
...
59943 7219%
max:
104201 12623%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
3411 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
12573 Points (14%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
11811 -6%
11853 -6%
11878 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics 610
12054 -4%
12228 -3%
12278 -2%
12418 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
12469 -1%
12505 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
12573
12578 0%
12591 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
12609 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
12614 0%
12640 1%
12762 2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870
12885 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
12932 3%
12975 3%
...
68064 441%
max:
87172 593%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5796     avg: 6344     median: 6438 (8%)     max: 6704 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
3.5 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4674     avg: 5514     median: 5649.5 (4%)     max: 6082 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 19.02     avg: 19.5     median: 19.3 (6%)     max: 20.53 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 11.8     avg: 24.5     median: 26.2 (2%)     max: 28.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3.2     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (1%)     max: 6.5 fps
3.3 -32%
3.6 -26%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
3.675 -24%
4.8 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
4.85
Intel UHD Graphics 610
5.4 11%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
6.35 31%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
6.7 38%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
7.05 45%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
9.3 92%
10.45 115%
11 127%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
11.4 135%
11.97 147%
...
536 10952%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.8     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (1%)     max: 17.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 14.2     median: 14.2 (2%)     max: 18.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 8.2     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (0%)     max: 24.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 30.7     median: 30.7 (2%)     max: 43.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 38     avg: 56.3     median: 56.3 (0%)     max: 74.5 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
1452 points (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 96     avg: 106.3     median: 111 (0%)     max: 112 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 206     avg: 220     median: 226 (0%)     max: 228 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 536     avg: 549     median: 548 (1%)     max: 564 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 11.1     avg: 14.4     median: 15.2 (2%)     max: 16 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
0 Watt (0%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
13.1 Watt (3%)
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
12.7 Watt (5%)
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
30.4 dB(A) (49%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
0 (!)
low 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
7.7
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
16.2 16.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.5 6.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6 6.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.1 10.8 11 13.2 13.3 15.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.5 8.4 9 9.2 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1 7.9 8.3 8.6 8.6 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
2.2 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.2 3.3 3.3 ~ 3 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
2.3 2.3 ~ 2 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.9 36.2 47.7 57.3 58.3 58.6 61.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 22 22.8 26.6 26.9 26.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6 11.8 11.8 11.8 12 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8 10.8 10.9 10.9 11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
4 13.5 14 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
0 (!) 25.1 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
57.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 22
Elden Ring5.18
F1 202119
Total War: Three Kingdoms15.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7
Strange Brigade1676
Far Cry 57
X-Plane 11.111298
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark632
Dota 2 Reborn48241211
The Witcher 311
GTA V13255.59
Counter-Strike: GO57.648.117.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
10
2

5
1

5


2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 07:54:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#13 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.03s

#14 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#15 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 10644 +0.028s ... 0.058s

#17 got single benchmarks 10644 +0.031s ... 0.089s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.772s ... 0.861s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.909s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.909s

#22 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.917s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.917s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.925s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.33s ... 1.255s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.258s

#27 return log +0s ... 1.258s

Notebook reviews with Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) graphics card

惠普Chromebook 15a 回顾

惠普Chromebook 15a (2023) 评测:学生和休闲冲浪者的最基本上网设备

惠普Chromebook 15a 旨在为学生和那些寻求廉价上网设备的人提供一个经济实惠的网络世界入口。尽管Chromebook 15a 已于 2023 年中期发布,但它在硬件方面做出了重大妥协,以维持其低于 30,000 英寸(低于 350 美元)的价位,而在这个价位段,性能更强的笔记本电脑却越来越多。...
Intel Celeron N4500 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | 15.60" | 1.7 kg
英特尔NUC11基本套件 - Atlas Canyon

英特尔NUC11基本套件别名Atlas Canyon,配备英特尔奔腾银N6005和英特尔赛扬N4505评测

英特尔的NUC11基本套件基于英特尔Jasper Lake SoC,非常适合办公室工作。我们仔细观察了这款迷你PC,它采用了英特尔奔腾银N6005和英特尔赛扬N4505。在这篇评论中,你可以了解到这两个系统的特点。...
Intel Celeron N4505 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | 535 g
王牌魔术师T8Pro

王牌魔术师T8Pro评测。用于办公的经济型迷你电脑

Ace Magician T8Pro是Minipc Union发布的一款极其紧凑的办公电脑。里面的Jasper Lake SoC只能够运行基本任务。在这篇评论中,我们通过大量的测量和基准测试结果总结了我们的发现,让你对这款产品有一个更好的了解。...
Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | 209 g
GEEKOM MiniAir 11上机评测

GEEKOM MiniAir 11上机评测

GEEKOM MiniAir 11很小,即使按照迷你PC的标准也是如此。尽管它的包装很小,但对于基本的家庭和工作任务来说,它是一台合格的PC。 ...
Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | 524 g
Beelink U59 Mini-S迷你电脑评论。超便宜的英特尔NUC HTPC替代品

Beelink U59 Mini-S迷你电脑评论。超便宜的英特尔NUC HTPC替代品

Beelink U59 Mini-S非常便宜,足以成为谷歌、亚马逊、Apple 、或Roku等典型智能电视加密狗或媒体播放器的一个值得尊敬的替代品,特别是对于那些希望在Windows环境中实现多功能的用户。...
Intel Celeron N5095 | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | 279 g

Beelink U59: Intel Celeron N5095, 0.3 kg
  Review » 英特尔赛扬N5095 Jasper Lake基准测试。Beelink U59迷你电脑评测

Asus Chromebook CX1400: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook CX1400

Acer Aspire 1 A115-32-C96U: Intel Celeron N4500, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 1 A115-32-C96U

HP Chromebook 15a-na0012TU: Intel Celeron N4500, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 15a-na0012TU

Asus Vivobook Go 14 Flip TP1400KA-EC040WS: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 14 Flip TP1400KA-EC040WS

HP Chromebook 14a-na1012ns: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Chromebook 14a-na1012ns

Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-C8XU: Intel Celeron N4500, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-35-C8XU

Samsung Galaxy Chromebook2 360: Intel Celeron N4500, 12.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Chromebook2 360

Asus Vivobook Go 14X E410MA-EB1272WS: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Go 14X E410MA-EB1272WS

Asus Chromebook Flip CR1 CR1100FKA-BP0023: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Chromebook Flip CR1 CR1100FKA-BP0023

Lenovo Flex 3i Chromebook 11-82N30012HA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Flex 3i Chromebook 11-82N30012HA

Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-C1CG: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 1 SF114-34-C1CG

Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-C51G: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 1 A114-33-C51G

Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0303RA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100CKA-GJ0303RA

Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Go 14 XE340XDA-KA1US: Intel Celeron N4500, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Chromebook Go 14 XE340XDA-KA1US

CTL Chromebook NL72: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.3 kg
  External Review » CTL Chromebook NL72

Chuwi Hi10 Go: Intel Celeron N4500, 10.10", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Hi10 Go

Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1H-C994: Intel Celeron N4500, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook 317 CB317-1H-C994

Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA: Intel Celeron N4500, 11.60", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus BR1100FKA-BP0109RA

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-08-13)