Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

Kirin 9000W

海思麒麟 9000W 是一款 SoC，可用于基于Android 的智能手机和平板电脑，并首次搭载于华为 MatePad Pro 13.2。

华为没有透露有关该 SoC 的任何信息。现有的少量信息来自基准测试和系统分析工具。CPU 由三个集群组成，共有 12 个内核。省电集群有四个 ARM Cortex-A510 内核，每个内核的工作频率高达 1,530 MHz，其他六个内核使用来自海思（HiSilicon）的未指定内核（0x0D42），工作频率高达 2,150 MHz。第三个集群包含两个海思内核（0x0D02），每个内核的最高时钟频率为 2,487 MHz。性能内核可能基于TaiShan V120 架构（如麒麟 970）。(麒麟 9000S）。

单核性能也相应参差不齐，但由于内核众多，多核性能达到了 2022 年高端 SoC 的水平。

A 马龙 910与 9000S 类似（主频高达 750MHz）。

制造工艺或架构方面尚无具体信息。该系统芯片可能将在中芯国际公司以 7 纳米工艺制造。

Series

Series:

Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock Rate1530 - 2490 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads12 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Manufacturing Technology7 nm
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date09/25/2023

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4731     avg: 5453     median: 5651 (67%)     max: 5778 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 1174     avg: 1248     median: 1237 (31%)     max: 1343 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 3987     avg: 4109     median: 4038.5 (16%)     max: 4370 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
491 -88%
...
Samsung Exynos 1480
3456 -16%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
3595 -13%
MediaTek Dimensity 8020
3617 -12%
Google Tensor G2
3638 -11%
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
3665 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
3757 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3860 -6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
3865 -6%
Samsung Exynos 2200
3938 -4%
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
4109
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4273 4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
4378 7%
Google Tensor G3
4390 7%
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
4484 9%
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
4485 9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
4493 9%
Google Tensor G4
4593 12%
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
4593 12%
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
4659 13%
...
Apple M4 (10 cores)
14978 265%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
25365 517%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 867     avg: 946     median: 965 (38%)     max: 1006 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3694     avg: 3841     median: 3878 (7%)     max: 3951 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -94%
...
Google Tensor G3
3462 -10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3548 -8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
3553 -7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
3571 -7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
3572 -7%
Samsung Exynos 2200
3600 -6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
3661 -5%
Google Tensor G4
3719 -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3811 -1%
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
3841
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
3863 1%
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
3874 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
3959 3%
Apple A14 Bionic
4019 5%
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
4056 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
4167 8%
HiSilicon Kirin 9010
4221 10%
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
4234 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
4318 12%
...
Apple M3
10697 178%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 1353%
0%
100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4712     avg: 4744     median: 4743.5 (47%)     max: 4775 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13875     avg: 13927     median: 13926.5 (14%)     max: 13978 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 836.4     avg: 1076     median: 1112.9 (1%)     max: 1243.7 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 32134     avg: 37658     median: 35905.5 (30%)     max: 46687 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 85     avg: 116     median: 109.5 (31%)     max: 160 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
200 Points (37%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 655341     avg: 684940     median: 684940 (41%)     max: 714538 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 182634     avg: 190270     median: 190270 (52%)     max: 197906 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 97.5     avg: 112.6     median: 110.5 (81%)     max: 129.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 1181     avg: 1393     median: 1434.9 (42%)     max: 1562 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 53.3     avg: 58     median: 57.4 (70%)     max: 63.18 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1521.67     avg: 1564     median: 1568 (44%)     max: 1601 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 45015     avg: 52045     median: 54852 (87%)     max: 56268 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 10620     avg: 12057     median: 11875.5 (49%)     max: 13858 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 834     avg: 927     median: 922.5 (35%)     max: 1028 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.62     avg: 8.4     median: 8.9 (4%)     max: 10.1 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.67     avg: 4.5     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 5.81 Watt
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 19. 08:30:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.03s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#25 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.01s ... 0.044s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.346s ... 0.39s

#28 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.39s

#29 return log +0s ... 0.39s

Reviews for the HiSilicon Kirin 9000W processor

华为 MatePad 12 X 笔记本评测

适合大学使用的 12 英寸轻便平板电脑，配备手写笔和磨砂显示屏 - 华为 MatePad 12 X 评测

Apple iPad Air 的经济型替代品？那么 MatePad 12X 将是您的最佳选择，它配备了经过特殊涂层处理的 PaperMatte 显示屏，支持手写笔，还赠送键盘盖。值得购买吗？...
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | 12.00" | 555 g
测试华为 MatePad 11.5 S PaperMatte 平板电脑

华为 MatePad 11.5 S PaperMatte 评测--纸质显示屏是平板电脑的未来吗？

通过 PaperMatte 显示屏，MatePad 11.5S 提供了一种特殊的涂层，结合对笔的支持，可以确保一流的书写体验。不过，华为平板电脑的磨砂屏幕也暴露出了一些弱点。 ...
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | 11.50" | 510 g
华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 评测--配备高精度手写笔的创意平板电脑

华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 评测--配备高精度手写笔的创意平板电脑

MatePad Pro 13.2 不仅拥有超大显示屏，还首次配备了采用 NearLink 技术的触控笔，有望在精度和延迟方面有显著提升。此外，MatePad Pro 还支持 HDR 和六个扬声器，娱乐功能同样不容忽视。全能型产品？...
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W | HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | 13.20" | 580 g

Huawei MatePad 12 X: HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 12.00", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 12 X

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024: HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 12.20", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S: HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad 11.5 S

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2: HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 13.20", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2

Huawei MatePad 12 X: HiSilicon Maleoon 910, 12.00", 0.6 kg
   » 对 MatePad 12 X 的评价：在许多方面都比 iPad Air 更出色

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series

» Samsung Exynos 2400
   10x 2 GHz - 3.2 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 2400e
   10x 2 GHz - 3.1 GHz
» Google Tensor G4
   8x 1.95 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.2 GHz
» Google Tensor G3
   9x 1.7 GHz - 2.91 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 9010
   12x 1.55 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
   8x 2.2 GHz - 3.35 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 9000
   8x 2.05 GHz - 3.13 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
   8x 2.05 GHz - 3.13 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 8050
   8x 2 GHz - 3 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 1300
   8x 2 GHz - 3 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 8100
   8x 2 GHz - 2.85 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 1200
   8x 2 GHz - 3 GHz
» MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» Google Tensor G2
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.85 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
   8x 2 GHz - 3.1 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
   12x 1.53 GHz - 2.49 GHz
» Google Tensor
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.8 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
   8x - 2.86 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 990
   8x - 2.86 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 8020
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7350 Pro 5G
   8x 2 GHz - 2.8 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7300
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7200
   8x 2 GHz - 2.8 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 1100
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 1000+
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7050
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7030
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7025
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 1080
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 920
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 7020
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 930
   8x 2 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» MediaTek MT8188J
   8x 2 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 900
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 820
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 820
   8x 1.84 GHz - 2.36 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 810
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 800
   8x 2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 820e
   8x 1.84 GHz - 2.22 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 810
   8x 1.88 GHz - 2.27 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 980
   8x - 2.6 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 800U
   8x 2 GHz - 2.4 GHz
» Broadcom BCM2712
   4x 2.4 GHz
» UNISOC T820
   8x 2.1 GHz - 2.7 GHz
» UNISOC Tangula T770
   8x 2 GHz - 2.5 GHz
» UNISOC Tangula T760
   8x 2 GHz - 2 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 700
   8x 2 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» UNISOC T765
   8x 2.1 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 720
   8x 2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 970
   8x 2.4 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 960
   8x 2.4 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 960s
   8x 2.1 GHz
» Apple A9X
   2x 2.26 GHz
» Samsung Exynos W1000
   5x 1.5 GHz
» UNISOC T750
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» UNISOC Tangula T740
   8x 1.8 GHz - 1.8 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 955
   8x 2.5 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 950
   8x 2.3 GHz
» UNISOC T619
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» UNISOC T618
   8x 2 GHz - 2 GHz
» Unisoc T7255
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Unisoc T7225
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» UNISOC T610
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Unisoc T7200
   8x 1.6 GHz
» UNISOC Tangula T700
   8x 1.8 GHz - 1.8 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 710
   8x 2.2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 710A
   8x 2 GHz
» Apple A9
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 850
   8x - 2 GHz
» Apple A8X
   3x 1.5 GHz
» Allwinner A523
   8x 0.48 GHz - 2 GHz
» Apple A8
   2x 1.4 GHz
» UNISOC SC9863A
   8x 1.2 GHz - 1.6 GHz
» VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
   4x 1.2 GHz - 1.46 GHz
» UNISOC Tiger T310
   4x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» JLQ JR510
   8x 1.5 GHz - 2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 925
   8x 1.8 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 920
   8x 1.7 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 935
   8x 2.2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 659
   8x 2.36 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 658
   8x 2.35 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 655
   8x 2.1 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 650
   8x 2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 930
   8x 2 GHz
» Apple A7
   2x 1.3 GHz
» Rockchip RK3566
   4x - 2 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 620
   8x 1.2 GHz
» Rockchip RK3288
   4x 1.8 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon W5+ Gen 1
   4x 1.7 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1
   4x 1.7 GHz
» MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
   4x 1.5 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 910T
   4x 1.8 GHz
» MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
   4x 1.3 GHz
» MediaTek MT8161
   4x 1.3 GHz
» Rockchip RK3188
   4x 1.8 GHz
» Apple S9 SiP
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Samsung Exynos W930
   2x 1.4 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 910
   4x 1.6 GHz
» Intel Celeron 220
   1x 1.2 GHz
» AMD GX-210JA
   2x 1 GHz
» Marvell Armada PXA1908
   4x 1.2 GHz
» Apple S8
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Apple S7
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Apple S6
   2x 1.8 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+
   5x - 1.7 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100
   4x - 1.7 GHz
» MediaTek MTK 8113T
   2x 2 GHz
» Apple S5
   2x
» Marvell PXA1088
   4x 1.2 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100
   4x - 1.2 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500
   4x - 1.2 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2100
   4x - 1.2 GHz
» Intel Celeron 2.8 GHz
   1x 2.8 GHz
» Texas Instruments OMAP 4470
   2x 1.5 GHz
» HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
   4x 1.2 GHz
» Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Renesas MP5232
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Broadcom BCM21664T
   2x 1.2 GHz
» Marvell PXA986
   2x 1.2 GHz
» Amlogic AML8726-MX
   2x 1.5 GHz
» Texas Instruments OMAP 4460
   2x 1.2 GHz
» Rockchip RK3168
   2x 1.2 GHz
» Broadcom BCM28155
   2x 1.2 GHz
» Texas Instruments OMAP 4430
   2x 1 GHz
» Apple A5x
   2x 1 GHz
» Apple A5
   2x 1 GHz
» Samsung Exynos W920
   2x 1.18 GHz
» Samsung Exynos 9110
   2x 1.15 GHz
» ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8500
   2x 1 GHz
» ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8420
   2x 1 GHz
» MediaTek MTK 8113L
   1x 1 GHz
» NXP i.MX 6SLL
   1x 1 GHz
» Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz
   1x 1.2 GHz
» AllWinner A10
   1x 1.2 GHz
» ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz
   1x 1.2 GHz
» Apple A4
   1x 1 GHz
» AllWinner A13
   1x 1 GHz
» WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
   1x 1 GHz
» Samsung Hummingbird S5PC110 / Exynos 3110
   1x 1 GHz
» UNISOC T107
   1x 1 GHz
» Texas Instruments OMAP 3630 1GHz
   1x 1 GHz
» Texas Instruments OMAP 3622
   1x 1 GHz
» Rockchip RK2918
   1x 1 GHz
» Telechips TCC8803 1GHz
   1x 1 GHz
» ZiiLABS ZMS-08
   1x 1 GHz
» ARM Cortex A8 1GHz
   1x 1 GHz
» Actions ACT-ATM7029
   4x 1 GHz
» Loongson 2F 900MHz
   1x 0.9 GHz
» CSR8670
   2x 0.08 GHz
» Huawei Kirin A1
   1x 0.2 GHz
» ARM Cortex-M4
   
» Dialog DA14697
   0.1 GHz
» HiSilicon Hi6262
   
» ST STM32L4R9
   1x 0.08 GHz
» Cypress PSoC6 MCU
   2x 0.15 GHz
» ST32
   
» Ambiq Apollo 3.5
   1x
» Ambiq Apollo 3
   1x 0.1 GHz
» NXP MK26FN2M0CAC18R
   1x 0.18 GHz
» DK3.5+ST
   2x
» unknown
   

Surrounding CPUs

+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.4 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
   8x 1.95 GHz - 2.4 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
   8x 1.9 GHz - 2.4 GHz
+ Google Tensor G2
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.85 GHz
+ MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
   8x 2 GHz - 3.1 GHz
» HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
   12x 1.53 GHz - 2.49 GHz
- Google Tensor
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.8 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
   8x - 2.86 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 990
   8x - 2.86 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 990
   8x 2 GHz - 2.73 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 8020
   8x 2 GHz - 2.6 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Kirin 9000W 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-02-15)