Notebookcheck Logo

LG G Pad 10.1 V700 平板电脑简短评测

似曾相识。 LG G Pad 10.1看起来非常像它的小兄弟G Pad 8.0。它们的配置几乎相同,唯一明显的区别是他们的屏幕尺寸。LG再次采用了牺牲性能以换得更长电池续航的设计理念。不过,这款测试机在升温后会自动降低屏幕亮度。
Touchscreen Tablet Android
275 mm 173 mm 8.9 mm 643 g261 mm 180 mm 20 mm 620 g266 mm 172 mm 6.4 mm 425 g262 mm 183.5 mm 8.9 mm 610 g260.9 mm 165.9 mm 8.95 mm 512 g243.4 mm 176.4 mm 7.95 mm 487 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
305
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 360 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 331.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 439:1 (Black: 0.82 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.59 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.02
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Surface 2
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
7%
17%
25%
25%
Brightness middle
360
418
16%
362
1%
388
8%
357
-1%
Brightness
331
402
21%
342
3%
374
13%
369
11%
Brightness Distribution
84
92
10%
86
2%
87
4%
89
6%
Black Level *
0.82
0.61
26%
0.5
39%
0.36
56%
0.51
38%
Contrast
439
685
56%
724
65%
1078
146%
700
59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.56
6.52
-17%
4.75
15%
5.28
5%
3.86
31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.59
5.92
-65%
3.93
-9%
5.6
-56%
2.4
33%
Gamma
2.02 109%
3.58 61%
2.48 89%
2.66 83%
2.46 89%
CCT
6483 100%
6511 100%
6565 99%
6631 98%
6740 96%

* ... smaller is better

AnTuTu v4 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
17735 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
15351 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
18926 Points +7%
Gigaset QV1030
30913 Points +74%
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
1279 Points
Google Nexus 10
2591 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
1282 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
1596 Points +25%
Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
85.2 MFLOPS
Google Nexus 10
134.2 MFLOPS +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
81 MFLOPS -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
113 MFLOPS +33%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
242.3 MFLOPS
Google Nexus 10
189.9 MFLOPS -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
225 MFLOPS -7%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
281 MFLOPS +16%
3DMark
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
5412 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
5565 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
4999 Points -8%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
5122 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
5236 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
4503 Points -12%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
6749 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
7131 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
8132 Points +20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
10.2 fps
Google Nexus 10
7.9 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
10.1 fps -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
5.6 fps -45%
Microsoft Surface 2
24 fps +135%
Gigaset QV1030
12 fps +18%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
5.8 fps
Google Nexus 10
12.4 fps +114%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
5.9 fps +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
5.6 fps -3%
Microsoft Surface 2
16 fps +176%
Gigaset QV1030
18 fps +210%
Epic Citadel
Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
31.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
14.4 fps -54%
High Quality (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
55.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
32.7 fps -41%

Legend

 
LG G Pad 10.1 V700 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 10 Samsung Exynos 5250 Dual, ARM Mali-T604 MP4, 32 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB SSD
 
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Surface 2 Nvidia Tegra 4, NVIDIA GeForce Tegra 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset QV1030 Nvidia Tegra 4, NVIDIA GeForce Tegra 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1810 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
1482 Points -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1759 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface 2
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3368 Points +86%
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
5191 Points +187%
Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
640 Points
Google Nexus 10
Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD
652 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
868 Points +36%
Microsoft Surface 2
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points +24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16134 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
15104 ms * +6%
Microsoft Surface 2
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10107 ms * +37%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1137 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
983 ms * +14%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
958 ms * +16%
Microsoft Surface 2
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
384.5 ms * +66%
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
754 ms * +34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112.7 MB/s
Google Nexus 10
Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD
99.5 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
117.8 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
97.6 MB/s -13%
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.84 MB/s -59%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16.31 MB/s
Google Nexus 10
Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD
20.02 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
16.71 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
16.13 MB/s -1%
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
11.08 MB/s -32%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
15.5 MB/s
Google Nexus 10
Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD
10.35 MB/s -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
14.77 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
13.73 MB/s -11%
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
4.11 MB/s -73%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
1.7 MB/s
Google Nexus 10
Mali-T604 MP4, 5250 Dual, 32 GB SSD
1.27 MB/s -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
1.83 MB/s +8%
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 MB/s -53%
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
0.49 MB/s -71%
Max. Load
 36.8 °C27.8 °C25.8 °C 
 40 °C28.8 °C26.7 °C 
 31.5 °C30.5 °C29.1 °C 
Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 30.8 °C
25.5 °C27.1 °C33.6 °C
27.2 °C29.5 °C39.4 °C
28.2 °C29.5 °C29.5 °C
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 29.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 16min
WiFi Surfing
12h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 24min
LG G Pad 10.1 V700
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8026, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Adreno 305, 400 MSM8226, 16 GB SSD
Gigaset QV1030
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 10 HD+
Adreno 305, 400 APQ8028, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Surface 2
GeForce Tegra 4, 4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-37%
-42%
1%
-34%
Reader / Idle
1696
942
-44%
1356
-20%
1099
-35%
H.264
777
574
-26%
853
10%
732
-6%
WiFi
771
621
-19%
519
-33%
945
23%
481
-38%
Load
444
193
-57%
223
-50%
398
-10%
195
-56%
In review: LG G Pad 10.1 V700. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.
In review: LG G Pad 10.1 V700. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.

每位第一次见到LG G Pad 10.1的用户应该都会惊讶一款10寸平板竟然会如此小巧。它的机身设计十分便于握持,电池的续航能力也十分出色。另外,LG的功能性软件也让它变得更加实用。

遗憾的是,它的屏幕分辨率并不高,而且在负载下屏幕亮度会变暗。这让它只适合在室内或树荫等无阳光直射处使用,特别是在夏天这会非常影响户外使用。除此之外,它没有配备环境光传感器。这确实很可惜,因为它的无线信号接受范围很广,本来十分适合在院子里使用。由于这些技术缺陷我们为它

它采用的处理器并非高性能的型号。想要运行对显卡要求较高的游戏的用户可能不太适合选择这款平板。偶尔玩游戏的用户应该会对它的性能感到满意。它可以流畅地播放高清视频。因此,这款平板对于主要使用社交应用和视频播放的用户来说会十分适合。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

屏幕的分辨率为1280 x 800像素。
屏幕的分辨率为1280 x 800像素。
它的摄像头十分适合视频通话。
它的摄像头十分适合视频通话。
当它的温度较低时,屏幕十分明亮。
当它的温度较低时,屏幕十分明亮。
机身接缝处很均匀,不过不太紧密。
机身接缝处很均匀,不过不太紧密。
它预装了很多LG的功能软件。
它预装了很多LG的功能软件。
塑料的机背比较容易沾染指纹。
塑料的机背比较容易沾染指纹。
它的相机位于机身的边缘。
它的相机位于机身的边缘。
读卡器最大支持32GB的存储卡。
读卡器最大支持32GB的存储卡。
G Pad 10.1的尺寸明显比G Pad 8.0大很多。
G Pad 10.1的尺寸明显比G Pad 8.0大很多。
Epic Citadel (超高画质)
Epic Citadel (超高画质)
Anomaliy 2 Benchmark (高画质)
Anomaliy 2 Benchmark (高画质)
3DMark
3DMark
Google Octane 2.0
Google Octane 2.0
Browsermark 2.1
Browsermark 2.1
Sunspider 1.0.2
Sunspider 1.0.2
Peacekeeper
Peacekeeper
WebXPRT 2013
WebXPRT 2013
Basemark OS II
Basemark OS II
AnTuTu v5
AnTuTu v5
Vellamo 3
Vellamo 3
Passmark
Passmark
 
 
 
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

Specifications

LG G Pad 10.1 V700 (G Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 4 x 1.2 GHz, ARMv7
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 305, Core: 450 MHz
Memory
1024 MB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, 电容式, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 整合耳机麦克风插口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 32 GB, Sensors: 加速传感器, 数字指南针, GPS, DLNA, SmartShare, Miracast
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, 体辐射值: 0.656 W/kg
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.95 x 260.9 x 165.9
Battery
30 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 8000 mAh, 3.8 V
Operating System
Android 4.4 KitKat
Camera
Webcam: 130万像素; 主相机: 500万像素(自动对焦, 全高清视频拍摄)
Additional features
Speakers: 两个立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器, 数据线, 快速开始指南, KnockCode, QPair 2.0, QSlide, QuickRemote, Smart cleaning, Dual Window, Polaris Office 5, LG SmartWorld, QuickMemo, TalkBack, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
512 g, Power Supply: 73 g
Price
299 Euro

 

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

三星 Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 平板电脑简短评测
Adreno 305, Snapdragon 400 MSM8226

Devices with the same GPU

LG G Pad 8.0 V480 平板电脑简短评测
Adreno 305, Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, 8.00", 0.338 kg

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

LG G Pad II 10.1 平板电脑简短评测
Adreno 330, Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, 10.10", 0.487 kg

Devices from the same Manufacturer

LG gram Pro 二合一 16T90SP 评测--轻巧、功能强大
Arc 8-Core, Meteor Lake-H Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.362 kg
配备 NvidiaGeForce 芯片的 LG Gram Pro 16 超轻笔记本电脑评测--大胆的极简主义
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Meteor Lake-H Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.269 kg
LG Gram 17 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测--小幅改进和全新酷睿 Ultra 7
Arc 8-Core, Meteor Lake-H Ultra 7 155H, 17.00", 1.339 kg
LG Gram 16 英寸二合一机评测--重量不再是独特卖点
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Raptor Lake-P i7-1360P, 16.00", 1.476 kg

Pros

+ 红外数据传输
+ 实用的软件功能
+ Wi-Fi接受范围广
+ 电池续航长
+ 紧凑设计

Cons

- 存储空间扩展仅支持 32 GB
- 处理器较慢
- 电源适配器较弱
- 屏幕黑值高
- 像素密度高
- 屏幕在负载下变暗...
- ...不太适合户外实用
- 无环境光传感器
- 扬声器位置不便

LG G Pad 10.1 V700 - 10/19/2014 v4 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
72%
Keyboard
78 / 80 → 98%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
45 / 65 → 69%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
96%
Display
80%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
28 / 76 → 37%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
57 / 85 → 67%
Add Points
-3%
Average
65%
79%
Tablet - Weighted Average
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > LG G Pad 10.1 V700 平板电脑简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2014-11- 1 (Update: 2014-11- 2)