LG G Pad 7.0
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 6 scores (from 11 reviews)
Reviews for the LG G Pad 7.0
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G Pad 7.0 is a decent choice if you're seeking portability in a tablet. It's about the size of a book and is therefore easy to slip into your bag. While it maintains parity with the G Pad 8.0 and G Pad 10.1 in some respects, the lower internal memory and weaker main camera make it a less appealing prospect, purely when it comes to specifications. To be brutally honest, the 8.0 model is only slightly larger and doesn't cost a great deal more – it's arguably the smarter choice, even if it's not quite as portable.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/17/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G Pad 7.0 is not the kind of tablet that’s going to get pulses racing. It’s a low-cost device, and there are signs of that, particularly in its screen. However, it also gets you a bunch of features not often seen in smaller tablets. The IR transmitter gives it lounge skills missing from the Nexus 7, multi-tasking is given a lot of promotion for a tablet this small and it can pair with your phone for extra notifications juice.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/16/2014
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G Pad 7.0 is a solid enough tablet product, but simultaneously feels like a disappointment compared to last year's G Pad success. It's not going to steal the Nexus 7 crown by any means, but that's to compare it against the wrong rank. In the world of Asus MeMo Pad 7 and Tesco Hudl the LG G Pad 7.0 holds its own. It's a solid product that would make a decent coffee-table tablet for the whole family.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/09/2014
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G Pad 7.0 makes a few compromises to achieve its low price, but overall it's a pretty good bargain. The tablet boasts a vivid 1280 x 800 screen, outstanding audio quality and epic battery life, all for the very reasonable cost of $150. However, LG did make some trade-offs to hit this budget price: Photos and videos look grainy and washed out, and the tablet delivers middling performance compared with other 7-inch slates.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/23/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G Pad 7.0 doesn't do a lot to stand out from the crowded field of small-screen tablets, but some unique and useful software features coupled with an aggressive price give it a leg up on competitors. Spec for spec, it's the Galaxy Tab 4's equal, but Samsung charges $50 more, and I'd argue LG's software execution is superior. The G Pad 7.0 offers great value if you can deal with relatively modest performance and a simply average display. Our Editors' Choice for small screen tablets remains the Google Nexus 7, which has a sharper full HD panel and stock Android experience with guaranteed timely updates.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/27/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Any way you look at the G Pad 7.0 it's hard to find much to frown at. Not much to get excited about either - after all the Nexus 7 had the exact same specs two years ago. 7-inchers have since been trying to beat Google's price without making too much compromise. Well, they're finally getting there. HD resolution on a 7" diagonal is the new entry level in tablets, at still a safe distance from Apple and with no dime-a-dozen WSVGA devices from white label manufacturers crowding the space. If you're shopping for your first tablet, the LG G Pad 7.0 is very much an option but so are a bunch of tablets from of Samsung, Acer, Asus and Huawei.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/04/2014
Source: Cyberbloc DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/06/2014
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/17/2014
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/04/2014
Source: Notebook-Center.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/08/2014
Source: Tablet.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/25/2014
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
400 MSM8226: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
7.00":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.