LG G3 Beat
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 17 reviews)
Reviews for the LG G3 Beat
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's not a bad option, but there are better phones you could buy at this price. Though it looks and feels good, it's a mishmash of lazy compromises elsewhere. A lower resolution screen and reduced processor can be expected, but the lack of an ambient light sensor is an unacceptable oversight. An underwhelming downgrade to the LG G3. It's competent in most ways, but the camera isn't good enough for a phone at this price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the S squeezes a 5-inch display into its nicely designed and compact body, we found the user interface to be a little slow in places, and its colour palette looks a little dated. There's no shortage of options, however, and the camera performance is good - but we just think that this smartphone would have fared better if LG stuck to the "simple" premise it set out with. With Motorola's aggressive pricing, the LG is also more expensive than you might want it to be at £250, but it comes in cheaper than some other options, such as the HTC One mini 2 or Samsung Galaxy S5 mini.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/12/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G3 S may look like the LG G3, but it offers much poorer value than LG's flagship. Relatively low screen resolution, limited storage, a low-end processor and at-best mid-range camera just don't stack up to the £240 price. At this point there are just too many great phones in the £200-300 price band for the LG G3 S to be able to compete. As such, the phone feels overpriced.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/12/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% performance: 60% features: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It hasn’t been long since LG launched its flagship – the LG G3 - which sports a 2560×1440 pixel display and comes with a 13MP camera with laser auto-focus. It was an impressive phone which gave a good battery life despite the high end specs. Recently LG announced the G3 Beat, which is a more affordable variant of the G3 line. We have been seeing these mid-range variants of high end flagships in the past and most of them used to come with the ‘Mini’ moniker. So will the LG G3 Beat prove to be a budget LG G3 worth investing in? Let us find out.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/10/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% features: 70% display: 75% mobility: 65% workmanship: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's quite a bit to like about the LG G3 Beat, except for its price, which is officially Rs. 25,000 but is hovering at around Rs. 18,500 in retail at the time of this review. Considering the relatively inconsequential addition of a laser autofocus system and IR emitter, the fact that it costs up to twice as much as the equally good Motorola Moto G (Gen 2) is a little startling. If you aren't living in an LTE market or have no need for greater-than-3G speeds, it makes even less sense. We weren't huge fans of the Moto G's looks and the G3 Beat is definitely improvement, aesthetically as well as in terms of size and comfort, but this isn't worth the enormous price difference.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/07/2014
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Digital Trends EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G3 tries to imitate the LG G3 but the thing is, it can’t, it doesn't have the hardware to do that. On top of that, LG has priced the phone just below the Huawei Honor 6 which, on paper, has almost 3 times the firepower. All in all, this is a good try from LG, but maybe next time, they can price it right.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2014
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’re after a premium user experience, the LG G3 S can undoubtedly deliver. It also packs a contemporary design and number of helpful and handy features; it just a shame that the end result isn't particularly memorable.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/03/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Between the two carriers selling the LG G3 Vigor stateside, Sprint is the one selling it for less – $29.99 on-contract or $312 outright. That certainly is better than AT&T’s asking price of $49.99 on-contract, or $334.99 outright. Looking at its on-contract prices, it’s not a bad option. For the most part, its specs are reduced compared to the original G3 to reflect its entry-level status, but it’s relieving to know that several features have been retained – like its IR blaster, the microSD card slot, and several software enhancements.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2014
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Though its 5-inch display is anything but small, the LG G3 Vigor is still a miniaturized flagship in the same vein as the HTC One Remix. But unlike that phone and older, small-screen options like the Samsung Galaxy S4 mini, the G3 Vigor carries an aggressively low price tag with relatively few compromises. It's a reliable performer with specs that outmatch the majority of phones in its price class, like the underwhelming $29 Kyocera Hydro Vibe. The G3 Vigor is an excellent choice for entry-level smartphones on Sprint. If you have a bit more room in your budget, consider the $99 HTC One E8, which delivers real flagship specs and features at a reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/07/2014
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 3/2015
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 86% mobility: 83% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Android Pit - Heft 2/2015
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2014
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 82% mobility: 93%
Source: Mobicroco DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2014
Rating: Total score: 92% features: 90% workmanship: 95% emissions: 90%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/01/2014
Source: Notebookinfo DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/12/2014
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 90% emissions: 85%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 5/2014
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
400 MSM8926: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.