LG G7 ThinQ
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/1.9, 80 °)
Price comparison
Average of 77 scores (from 154 reviews)
Reviews for the LG G7 ThinQ
Radiant. The LG G7 ThinQ is the successor to the G6, one of 2017’s first smartphones with a 2:1 display, frequently referred to as an 18:9 aspect ratio. Notably, LG has followed one of 2018’s smartphone trends in designing the G7 ThinQ with a notch. The display is more than its notch though, with the G7 ThinQ being the first smartphone with an mLC display, which can get extremely bright. LG has improved the camera too and iteratively updated the hardware to Qualcomm’s latest flagship SoC. Find out in this review why the G7 ThinQ falls slightly short of the top-tier of current smartphones.
Update: Cameras reviewed and final rating published.
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a quality Android phone that excels in a few areas. The phone sports one of the brightest screens I've seen, for example, and its audio playback credentials are top, top tier. The internal hardware is fast and flagship competitive if not market leading, and its understated design is stylish, too, sitting somewhere between last year's offering and an iPhone X. Its battery capacity (only 3,000 mAh) is definitely less than ideal, though, and it lacks some of the standout, bar-pushing features of rival flagships.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ camera is certainly not the best of its kind, but it gets close enough and can create some good images. With so many filters, shooting modes, and gimmicks, you can find a way to make every shot fun and interesting.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In good conditions, the LG G7 ThinQ is capable of capturing nice images and video with pleasant color and good exposure. However, overall image quality is not quite up at the same level as the best in class. Dynamic range is a little more limited than we would expect from a high-end device, and image detail is only average, especially in lower light scenes. We also found the autofocus system to be a touch slower to react than for some direct rivals.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a completely unsurprising, risk-averse smartphone that's meant to be smart, not flashy, unlike the LG V40 that just launched. It has an AI-powered camera, loud 'Boombox' speaker, and a bright 6.1-inch display. It's a reasonable, but not monumental upgrade over the LG G6.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techaeris EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the LG G7 ThinQ doesn’t look remarkably special, it does have some great options and features, as well as decent build quality for those looking for a new smartphone. Given the crowded market and bigger name recognition of other OEMs, hopefully, users will give the LG G7 ThinQ a fair shake!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 100% display: 100% workmanship: 95%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, the G7 ThinQ is still a wonderful device which will power through your work, and allow you to get some gaming done. The notch won’t bother you, especially if you use the software tweaks to hide it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For me the G7 just feels like a phone that has been rushed out and the designers just didn’t get to polish the details out. The two biggest concerns, display calibration and camera calibration, are both fixable by software. But as we’ve seen in the past, the chances of vendors addressing such issues after the fact are slim and are more of an exception to the norm. For now, I don’t see the G7 as a competitive offering versus a similarly priced OnePlus 6, or a superior product, the Galaxy S9(+).
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/09/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yet, the LG G7 its like no other. Beautiful, it is also one of the smallest handset with a Snapdragon 845, a MIL-STD-810G certification, a 1000-NIT display and the best loudspeaker on the market. LG has managed to build this into one of the thinnest and lightest (162g) chassis in this category.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG produced a solid shooter in the G7, except it didn’t innovate in a significant way. The AI Cam isn’t as effective as advertised. Not bolstering the hardware inside was also ill-advised, especially when smarter software works better if it isn’t doing all the heavy lifting. What you end up with is a phone that shoots closer to its predecessors than to its rivals.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/06/2018
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This isn't the most exciting phone, but a full set of genuinely useful features at a fair price is the kind of innovation we like.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Sorry LG but a merely “nice” phone is not good enough to compete at the moment. For the vast majority of prospective phone buyers, the Huawei P20 Pro is far better value for money than the LG G7 ThinQ.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a quality Android phone that excels in a few areas. The phone sports one of the brightest screens I've seen, for example, and its audio playback credentials are top, top tier. The internal hardware is fast and flagship competitive if not market leading, and its understated design is stylish, too, sitting somewhere between last year's offering and an iPhone X. Its battery capacity (only 3,000 mAh) is definitely less than ideal, though, and it lacks some of the standout, bar-pushing features of rival flagships.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is not meant to be its flagship That spot goes to the innovative V30S ThinQ. Yet this meets or exceeds many flagship paradigms. It is a desirable phone with a smart AI camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a pretty difficult smartphone to judge. It’s almost forgettable in terms of design but has a lot of features to make it almost worth the $750 price tag. It checks all the right boxes and tries to be a good Android citizen but hardly stands out from the crowd. LG has definitely made yet another solid and commendable smartphone but only sales figures will prove if its gamble truly paid off this time.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/06/2018
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG's G7 ThinQ is a by-the-numbers hardware play that - while perfectly adequate - utterly fails to be anything more than a raw, arithmetical, sum of its parts.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Manila Shaker EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is available through official local stores as well as in their official online store. The handset has a price tag of PHP 42,990. The device is a bit pricier than other flagship phones that contain almost the same specifications. Nonetheless, the LG G7 ThinQ is a good quality smartphone. It was able to take good shots and the phone works fast as well.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: Sydney Morning Herald EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall the G7 ThinQ is a quietly confident phone. Awful name aside, it's nowhere near as in-your-face about its unique features as the latest from Sony or Samsung are, but it has a lot of strengths. It's got the sturdiest design, the tallest and brightest screen and the loudest sound of the lot. Plus, with the latest Snapdragon chip, it's also just as fast.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's not like LG didn't try to compete with the rest. It made the LG G7 best at what it's advertised for - the design, durability, speaker, display, chipset, and camera. It pretty much has it all, even if with the few small caveats.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While LG made very little changes in the exterior of the G7, most of the improvements were under the hood — a newer, more powerful chipset, gorgeous display, a better camera system, best sound in any phone and an AI ecosystem that adds to the over-all experience.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2018
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
And that leaves us with the question of who should buy a G7 today. This is not really a phone for enthusiasts. At $750 US, this is not a phone that you should pay full retail price for. Instead, the G7 makes most sense as an on-contract buy for someone who just wants a decent, small-ish phone with an emphasis on audio, and some neat camera features to play around with.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In many ways the LG G7 is every bit the equal of its flagship rivals. There's power, a solid build, waterproofing and a great display. What LG offers than few-to-no others do is a second wide-angle camera, but the battery is a more limited than its rivals. What it does have in its favour is a reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Here's the thing about the LG G7 ThinQ: despite the silly name, it is a phone worth owning. It is worth owning for the awesome wide-angle camera, for the large and bright display, for the fast Snapdragon 845 chip, and for the extra-loud Boombox speaker. Its design may lack originality, but the premium look and feel you'd expect out of a 2018 flagship are definitely there. And at a full price of $750, the LG G7 is not terribly expensive either.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In terms of comparisons, the G7 stacks up well against the other premium handsets on the market, but whether I'd recommend purchasing it over any other depends on your preferences. If you primarily desire a simple and smooth UI, I'd look elsewhere. If you want great audio and a good quality wide-angle camera, this is the device to beat.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hot Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The real question is, does LG deliver the features you're personally looking for with the G7 ThinQ? In terms of its display, fit, finish and form factor, we'd say it's a compelling device to be sure, so long as battery life isn't top on your list of priorities. However, if you're looking for a top performing Android handset, with a gorgeous display, a great camera and all the latest technologies, like wireless charging, Qualcomm's potent Snapdragon 845 mobile platform, and all the AI supported hooks that come with Android 8.0 Oreo, the LG G7 ThinQ is worthy of your double-take consideration for sure.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2018
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall it has all the ingredients for a runaway success. LG makes quality smartphones and should be on your shopping list.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/10/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a really good phone, but one that fails to distinguish itself from more compelling offerings from Samsung, OnePlus and Google.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
After a few weeks with the G7 ThinQ, it has proved a confusing phone. The design is not special by any degree, but its weight made it great to use. The processor setup is similar to a few phones out there, but it's scored the best while benchmarking. Add to that the fact that it features all the components and elements that one expects of a flagship phone, and the G7 becomes hard to distinguish from many of the new devices out there.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/08/2018
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you need a new smartphone, LG’s G7 ThinQ is as good a choice as any Android smartphone out there (apart from Samsung’s selection of top-rated – although more expensive – phones, the S9 and S9+).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a really good phone, but one that fails to distinguish itself from more compelling offerings from Samsung, OnePlus and Google.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the LG G7 has a bigger screen and a better processor than last year's G6, it doesn't improve in the areas that count: the battery and camera.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Greenbot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With a retail price of $750 and full carrier support (meaning there will be deals to be had), I certainly wouldn’t recommend against buying a G7. But unless you’re specifically looking for the phone with the best sound or really want to add a rainbow to the top of your screen, I probably wouldn’t recommend the LG G7 as your first option.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is available in the U.S. starting June 1 on all major U.S. carriers with the exception of AT&T. Pre-orders open May 24 for Verizon and May 25 for Sprint. Pricing is still a bit of a mystery, as LG is leaving it up to the carriers — we’re expecting it to cost at least $650. That’s still a good chunk of money, but it’s very competitive compared to Samsung’s Galaxy S9 and Apple’s iPhone X.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G7 is cheaper than most flagships, but the OnePlus 6 is cheaper still. In terms of features, the G7's highlights include the very bright screen, water-resistance, wireless charging and surprisingly good sound from the mono speaker.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Close to greatness in parts, the LG G7 feels like it needed a bit more time on the drawing board.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Droid Life EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Should you buy the G7? I wouldn’t recommend it. With so many other good options on the market, plus plenty more phones on the horizon, investing in the G7 doesn’t sound very appealing. You’ll be living with a subpar Android skin, battery life that seems all over the place, as well as the possibility that your phone may not see great software update support. I still stress, though, Google’s Treble could help you there, but until we know for sure, buyer beware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/29/2018
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The one thing I'd suggest if you buy the G7 ThinQ is that you spend some time familiarizing yourself with the AI Cam. Decide if you love it or if you hate it, and get familiar with which situations and scenes it does better with. Remember that before you turn the feature on.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: G Style Magazine EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I happen to like the LG G7 ThinQ quite a bit. The simple design, the display, the response time, and the speed are important features for me. Eventually, I can see myself using the boombox, but the deal breaker for me though is the camera. I take a lot of photos, and while the AI camera has the capability to take great shots, how the G7 handles low light natively is a problem. There are other phones on the market that tackle this problem with minimal effort. While there may not be a fix for that, what LG has going for it is a promised expandability via software updates. In just using it the last few weeks I have noticed the speed in which LG addresses problems in the device. Something I have not experienced before with other smartphones. LG may be on to something.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2018
Source: Techno Buffalo EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The device’s audio capabilities, while nice, cater to a very niche market, while the display and battery life don’t quite match the competition. Sure, the device is fast, and it looks pretty, but as a phone competing in the upper echelon, it falls short of phone likes the Galaxy S9 and iPhone X.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a completely unsurprising, risk-averse smartphone that's meant to be smart, not flashy. It has an AI-powered camera, loud 'Boombox' speaker, and a bright 6.1-inch display. It's a reasonable, but not monumental upgrade over the LG G6.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If LG was hoping to blaze a new path and revitalize its mobile division with the G7 ThinQ, I don’t think this is going to get the job done. The trouble really started with that name. There are definitely people who will buy this phone for its fun cameras and amazing audio. They’ll be happy. But this isn’t something grand reinvention. The G7 is iterative, looks like an iPhone, and its battery life needs improving.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G7 ThinQ hits the latest phone trends and includes signature LG features like a wide-angle camera and audiophile-quality sound.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But if buzzwords are what it takes for LG to sell a lot of G7 units, then may the ThinQ brand live long and prosper. At the end of the day, the LG G7 is a solid, feature-packed, and reasonably priced Android flagship, and I plan on keeping it in my pocket for at least a bit longer. If you plan on doing the same, then I doubt you'd be disappointed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is available in the U.S. starting June 1 on all major U.S. carriers with the exception of AT&T. Pre-orders open May 24 for Verizon and May 25 for Sprint. Pricing is still a bit of a mystery, as LG is leaving it up to the carriers — we’re expecting it to cost at least $650. That’s still a good chunk of money, but it’s very competitive compared to Samsung’s Galaxy S9 and Apple’s iPhone X.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 93% display: 93% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ may not look like the most original phone around, but from what I’ve seen thus far, it ticks all the right boxes for a flagship device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2018
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At £600, the G7 is cheaper than most flagships, but it's likely the OnePlus 6 will be cheaper still. In terms of features, the G7's highlights include the very bright screen, great performance from the Snapdragon 845 chip and surprisingly good sound from the mono speaker.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2018
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We'll continue using it to evaluate the camera, audio, and more so please let me know if there is anything specific you want addressed in the full review.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG must be frustrated. Past attempts at innovation, the modular G5 and the G6, which pushed smartphone cameras and displays forward, haven’t toppled Samsung. Meanwhile, Huawei’s camera technology and OnePlus’s vivid displays and affordable price are making those companies more competitive. So LG scaled back its ambitions with the G7, a flagship phone that follows in the footsteps of the company’s rivals.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you need a phone that can last a long time without a charge, the G7 isn’t the device for you. LG is highlighting the phone’s 1,000-nit brightness, but if you max out the display to make it more viewable in direct sunlight, you’ll kill the battery even more quickly.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a fine phone, but it does nothing to distinguish itself from more compelling offerings from Samsung, OnePlus and Google.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ is a completely unsurprising, risk-averse smartphone that's meant to be smart, not flashy. It has an AI-powered camera, loud 'Boombox' speaker, and a bright 6.1-inch display. It's shaping up to be a reasonable, but not monumental upgrade over the LG G6.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 has a lot going for it. It has beautiful build quality, a gorgeous display with bonus brightness, a dedicated Google Assistant button, 3.5-mm headset jack for old-school audiophiles and an AI-powered camera that takes pretty great photos.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The next few years are going to be big ones for smartphones. Next year, 5G will launch, enabling new applications and new form factors. We might see foldable phones, or AR- and VR-focused devices. But for now, we have the Samsung Galaxy S9 and the LG G7 ThingQ, which make everything a little bit better. We'll see by just how much when we get the G7 in for review. Check back soon for more info, including pricing and availability.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It’s becoming increasingly difficult for smartphones to stand out from the crowd. The G7 ThinQ is certainly guilty of following the herd on the design front, but LG is betting on its sunlight-defying display, clever clogs camera and excellently-named Boombox speaker setup to mark it out as a smartphone worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Hopefully, LG will do the smart thing and price the G7 below those Galaxies, P20s, Pixels, Xperias, iPhones, and make that the killer feature. It will be nice to see a well selling LG phone for a change. The company certainly deserves a winner.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG G7 ThinQ tells a flagship story on the spec sheet, hitting a few unique points with an enhanced audio offering, that wide-angle camera and a good level of design and build. There's even a 3.5mm headphone socket.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In conclusion, the LG G7 comes out of the gate as a very strong smartphone in its category, but one that faces stiff competition from Samsung’s Galaxy S9 and Huawei’s P20 Pro (and vice-versa). We will run benchmarks and more extensive photo tests once the G7 gets its retail firmware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All in all, LG made incremental updates to the G-series and the G7 seems to be a well-rounded product. The biggest open-question for me will be the screen quality and characteristics as that’s where LG made the biggest changes. Battery life is also something that should be a deciding factor for the G7, as we’ve seen major changes in the three most impacting factors (SoC, battery size, screen efficiency).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: What Hi-Fi EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But for all the G7’s laudable qualities, we can’t help but feel our time with it is rather inconclusive. There are a number of Android phones out there that have covered similar ground, whether that’s having a notch, dual cameras or cameras featuring AI.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Equally, while the LG G7 ThinQ's camera tech is high-powered on paper, and did deliver some good shots during the hands on testing period, including in low-light, I did notice some less than ideal image processing when shots were blown up, so again until I can test the camera system over an extended period, I will definitely not pass definitive judgement.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There you have it: the LG G7 ThinQ. LG proves each year it really prioritizes key aspects others might take for granted (like a high-quality headphone jack, for instance). While some of its decisions this year seem more trend-following (like the notch), the features where LG tries to be different are what people will really appreciate. The wide-angle camera is great but we will have to wait and see if Boombox Sound ends up on the list, as well.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 91% display: 93% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2019
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 88% display: 96% mobility: 71% workmanship: 100%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/14/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 92% display: 100% mobility: 96%
Source: Chip (Print) - 09/18
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 09/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 98% display: 90% mobility: 89%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/15/2018
Source: Connect - 8/18
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 88% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tech.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 98% display: 92% mobility: 80% workmanship: 92%
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2018
Source: RP-Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 58% performance: 90% display: 94% mobility: 72% workmanship: 100%
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2018
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 87% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 98% display: 90% mobility: 89%
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/17/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2018
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2018
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/26/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% features: 90% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/29/2018
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 95% display: 93% mobility: 75% workmanship: 98%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/15/2018
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/08/2018
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/08/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/19/2018
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 100% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2018
Source: Giz Blog IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/01/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/27/2018
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/03/2018
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 76% features: 93% display: 95% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 70% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/13/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 60% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70% display: 89% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: Techstation.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/29/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/01/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2019
Source: Le monde numerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Geekbecois FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 100% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2018
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: Erenumerique FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2019
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 82%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 75% workmanship: 95%
Source: Teknokulis TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/03/2018
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/29/2018
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/20/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/26/2018
Source: Tinh Te VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Ljud och Bild SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 630:
高通骁龙845 SoC中的集成显卡。据高通公司称,比旧款骁龙835中的Adreno 540快了30%,功耗降低30%。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 845:
适用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2018年初推出,采用台积电的10 nm LPP FinFET制造。 集成了高性能2.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核(Cortex-A75),和低功耗1.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核,从而提高效率。 此外,还提供X20 LTE调制解调器,交流WiFi和双通道32位1866 MHz LPDDR4x内存控制器。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.10":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.