LG Q Series
Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762, Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, Mediatek MT6750S, Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 675Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2, Imagination PowerVR GE8320, Qualcomm Adreno 505, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 530, Qualcomm Adreno 612
Display: 5.20 inch, 5.50 inch, 6.20 inch, 6.26 inch, 6.40 inch, 6.53 inch
Weight: 0.145kg, 0.146kg, 0.149kg, 0.172kg, 0.192kg, 0.198kg
Price: 250, 280, 330, 349, 400 euro
Average of 82 scores (from 146 reviews)
LG Q6
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q6Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.50 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.149kg
Price: 349 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Trimmed. The looks of the LG Q6 closely resemble those of the LG G6, only at a much lower price point. The trade-off is its trimmed performance, a performance that makes the phone struggle hard in its price range. We will find out whether the phone is a recommendable purchase.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Q6 offers generally solid performance in a sleek and durable form factor for a reasonable price, whether you buy it using Amazon Prime or not. And it's even more alluring with the loss of loss of Huawei and ZTE in the US, two very strong players in the unlocked market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With Full HD screen, good battery life, and decent overall performance, the lg Q6 is one of the most affordable all-screen smartphone to date priced at PhP 12,990.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Q6 impresses with its screen, bearing an aspect ratio that still isn't common under €300, and small bezels which make it very easy to use with one hand. It banks on looks that are similar to the flagship G6, at least on one side, and will be the perfect choice for someone who prioritizes that above all.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 64%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Unofficially titled the “LG G6 mini”, the Q6 is an impressive midrange phone on its own. While it lacks certain flagship features and annoyingly, a fingerprint sensor, the FullVision display and rear-facing camera are stand-out inclusions that you probably won’t find elsewhere for this cheap.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2017
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Q6 is a beautiful device and looks like a modern day flagship, but it doesn't feel like one. During my time with the phone, I was constantly reminded that I was using a mid-range device with its lack of notification light and fingerprint sensor, its over-sharpening camera, its mediocre battery and easily scratchable plastic finish.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Let’s face it, most people do not WANT to buy a $349 phone but do it out of necessity. Not everyone can afford the $1000-$1500 required for a flagship in 2017 and thus there needs to be options for consumers at all price points. With the Q6 LG are trying to bring as many of their flagship features to their, well they say mid-range but I will call $349 low-range, devices.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When we took a closer look at the Q6 in late August, we pondered whether this mid-range device could in fact serve as a G6 mini of sorts. Following our time reviewing the Q6, it sadly is not the case. While the specifications of the Q6 will stand you in good stead for now, we don't think it will be the case one year down the line, particularly when more powerful mid-range phones are on offer.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/20/2017
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you are more interested in technical specs, then the Samsung J7 seems like a worthy choice, because on the paper, it does look more powerful – but also bigger and heavier. Note that the J7 has only 16GB of storage, so you may want to look at micro-SD cards. Finally, if you want less pre-loaded apps, and a leaner interface maybe the Nokia 6 would be a fine choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: The Techy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The new LG Q6 fits perfectly into the pocket of mid-range buyers at Rs 15,999. It clearly justifies the price tag with the kind of specifications it has to offer. The device lags on multitasking, wish they could have added some more RAM in a phone for better performance in multitasking! For people on a budget, this is the closest they could get to getting flagship look-alike at very affordable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Girl EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Q6 is a great mid range smartphone. I’ve always loved the LG offerings (other than the modular thing they did) and think they make practical phones that do the job and look the part. Plus, one handed texting friends, I’ve missed this!
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2017
Source: India Today EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Q6, for all intents and purposes, can be considered as a mini G6. The mid-level Q6 looks every bit as futuristic as LG's flagship G6. It feel as good, if not better, and is built from scratch to take a beating (although that plastic back is susceptible to scratches) something that not a lot of phones at around Rs 15,000 can really brag about. Its 18:9 Full Vision display, meanwhile, adds a third dimension to the Q6, much like the G6. LG has even gone on and added the same set of software gimmicks to it, to make that unusual aspect ratio count, as the flagship G6. Unlike the G6, however, the Q6 costs just Rs 14,990.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, the Q6 is beauty that is skin deep, which is a shame because we really wanted it to be good. If LG were to make a version with more power under the hood, we would love to give it another shot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2017
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We cannot recommend the LG Q6, however. The lack of a fingerprint reader, unimpressive cameras, and other minor issues just make it tough to justify over competing options. Unless you really want a near bezel-less display for a cheap price, you will probably be happier with something else.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Based on our analysis, the LG Q6 has several factors that work in its favour and some that don't. It has a beautiful display with wide 18:9 aspect ratio which we've seen with the flagship LG G6. The body is compact and light-weight while the battery is one of the most appealing corners in the device. The camera too works flawlessly across the board.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The highlight of the LG Q6 is the display and the design. But as I said the specifications, including the Qualcomm 435 processor, battery life, make this appear to be a more expensive proposition for most people. If you want a more compact phone with a unique display, then the LG Q6 is an option to consider. However, those looking for a blazing performance or a great camera at this budget should probably examine options in the market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To sum up, the LG Q6 comes with a surprisingly compact form factor and the FullVision display does almost do a decent job. However, other than this, the overall performance of the smartphone is not matchable with the likes of Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, Moto G5 Plus, Honor 6X and more, as each of one of them comes loaded with better hardware arsenal and have proved their mettle in the market.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2017
Source: Tech PP EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There are no second thoughts about the fact that the LG Q6 is one very good looking device. But priced at Rs. 14,999, it faces some tough competition from the likes of Xiaomi, Moto, Lenovo, Huawei, and even Samsung. Apart from the 18:9 screen ratio, there is nothing particularly outstanding in the device. The camera is decent, the battery is average, and the overall performance is not that great. You get a similarly specced device (minus that display but plus a larger battery), the Xiaomi Redmi 4 under Rs. 10,000, and if we move into the Q6’s price range, then the likes of the Lenovo K8 Note, the Redmi Note 4, the Honor 6X and the Moto G5 Plus start making their presence felt, more than matching it in all departments other than that display. The Q6 definitely looks future proof, but its performance and price hark more to a period of the past.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 60% performance: 70% workmanship: 85%
Source: Fone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, LG Q6 is an above average device packing nothing special in it if not for FullVision display. With Q6, LG has tried too hard to make a dent in the mid-range market but failed. At a price of Rs. 14,990, the LG Q6 lacks fingerprint, has a scratch prone plastic back and average camera. Unless and until, if you don’t mind spending Rs. 15,000 for a phone with a large screen in a compact size, you can go for LG Q6. If not, you have lots of options including, Moto G5 Plus, Honor 6X, Lenovo P2 and more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/28/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 18:9 screen aspect ratio is sure to become popular in the smartphone world, and the LG Q6 looks futuristic despite its value pricing, which could be a major selling point. Even a few of years down the line, the Q6 should still look modern. It isn't the most powerful smartphone in its class so if brute force is what you’re looking for, then you’d be better served by the likes of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (Review), Honor 6X (Review) or even the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime (Review).
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It has Bluetooth 4.2 (no mention of NFC), and 802.11b/g/n WiFi, 2.4GHz only. It supports WiFi direct and can provide a WiFi hotspot. The phone supports the common 4G bands. No mention is made of super high performance LTE specs, so I guess it’s pretty much standard on that front. The socket at the bottom of the phone is Micro-B USB.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At its price of €200 in India and at the lower prices in the UK and Australia, we can easily overlook the phone’s flaws (well, it’s hard to forgive the lack of a fingerprint scanner…) and blame it all on the cost, but at the €350 full retail price in Europe, there are far better options out there.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite its faults there is a market for the LG Q6. People looking for a small and handy phone that don’t want to sacrifice screen size for portability will find it the perfect phone for them.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2017
Source: Yugatech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG is bringing the FullVision display feature to an affordable price range, including a really beautiful design and great build quality. LG is unifying their lineup with this design ethos and we’ve seen it with the LG G6 tot he LG G6+ and now the LG Q6. LG might just as well call the Q6 the LG G6 Mini.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/20/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Unofficially titled the “LG G6 mini”, the Q6 is an impressive midrange phone on its own. While it lacks certain flagship features, the FullVision display and rear-facing camera are stand-out inclusions that you probably won’t find elsewhere for this cheap.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/17/2017
Source: Unbox EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
That’s pretty much it for this unboxing and first look at the LG Q6. The Q6 was spotted earlier in the Philippines and is priced at Php 13,990. At that price point the phone’s going to be up against heavy competition with the offerings of Huawei, OPPO, Vivo and Samsung.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2017
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Q6 is a phone with the Redmi 4’s hardware inside the LG G6’s body. It’s meant for those who put more stock in design than internal hardware specs.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Mobygyaan EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG Q6 is priced at ₹14,990 and it is available in Astro Black, Ice Platinum, Terra Gold colors and exclusively on Amazon India. LG offers a 1-year warranty with free screen replacement within 6 months of purchase.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/12/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Q6 looks to be one of the more high-end looking (and feeling) mid-range phones available in 2017. This is one to keep an eye on.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We really need to know the prices of the LG Q6 models to see how it competes with it's bigger brother. The price will need to be fairly cheap to make it worth losing various key features as the G6 is already available for a lot less than the £649 launch figure.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/09/2017
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 73% features: 57% display: 83% mobility: 79%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2017
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% features: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 50% performance: 40% features: 60% display: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/19/2017
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2017
Source: Sin Celular ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/28/2018
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Review Type Unknown, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/30/2017
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/15/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/15/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/15/2017
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/03/2017
Source: 4G News PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 45% performance: 50% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 65% display: 75% mobility: 65% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/17/2017
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2017
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 65% features: 70% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 60% display: 79% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 70% features: 65% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2017
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 70% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Meilleurmobile FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Teleguru PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/11/2017
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 75% display: 90% mobility: 65% workmanship: 75%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 71%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/24/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/05/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: Zing VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/11/2017
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
LG Q6 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q6 PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 505
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.149kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2017
LG Q8
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q8Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.146kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tecno Cino IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/23/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/09/2017
Source: Geek 4 You IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/23/2017
Source: InstaNews IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/22/2017
Source: Ridble IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 75% display: 85% mobility: 50% workmanship: 75%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/05/2017
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 85% features: 85% display: 88% mobility: 78% ergonomy: 88%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 65% display: 80% mobility: 55% workmanship: 75%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2017
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Key for web IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 70% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 65% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
LG Q7 Plus
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q7 PlusProcessor: Mediatek MT6750S
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.50 inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
LG's top model in the Q7 line promises users upper mid-range performance, and the new device offers the QLens AI technology otherwise found in LG's premium smartphones. But what will buyers of the LG Q7 Plus really get for their 400 Euros (~$470)? Read our review to find out.
Foreign Reviews
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Blick DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2018
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2018
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
LG Q Stylus Plus
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q Stylus PlusProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 6.20 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.172kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Q Stylo+ benefits from its similar appearance to the LG Q6, but suffers from a poor performance and an average camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2018
LG Q Stylus
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q StylusProcessor: Mediatek MT6750S
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 6.20 inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.172kg
Price: 280 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Protected against shocks, water and dust. This is how LG has presented its Q Stylus, which comes with a stylus integrated into its 6.2-inch case. Find out what else the affordable smartphone has to offer in our review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While they're the same size as the Note 8 and 9, they use a less powerful processor, basic stylus without pressure support and have single cameras. Nor does LG specify what the display technology is, but it's unlikely to be OLED.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/06/2018
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 72% features: 81% display: 80% mobility: 70%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2018
LG Q7
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q7Processor: Mediatek MT6750S
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Display: 5.50 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Q7 offers some enticing features - such as waterproofing, quick charging and fingerprint scanning - but there's not much more in the package to draw you in.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2018
Source: Htxt Africa EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Well styled and equally well equipped, the Q7 from LG features all one needs from a mid-range phone. If you're in the market for a svelte option, it's highly recommended.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 61% features: 60% display: 70% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/13/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/11/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 75% features: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 55% display: 65% mobility: 65% workmanship: 65% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 59% price: 62% features: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 60% display: 75% mobility: 62% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% features: 68% display: 78% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 95%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/20/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Source: Les Numeriques FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 50% performance: 30% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 50%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 65% performance: 50% display: 80% mobility: 45% workmanship: 70%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/27/2018
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/24/2018
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 58%
Source: Playtech.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/10/2018
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
LG Q7+ BTS Limited Edition
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q7+ BTS Limited EditionProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 450
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 5.50 inch, 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.145kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Log.com.tr TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 68%
LG Q60
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q60Processor: Mediatek Helio 20 Helio P22 MT6762
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.26 inch, 19:9, 1520 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.172kg
Price: 250 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
LG brings a triple camera in the middle class and with the Q60 in particular, puts multimedia applications in the foreground. The 19:9 screen and a good sound should be the main highlights, but the Google Assistant with integrated LG voice commands gets even greater importance. In our test we check how the interaction works.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With a retail price of R3 800 in South Africa, the LG Q60 is up against the likes of the Samsung Galaxy A20 and Huawei Y7 2019, pretty similar devices at that price point, with a few things that counts for and against them. While the wider camera gives the LG Q60 the edge for photography, its screen resolution knocks it back down again. Nonetheless, the LG Q60 should definitely be on your mid-range shortlist if you’re aiming for the sub-R4k mark.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/20/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2019
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/02/2019
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 71% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 61% performance: 60% display: 50% mobility: 75% workmanship: 60%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 77%
LG Q70
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q70Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 675
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 612
Display: 6.40 inch, 19.25:9, 2310 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.198kg
Price: 330 euro
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG’s Q70 is a good mid-range smartphone. It offers a solid experience without the premium specs of more expensive smartphones. Upfront the LG Q70 costs $520 CAD, and for a mid-range smartphone that offers such nice design and a decent overall user-experience, it's worth that price. That said, there are other mid-rangers on the market like the Pixel 3a that offer a better camera experience, stock Android but an overall worse look. I don’t think the Q70 is the best mid-range handset on the market, but someone looking for a competent, inexpensive Android smartphone, likely won't find many issues with this device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
LG Q61
Specifications
Notebook: LG Q61Processor: Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.53 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.192kg
Links: LG homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/22/2020
Comment
LG:
Qualcomm Adreno 505:
ARM Mali-T860 MP2:
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Qualcomm Adreno 612:
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
搭配于高通Snapdragon 820中的集成显卡,最大频率为624MHz。在2016年初它属于安卓系统智能手机/平板的高端显卡,可以运行需求很高的游戏。
Imagination PowerVR GE8320:
用于中档ARM SoC的集成显卡。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
820 MSM8996:
整合四核处理器(两颗2.15GHz高速核心以及两颗1.6GHz节能核心)和Adreno 530显卡的高端ARM系统芯片。使用14纳米HPM技术制造。
SD 450:
较低端的主流八核ARM Cortex-A53 SoC,主频高达1.8 GHz,Adreno 506 GPU,LPDDR3单通道内存控制器以及X9 LTE(Cat.7 300/150 Mbps)调制解调器。
Mediatek:
Helio P35 MT6765:
基于ARM的八核SoC(8x ARM Cortex-A53),频率高达2.3 GHz。该芯片还包括Cat.7 LTE调制解调器(下载速度为300 Mbps)。
Mediatek Helio 20:
Helio P22 MT6762:
基于ARM的八核SoC(8x ARM Cortex-A53),频率高达2 GHz。该芯片还包括Cat.7 LTE调制解调器(下载速度为300 Mbps)。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
71.75%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.