LG Velvet
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.9, 29mm, 1/3.1, 1.0µm
Price comparison
Average of 52 scores (from 88 reviews)
Reviews for the LG Velvet
The Velvet is LG’s latest upper-midrange smartphone, which scores some major points with its refined design and a dual-screen case. Read our review to learn if the manufacturer suggested retail price of 599 Euros ($683) is justified.
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN
Obviously, it's not perfect, and my biggest complaint is the battery life. It's also a real shame to see LG ditch its 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC; honestly, if that's not going to be included, I'm fine with LG getting rid of the headphone jack entirely. And finally, we're seeing 90Hz screens in sub-$500 phones now, so that's really something I'd have liked to have seen.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN
LG Velvet with dual display accessory is not a smartphone for everyone. It makes a strong case by offering a host of features and use cases. But it is far from what a truly foldable smartphone can offer. However, the smartphone alone is a good choice and has a lot going for it
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN
While LG's idea of a foldable smartphone is cost-effective, it does not have the same wow factor as true foldable phones such as the Samsung Galaxy Fold. It will appeal mainly to multitaskers who should be able to take advantage of the dual display setup. The USP of the LG Velvet is its dual-screen accessory, and if you are looking to buy this phone, you should get the bundle. Outright performance is something that the LG Velvet is missing out on though, and if that's what you want, you could instead consider the OnePlus 8T (Review) at this price level.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Bit-Tech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The high launch price of the LG Velvet 5G has already dropped to the point where it can now be had for $728 which represents very good value in the premium 5G market. It’s not enough to make us give up our (similarly-priced) Huawei P30 Pro but if you’re after 5G it’s worth checking out Samsung’s (also similarly-priced) Galaxy S10 5G rival too. Ultimately, it’s not the most premium phone but it’s a solid choice at this price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/15/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Indian Express EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Velvet on its own is a good phone, but one that will have to compete with the likes of the OnePlus 8 and Samsung mid-range phones. So buy this primarily because you want to explore a second screen at some point. The phone will not disappoint you and will certainly make you the center of attention anywhere you go. And that could be another reason to buy this one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As someone who used to be a bit of an LG fanboy (owning the G3, G5, G6, and G7), I was excited to see what LG was going to do with the Velvet. But I was left simply unsatisfied and always looking for more. It’s clear that LG wanted to change things up in the design department, but there are just too many sacrifices elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you know you like LG phones and you’re just itching for an affordable 5G, it’s not a bad phone. But LG and its partner carriers are asking upwards of $600 for this phone before any deals, and that’s a really tough sell when you can get a Galaxy S20 FE or Pixel 5 for around the same price, both of which offer either better cameras or better processing power. Let’s not even get started with updates.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/24/2020
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I wasn’t sure how LG’s strategy was going to plan out when they first announced they were going back to the drawing board. I was even less confident when renders started to appear because the Velvet looks like every slim and sexy slab of glass released in the last five years. But then I picked one up and started using it. It’s the first time I really don’t have any complaints about an LG phone in a long, long time.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/19/2020
Source: G Style Magazine EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG managed to create one of the better-looking smartphones they have designed in years. But also fallen into the midrange category as well. By giving us an elegant looking phone, we aren’t getting the highest performing processor nor the smoothest moving display. While it doesn’t feel slow by itself its hard to compare when there are devices from OnePlus and others lingering around. I get that with lesser specs it does put the price at $600 and you still get a smartphone that has 5G. It looks to be a fresh start for LG, and I am interested to see where they go from here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2020
Source: Gear Diary EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you buy the LG Velvet outright at AT&T, it will cost $599, but if you make the 30-month AT&T installment payments at $10 per month, it is just $300, which makes it an excellent deal. For $300, you’ll get a gorgeous IP68 5G phone with a large, brilliant screen, a decent camera, a fast processor, wireless charging, and the ability to add the Dual Screen Case with a second display for $200 more. That makes the LG Velvet a compelling choice; if better multitasking is what you need from your phone, you’ll likely love it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/25/2020
Source: JerryRigEverything Archive.org version
Its time to see how durable LG's new Velvet phone is... The LG Velvet is a super thin smartphone with all the bells and whistles of 2015 and the 5G of 2020. AND it has a dual screen option. Should be interesting. I tried out a new camera for this video! Not sure if its my favorite. Might take me a little bit to get the settings figured out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2020
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG deserves credit for trying to shake up its phone lineup. The LG G series that the Velvet replaces just wasn't resonating with people. Swapping in a better looking phone — which the LG Velvet clearly is — is a big step toward making LG's handsets relevant with a wider audience. The cameras also take decent pictures, though LG would be advised to improve with low-light performance and portrait shots.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Best Products EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you want a flashy smartphone that’s plenty capable at a competitive price, the LG Velvet is worth considering. It sports a more expensive build quality than most other midrange smartphones, is equipped with wireless charging, stereo speakers, and lets you add a second screen or use it in tandem with a stylus. Considering its svelte looks, stellar battery life, and 5G support, I think it’s worthy of being your next phone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hot Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We really like the Velvet’s design and we appreciate that it does everything adequately. The headphone jack is a nice bonus, even without that lovely 32-bit HiFi Quad DAC. Wireless charging and water resistance are always welcome features too. Still, without a high-refresh display or OIS for the main camera, the Velvet cuts a few too many important corners in this segment, and the user experience is compromised by excessive bloatware and by software that could use an update. It also seems like an antiquated business model to only offer carrier exclusives with no unlocked option at this point.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/24/2020
Source: Techaeris EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I think the LG Velvet is a new direction for LG and it’s a great direction. Their one misstep was working with AT&T on an exclusive first release. They should have just made this unlocked and useable across carriers. AT&T’s bloatware was godawful and sullied my experience. But there are a lot of redeeming qualities if you can muscle past the AT&T mess. I still think this is a phone to consider but you just need to understand what you’ll be walking into with the AT&T version.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 75% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 95% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tech Smart EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At R11 800, the LG Velvet 5G is pushing the top of the midrange market, still below the R20k we see for some flagships. What it has going for itself is 5G, although competition for cheaper solutions in the 5G space, such as the Huawei P40 lite 5G, will soon start crowding the market. The Velvet’s new look is impressive and the sleekness of this metal design and rounded edges will win new users for LG. That said, LG disappoints with the cameras on the Velvet, and I expected more from the brand since their previous phones were strong in this department. It's a decent smartphone that will serve its master well, but ultimately the Velvet lacks that something special to make it a fan favourite.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2020
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Velvet is LG's signal that it's heading towards another, more affordable but thoughtful direction. But the company should go even further. After spending time with the Velvet, I would still prefer something like the OnePlus 8 ($699 at OnePlus). While it doesn't have a headphone jack or work with a secondary screen accessory like the Velvet (which, by the way, costs an extra $199), it does have a great camera, a silky-smooth screen with a higher refresh rate and a more powerful processor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Velvet is trying to be a flagship-ish stylish phone at well under $1000. It succeeds in being stylish and has some good hardware and software features but is held back by its average camera and what’s inexplicably left out weakens the phone’s key strengths.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2020
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To put the price in perspective, the Samsung Galaxy A71 costs about $600 as well and sports similar specs, although the Velvet is more future-proof with its Snapdragon 765 processor compared to the A71’s Snapdragon 730 chipset. If you compare it to the Pixel 4a, that device has a price tag of $479, but if you’re someone who likes bigger displays, and the 5G-ready chipset, the Velvet might be the choice (there’s a Pixel 4a 5G coming that will cost $679). Both A71 and Pixel 4a sport better cameras than the Velvet, though.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/14/2020
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Pricing is everything when judging this phone. The Velvet lists for $599.99, but as of this writing, AT&T is offering it for $300 on an installment plan. That makes it cheaper than the $349 Pixel 4a. AT&T is also offering the Galaxy A71 5G for the same price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With the 5G-enabled LG Velvet, the South Korean phone-maker is trying something new. The Velvet doesn't belong to any of the company's established lines, like the G- and V- series. It looks different than most LG phones and at $599 in the US, it's more affordable than LG's G8 and V60. (UK and Australian prices and availability are TBA, but the South Korean price converts to about £600 or AU$1,100.)
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With the success of the early G-Series handsets further and further behind them, LG’s flagship smartphones seemed to get more and more formulaic with each passing year. The results became equally as predictable. They’d come out a month or two after Samsung launched their latest salvo, packing a lot of the same tech but lagging when it comes to design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 9to5google Archive.org version
LG Velvet is the company's most exciting release in years and, while it doesn't fix all of the problems, is an important release for LG. Here's why.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/28/2020
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Velvet is an excellent phone, especially when you consider that it only costs $599. Yes, that was a flagship price only a few years ago, but in 2020, that's half the price of a Samsung Galaxy S20+. Sure, it's not perfect, and I place high expectations on it because it feels so premium.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Tech Review Archive.org version
The Velvet is also coming to T-Mobile and Verizon later this summer. The Velvet is a lovely new look for LG, and it has a 6.8” OLED display that supports Wacom AES pens (as does the Dual Display accessory). It has the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G CPU, 6GB RAM, 128GB storage, a microSD card slot and triple rear cameras. It competes with the Samsung Galaxy A71 and the OnePlus Nord.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/23/2020
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Velvet won’t offer you any fancy bells and whistles such as a high refresh rate display, super-fast charging, or periscope cameras. That doesn’t mean it’s bad, it just leaves a lot to be desired in a world where competition is sky high. Almost every phone on the market has at least one killer feature that would make you buy it above other devices. The LG Velvet’s best feature — its design — isn’t on the spec sheet.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 73% display: 89% mobility: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Velvet is a mid-range 5G phone that costs a little too much, even compared to LG’s high-end phones of the last year or two. Its lower power chipset does not feel a huge step down, but the rear camera array is not as versatile as we would hope for at the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With the 5G-enabled LG Velvet, the South Korean phone-maker is trying something new. The Velvet doesn't belong to any of the company's established lines, like the G- and V- series. It looks different than most LG phones and at $599 in the US, it's more affordable than LG's G8 and V60. (UK and Australian prices and availability are TBA, but the South Korean price converts to about £600 or AU$1,100.)
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, both phones aren’t the most competitive phones, but they’re still LG’s best phones they have made to date, and are both definitive improvements of the company’s past attempts. Let’s hope the Velvet’s fresh redesign can also be applied to other future LG devices.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/15/2020
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
Unboxing LG's new Velvet smartphones. The company is departing from the G and V series and focusing on thinking outside the box in terms of design and more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/10/2020
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This device - despite sub-flagship hardware - makes for a more attractive offering than many recent LG phones. What's really caught our attention is the Dual Screen cover - doubling the 6.8-inch screen with a second one of the same size. However, there are weaknesses in the camera, giving pause for thought in a very competitive market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/29/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Engadget Archive.org version
LG is betting on a new smartphone strategy, starting with the mid-range Velvet which comes with a refreshing look, some flagship qualities and an optional Dual Screen case. Engadget’s Richard Lai gives this 5G phone a quick test drive.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG’s new design language works very well here and this looks a lot better than LG’s last few efforts. There’s a lot to like with the camera array, specs and feature list too, even if the software lacks polish.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2020
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For me it comes down to whether or not you're taken with the idea of the DualScreen, despite its shortcomings. If you are, and we may be down to a small number of potential buyers now, then the Velvet is a great choice - especially if LG decides to bundle it as standard.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I like LG’s approach with the Velvet. It’s genuinely trying something different after years of making niche flagships, and this is a strong first attempt at a striking new design. Unfortunately, it falls short in a couple of key areas, and I think most people will probably be able to find better options. But between the Velvet and reports of even more experimental form factors, I can at least say I’m intrigued by LG’s phone design again.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Depending on the final price – which we don't have yet – the LG Velvet could be the phone for you, if it ticks the boxes that you need: a headphone jack, an almost-unique Dual Screen accessory, and performance that will be more than enough for most users.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With expected pricing around the US $750 mark, you could certainly do a lot worse than the LG Velvet. The Dual Screen accessory, in particular, might be its greatest asset — giving many folding-phone benefits at a much lower price. Direct rivals like the OnePlus 8 offer a better balance of specs and features at a similar price point, and fans of the Dual Screen concept would be better off bagging a discounted V60.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG's doing a change of pace with this year's premium roster. Gone are the letters and numbers and ThinQ branding (how does one end up at a mouthful like the G8X ThinQ), in comes the Velvet with its expressive personality. With that much of it, universal appeal is inherently out of the question, obviously.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Velvet is a breath of fresh air from LG with an attractive design refresh, but it’s nothing new to the rest of the Android world. For the €650 price you get 5G, a decent OLED display, a headphone jack and solid performance while the options of the dual screen and active pen are perhaps the real differentiators here.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocketnow Archive.org version
LG is changing things up! And that's a really good thing, for the most part. Where will you land in this new, stylish brand that finally breaks away from the Vs and the Gs of the world? This is Pocketnow and I'm Joshua Vergara — what's going on, everybody? — this is my review of the LG Velvet.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Velvet is a mid-range 5G phone that costs a little too much, even compared to LG’s high-end phones of the last year or two. Its lower power chipset does not feel a huge step down, but the rear camera array is not as versatile as we would hope for at the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/23/2020
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The LG Velvet does have a "fast charger" in the box, but — compared to today's standards — it's anything but fast. It'll top you up from 0% to 100% is almost two hours. If you are in a hurry, a 15 minute charge will give you 20% and 30 minutes of being plugged in results in 40%. It's not abysmal, but not ideal.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
LG’s new design language works very well here and this looks a lot better than LG’s last few efforts. There’s a lot to like with the camera array, specs and feature list too, even if the software lacks polish.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 88% display: 80% mobility: 88% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 94% display: 80% mobility: 82% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/23/2020
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/24/2020
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/17/2020
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/13/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2020
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: n-tv DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/02/2020
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: MuyComputer ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 95%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/06/2020
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 83% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/23/2020
Source: Android Geek PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2020
Source: Notebook Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 70% performance: 65% workmanship: 85%
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% features: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/27/2020
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 52% features: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 69% workmanship: 92%
Source: GadgetGear.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/22/2020
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/24/2021
Source: Geekbecois FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/24/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/18/2021
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/30/2020
Rating: Total score: 83% display: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/03/2020
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 84% features: 85% mobility: 91% workmanship: 93%
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2020
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2020
Source: Danviet VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/30/2020
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/29/2020
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2020
Source: Arena IT →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 765G:
具有8个CPU Kryo 475内核的快速中端ARM SoC(一个主频为2.4 GHz的高速ARM Cortex-A76主核,一个主频为2.2 GHz的A76中核和六个主频为1.8 GHz的ARM Cortex-A55小核)。作为首批SoC之一,它还集成了5G调制解调器(Snapdragon X52下行和上传速度高达3.7 / 1.6 Mbps,支持mmWave和Sub-6)。该处理器在采用三星高效的7纳米EUV工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.80":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.