戴尔 Latitude 12 E5250 笔记本电脑简短评测
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Sandisk X110 SD6SF1M-256G-1022 | HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Lenovo ThinkPad X240 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 2% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42.02 | 40.56 -3% | 43.29 3% | 43.55 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 63.2 | 61 -3% | 63.9 1% | 64.9 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.44 | 41.92 -3% | 44.95 3% | 45.05 4% |
Screen | -9% | 58% | 77% | |
Brightness middle | 178 | 188 6% | 377 112% | 433 143% |
Brightness | 160 | 186 16% | 348 118% | 396 148% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 91 10% | 84 1% | 80 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.586 | 0.86 -47% | 0.518 12% | 0.47 20% |
Contrast | 304 | 219 -28% | 728 139% | 921 203% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.42 | 12.31 -18% | 6.85 34% | 5.56 47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.57 | 12.56 -9% | 6.48 44% | 4.92 57% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 1.86 118% | 2.75 80% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 13931 47% | 12047 54% | 6379 102% | 6054 107% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 38.6 -3% | 41 3% | 41 3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-7% | 30% /
43% | 41% /
57% |
* ... smaller is better
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 177 cd/m²
Contrast: 304:1 (Black: 0.586 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 11.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.02% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | |
Dell Latitude 14 E5450 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G | |
Dell Latitude 14 E5450 |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Sandisk X110 SD6SF1M-256G-1022 | HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Lenovo ThinkPad X240 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCMark 7 | ||||
Score | 4067 | 1869 -54% | 4629 14% | 2504 -38% |
PCMark 8 | -16% | -8% | -22% | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2696 | 2291 -15% | 2470 -8% | 2120 -21% |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2996 | 2341 -22% | 2461 -18% | 2115 -29% |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3636 | 3227 -11% | 3697 2% | 3066 -16% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-26% | 3% /
-3% | -30% /
-26% |
PCMark 7 Score | 4067 points | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2696 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2996 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3636 points | |
Help |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Sandisk X110 SD6SF1M-256G-1022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X240 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | |
---|---|---|
AS SSD | 7% | |
Seq Read | 462.3 | 517 12% |
Seq Write | 373.7 | 242.8 -35% |
4K Read | 28.65 | 29.93 4% |
4K Write | 72.7 | 106.2 46% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G |
3DMark 11 Performance | 930 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 36234 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3697 points | |
Help |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 HD Graphics 4400, 4310U, Sandisk X110 SD6SF1M-256G-1022 | HP EliteBook 725 G2 Radeon R6 (Kaveri), A10 Pro-7350B, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Lenovo ThinkPad X240 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Samsung SSD 840 250GB MZ7TD256HAFV | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G HD Graphics 4400, 4210U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite | ||||
1280x720 Very Low Preset | 29.5 | 28.7 -3% | 29.6 0% | |
Tomb Raider | ||||
1024x768 Low Preset | 41.9 | 31.6 -25% | 37.8 -10% | 38.9 -7% |
Anno 2070 | ||||
1024x768 Low Preset | 51.2 | 42.5 -17% | 51.3 0% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-15% | -5% /
-5% | -4% /
-4% |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anno 2070 (2011) | 51.2 | 29 | 18.8 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 41.9 | 20.3 | 11.8 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.5 | 15.3 | 12.64 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29.5 / 29.5 / 31.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.9 / 36.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Voltcraft sl-451 (15 cm distance) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.7 °C / 94.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.4 °C / -11.6 F).
Off / Standby | 0 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 3.6 / 5.5 / 7.7 Watt |
Load |
28.9 / 29 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Extech Power Analyzer 380803 |
Battery Runtime - WiFi (sort by value) | |
Dell Latitude 12 E5250 | |
HP EliteBook 725 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X240 | |
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU201LA-DT036G |
尽管戴尔的Latitude E5250相比14寸的姊妹机型小了1.5寸,它仍然是一款设计优秀的商务笔记本。它机身简洁雅致的设计和杰出的工艺质量都让人无可挑剔。遗憾的是,尽管售价高达1050欧元(约7536人民币),它的屏幕却没有提供高质量镁合金上盖材质。同时,它的维护底盖也需要更实用的设计。它脆弱的小卡扣显得十分容易折断。我们特别喜欢的是它的输入设备。它们不仅适合移动实用,也可以完美替代外接设备。按键压力点和手感都十分不错。戴尔十分重视产品安全性。这款设备提供了对NFC和智能卡的支持,很多软件选项可以在定制选购中选择——当然都不是免费的。E5250最大的缺点在于屏幕。它采用的低亮度TN屏幕让这款本身不错的笔记本电脑显得黯淡无光。尽管采用了磨砂屏幕表面,在户外使用仍然十分困难。全高清的IPS屏幕只有增加预算才可以选择。戴尔的Latitude在系统性能上再次表现优秀。由于配备了高速的固态硬盘和强劲处理器,这款测试机可以满足各种软件的需求。它的散热系统也十分出色。在负载下的噪音控制在了舒适的水平,而不连接电源它也可以在日常使用中坚持很长一段时间。但是,它无法在我们的无线上网测试中达到一个工作日所需的续航时间。
整体上,戴尔Latitude E5250表现十分不错。不过,这款商务本的很多配置选项都会提高购买所需的预算。有充足预算的用户可以自行定制一台出色的12.5寸笔记本电脑。预算有限的用户则最好对比一下市场上的其他产品再做决定。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。