Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 9300+

Mediatek Dimensity 9300+

联发科技 Dimensity 9300+（9300 Plus）是一款用于智能手机和平板电脑的高端 SoC，基于Android 。该处理器首次不再使用传统的节能内核，而只使用所谓的大内核。CPU 部分集成了一个主频高达 3.4 GHz 的快速 ARM Cortex-X4 内核、三个主频高达 2.9 GHz 的低频 X4 内核和四个主频高达 2 GHz 的较小 Cortex-A520 内核。快速初级内核也是与相同的 Dimensity 9300.与后者一样，SoC 提供了 18 MB 三级高速缓存。

不出所料，在最初的基准测试中，小米 14T Pro 的性能略快于 Dimensity 9300，可与 骁龙 8 代 3(在 Geekbench 6 中）。在 PCMark 和 Crossmark 中，性能稍差，与 高通骁龙 8 代 2.

集成的联发科 APU 790 完全依赖于生成式人工智能（Generative AI），旨在将适应的算法加速 8 倍。据说能效提高了 45%。有了 MiraVision 990，显示器可以在高达 120 Hz 的超高清条件下运行，还支持谷歌 Ultra HDR 图像显示（来自Android 14）。

图形处理器为 ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12使用。

SoC 采用台积电第三代 4 纳米工艺（N4X）制造。

SeriesMediatek Dimensity 9000
CodenameCortex-X4 / A720

Series: Dimensity 9000 Cortex-X4 / A720

MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ « 2 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores18 MB L3 Cortex-X4 / A720
MediaTek Dimensity 93002 - 3.25 GHz8 / 8 cores18 MB L3 Cortex-X4 / A720
Clock Rate2000 - 3400 MHz
Level 3 Cache18 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.4 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
3 x 2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
FeaturesARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, Wi-Fi 7 up to 6.5 GBit/s, Bluetooth 5.4, LPDDR5T-9600 @ 4800 MHz, Imagiq 990, AI 5G Modem up to 7 GBit/s,
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date11/06/2023
Product Link (external)www.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 7393     avg: 7609     median: 7451 (88%)     max: 7982 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2182     median: 2187 (56%)     max: 2192 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 6972     avg: 7131     median: 7094 (28%)     max: 7327 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1598     avg: 1623     median: 1632 (64%)     max: 1639 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6737
58 -96%
...
Google Tensor G4
1399 -14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
1436 -12%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
1455 -10%
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
1541 -5%
Apple A14 Bionic
1549 -5%
Samsung Exynos 2400
1560 -4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
1561 -4%
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1581 -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1604 -1%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
1623
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1652 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
1684 4%
Apple A15 Bionic
1723 6%
Apple M1
1729 7%
Apple A16 Bionic
1882 16%
Apple M2
1914 18%
Apple A17 Pro
2138 32%
Apple M3
2316 43%
Apple A18
2327 43%
...
Apple A18 Pro
2437 50%
max:
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
2544 57%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6478     avg: 6744     median: 6678 (12%)     max: 7077 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -96%
...
Apple A16 Bionic
5273 -22%
Apple A17 Pro
5305 -21%
Samsung Exynos 2400e
5622 -17%
Samsung Exynos 2400
5716 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
6058 -10%
Apple A18
6130 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
6163 -9%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
6681 -1%
Apple A18 Pro
6687 -1%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
6744
Apple M1
7501 11%
Apple M2
8812 31%
Apple M3
10697 59%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 728%
0%
100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9443     avg: 9448     median: 9448 (94%)     max: 9453 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30323     avg: 30653     median: 30653 (31%)     max: 30983 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 632.4     avg: 1132     median: 639.3 (1%)     max: 2123.5 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25646     avg: 54879     median: 67938 (57%)     max: 71054 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 78     avg: 153.7     median: 190 (53%)     max: 193 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 37.1     avg: 82.2     median: 82.2 (60%)     max: 127.2 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 1487     avg: 2042     median: 2041.5 (59%)     max: 2596 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 39.6     avg: 47.4     median: 47.4 (58%)     max: 55.2 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1504     avg: 1762     median: 1761.5 (49%)     max: 2019 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 16494     avg: 33025     median: 33025 (52%)     max: 49556 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 16053     avg: 16493     median: 16684 (69%)     max: 16743 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 956     avg: 1222     median: 1342 (51%)     max: 1367 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7.29     avg: 9.8     median: 10.8 (5%)     max: 11.2 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.789     avg: 3     median: 4 (4%)     max: 4.16 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 19. 14:13:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:31:10 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18426 +0.003s ... 0.015s

#8 got single benchmarks 18426 +0.01s ... 0.025s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.245s ... 0.27s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.27s

#12 return log +0s ... 0.27s

Reviews for the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ processor

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 评测--最大的Android 平板电脑现在依赖联发科技术

三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 评测--最大的Android 平板电脑现在依赖联发科技术

今年，三星主要对其最大的高端平板电脑进行了微调。它的座右铭是更快更长。在这篇评测中，你可以发现Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 为什么仍然是行业标杆，以及我们还缺少哪些功能。 ...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 14.60" | 718 g
三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 笔记本评测

人工智能平板电脑的显示屏有问题--三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus 评测

据三星称，Galaxy Tab S10+ 是一款专为人工智能功能开发的平板电脑。然而，这家制造商在处理器的选择上有了新的突破。在我们的 Tab S10 Plus 评测中，我们将仔细研究Galaxy Tab 是否真的使用了这款芯片组。...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 12.40" | 571 g
Notebookcheck 小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测

小米 14T Pro 智能手机评测：亮度惊人的价格杀手

小米公司将其 14T Pro 视为高端智能手机，售价不到 800 欧元（约合 867 美元）。在我们的测试中，这款小米智能手机配备了徕卡摄像头，其 144Hz AMOLED 显示面板显示出极高的亮度。这款旗舰杀手手机的其他配置也几乎没有让人失望。...
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 | 6.67" | 209 g

Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo+

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12.40", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+

Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra

Xiaomi 14T Pro: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 14T Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 与 Tab S9 Ultra：联发科碾压高通--效率问题迫在眉睫

Xiaomi 14T Pro: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 小米 14T 和小米 14T Pro：根据 DxOMark 相机分析，Pro 机型的附加费用并不值得

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Tab S10：推出至少两个 iPad Pro 竞争对手的第一个迹象与Galaxy S25

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+: ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12.40", 0.6 kg
   » 三星Galaxy Tab S10：推出至少两个 iPad Pro 竞争对手的第一个迹象与Galaxy S25

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Dimensity 9000

» MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.35 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9000
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Apple A17 Pro
   6x 2.11 GHz - 3.78 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.39 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.3 GHz
+ Apple A18
   6x - 3.8 GHz
+ Apple A16 Bionic
   6x 2.02 GHz - 3.46 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 2400
   10x 2 GHz - 3.2 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 2400e
   10x 2 GHz - 3.1 GHz
- Apple A15 Bionic
   6x 2.02 GHz - 3.23 GHz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
   8x 2 GHz - 2.8 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Dimensity 9300+ 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-10-21)