Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Dimensity 9400

Mediatek Dimensity 9400

截至 2024 年 11 月，联发科Dimensity 9400是台湾公司为高端Android 手机和平板电脑开发的最新旗舰 SoC。它采用 1 个 Cortex-X925 内核，主频高达 3.62 GHz，还有 3 个 Cortex-X4 内核（主频高达 3.25 GHz）和 4 个 Cortex-A720 内核（主频高达 2 GHz）。集成 GPU 为 Immortalis-G925 MP12，还有联发科 890 第八代 NPU，其中一个为 "高性能 "核心，一个为 "灵活 "核心。当然，还包括 5G、Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙和卫星导航。

架构和功能

CPU 在一定程度上基于 ARM v9.2 架构。这里没有 "小 "核心，这与 Dimensity 9300(4x Cortex-X4 和 4x Cortex-A720 内核）一样。这种做法与所有其他 ARM 芯片制造商的做法大相径庭。

与上一代芯片相比，制造商对三级缓存和 SLC 缓存进行了提升，现在它们的总容量达到了 22 MB（12 MB 三级缓存 + 10 MB 系统缓存）。支持速度高达 10667 MT/s 的 LPDDR5x RAM；还有其他很酷的功能，如 12 晶体管 L1 高速缓存系统和 "长达 1.5 公里 "的蓝牙覆盖范围。

性能

该芯片的 Geekbench 6.3 Multi 分数为 9000 分，比 A18 Pro 快几个百分点。 Apple A18 Pro快几个百分点，比 Dimensity 9300.

图形

ARM 开发的 Immortalis-G925图形处理器（12 核图形处理器）配备硬件光线追踪、精确超分辨率等功能。它可为三屏折叠手机提供动力，并能以高达 180 Hz 的速度驱动 "WQHD+"分辨率的显示器，还能对最重要的编解码器（AVC、HEVC、VP9、AV1）进行硬件解码。

它提供的 ~2700 3DMarkSteel Nomad Light points 使其速度几乎与高通 Adreno 830 不相上下。

功耗

据报道，它的峰值功耗非常高，远远超过 10 W。采用先进散热解决方案的游戏手机将从 SoC 中获得比普通轻薄机型更好的性能（尤其是持续性能）。

Dimensity 采用台积电的 N3E 工艺制造，该工艺到 2024 年底仍是最先进的工艺。

CodenameCortex-X925, X4, A720
SeriesMediatek Dimensity 9000
Clock Rate <=3620 MHz
Level 2 Cache7 MB
Level 3 Cache22 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X925
3 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
Transistor Count29100 Million
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Features5G (3GPP, Sub-6GHz), Wi-Fi 7, BT 6.0, UFS 4, LPDDR5X 10667 Mbps, NPU 890
GPUARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date10/09/2024
Product Link (external)www.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
10632 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2589     avg: 2647     median: 2605 (65%)     max: 2748 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8078 (31%)     max: 8574 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1838     avg: 1973     median: 1998 (78%)     max: 2084 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6737
58 -97%
...
Samsung Exynos 2400e
1581 -20%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
1604 -19%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
1623 -18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
1651 -16%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
1684 -15%
Apple A15 Bionic
1723 -13%
Apple M1
1729 -12%
Apple A16 Bionic
1882 -5%
Apple M2
1914 -3%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
1973
Apple A17 Pro
2138 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
2202 12%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
2221 13%
Apple M3
2316 17%
Apple A18
2327 18%
Apple A18 Pro
2437 24%
max:
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
2559 30%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5870     avg: 7131     median: 7398 (13%)     max: 8126 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -97%
...
Apple A17 Pro
5305 -26%
Samsung Exynos 2400e
5622 -21%
Samsung Exynos 2400
5716 -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
6013 -16%
Apple A18
6130 -14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
6163 -14%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
6681 -6%
Apple A18 Pro
6687 -6%
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
6744 -5%
Mediatek Dimensity 9400
7131
Apple M1
7501 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
7553 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8122 14%
Apple M2
8812 24%
Apple M3
10697 50%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 683%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7074 points (71%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
27283 points (27%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 431.56     avg: 572     median: 625.4 (1%)     max: 660.34 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 56843     avg: 68258     median: 60987 (50%)     max: 86943 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 147     avg: 182.7     median: 176 (48%)     max: 225 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 2374540     avg: 2503070     median: 2429500 (81%)     max: 2705160 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 398259     avg: 512572     median: 532245 (16%)     max: 607213 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
72.4 MB/s (49%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1730 MB/s (49%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
44.6 MB/s (55%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1725 MB/s (48%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
158502 Points (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12314     avg: 14793     median: 15849 (58%)     max: 16216 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1145     avg: 1469     median: 1599 (60%)     max: 1663 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.9     avg: 7.3     median: 7.8 (3%)     max: 8.21 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.685     avg: 0.9     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 1.251 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.30.50.60.811.11.31.41.61.81.92.12.32.42.62.72.93.1Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.29
log 07. 13:54:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Mar 2025 05:41:21 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 18562 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#7 got single benchmarks 18562 +0.014s ... 0.032s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.367s ... 0.399s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.399s

#11 return log +0s ... 0.399s

Reviews for the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 processor

vivo X200 Pro Mini 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

最适合摄影的紧凑型智能手机 - vivo X200 Pro Mini 评测

2025 年在全球推出迷你旗舰手机可能会成为Galaxy S25 的难题。vivo 的紧凑型高端手机展示了什么是可能的--尤其是在摄影领域。超薄边框、大尺寸索尼传感器、XXL 电池和快速充电只是其中的一些亮点。...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 6.31" | 187 g
vivo X200 Pro 测试智能手机（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

2024 年最佳拍照智能手机Android - vivo X200 Pro 评测

vivo X200 Pro 的蔡司摄像头和旗舰处理器为其提供了强大的照片质量和卓越的性能。OLED 显示屏的亮度也令人难以置信，在我们的测试中超过了 4,800 尼特。请阅读我们对这款 vivo 手机的评测，了解它的不足之处。 ...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 6.78" | 223 g
Oppo Find X8 Pro 智能手机评测--凭借创新电池技术向 iPhone 发起进攻

Oppo Find X8 Pro 智能手机评测--凭借创新电池技术向 iPhone 发起进攻

Find X 系列也在欧洲卷土重来：Find X8 Pro 配备哈苏相机、联发科高端 SoC、明亮的 OLED 显示屏和超长电池续航时间，具备了顶级市场所需的一切。但这足以挑战大型厂商吗？...
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 | 6.78" | 215 g

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro

Oppo Find X8 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X8 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.31", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200 Pro Mini

Vivo X200 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200 Pro

   » 一款极端的智能手机对 vivo X200 Pro 的评价

Oppo Find X8 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » 相机测试：在 OnePlus 13、Oppo Find X8 Pro 和 Vivo X200 Pro 的对比中明显胜出

Vivo X200 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » 相机测试：在 OnePlus 13、Oppo Find X8 Pro 和 Vivo X200 Pro 的对比中明显胜出

   » 蔡司相机天堂出现问题，vivo X200 Pro 用户抱怨镜头眩光问题难看

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » 蔡司相机天堂出现问题，vivo X200 Pro 用户抱怨镜头眩光问题难看

Oppo Find X8 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 Pro：双摄已确认，多张新照片在发布前不久曝光

Vivo X200 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » vivo X200 Pro 的视频和最新样张揭示了 2 亿像素蔡司变焦相机的锐利目光所及之处

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » vivo X200 Pro 的视频和最新样张揭示了 2 亿像素蔡司变焦相机的锐利目光所及之处

Oppo Find X8 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 和 Vivo X200：预计很快将在全球发布

Vivo X200 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 和 Vivo X200：预计很快将在全球发布

Vivo X200 Pro Mini: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.31", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 和 Vivo X200：预计很快将在全球发布

Vivo X200 Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
   » vivo X200 Pro：更好的相机和 V4 AI 芯片预告。X100 和 X90 Proto 将配备 vivo X100 Ultra 的相机功能

   » vivo X200 Pro：欧洲全球版本已确认，200 万像素蔡司长焦镜头可能与 vivo X100 Ultra 相同

   » vivo X200 Pro：即使与Galaxy S24 Ultra 和 iPhone 16 Pro 相比，蔡司相机也给早期测试者留下了深刻印象

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Dimensity 9000

» MediaTek Dimensity 9500
   8x - 4 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400
   8x - 3.62 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.35 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9000
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ MediaTek Dimensity 9500
   8x - 4 GHz
+ Apple M2
   8x 2.42 GHz - 3.48 GHz
+ Apple A18 Pro
   6x - 4 GHz
+ Apple M1
   8x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
+ Apple A17 Pro
   6x 2.11 GHz - 3.78 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400
   8x - 3.62 GHz
- Apple A18
   6x - 3.8 GHz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.39 GHz
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
   8x 2.3 GHz - 3.3 GHz
- Apple A16 Bionic
   6x 2.02 GHz - 3.46 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-11-30)