Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio G35

Mediatek Helio G35

Mediatek Helio G35是2020年末推出的智能手机（主要是Android）用入门级ARM SoC。 采用12nm FinFET工艺制造，配备8个ARM Cortex-A53 CPU核心，时钟最高2.3GHz。 4个核心时钟最高为2GHz，效率集群时钟最高为1.5GHz。 与类似的Helio G25相比，G35的CPU时钟速度（+300MHz）、GPU时钟速度（+30MHz），最高支持2400x1800的高分辨率显示。

此外，SoC还内置LTE Cat.4调制解调器、Wi-Fi 5/Bluetooth 5.0调制解调器、LPDDR3-933/LPDDR4-1200/LPDDR4x-1600内存控制器、IMG PowerVr GE8320显卡和1080。

SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio G
CodenameCortex-A53

Series: Mediatek Helio G Cortex-A53

Mediatek Helio G371.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G35 « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G362.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio G252 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Clock Rate2300 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
Manufacturing Technology12 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL, LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
GPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date06/30/2020
Product Link (external)www.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU
0.3 pt (24%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -48%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -43%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -36%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -32%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -26%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -7%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -2%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -1%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 6%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 6%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 40%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 41%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 46%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 47%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 47%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 312%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 839     avg: 1086     median: 1073 (13%)     max: 1304 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 954     avg: 1156     median: 1173 (13%)     max: 1343 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 149     avg: 167.2     median: 170 (7%)     max: 178 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6737
58 -65%
...
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
143.5 -14%
Mediatek Helio G36
146 -13%
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761
146.7 -12%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
151 -10%
Mediatek MT8768
156 -7%
Mediatek Helio G37
160 -4%
JLQ JR510
164 -2%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
166 -1%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
166.7 0%
Mediatek Helio G35
167.2
Samsung Exynos 850
167.3 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
168 0%
Allwinner A523
169 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
176 5%
Mediatek Helio P25
177 6%
Samsung Exynos 7904
239 43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
251.4 50%
Mediatek Helio P60T
258.5 55%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
271 62%
...
Apple A18 Pro
2437 1358%
max:
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
2544 1422%
0%
100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 538     avg: 780     median: 881 (2%)     max: 965 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -68%
...
Apple A8
627 -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
631 -19%
UNISOC SC9863A
640 -18%
Mediatek Helio G25
668 -14%
Mediatek Helio G37
728 -7%
UNISOC Tiger T310
756 -3%
Mediatek Helio A25
758 -3%
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
761 -2%
Mediatek MT8768
775 -1%
Mediatek Helio G35
780
Allwinner A523
797 2%
JLQ JR510
818 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
823 6%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
867 11%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
886 14%
Mediatek Helio P25
891 14%
Samsung Exynos 850
900 15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
924 18%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
936 20%
...
Apple M3
10697 1271%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
55811 7055%
0%
100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
783 points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3585 points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
753 points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3421 points (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3535 points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
797 points (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
10031 ms (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5007     avg: 5370     median: 5369.5 (4%)     max: 5732 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
34 Points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
25846 Points (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24983 Points (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
14363 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
41824 Points (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
107016 Points (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
0 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
1727 Points (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
4665 Points (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5208     avg: 5333     median: 5297 (22%)     max: 5581 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5279     avg: 5437     median: 5436.5 (36%)     max: 5594 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
226 Points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (1%)     max: 2.23 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.801     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.886 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.10.10.20.20.30.30.40.50.50.60.60.70.80.80.90.9111.1Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 13. 03:36:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:28:38 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13249 +0.014s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 13249 +0.026s ... 0.048s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.287s ... 0.335s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.343s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.111s ... 0.454s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.454s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.454s

Reviews for the Mediatek Helio G35 processor

Ulefone Armor 15智能手机评测--带耳机的坚固户外手机

Ulefone Armor 15智能手机评测--带耳机的坚固户外手机

Ulefone Armor 15具有抗摔和防水功能，甚至还配备了自己的完全无线入耳式耳机。因此，制造商将尺寸和重量都推到了极致，但却推出了一个全面的整体包装--价格还算合理。...
Mediatek Helio G35 | PowerVR GE8320 | 5.45" | 346 g
红米9C

小米红米9C智能手机评论。大量的内存？是的!大量的电源？不是!

小米重新推出了价格低廉的红米9C，配备了128GB的存储空间和更多的内存，但这款在2020年发布的手机没有其他变化。在我们的评论中，我们将发现红米9C在2022年是否仍然值得购买。...
Mediatek Helio G35 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.53" | 196 g
Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑，带NFC功能

Oppo A16s智能手机评测--价格低廉的耐力跑，带NFC功能

Oppo A16s是一款廉价的入门级智能手机，它想用5000毫安时的强劲电池、对眼睛友好的显示屏和最后但并非最不重要的三合一摄像头来说服人们。这款不到180欧元（约208美元）的Oppo智能手机的表现如何，可以在评论中阅读。...
Mediatek Helio G35 | PowerVR GE8320 | 6.52" | 190 g

Blackview Oscal C30 Pro: PowerVR GE8320, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview Oscal C30 Pro

Blackview BV5200 Pro: PowerVR GE8320, 6.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV5200 Pro

Blackview A53 Pro: PowerVR GE8320, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Blackview A53 Pro

Oppo A17k: PowerVR GE8320, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A17k

Oppo A17: PowerVR GE8320, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A17

Oppo A57e: PowerVR GE8320, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A57e

Oppo A57s: PowerVR GE8320, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A57s

Doogee S61: PowerVR GE8320, 6.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee S61

Ulefone Armor 15: PowerVR GE8320, 5.45", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Armor 15

OnePlus Nord N20 SE: PowerVR GE8320, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord N20 SE

Doogee S61 Pro: PowerVR GE8320, 6.00", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Doogee S61 Pro

Oppo A57 4G: PowerVR GE8320, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A57 4G

Ulefone Note 13P: PowerVR GE8320, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Note 13P

Oppo A54s: PowerVR GE8320, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A54s

Xiaomi Poco C31: PowerVR GE8320, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco C31

Infinix Hot 11 Play: PowerVR GE8320, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 11 Play

Oppo A16k: PowerVR GE8320, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A16k

Ulefone Power Armor 14: PowerVR GE8320, 6.52", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 14

Oppo A55 4G: PowerVR GE8320, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A55 4G

Wiko Power U20: PowerVR GE8320, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko Power U20

Oppo A16s: PowerVR GE8320, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A16s

Oppo A16: PowerVR GE8320, 6.52", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Oppo A16

Nokia G20: PowerVR GE8320, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia G20

Infinix Hot 10 Play G35: PowerVR GE8320, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 10 Play G35

Wiko Power U30: PowerVR GE8320, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko Power U30

Xiaomi Redmi 9C: PowerVR GE8320, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9C

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Mediatek Helio G

» Mediatek Helio G37
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G35
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G36
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G25
   8x 2 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Mediatek MT8176
   6x 2.1 GHz
+ Mediatek Helio P25
   8x 2.6 GHz
+ Mediatek MT8173
   4x 2.4 GHz
+ MediaTek MT8169A
   6x 2 GHz
+ Mediatek Helio G37
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G35
   8x 2.3 GHz
- Mediatek Helio G36
   8x 2.2 GHz
- Allwinner A523
   8x 0.48 GHz - 2 GHz
- Mediatek MT8173C
   4x 2.1 GHz
- Mediatek MT6595 Turbo
   8x 2.5 GHz
- Mediatek MT8768
   8x 1.5 GHz - 2 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Mediatek Mediatek Helio G Helio G35 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-08-13)