Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio G85

Mediatek Helio G85

联发科技Helio G85是智能手机(主要基于Android)于2020年推出的主流ARM SoC。它采用12 nm FinFET工艺制造,并集成8个CPU内核。两个高达2 GHz的快速ARM Cortex-A75内核用于执行性能任务,六个1.8 GHz的小型ARM Cortex-A55内核以提高效率。由于异构多处理支持,所有八个内核可以一起使用。集成的GPU是ARM Mali-G52 MC2(MP2),具有两个集群,主频1000 MHz(高于其他类似的Helio G80的950 MHz)。 SoC还集成了HyperEngine,可对CPU,GPU和内存进行动态管理。

SoC还集成了具有Cat-7(下载)/ Cat-13(上传)支持,Wifi 5(ac),蓝牙5.0,LPDDR4x 1800 MHz和eMMC 5.1存储的LTE无线电。

CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
SeriesMediatek Mediatek Helio G

Series: Mediatek Helio G Cortex-A75 / A55

Mediatek Helio G881.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G85 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G802 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G702 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock Rate1800 - 2000 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
Manufacturing Technology12 nm
Features2x Cortex-A75, 6x Cortex-A55
GPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 ( - 1000 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date03/30/2020
Product Link (external)www.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU
0.5 pt (37%)
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -7%
0.4442 -6%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4616 -3%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 -2%
0.4641 -2%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -2%
0.4685 -1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 0%
0.4743 0%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4746
0.475 0%
0.4793 1%
0.4795 1%
0.4809 1%
0.4813 1%
0.4915 4%
0.516 9%
0.517 9%
0.53 12%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 174%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 16484     avg: 17640     median: 17640 (15%)     max: 18796 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2533     avg: 2710     median: 2732 (26%)     max: 2886 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2644     avg: 2697     median: 2684 (31%)     max: 2778 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 366     avg: 399.6     median: 403 (10%)     max: 416 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 1251     avg: 1367     median: 1396 (5%)     max: 1449 points
491 -64%
...
907 -34%
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
1011 -26%
1129 -17%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
1172 -14%
Mediatek MT8183
1214 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
1253 -8%
Mediatek Helio G88
1277 -7%
Mediatek MT8788
1284 -6%
Unisoc T7200 (T606)
1364 0%
Mediatek Helio G85
1367
1384 1%
1505 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
1544 13%
Unisoc T7255 (T616)
1553 14%
1688 23%
1781 30%
1809 32%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
1856 36%
1879 37%
...
15016 998%
max:
25760 1784%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 408     avg: 420     median: 423 (13%)     max: 429 points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 1315     avg: 1375     median: 1368 (6%)     max: 1442 points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 335     avg: 356.5     median: 352.5 (14%)     max: 437 points
58 -84%
...
Apple A8
328 -8%
330.5 -7%
344 -4%
346 -3%
347.3 -3%
Unisoc T7255 (T616)
350.9 -2%
351.5 -1%
354 -1%
Mediatek Helio G88
356 0%
Mediatek Helio G85
356.5
Unisoc T7250 (T615)
357 0%
357.3 0%
UNISOC T610
357.3 0%
UNISOC Tangula T740
367 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
374.1 5%
UNISOC Tiger T310
376 5%
380.2 7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)
386 8%
387.5 9%
...
2437 584%
max:
2559 618%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1321     median: 1324.5 (2%)     max: 1456 points
Mediatek MT6580M
248 -81%
...
1240 -6%
UNISOC T610
1264 -4%
1275 -3%
1299 -2%
1308 -1%
1310 -1%
Mediatek Helio G88
1312 -1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
1315 0%
1320 0%
Mediatek Helio G85
1321
1332 1%
1338 1%
1340 1%
1342 2%
Unisoc T7250 (T615)
1350 2%
1356 3%
1368 4%
Mediatek MT8788
1383 5%
Apple A10 Fusion
1403 6%
...
10697 710%
max:
55811 4125%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1662 points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5301 points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1369 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2836 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9944 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4915 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5907 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2711.6     avg: 3334     median: 3466.5 (4%)     max: 3939 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10299     avg: 12959     median: 12745.5 (10%)     max: 15443 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 51     avg: 56     median: 58 (16%)     max: 59 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 43     avg: 45.2     median: 45 (8%)     max: 47 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 33983     avg: 35191     median: 35191 (29%)     max: 36399 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 36589     avg: 37154     median: 37153.5 (30%)     max: 37718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 34679     avg: 39134     median: 39134 (7%)     max: 43589 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 62320     avg: 62867     median: 62866.5 (23%)     max: 63413 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 171116     avg: 174345     median: 174345 (17%)     max: 177574 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 191865     avg: 213512     median: 217448 (11%)     max: 231224 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 62911     avg: 64321     median: 63851 (16%)     max: 66202 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 278813     avg: 280106     median: 280106 (9%)     max: 281399 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 86841     avg: 88909     median: 88908.5 (3%)     max: 90976 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 18.9     avg: 29.8     median: 32.7 (22%)     max: 35 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 199.8     avg: 222.2     median: 221 (6%)     max: 247 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 12.1     avg: 22.4     median: 24.3 (30%)     max: 28.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 274     avg: 278.5     median: 277.5 (8%)     max: 285 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 7835     avg: 12510     median: 12098.5 (5%)     max: 16308 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 6596     avg: 8086     median: 8214.5 (30%)     max: 9437 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5692 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5697 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8655     avg: 8674     median: 8670 (57%)     max: 8698 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 11421     avg: 11655     median: 11655 (58%)     max: 11889 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 280     avg: 350.8     median: 369 (14%)     max: 394 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 3.5     median: 3.7 (2%)     max: 6.28 Watt
012345678910Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.839     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.89 Watt
00.10.20.30.40.60.70.80.911.11.21.31.41.61.71.81.922.1Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.29
log 03. 00:04:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 01 Mar 2025 05:39:52 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.007s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12751 +0.013s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 12751 +0.05s ... 0.071s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.879s ... 0.95s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.95s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.95s

Reviews for the Mediatek Helio G85 processor

联想 Tab TB311FU 评测

联想 Tab 评测--10 英寸平板电脑是学校、大学和起居室的经济实惠的替代品

联想 Tab 是一款结构紧凑、价格实惠的平板电脑,其高分辨率显示屏、坚固的金属外壳和立体声扬声器给人留下了深刻印象。它可用于学校、大学或娱乐。我们将在测试中了解联想 Tab 是否值得购买。...
Mediatek Helio G85 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 10.10" | 424 g
小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 评测

小米红米 Pad SE 8.7 平板电脑评测--与 iPad mini 一样小巧,但价格便宜得多

你已经可以在网上以 100 美元左右的价格买到小米红米 Pad SE 8.7。价格如此低廉的便携式平板电脑是否能同时提供流畅的操作和视频流?我们的评测将揭示我们是买到了便宜货,还是低性能将成为一个问题。...
Mediatek Helio G85 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 8.70" | 373 g
摩托罗拉 Moto G24 智能手机评测--配备 90 赫兹显示屏的迷人手机

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 智能手机评测--配备 90 赫兹显示屏的迷人手机

你可以用不到 200 美元的价格买到摩托罗拉 Moto G24,而不必在 NFC、立体声扬声器和漂亮的外壳上妥协。反过来说,你也不能指望它有最好的性能,但这款经济实惠的手机是否仍然值得一看呢?...
Mediatek Helio G85 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.56" | 181 g
摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测--一款经济实惠、电池寿命长的手机

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测--一款经济实惠、电池寿命长的手机

摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 配备超大容量电池,即使在远离电源插座的地方,也能让您长时间工作和上网。这款智能手机还具有许多其他优点,如强大的内存和存储配置以及 90Hz 显示屏。...
Mediatek Helio G85 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.56" | 197 g
小米红米 13C 智能手机评测--设计新颖、存储容量大的廉价手机

小米红米 13C 智能手机评测--设计新颖、存储容量大的廉价手机

在红米 12C 在某些方面显得有些落伍之后,目前的小米红米 13C 旨在重新夺回平价智能手机的宝座。包括相当大的功率、大量存储空间和 90Hz 屏幕。这足以让它成功复出吗?...
Mediatek Helio G85 | ARM Mali-G52 MP2 | 6.74" | 192 g

Xiaomi Redmi 12C: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米红米12C智能手机评测--速度快,但在某些方面过时了

Motorola Moto G13: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G13评测--带NFC的经济实惠的智能手机

Motorola Moto G23: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G23智能手机评测--为中端产品提供充足的内存

Blackview Tab 13: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  Review » Blackview Tab 13评测--4G平板电脑有很多配件和恼人的应用程序

Cubot KingKong Mini 3: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  Review » Cubot KingKong Mini 3评测 - 具有可靠品质的紧凑型智能手机

Motorola Moto G41: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G41评测--带OIS和750尼特的OLED智能手机,价格很高

Motorola Moto G31: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G31智能手机评论。以牺牲一些功能为代价的OLED显示屏

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米Redmi Note 8 2021评论。有问题的智能手机刷新为推荐?

Gigaset GS5: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  Review » Gigaset GS5评论 - 温和的升级,在德国的智能手机

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  Review » 红米Note 9智能手机评测:有着6400万四摄的红米9

Oukitel WP35s: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Oukitel WP35s

Honor X6b: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X6b

Samsung Galaxy A06: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A06

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 8.70", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches

Vivo Y18: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y18

Vivo Y18s: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y18s

Realme C65: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme C65

Vivo Y03: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y03

Motorola Moto G24: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G24

Motorola Moto G24 Power: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G24 Power

Coolpad Cool 20+: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Coolpad Cool 20+

Oppo A18: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A18

Vivo Y27: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.64", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y27

Xiaomi Poco C65: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.74", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco C65

Xiaomi Redmi 13C: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.74", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 13C

Samsung Galaxy A05: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A05

Vivo Y17s: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y17s

Oppo A38: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A38

Infinix Note 30i: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.66", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 30i

Motorola Moto G Stylus 2023: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Stylus 2023

Xiaomi Poco C55: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco C55

Blackview Oscal S80: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Oscal S80

Volla Phone 22: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Volla Phone 22

Motorola Moto G23: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G23

Motorola Moto G13: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G13

Xiaomi Redmi 12C: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 12C

Blackview BV7200: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.10", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV7200

Cubot Pocket 3: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot Pocket 3

Cubot KingKong Mini 3: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 4.50", 0.1 kg
  External Review » Cubot KingKong Mini 3

Infinix Hot 20: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 20

Blackview BV7100: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.58", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview BV7100

Vivo Y22: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y22

Blackview Tab 13: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 10.10", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Blackview Tab 13

Gigaset GS5 Lite: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GS5 Lite

Wiko T50: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Wiko T50

Infinix Note 12i: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 12i

Infinix Hot 12: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 12

Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.52", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro

Motorola Moto G41: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G41

Infinix Note 11i: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 11i

Motorola Moto G31: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G31

Gigaset GS5: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Gigaset GS5

Realme Narzo 50A: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 50A

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021

Infinix Note 10: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Note 10

Realme C25s: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C25s

Infinix Hot 10S: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Infinix Hot 10S

Realme Narzo 30A: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 30A

Realme Narzo 20: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 20

Realme 7i: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 7i

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 9

Lenovo Tab: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 10.10", 0.4 kg
   » 联想 Tab - 配备全高清屏幕的小巧平板电脑,包括卫星定位功能。

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Mediatek Helio G

» Mediatek Helio G100
   8x 2 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G99
   8x 2 GHz - 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G96
   8x 2 GHz - 2.05 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G95
   8x 2 GHz - 2.05 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G90T
   8x 2.05 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G88
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G85
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G80
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G70
   8x 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G37
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G35
   8x 2.3 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G36
   8x 2.2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G25
   8x 2 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Unisoc T7225 (T612)
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
+ UNISOC T610
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
+ Unisoc T7200 (T606)
   8x 1.6 GHz
+ UNISOC Tangula T700
   8x 1.8 GHz - 1.8 GHz
+ Mediatek Helio G88
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
» Mediatek Helio G85
   8x 1.8 GHz - 2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
   8x 2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio G80
   8x 2 GHz
- Mediatek Helio G70
   8x 2 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 710
   8x 2.2 GHz
- HiSilicon Kirin 710A
   8x 2 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-11-25)