Microsoft Lumia 650
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, 广角)
Price comparison
Average of 18 scores (from 27 reviews)
Reviews for the Microsoft Lumia 650
主流微软。 来自微软的最新Lumia 650希望通过有竞争力的定价和Windows操作系统征服用户。这家来自雷德蒙德的生产商特别将标枪对准了商务用户。由于较慢的硬件,它的表现一般,同时也缺少对Windows Continuum功能的支持。
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The 600 series within the Lumia line-up has always been where the best of budget and premium combine to offer something distinctive. From the 620 through to the 640, these have been popular, powerful devices. The Lumia 650 is a different beast. It's the experience of using this phone that sets it apart. The lovely in-hand feel, the dependable camera, the decent battery life, the surprisingly good speakers and the mostly smooth day-to-day operation are all key to what a good smartphone experience should be.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Microsoft Lumia 650 provides a mostly adequate experience, making it a solid choice for an entry-level Windows 10 handset. It's nicely put together and handles well. The screen and speaker are of good quality and make for enjoyable multimedia. The hardware is competent enough to ensure smooth basic functionality, though it isn't capable of more than that. For an entry-level phone, the Lumia 650 delivered better photo quality than we expected, but then there's the borderline unusable camcorder.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There’s plenty to like about the Lumia 650. It offers up a great design that makes it look and feel far more expensive than it actually is, and the OLED screen is one of the best I’ve seen on an affordable smartphone. While I’m still not convinced that Windows 10 Mobile is great for general consumers, for business users the Lumia 650 ticks all the right boxes.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 40% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In its second generation since going solo, the Microsoft lineup is keeping up the ambition and drive. It's obviously the flagship that sets the tone but the lower ranks do have a purpose in the greater scheme as well. Especially when you consider that Microsoft intends to have a lot fewer devices in its portfolio this time around.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2016
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In some ways Microsoft has its upped standards, but only at a surface level. The screen and metal-rimmed design make a great first impression, but the slow performance and water-treading hardware in other areas make it seem less of a smart buy than several Androids around the same price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: It Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Without the draw of Windows 10 Continuum, it feels like the Lumia 650 is perpetually on the back foot. It never really makes the most of its new operating system, and there's very little to distinguish it from its Windows Phone 8-based predecessors apart from its metal frame and beautiful OLED display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Still, the interface is smooth, apps (people, phone) load quick, scrolling through long lists was a breeze. The camera interface was reasonably snappy too. The browser takes its time to re-render the page as you pan and zoom, though. That's what you get with a low-power chipset and a single gig of RAM.
video review
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/23/2016
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The build quality of the Lumia 650 is decent enough for the money and the screen, despite being 720p, does its job well. There's a heft to the handset that makes it feel strong, like it will last. Limitations to processing power, camera resolution and connectivity really pull the phone down. Yes the price is low at £150, but without Windows 10 Continuum, 4G or 1080p video recording it'll be a no go for some.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/22/2016
Source: PC Pro EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
After first setting eyes on its slim form and understated design, I wanted to like the Microsoft Lumia 650. Its screen is great, the camera isn’t bad and there are plenty of elements of Windows 10 Mobile that I like. But it's completely spoiled by Microsoft's decision to hobble the performance of the phone by shoehorning in a processor so low on power that not even Windows Phone can make it look good.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is such a shame, as this would have been a great Windows phone if only it had a decent processor inside it. Battery life was very respectable at 11h 36m in our continuous video playback test with the screen brightness set to 170cd/m2, and its screen and build quality are practically second to none in its price range. However, when it's so crippled by its bad choice of chipset, the Lumia 650 just can't measure up to its infinitely superior predecessor. If you're looking for a cheap Windows handset, the Lumia 640 is still your best choice, as you can now pick one up for £120 SIM-free or £90 on pre-pay. The only silver lining is that this could be the basis for a great mid-range Windows phone just around the corner.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
However, the limited performance and lack of killer features such as Continuum make it difficult to recommend as a business device, especially as the competition from the Android market is very strong. For less money you can grab a Moto G, Wileyfox Swift or Vodafone Prime Ultra, which offer excellent features and dependable performance. And if you’re dead set on Windows, you can still pick up last year’s brilliant Lumia 640 LTE for under £100.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% mobility: 67%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 82% performance: 68% features: 48% display: 94% mobility: 53%
Source: SFT - Heft 8/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2016
Source: PocketPC DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2016
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Expert Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/20/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 08/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Connect - Heft 5/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2016
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 63%
Source: Teltarif DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 90% workmanship: 93% ergonomy: 84%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 304:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
212 APQ8009: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00": 这是常见的智能手机对角线尺寸。» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.