Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix autofocus, rear
Price comparison
Average of 26 scores (from 39 reviews)
Reviews for the Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
没有风扇的i5版本Surface Pro性能上明显不如i7版本,而且续航也没有多大提升。但这换来的是完全的静音和低了不少的价格,这是否能让它成为适合大家的主流Windows平板电脑呢?
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Surface Pro 6 isn't for everyone. It's for people who will truly benefit from having a detachable 2-in-1 that's light enough to carry anywhere and flexible enough to use as a tablet or laptop.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Microsoft hasn’t broken any new ground with the Surface Pro 6 unless you consider the quad-core 8th-gen processors to be a breakthrough.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you are considering buying a Surface Pro then yes, this is the best yet. Great screen, battery and power to burn. It is still the one although I love the HP Envy x2 and ASUS Zen. I will be anxiously awaiting a review of HP’s new luxury leather Folio x2 just released.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 78% performance: 79% workmanship: 100%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The sixth-gen Pro is the best to date thanks largely to improved battery life. However, the familiar form factor, bezels that are larger than competitors' equivalents, and lack of USB-C port feels like this Surface is holding back from what's around the corner.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Regrettably, the Surface Pro 6 carries on the repair, or un-repairability tradition scoring 1-out-of-10. While that is not good, it is due to copious amounts of hot melt glue and almost everything inside being surface mounted. While batteries are replaceable, the path to get there is fraught with danger.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With a slight power boost and a new color choice, the Microsoft Surface Pro 6 may not have changed much from the previous iteration, but what we loved then, we still love now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Microsoft's Surface Pro 6 is the latest iteration of its iconic Windows tablet, complete with an 8th-generation, quad-core chip inside of it. While it's nearly identical to earlier Surface Pro versions, that means its design remains one of the best—plus, it offers very good battery life compared to similar competition.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The latest Surface Pro tablet doesn't make any radical design changes, but the performance jump makes it viable as a mainstream performance laptop replacement.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Surface Pro 6 isn’t for everyone but it’s a very capable two-in-one tablet.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Surface Pro 6 is the complete tablet PC package: It’s fast, light and has a great keyboard cover. But that was also true of last year’s model. And it’s facing stiffer competition this year from the Surface Go.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Set aside what the Surface Pro 6 should be, though, and what you have is this: Microsoft’s implicit statement that the Surface Pro lineup has reached its zenith, and needs no further improvement save for periodic upgrades. HP and Lenovo would probably disagree. I stand by what I said in my review of the Surface Pro (2017): You can’t go wrong buying a Surface Pro 6. But you might be able to do better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/16/2018
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Microsoft Surface Pro 6 is all about performance improvements tied with a shiny new color scheme. Beyond that, not much – if anything – has changed.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 80% display: 92% mobility: 82%
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/22/2019
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/01/2019
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/26/2019
Source: Ofertaman ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/03/2019
Source: Hipertextual ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 88% display: 93% mobility: 90% workmanship: 93% ergonomy: 88%
Source: PC Guia PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2019
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Webnews.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% performance: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Webnews.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/03/2018
Source: Techzine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Fredzone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 75% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 95%
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Source: Zive CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Dinside NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Lyd og Billede DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Tweak.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Alt om Data DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 50% performance: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Comment
Intel UHD Graphics 620:
集成显卡(GT2,24 EU),可以在一些Kaby-Lake-Refresh 中央处理器型号(15 W ULV系列)上找到。技术上与之前名为HD Graphics 620的Kaby-Lake的显卡相同。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
i5-8250U:
基于Kaby-Lake-Refresh的低功耗四核处理器。这四个内核的频率介于1.6和3.4 GHz之间(Turbo Boost),并支持超线程。集成GPU的时钟频率介于300和1,100 MHz之间。 SoC采用14nm + FinFET工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
12.30":
这个屏幕尺寸对于平板来说略大,而对亚笔记本来说稍小。一些变形本采用了这个尺寸的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
0.781 kg: 大体上,大尺寸平板电脑或变形本的重量介于这个水平之间。
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.