Motorola Moto E 1. Gen 2014

Old Moto E vs New Moto E (2nd generation): Why the 2015 Moto E is the most smartphone you can buy for £109
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The screen is bigger, it has double the storage, a quad-core processor, support for 4G and a front-facing camera. It’s a very easy choice between the old and new Moto E: the second generation phone is another winner.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/04/2015

Lumia 535 vs Moto E comparison: the best cheap smartphone you can buy
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Right now there is only one choice: that of the Moto E. But come the new year when the Lumia 535 is in town you will have a tough choice. It is likely that the Lumia 535 will cost a little more. But it has better storage and camera, and a bigger (if not sharper) screen. These are both great cheap phones - your choice will likely depend on your preference of Windows Phone or Android. But even as an Android user I'd say that when the Lumia 535 is available it will likely be the better deal. Just. (See also: Moto E price, specs, release date, features.)
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/18/2014

90% Motorola Moto E
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
A well placed fingernail will remove the back to allow you to insert a micro SIM and a micro SD card. The latest entry level phone offering from the company that first brought you a SmartPhone at a price that broke through the glass ceiling. Here is a smart phone that has corners cut to produce something acceptable at a lower price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 80%

Moto G2 (2014) vs Moto E comparison review: New Moto G is worth the extra cash
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It's unsurprising that the Moto G2 is a better phone than the Moto E and we recommend spending the extra if you can afford it for the better screen, camera, processor, storage, battery life and stereo speakers. The one caveat is that neither phone supports 4G so look elsewhere (Moto G 4G, for example) if this is a must.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/22/2014

Motorola Moto E Smartphone Review
Source: Techspot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto E isn’t a device suited to power users. It isn’t a device for people that demand the best hardware or a suite of crazy features. It is, however, a great entry-level handset that gives you all the necessities in a simple, functional package for a very attractive price. Crucially, the necessities aren’t hampered by terrible software or laggy performance, which typically haunt cheap Android smartphones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/25/2014

Nokia Lumia 530 vs Motorola Moto E: Windows vs Android for best budget phone
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Choosing between the Nokia Lumia 530 and Motorola Moto E is difficult. I'm a seasoned Android user, but I like what I see in Windows Phone 8.1. And without that tired old Windows Phone lacks apps argument (the Motorola Moto E doesn't have enough built-in storage to take full advantage of what Google Play and third-party developers have to offer), there is nothing that you might expect of a budget smartphone that either Windows Phone or Android are unable to do. In many respects these two phones are very evenly matched. The Motorola Moto E stands out for its display, while the Nokia Lumia 530 is the winner on the storage front. And the Lumia 530 absolutely wins on the pricing - you cannot argue at £60.
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/19/2014

70% Review: Motorola Moto E
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Using the Moto E is just like using a Google Nexus phone, which should come as no surprise to people since Motorola was previously owned by Google. As a result of that ownership (and collaboration), the Moto E runs Android pretty much just like its brother, the Moto X, with Android the way Google envisioned it, complete with widgetised home screens, a lock screen, Google’s own drop-down notification bar, and an apps menu with tabs for apps and widgets. It’s a pretty simple interface, and it is even one of the most up-to-date ones you’ll find, with an update rolled out to our handset mid-review bringing the Moto E up to Android 4.4.4, higher than the version running on this reviewer’s flagship handsets at the time.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/11/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 60% workmanship: 80%

70% Motorola Moto E
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall I reasonably impressed with this smartphone’s performance although it does fall short of the Moto G. I was disappointed that I was unable to get the Moto E to work with OTG. Perhaps this feature will be implemented with the promised one major Android software update that Motorola made regarding this product.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/02/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60%

90% Motorola Moto E review
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
All said and done the Moto E gives plenty of bang for your buck. But it sits in a busy market, and one that's already dominated by Motorola. That, in part, is the Moto E's undoing, because we would still opt to spend a little more cash and buy the 4G Moto G instead. But that can't detract from the Moto E's successes: it's a great phone available at a great price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 90%

Moto E Review: you get what you pay for...and a little more
Source: Mobileburn EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Motorola has rested its hat on delivering the most phone possible for the least money necessary. The company cut corners on the Moto X and focused on software, then cut even more corners with the Moto G and focused on price. With the Moto E, it's raced to lower depths and still managed to create a phone worth buying. That's because the Moto E costs only $129 without a contract. At that price, no other smartphone comes close. I'd recommend anyone considering a Moto E aim a little higher and get the Moto G if they can afford it, but for someone whose first priority is the budget, the Moto E is the best option. The camera is abysmal and the form is a little shaky, but the Moto E is good in so many other key areas that it's hard to not be impressed by how good a phone can be even when aiming to go downmarket.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2014

Motorola Moto E review: Have a break!
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Well, we've come to the end of this review and we are happy to report that the Moto E is another bulls-eye by Motorola. It's not the best performer out there, but it packs a serious punch for the least amount of money. We especially appreciated the unspoiled Android OS and the solid promise for timely updates. The camera is certainly a letdown, but not everybody needs a good camera. What everybody would get with the Moto E is a solid user experience and great bang-for-buck ratio, and that's what counts.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/14/2014

Moto E review: The low-end phone that Android deserves
Source: Androidbeat EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto E comes with a non-removable 1980mAh battery that provides more than enough juice for the handset to make it through a day of heavy usage. Even when using two SIM cards with a lot of phone calls and Google Drive usage, the Moto E easily lasted a day for me with 35% juice still left at the end of the day. The Moto E is truly a remarkable device for the price it’s selling at. Just like the Moto G, it bests the competition in nearly every possible aspect, except for the camera, and makes other low-end devices feel downright awful.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/10/2014

Motorola Moto E Review: Flawed Affordability
Source: Slashgear EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As a gateway to reliable Android ownership, however, the Moto E packs an impressive punch. Camera aside, I’d struggle to fault Motorola’s decisions in specifications, and while the design is uninspiring, it’s at least well put together. That counts for a lot, and I can’t help but welcome a company looking to innovate as much in price as it does in whiz-bang hardware.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/09/2014

70% Motorola Moto E
Source: Wired Magazine EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The question I kept asking myself was: Is this your primary phone? Despite the low price, when you factor in a phone bill, I think the answer is not yet. Even if you buy the Moto E off contract, you’ll still need a voice and data plan to use it. And given how much you’ll spend on that every month, it probably makes more sense to spend, say, the $70 more to buy an unlocked Moto G. But if you want a beater phone to take adventuring, or need something to fill in for a broken device until you reach the end of your contract, this is a great option.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/06/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%

70% Moto E Review: Best Entry-Level Android Phone Among Reputed Brands
Source: Techtree.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto E is priced aggressively at Rs 7000. No other Android handset from a top-tier manufacturer can currently compete with the Moto E. Despite a few niggles, we would like to recommend for its sharp display and impressive performance. Plus, latest Android Kitkat further sweetens the deal. The only potential deal breaker here are the camera and shoddy craftsmanship. The bottom-line is that if you’re looking for an entry-level Android smartphone from a reputed brand, Moto E is your only option. If you’re open to try out other platforms, the Lumia 520 is a better build handset that offers much polished smartphone experience.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/06/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 70% workmanship: 50%

80% Motorola Moto E review
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If a £90 Nexus existed, it would look a lot like the Moto E. This isn’t just Android for the masses, it’s tidy, reliable, loveable Android for the masses. No, it isn’t perfect. But considering we’re yet to meet a mobile device that is, this Moto is £90 (£80 on O2) well spent. Its main flaw is its camera, but until you get to around the £200 mark, almost every handset disappoints in this department - including Motorola’s own Moto G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% workmanship: 80%

Nokia Lumia 520 review - a cheap Windows Phone 8 smartphone with a lot to offer
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Lumia 520 vs Motorola Moto E comparison review: best cheap smartphones you can buy in the UK in 2014 There is little to choose between the Moto E and the Lumia 520. Indeed, the chief thing to note is that these are both great handsets at a remarkably low price. The Lumia 520 is thinner and lighter, and comes in multiple colours. The Moto E is marginally cheaper and more powerful. And it has a bigger, better display. You will make your own choice, but for us the combination of that display and the greater flexibility of Android makes us choose the Moto E.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2014

80% Motorola Moto E review
Source: Expert Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Camera issues aside, the Moto E is a great phone for its price. The Moto G may have a better screen and a marginally better camera, but the Moto E has a longer-lasting battery and helpful new apps. Whether you're looking to buy your child their first phone or just want a superb budget handset for yourself, the Moto E is an excellent choice and is a worthy alternative to the Moto G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/27/2014
Rating: Total score: 80%

80% Motorola Moto E Review
Source: Think Digit EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you are looking for a reliable smartphone under a budget of Rs.10,000 then look no further. Yes, we agree that the camera quality is poor and skipping the LED flash and front facing camera was a huge blunder. But in the end, Moto E proves to be a sturdy and nimble little smartphone with a solid build quality and decent performance capability.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 60% workmanship: 80%

82% Where very good meets very cheap
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's no two ways about it -- the Moto E is exciting, if not in the way most mobile buffs would like. You really shouldn't underestimate the sort of world-shaking power that can come from making something that's both very good and very cheap. So what if the spec sheet is a bit passé?
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/26/2014
Rating: Total score: 82%

Motorola Moto E vs Moto G video review: What's the best budget smartphone?
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G has been PC Advisor's best budget smartphone for a while but Motorola has come along with an even cheaper model in the Moto E. Watch our Moto E vs Moto G video review to see how the two budget smartphones compare. See also: What's the best budget smartphone.
video review
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2014

80% Motorola Moto E review: £89 budget smartphone sets new bar
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Motorola set a new benchmark for the budget smartphone with the Moto G but has gone even lower on price with the Moto E. Although we're impressed with the Moto E which will make a great first or spare smartphone, it's worth paying the extra for the Moto G which is now £99 on PAYG.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 70% features: 60% workmanship: 80%

70% Moto E review: Redefining the budget smartphone
Source: Greenbot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It likely won’t take the Moto E very long to prove its worth to the world, emerging market or not. It proves itself by being a great backup phone you can buy without issue off-contract and may be a good option for the first-time smartphone buyer. Motorola’s strategy to tackle the low-end market may not be the most glamorous, but it sure looks like this model is doing well for the company. The Moto E stays light on its feet and easy on the pocket, making it a low-end force to be reckoned with.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%

80% Motorola Moto E review
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Motorola Moto E sits in a tricky spot. Among its sub-£100 peers, it offers better basics than the competition. The screen, software and design are great for the price. But if you’re willing to pay a little more, you get a significant bump-up in quality by moving up to the Moto G. Its screen is better, its camera much more versatile and there are very real benefits in moving up to a quad-core Snapdragon 400 CPU from the Moto E’s dual-core Snapdragon 200.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%

100% Motorola Moto E
Source: Gadgets Now EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Motorola just keeps on stunning us with its low price mobiles: quite how the company can be making a profit on the Moto E is beyond us, but that’s only for them to worry about, not you. All you need to know is that this is the best phone you can buy for under £100 right now, and in a few weeks, perhaps it’ll even hit the £50 point. This isn’t just a budget smartphone: it’s a back up smartphone, an emergency smartphone, a holiday smartphone, a why-haven’t-you-bought-one-yet smartphone? Your move, everyone else.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 100%

90% Motorola Moto E review: The only sensible choice under Rs 10,000
Source: Tech2.in.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At a crazy price of under Rs 7,000, you can see why the Moto E has been a mega hit. Apart from being a handset from a reputed OEM, with extensive after sales support, you don’t feel short-changed when it comes to the features and performance. If you’re going to diss the Moto E because of its sub-par camera and the fact that it doesn’t have a front-facing one, then you’re missing the point.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2014
Rating: Total score: 90%

Motorola Moto E: Brill budget blower with one bothersome blunder
Source: Reg Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While others might not care so much about a front-facing camera, I find its absence actually annoys me and knocks some of the shine off a device that I'd otherwise be very enthusiastic about. As it stands, unless you are after a backup handset, are confident that you will never have a use for a webcam or are truly skint, I’d suggest saving up the extra £70 and buying the 4G Moto G.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2014

Motorola Moto E, First Take: Great value, but only one camera
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Motorola may have caused a mini-revolution with the first-generation Moto G, but the Moto E has been built to even tighter financial constraints, and that shows. There are plenty of good things about this £89 handset, but there are clear opportunities for a competitor to improve on some aspects. Also, the £149 Moto G with 4G (LTE) connectivity, a front-facing camera and 8GB of internal storage may prove to be a bigger draw for those who are prepared to spend a bit more money.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/19/2014

70% Motorola Moto E Review: Fresh Competition in the Budget Segment
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
What Motorola has done with the Moto E is let loose a performance beast in the sub-10k range of smartphones. It might have a bad camera, but in every other respect the Moto E trumps its competition by a large margin. The only other smartphone that comes close is the Nokia Lumia 525 (review) which runs Windows Phone 8, is more expensive, and has a limited number of applications in the app store.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2014
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%

70% Motorola Moto E (Unlocked)
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Like the Moto G before it, the Moto E proves once again that low cost doesn't have to mean low quality. Motorola makes a compelling case for the end of the feature phone, but the Moto E will inevitably face limited appeal, at least here in the U.S. where subsidized phone prices and contract-bound plans still rule the day. The Moto E is an ideal starter smartphone, though, and is far more polished than similarly priced competitors. T-Mobile and MVNO subscribers, and especially parents looking to get a smartphone for their kids, should consider the Moto E. It's also worth taking a look at the Nokia Lumia 520/521, which goes for $100 or less online, but is network locked, and Windows Phone might not be for everyone.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/16/2014
Rating: Total score: 70%

60% Motorola Moto E
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The $129 Moto E packs a lot of promise into a very affordable device. You get a pure Android experience in a compact and durable design. Plus, you can swap out the back cover for other colors if you're looking for a little more personality. However, there are some things missing here, such as a front camera, a flash for the back camera and LTE connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2014
Rating: Total score: 60%

Best budget smartphone 2014: Motorola Moto G vs Motorola Moto E comparison review
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
You might have come to our Motorola Moto G vs Motorola Moto E comparison review wondering why on earth we are comparing the specifications of two smartphones from the same company with a £60 price difference; clearly the more expensive Motorola Moto G is going to best the £89 Moto E on the hardware front. Actually, what we've learned is that although the Motorola Moto G has the better specification, the Moto E's hardware is sufficient that it will be a great fit for many users - and especially so when you consider that those in the market for a budget smartphone don't expect to get ultimate performance. The Motorola Moto E might not have as good a screen or as much storage or processing- and graphics power as the Moto G, nor its support for 4G and microSD expansion. But it does do everything most people will require, and at a staggeringly good price. It truly looks to be the best budget smartphone money can buy.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 05/14/2014

Motorola Moto E hands-on review: £89 budget smartphone sets new bar
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Motorola set a new benchmark for the budget smartphone with the Moto G but has gone even lower on price with the Moto E. This smartphone is well built and has decent specs for just £89 so there's little not to like. Check back for a full review soon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2014

Motorola Moto E review: Hands-on
Source: T3 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The price is clearly the big selling-point here, and whilst there are plenty of sub-£100 smartphones out there Motorola has clearly thought about what can make the Moto E a considerably better option that perhaps some of its rivals. The loss of a front-facing camera is a decision that could come back to kick Motorola but it's certainly not the end of the world, for now though we'll say that from spending a short amount of time with the Moto E it certainly feels like a mid-range smartphone which is probably what Motorola is hoping for.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/13/2014

80% Hands on: Motorola Moto E review A dinky dialler that's got a lot to shout about
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The low budget smartphone market is starting to get interesting as some genuinely good phones, such as the Moto G and EE Kestrel, are coming out at low price points. But while both those phones are cheap they're still more expensive than the Moto E. For £90 or less there are very few compelling options and when it comes to Android handsets at that price I'd argue that there's nothing else out there as good as the Moto E. It's undeniably basic but it looks good, has a decent screen and it runs well. At this price you can't ask for more than that.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2014
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 70% features: 60% workmanship: 70%

Motorola Moto E
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Motorola Moto E is not as exciting a phone as its bigger brother. Its specs are more ordinary, its screen more commonplace. But if networks eat enough into the £89 ‘suggested’ price when the phone is locked to a network or tied in with buying £10 of credit, we could be looking at another class-leading budget Android phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/13/2014

92% Motorola Moto E
Source: Chip Test & Kauf - Heft Nr. 6/2014
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 92% emissions: 85%

Motorola patzt an den falschen Stellen
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/18/2014

86% Der KitKat-Einsteiger
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2014
Rating: Total score: 86% price: 92% mobility: 89%

90% Motorola Moto E im Test: Das kleine Komplettpaket zum günstigen Preis
Source: Mobicroco DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/23/2014
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 85%

Gut, aber nicht konkurrenzlos
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2014

在一些Snapdragon 200整合芯片中使用的集成显卡，提供了6个着色器，运行于400MHz。