Motorola Moto G7 Power
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 8 MP, ƒ/2.2, 1.12um Pixel, Displayblitz
Price comparison
Average of 26 scores (from 50 reviews)
Reviews for the Motorola Moto G7 Power
On paper, the Motorola Moto G7 Power is all about battery life. Motorola promises up to 60 hours of battery life from a single charge, but the device shares many traits with its G7 siblings like its glass back and Snapdragon 632 SoC. Read on to find out how the latest Moto G7 model to enter our offices fares in our tests and whether it lives up to expectations.
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G7 Power is not a flashy device. For the most part, it's a fine option for a cheap phone, with performance that's serviceable (so long as you don't game) and a software experience and selection of features that are among the finest in its class.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G7 Power is not a flashy device. For the most part, it's a fine option for a cheap phone, with performance that's serviceable (so long as you don't game) and a software experience and selection of features that are among the finest in its class.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/04/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G7 Power isn’t a bad phone and as I said earlier, had I not recently used the G7 which was only $50 more in cost – it would probably have rated far higher for me. The problem is that Motorola have proven that they can do far better than this on the camera and screen which is a little disappointing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/11/2019
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
For my money, I'd skip the regular G7's frivolous features, save $50 and go for the G7 Power. The peace of mind of having a phone that lasts an eternity is worth it. While the Nokia 7.1 offers a more premium design and better camera if you have more to spend, anyone chiefly concerned about battery life and looking for a device under $300 needn't look further than the G7 Power.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Both the G7 and the G7 Power offer great devices for Moto to add to its lineup for 2019. However, they target a need for two different people depending on their preference. Do you want a sleeker design with slightly better internals, screen, and camera? Then you should buy the G7 standard.
Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To me, the G7 Power really feels like the Moto G7 to get. Its battery life is incredible and worth the cost-cutting that Motorola did elsewhere. When you’ve got a $250 phone that’s plenty good at a smartphone’s core duties and can handily outlast a Galaxy S10 Plus or iPhone XR, that’s pretty special.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Buy it. The Moto G7 Power isn't pretty, but it's powerful enough and has superior battery life. Those looking for a more-premium midrange handset should consider Nokia's 7.1, but if all you need is a long-lasting smartphone under $300, this is your best bet.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G7 and Moto G7 Power offer excellent value. You're getting a great design, modern features, and clean and fast software. For the price, Motorola elegantly balances performance and features without making too many compromises. The Moto G7 will give you the best that Motorola has to offer in the G7 series while the Moto G7 Power focuses on extended battery life.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Motorola Moto G7 Power offers excellent performance, two-day battery life, and an attractive design for a budget-friendly price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If the Moto G7 Power was the only device to come out from the G7 series, maybe along with the G7 Play, I'd say it's a solid device. But sadly, it sits aside the G7, which only costs $50 more. The Moto G7 is more stylish, has more RAM, has a better camera, has a better display, has better audio, and more. Motorola also still sells the Moto G6, which has a 1080p display, along with a 64GB storage and 4GB RAM variant, and that only costs $199.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/31/2019
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Earlier this month, I reviewed the Moto G7, and once again it sets the bar for the mid-range. But Motorola launched a variety of G7 devices, and now I've got my hands on the Moto G7 Power.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/23/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While its camera and design won't blow away users of high-end phones, the Moto G7 Power's impressive battery size and specs make it a compelling option for users on a budget. Not all its features are immediately intuitive, which holds the phone back from greatness.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, Moto is not doing anything extraordinary, but it does not need to: the new Moto phones are an evolution in terms of design with thinner bezels and more stylish looks, they are faster with the Snapdragon 6xx series of chips, and they work reliably, with a clean and likeable interface.
Comparison, online available, Length Unknown, Date: 02/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G7 Power has a lot of strings to its bow. It sits at the affordable end of the Android spectrum, providing unbeatable battery power at a great price point. There's a big display, expandable storage, bloat-free software, and enough power to attack most things - even if you need to let the settings slide.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Obviously, the Moto G7 Power isn't the most powerful smartphone in its price bracket. Motorola is no Xiaomi or Realme, so we never really expected for Moto to match their budget offers. And yet, the Power comes very close, which is quite the surprise.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The perfect solution for those tired of phones that empty their batteries, and your bank account, too quickly.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Offering a near-unskinned version of Android, solid specs for the money and a giant 5000mAh cell, the Moto G7 Power may not be cutting-edge, or the most alluring phone on the market. However, if it can deliver on Motorola’s battery claims then it could be one of the best sub-£200 phones to arrive this year.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G7 Power is a decent budget phone with a colossal 5,000mAh battery, a feature that is far and away the most exciting thing about the phone.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2019
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Spiegel Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: c't - 6/19
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Arturogoga ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2019
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/11/2019
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2019
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/17/2019
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2019
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/17/2019
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 79% display: 65% mobility: 95% workmanship: 69%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 85% display: 65% mobility: 100% workmanship: 75%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/21/2019
Source: Mobil DK DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 69% display: 50% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 632: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.20":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.