Motorola Moto G8 Power
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix , ƒ/2.0, 1 µm
Price comparison
Average of 25 scores (from 41 reviews)
Reviews for the Motorola Moto G8 Power
摩托罗拉(Motorola)通过Moto G8 Power完善了具有长续航的廉价智能手机的概念。 它的硬件不仅适合日常使用,而且还具有令人惊讶的优质相机。 继续阅读以了解Moto G8 Power除了续航和像样的相机以外还提供什么。
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite their similar names and large-capacity batteries, there are more differences than similarities between these two phones. The more affordable handset doesn't always come off worse -- if you need two SIMs and MicroSD expansion, then look to the £149.99 G8 Power Lite. But the Lite model's screen is disappointing and the processor is underpowered, and it's noticeably larger and more unwieldy. So if your budget stretches the extra £70, we recommend the £219.99 Moto G8 Power.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 06/15/2020
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G8 Power is a solid budget phone that performs better than its price would suggest. Motorola has added more cameras, and refined its look to mimic the flourishes of flagship smartphones, including smaller bezels and a punch-hole in the display for the selfie camera. Moto purists may be dismayed by the departure from the line’s signature design, but the phone’s performance, cameras, and extensive battery life should endear it to folks looking for a solid phone at a low cost.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Motorola's market share has been on the up and up here in the US, and its staple G-series of phones was recently enriched with three new budget models - the G8 Power, G8 Power Lite and the G8 itself. Just like the G7 series last year, they differ by battery capacity, among other specs, and come at budget phone prices, carrying big displays with them. Needless to say, the Power models stand for long battery life, as both ship with 5000mAh packs, and we found the new Motos to deliver some record longevity in our benchmark tests indeed. If you are looking for a budget phone with an incredible battery life and a great price, the Moto G8 Power seems to be the way to go.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
This is the latest offering from Motorola the Moto g8; it can work using the three buttons at the base of the screen or after a single click in Settings with ‘Gestures’. Unlike a lot of recent phones this still has a 3.5mm socket for headphones or earbuds. It also comes with a clear cover for the back and sides for protection for the odd drop.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes, you can go out there and get yourself a phone with a blazing fast processor. Yes, you can get one that costs nearly £1,000 and has a stack of cameras and a whole bucket-full of tricks. But what if you want one that doesn’t cost the Earth and has a really decent battery life?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 82%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The G8 Power has a large battery and a nice screen but these are no longer enough to make for a truly compelling smartphone offer. What we miss here is more fluid performance and better camera image quality. In their current implementation, they are not up to the level of the competition in this price range.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you've got a budget of around £200 then this a great choice, it's good across the board, with an excellent battery, and a good screen. The camera is decent and very versatile, while performance matches that of other phones in the same price bracket.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
With a big battery and simple specs, the Moto G8 Power will last for days without breaking a sweat. On the downside it’s not much of a looker, it can get a little sluggish, and while the main camera lens is fine the additional shooters don’t add much. This price point is all about priorities though, so if battery is yours then look no further.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you're shopping on a budget: the Moto G8 Power is the class-leading affordable phone with an immense battery. It improves upon the G7 in most departments - screen, design, storage - with its only real lackings being no NFC and slow Wi-Fi.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: What Mobile EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Personally what lets this phone down is the fact you do not get NFC support for contactless payment and at the time of writing this review, we are in the middle of the coronavirus outbreak. Wireless payments have never been more important and this phone not supporting NFC is a big negative in my opinion. However, if you can look past that downfall this phone is a decent mid-range with a good camera and long-life battery being the key reasons you would buy this phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the Moto G8 Power isn’t quite as impressive or affordable as its predecessor, and somewhat eclipsed by the G8 Plus, it’s still well worth considering if battery life is a priority.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Moto G8 Power is an exciting proposition: while there will be plenty of devices boosting their specs in 2020, this is a phone that focuses on what really matters - battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2020
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We haven’t had enough time with the phone to provide you with definitive buying advice, but it certainly looks promising from our initial impressions. The behemoth of a battery will almost certainly be a strong recommending factor, and the screen also looks pleasant too, while the processor should be capable enough of handling typical day-to-day activities without a problem. The camera demands more cautious attention, as I wasn’t completely sold on what I saw at first – but the fact there are more cameras to play around with compared to its predecessor is an encouraging sign. It looks like a capable device, but before you make the decision to buy it’s worth waiting for our upcoming full review with our final verdict.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/11/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2020
Source: Techtest.org DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/04/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/17/2020
Source: RP-Online DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/09/2020
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2020
Source: Computerbase DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2020
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2020
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Gizmodo Brasil PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2020
Source: Showmetech.com.br PT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 78% display: 84% mobility: 83% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/20/2020
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 70% display: 72% mobility: 95% workmanship: 69%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/18/2020
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/10/2020
Source: Antyweb PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2020
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: FPT shop VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2020
Source: Mere Mobil.dk DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Computerblog.ro →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/05/2020
Source: Puhelinvertailu →zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610:
基于Adreno 600架构的集成(Snapdragon 665)图形卡。 GPU的性能介于Adreno 510和512/612之间,因此处于较低的中档范围。 支持DirectX11_1,Vulkan 1.0,OpenCL 2.0,OpenGL ES 3.2。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 665:
具有8个CPU Kryo 260内核(集群中有四个高速的2 GHz Cortex-A73内核和两个省电的1.8 GHz Cortex-A53内核)的高性能中端ARM SoC,以及相当慢的Adreno 610 GPU。以11 nm LPP工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.40":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.