华硕 N551JK-CN166H 笔记本电脑简短评测
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung 156HL01-102 (SDC324C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 336 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 312.2 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 323 cd/m²
Contrast: 850:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.24 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.98
| Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | HP Envy 15-k010ng GeForce GTX 850M, 4510U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -26% | -9% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.3 | 49.35 -27% | 66.9 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.7 | 71.8 -26% | 84 -13% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.4 | 51.1 -26% | 61.4 -12% |
| Screen | -34% | -2% | |
| Brightness middle | 323 | 343 6% | 317 -2% |
| Brightness | 312 | 330 6% | 319 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 84 1% | 87 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.75 -97% | 0.46 -21% |
| Contrast | 850 | 457 -46% | 689 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.4 | 9.72 -31% | 5.79 22% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.24 | 11.24 -80% | 5.01 20% |
| Gamma | 2.98 74% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 8098 80% | 11010 59% | 7347 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 69 | 46 -33% | 55 -20% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-32% | -6% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
| HP Envy 15-k010ng | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
| HP Envy 15-k010ng | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4131 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3113 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3437 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3881 points | |
Help | ||
| Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | HP Envy 15-k010ng GeForce GTX 850M, 4510U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 22685% | 13254% | |
| Read Seq | 102.3 | 509 398% | 514 402% |
| Read 4k | 0.326 | 32.95 10007% | 32.23 9787% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.609 | 351.7 57650% | 180.7 29572% |
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680
Transfer Rate Minimum:
50.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
326.8 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
88.7 MB/s
Access Time:
19.8 ms
Burst Rate:
254.4 MB/s
CPU Usage:
3.6 %
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
| HP Envy 15-k010ng | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
| HP Envy 15-k010ng | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Asus N551JK-CN166H | |
| HP Envy 15-k010ng | |
| Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4255 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 61456 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9818 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2675 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 75.2 | 54.3 | 20.3 | |
| Thief (2014) | 35.8 | 34.8 | 32.8 | 18.2 |
| GRID: Autosport (2014) | 54.8 | 44.32 | 31.48 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 32.1 / 32.9 / 33.7 dB(A) |
| DVD |
| 36.6 / dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42 / 44.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.5 Watt |
| Idle | 8.6 / 12 / 13 Watt |
| Load |
72.2 / 104 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 | |
| Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680 | HP Envy 15-k010ng GeForce GTX 850M, 4510U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-591G-77A9 GeForce GTX 860M, 4710HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3128GD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 436 | 507 16% | 596 37% |
| WiFi | 271 | 249 -8% | 277 2% |
| Load | 76 | 77 1% | 68 -11% |
| H.264 | 221 | ||
| Gaming | 45 |
华硕N551JK-CN166H的最终得分说明它在测试中成功地证明了自己。我们没有找到什么重大的问题。当然，选择一颗双核的47W功率处理器有些奇怪，这可能主要出于预算方面的考虑。它较软的键盘按键和小尺寸数字键盘区设计好不好可能是个人喜好的问题，不过我们认为它的输入设备质量整体不错。混合式的硬盘当然无法与两块真正的固态硬盘相抗衡，惠普和Acer的笔记本电脑都因此获得了更流畅的使用体验。我们的测试机在负载下也保持了安静和清凉；它的性能也因此得到了最大程度的发挥。它的一大亮点在于非常明亮、视角稳定且高对比的屏幕。它只有在色彩准确度和伽马曲线方面有些不足。而时尚又坚固的机身对测试者来说也为它加分不少——如果不考虑到维护底盖的问题的话。
惠普 Envy 15-k010ng在比较中略占下风，不过Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro (VN7-591G-77A9)则不然，它凭借固态硬盘和更强更快的处理器和显卡得分更高。同时它也相比其他两款产品更轻更薄。不过，它的屏幕无法与这台测试机相媲美，而Acer那款笔记本的发热量和噪音也更大。另外，这也导致了处理器频率在满负载下有下降的问题。我们在测试中对这款笔记本缺乏维护底盖和不准确的触控板表示了不满。Nitro显然对于游戏玩家来说是个更好的选择，不过华硕这款笔记本也没有什么真正的缺点，Acer这款产品的性价比相对更高一些。我们没法不推荐华硕的N551JK-CN166H，有什么理由不喜欢它呢？
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
