Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 825M

NVIDIA GeForce 825M (有时称作GT 825M)是一款支持DirectX 11的中端显卡。它基于28纳米的Kepler架构,使用了和GeForce GT 730M和740M相同的GK208核心。 架构 GK208基于Kepler架构,提供了两个名为SMX的着色器模块,每个包括192个着色器,即总计384个着色器核心。这些着色器有和芯片其他部分相同的运行频率。另外,GK208核心有16个TMU和8个ROP,和64位的显存位宽。 移动Kepler系列显卡现在提供了对PCIe 3.0的支持,以及Boost 2.0加速模式可以在系统散热允许的情况下自动超频。800M系列显卡均提供了这个功能。 性能 根据我们的基准测试成绩,GeForce 825M的性能表现介于GT 730M和GT 740M之间。最新的游戏(2013或2014年)可以在1366 x 768的分辨率和中等设定下运行。不过,大型游戏如孤岛危机3和战地4需要使用更低的分辨率或细节设定运行。 特性 825M的特性与GT 730M和740M相同,包括了对4个显示器输出的支持。另外,最高3840x2160分辨率的高清显示器可以通过DisplayPort 1.2或HDMI 1.4a连接(如果可用)。高清的音频,如杜比TrueHD和DTS-HD,可以通过比特流模式经由HDMI端口传输。不过,由于大多数的笔记本会使用Optimus技术,CPU的集成显示核心可能会对显示接口有直接的控制,这可能会限制Nvidia Kepler显卡的一些附加的功能。 第五代的PureVideo HD视频处理器(VP5)同样集成于GK107核心之中,提供了对HD视频的硬解码支持。它对通常的编码格式,如MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264和 VC1/WMV9,提供了高达4K分辨率硬解码的支持,而对VC1和MPEG-4则提供最高1080p分辨率硬解码的支持。两个视频源可以被同时平行解码,提供了对类似于画中画的功能的支持。另一个新的特点是配备了一个类似于Intel的QuickSync的视频编码引擎,它可以被NVENC API调用。 功耗 GeForce 820M的功耗与GT 730M相当。因此,这款Nvidia显卡最适用于14寸或更大的多媒体笔记本电脑。800M系列同样支持Optimus技术,笔记本可以在CPU的集成显卡和Nvidia独立显卡间自动切换。

GeForce 800M Series

GeForce 845M 384 @ 1.07 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce 840M 384 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 830M 256 @ 1.03 - 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 825M 384 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 820M 96 @ 0.78 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed850 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption33 Watt
Transistor Count1.3 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.01.2014

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.5 pt (2%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -87%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
0.4521 -11%
0.462 -9%
0.4686 -8%
Intel HD Graphics 630
0.4713 -7%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
0.4713 -7%
0.4772 -6%
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
0.4922 -3%
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
0.502 -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
0.506 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
0.508
0.508 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
0.508 0%
0.509 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
0.513 1%
0.516 2%
0.517 2%
0.52 2%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
0.523 3%
0.529 4%
...
20.4 3916%
max:
33.3 6455%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5142     avg: 5421     median: 5421 (5%)     max: 5700 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7378     avg: 7416     median: 7416 (2%)     max: 7454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1043     avg: 1050     median: 1050 (2%)     max: 1057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1147     avg: 1150     median: 1150 (1%)     max: 1153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 73985     avg: 78894     median: 78893.5 (9%)     max: 83802 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1831     avg: 1860     median: 1859.5 (2%)     max: 1888 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1738     avg: 1757     median: 1756.5 (2%)     max: 1775 Points
171.8 -90%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
1708 -3%
AMD Radeon R5 (Carrizo)
1711 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
1711 -3%
AMD FirePro M4100
1728 -2%
1734 -1%
1741 -1%
1742 -1%
1749 0%
1749 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
1757
AMD Radeon R5 M335
1784 2%
1792 2%
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
1793 2%
1807 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
1819 4%
1823 4%
1831 4%
1843 5%
1846 5%
...
59943 3312%
max:
104201 5831%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
6000 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
5243 Points (3%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
5059 -4%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
5072 -3%
5081 -3%
5111 -3%
5142 -2%
5150 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
5162 -2%
Intel HD Graphics 530
5173 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
5188 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
5243
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
5324 2%
5366 2%
5369 2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
5372 2%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
5382 3%
5410 3%
5411 3%
5452 4%
5560 6%
...
132443 2426%
max:
170928 3160%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
17043 Points (19%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
16696 -2%
16712 -2%
16766 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
16771 -2%
16882 -1%
16936 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
16942 -1%
16944 -1%
16972 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 825M
17043
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
17105 0%
17192 1%
17271 1%
17513 3%
17545 3%
17784 4%
18044 6%
18136 6%
18199 7%
...
69623 309%
max:
87172 411%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
9290 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 30.87     avg: 31.6     median: 31.6 (10%)     max: 32.4 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
49 fps (3%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
med. 1366x768
35.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
26.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
37.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
60.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
51.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
80  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
med. 1366x768
80  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
70  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
ultra 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
61.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
50.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
39.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
49.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
med. 1366x768
74.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
med. 1366x768
70.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
33.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
69.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
79.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
41.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
70.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
90 91.2 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.2 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.9 24.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
53.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
44.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
med. 1024x768
96  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Titanfall35.522.8
Thief26.215.512.4
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag37.629.215.4
X-Plane 10.2543.125.411.3
Need for Speed: Rivals3025.622.7
Call of Duty: Ghosts60.442.518.7
Battlefield 451.234.724.7
Batman: Arkham Origins804822
F1 2013807028
Fifa 1484.5
Total War: Rome II61.9
Saints Row IV50.539.715
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified39.434.222.7
Splinter Cell: Blacklist49.533.916.1
Dota 274.826.9
Company of Heroes 221.620.8
GRID 270.849.513.4
Metro: Last Light33.424.515
BioShock Infinite69.237.531.1
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm79.741.814.4
SimCity70.734.424.4
Tomb Raider914424
Crysis 332.219.1
Dead Space 353.642.2
Hitman: Absolution44.928.513.3
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim57.238.327.1
World of Warcraft9631
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
11
6
8
12
5
16
5
1
4

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 22. 04:19:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.023s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.024s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5252 +0.025s ... 0.048s

#12 got single benchmarks 5252 +0.009s ... 0.057s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.363s ... 0.42s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.42s

#16 Got 74 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.423s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.423s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.015s ... 0.438s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.699s ... 1.136s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.139s

#21 return log +0s ... 1.139s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter