Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 840M

NVIDIA GeForce 840M

2014年3月发布的NVIDIA GeForce 840M是一款支持DirectX 11的中端显卡。它是最早一批基于Nvidia的新Maxwell架构(GM108核心)的显卡之一,但仍使用了28纳米制程技术制造。840M提供了频率为1029MHz(最大速度)的384个着色器单元,和2GB DDR3显存(64位显存位宽,2000MHz有效频率)。 架构 相较于Kepler架构,Maxwell架构提供了一些细节优化改进,提供了更高的功效。一个更小的只使用了128个ALU算数逻辑单元(Kepler为192个)的流处理器(SMM)和一个可以提高着色器使用效率的优化了的调度器。Nvidia承诺了Maxwell的128算数逻辑单元流处理器可以提供Kepler的192算数逻辑单元SMX的90%性能。GM108核心提供了5个SMM,即384个着色器核心,24个TMU,和8个ROP(64位界面)。 另外一个优化是大大增加了的二级缓存容量(GM107有2MB)。更大的缓存容量可以提供对显存数据的更好管理,从而并不因相对较窄的显存带宽而性能明显降低。 和Fermi和Kepler相似,Maxwell的GM107核心支持DirectX 11.2的11.0功能级。 性能 根据我们的基准测试成绩,GeForce 840M性能超出上代的GT 740M约30%,仅略低于GeForce GT 750M(DDR3版本)。很多2013和2014年发布的游戏(如古墓丽影和生化奇兵无限)可以在WXGA分辨率(1366 x 768)和中高细节设定下流畅运行。不过一些非常大型的游戏如孤岛危机3或战地4需要使用更低分辨率和/或细节设定运行。 特性 GM108核心集成了第六代的PureVideo HD视频引擎(VP6),提供了对H.264和MPEG-2视频的更好解码性能。当然,VP6支持所有前代的功能(4K支持,PIP,VCENC API视频编码)。遗憾的是,仍未提供对HDMI 2.0的支持。 功耗 GeForce 840M的功耗通常是30W或更低。因此,这款显卡最适合于13到14寸或更大的笔记本电脑。800M系列同样支持Optimus技术,笔记本可以在CPU的集成显卡和Nvidia独立显卡间自动切换。

GeForce 800M Series

GeForce 845M 384 @ 1.07 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
GeForce 840M 384 @ 1.03 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 830M 256 @ 1.03 - 1.15 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 825M 384 @ 0.85 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 820M 96 @ 0.78 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameN15S-GT
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1029 MHz
Memory Speed2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
technology28 nm
FeaturesGPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, GeForce Experience, GameWorks
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.03.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.7 pt (2%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -91%
...
0.627 -10%
0.64 -8%
Intel Iris Graphics 540
0.64 -8%
0.645 -7%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
0.65 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
0.672 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
0.676 -3%
0.681 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
0.695 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
0.695
AMD Radeon R7 M445
0.697 0%
0.704 1%
0.705 1%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
0.709 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
0.716 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
0.716 3%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
0.728 5%
0.757 9%
0.757 9%
...
20.4 2835%
max:
33.3 4691%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
119888 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
42956 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4600     avg: 5952     median: 5829 (6%)     max: 8314 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7985     avg: 8813     median: 8723.5 (2%)     max: 9691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1286     avg: 1375     median: 1361 (2%)     max: 1595 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1471     avg: 1572     median: 1573 (2%)     max: 1713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 39342     avg: 59792     median: 54117 (6%)     max: 87016 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2260     avg: 2412     median: 2378 (3%)     max: 2683 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 2282     avg: 2371     median: 2340 (2%)     max: 2511 Points
171.8 -93%
...
2245 -5%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
2275 -4%
2300 -3%
AMD FirePro W4170M
2315 -2%
2327 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
2328 -2%
2341 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
2353 -1%
2355 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
2371
AMD Radeon HD 8850M
2381 0%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
2396 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
2398 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
2417 2%
2422 2%
2427 2%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
2434 3%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
2435 3%
2452 3%
...
59943 2428%
max:
104201 4295%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6996     avg: 7373     median: 7191 (2%)     max: 8132 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6602     avg: 6846     median: 6627 (4%)     max: 7412 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
6451 -6%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
6498 -5%
6557 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
6578 -4%
6661 -3%
6665 -3%
6673 -3%
6763 -1%
6770 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
6846
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
6931 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
6943 1%
7015 2%
7078 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
7119 4%
AMD Radeon 610M
7128 4%
7155 5%
7181 5%
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
7243 6%
...
132443 1835%
max:
170928 2397%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
20038 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
17271 Points (19%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
16771 -3%
16882 -2%
16936 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
16942 -2%
16944 -2%
16972 -2%
17043 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
17105 -1%
17192 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
17271
17513 1%
17545 2%
17784 3%
18044 4%
18136 5%
18199 5%
18199 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
18414 7%
18466 7%
...
68166 295%
max:
87172 405%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 9895     avg: 10856     median: 10332 (14%)     max: 13184 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
22.5 fps (7%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
30.1 fps (6%)
0.6 -98%
...
28.1 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
28.3 -6%
28.32 -6%
28.5 -5%
28.65 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
29 -4%
29.45 -2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
29.5 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
29.8 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 840M
30.1
30.2 0%
AMD FirePro W4170M
31.1 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
31.4 4%
31.4 4%
32.57 8%
32.6 8%
33.3 11%
33.55 11%
33.7 12%
...
532 1667%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
1.1 fps (1%)
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.6 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
1.6 fps (2%)
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
6.8 fps (5%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
14.3 fps (15%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
17.3 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
9.8 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 4.88     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (1%)     max: 5.95 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 1.26     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (0%)     max: 1.34 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 9.8     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (2%)     max: 10.57 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 1.58     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 2.02 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 6.84     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (2%)     max: 6.86 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 12.73     avg: 13.3     median: 13.3 (12%)     max: 13.88 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 16.78     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (7%)     max: 20.06 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 8.54     avg: 8.9     median: 8.9 (1%)     max: 9.33 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5073     avg: 6057     median: 6070.5 (4%)     max: 6759 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 29.96     avg: 40.8     median: 40.3 (13%)     max: 52.4 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 24.17     avg: 54.1     median: 55.9 (3%)     max: 64.3 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 98     avg: 99.5     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.6 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
41 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 337     avg: 356.7     median: 359 (1%)     max: 374 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 616     avg: 648     median: 651 (1%)     max: 676 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1671     avg: 1674     median: 1674 (2%)     max: 1677 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
88.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366x768
103.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
34.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21 25 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18 21 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
27.8 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3 9.2 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 6.3 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
183.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
71.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
35 36.4 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.2 26.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13 13.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.7 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
41.8 42 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.2 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 14.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4 7.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
40.9 51.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.1 35.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3 16.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
44.4 49.3 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.4 33.2 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3 14.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
26.6 27.2 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4 18.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1 10.5 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
67.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
96 109 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73 84 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58 59 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
31.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
64.8 65.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.8 43.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.7 22 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9 16.6 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
37.3 40.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
21.7 26.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.1 14.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
81.4 89.8 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
67.3 74.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.6 50.5 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
105 115.3 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.7 60.2 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31 37.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2 27.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
49.9 52.3 57.8 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.7 31.3 32.3 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4 20.1 22.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3 12 17.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
89.5 114.1 121.3 156.4 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.8 58.3 60.7 66.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5 29.6 29.9 29.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2 15.7 19.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
36.7 37.4 38.8 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.6 27.9 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5 14.1 15.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4 6.7 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.1 31.7 32.1 42 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
30.8 30.9 31.1 35.8 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.8 15.2 15.4 17.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4 13.5 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
67.3 67.5 75 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.6 47.2 53.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.2 34.2 36.3 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5 17.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
52.1 53.6 55.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.2 38.7 43.7 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.9 30.2 36.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.2 22.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
15.4 29.5 31.9 32.4 32.7 32.9 33.8 33.8 33.9 35.1 35.2 36.5 38.7 40.3 40.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.9 21.2 21.3 21.4 21.7 22.3 22.8 23.6 24.8 25.2 25.5 25.5 25.8 26.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.9 17.1 17.3 17.6 17.6 17.7 18.4 18.9 19.5 19.8 19.9 20.3 20.6 21.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3 8.5 8.6 8.9 9 9 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.6 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
38.5 39.8 41.2 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4 30.5 31.6 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.2 16.4 18.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7 7.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
70.5 82.3 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6 40 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.7 19.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.2 24.9 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
56.2 57.9 64.2 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.9 38.2 41.7 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.3 22 22.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
58.6 69.6 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.2 47.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.5 30.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
96 98 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60 61 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
105 105 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83 88 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
74 81 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
186.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
140.2 146.1 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
125.4 127.6 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
59.3 59.3 59.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
46.1 46.3 47 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.5 39.7 39.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 10.2 10.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
51.9 52.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.7 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18 19.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
48.2 49.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.3 43.7 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.6 29.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
52 53.1 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.6 41.3 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.6 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
87.1 90.2 99.9 104.6 116.2 119 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64 67.8 67.8 85 85.9 96.8 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5 31.2 36 39.4 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
26.6 30 31.7 32.4 35.1 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.1 25.6 25.7 25.7 28.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13 14.4 15.6 17.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.6 7.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
93.3 103.4 121.6 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.3 77.4 82.3 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45 62.7 63.2 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.3 20.3 20.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
36 39.7 41.6 43 47.6 48.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32 34.7 34.9 36 38.9 40.4 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21 21.3 22 22.6 23.9 28.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 11 11.1 11.6 13.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
67 79.9 82.6 82.7 83.1 83.1 83.1 83.4 84 84.3 85.3 86.7 87.2 87.3 87.9 88.3 89.1 97.3 98 98.5 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47 47.1 47.4 47.5 47.5 47.7 47.8 48.2 48.2 48.3 49 49.3 49.6 50.3 51.4 51.7 53.5 53.6 54 54.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.3 37.8 38 38.2 38.4 38.5 38.6 38.7 39 39.4 40 40 40.1 41.1 41.8 42.1 42.3 43.4 43.7 43.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9 13 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.6 14 14.1 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.7 14.8 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
159.5 170.8 174.6 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.3 75.1 76.2 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
40.1 41.3 44.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3 17.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
147.2 149.6 155.9 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.9 37.1 38.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.5 24.5 25.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
85.1 118.3 120.3 122.5 123.3 124.8 125.2 125.3 126.5 127.7 128.6 128.8 129.1 130.1 131.4 134.2 137.3 141.6 143.4 146.2 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.2 58.5 58.8 58.8 58.9 59.3 59.7 59.9 61.2 61.5 61.6 62 62.4 62.8 63.8 64.2 65.8 66.5 68.1 68.2 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.1 28.7 29.2 29.3 29.4 29.5 30 31.4 32.4 32.7 32.9 33 33.1 33.5 33.5 34.1 35.8 35.9 36.4 37 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5 11.4 15 15 15.2 15.4 16 16.4 16.4 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.7 16.9 17.5 17.5 17.7 18.1 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
37 37.1 38.2 42.2 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.8 22.3 23.1 24.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.3 16.5 18.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7 6.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
121.3 124.5 129 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.2 62.2 64 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.3 51.5 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 30.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
70.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
40.5 42.3 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.4 38.2 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
43.9 45.3 45.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.4 35.5 38.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.4 16.6 18.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
73.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.1 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.5 30.3 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.2 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.1 36 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
74.1 76.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.2 57.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.2 50.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
71.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
49.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
62.9 81.3 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.8 33.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.6 11.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
high 1366x768
79.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
75 75.6 79 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.7 56.5 58.9 59.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.1 26.5 27.1 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.5 6.9 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
40.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
41.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.3 45.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.1 30.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
61.5 (!) 62.6 (!) ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.7 (!) 36.4 (!) ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.5 (!) 32.4 (!) ~ 31 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 (!) 18.2 (!) ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
42.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.7 37.4 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.4 22.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
40.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
95.3 107.3 112 120.3 125.6 126 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51 57.1 57.7 58 61.3 62.5 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36 37.2 37.5 39.3 39.8 42 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.3 18.4 19.5 21.3 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
70.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
53.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1366x768
49  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
118.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
64.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
115  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Civilization 5

Civilization 5

2010
low 1024x768
60.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
84 126.2 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
68.3 115 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
50 102.2 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
171.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
74.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
41.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
101.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
62.5 102.1 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
31.7 58.7 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
75.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
55.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
med. 1024x768
94.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
FIFA 1688.557.938.5
World of Warships103.478.136.622.5
Metal Gear Solid V5839.916.111.9
Mad Max34.41715.5
Batman: Arkham Knight2320137
The Witcher 3281896
Dirt Rally183.245.122.612.5
Battlefield Hardline71.750.21810.7
Evolve36251311
The Crew4232148
Dragon Age: Inquisition46301511.8
Far Cry 447311412
Assassin's Creed Unity271895.7
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare67.83722.612
F1 2014103795934
The Evil Within31.922.312.7
Ryse: Son of Rome3119.39.48.9
Alien: Isolation65432116
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor3924146.6
Fifa 15867147
Sims 4110593425
Risen 3: Titan Lords53311914
GRID: Autosport120542617
Watch Dogs3827146
Wolfenstein: The New Order3432169
The Elder Scrolls Online70493518
Titanfall54403221
Thief3423199
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag4031177
X-Plane 10.2576371810.5
Need for Speed: Rivals30302312.1
Call of Duty: Ghosts59382110.8
Battlefield 464442911.2
Batman: Arkham Origins9761298
F1 2013105867837
Fifa 14186.314312797.2
Total War: Rome II59464010
Saints Row IV52441912
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified4943287.4
Splinter Cell: Blacklist5341229.4
Dota 21037834
Company of Heroes 23125156
GRID 2106795720
Metro: Last Light43362312
BioShock Infinite86504014
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm168734217
SimCity151382412
Tomb Raider127623216
Crysis 33923176
Dead Space 3125625025
Far Cry 370.14725.48.4
Assassin´s Creed III413717.2
Hitman: Absolution4536176.7
Call of Duty: Black Ops 273.358.539.726
Need for Speed: Most Wanted5741305.8
Medal of Honor: Warfighter66433613
Dishonored75565019.5
Borderlands 271.349.932.120
Guild Wars 2723112
Counter-Strike: GO79.645.5
Sleeping Dogs7758277
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier40.817.6
Max Payne 341.84230
Diablo III62363118
Risen 2: Dark Waters42.22822.4
Mass Effect 3593722
Alan Wake40.224
Anno 2070114583919
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim70.744.532.717.3
Battlefield 353.637.530
Batman: Arkham City4936
Deus Ex Human Revolution118.764.3
Total War: Shogun 21154017.4
Civilization 560.816.1
Mafia 2105927663.5
StarCraft 2171.274.341.219.6
Metro 2033101.482458.4
Battlefield: Bad Company 275.355.923.6
World of Warcraft94.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
31
31
8
14
43
14
1
38
29
5
1
62
6
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 08. 04:36:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5073 +0.028s ... 0.057s

#12 got single benchmarks 5073 +0.08s ... 0.137s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.776s ... 0.913s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.914s

#16 Got 770 rows for game benchmarks. +0.045s ... 0.959s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.959s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.055s ... 1.013s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +2.633s ... 3.647s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.006s ... 3.653s

#21 return log +0s ... 3.653s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 840M graphics card

联想 Flex 2 Pro 15 笔记本电脑简短评测

联想 Flex 2 Pro 15 笔记本电脑简短评测

Flexible all-rounder. 联想的15.6寸Flex 2 Pro 15多模式笔记本电脑没有什么弱点,是一款表现全面的设备。不过它的较高配置型号(固态硬盘,16 GB内存)售价接近1000欧元(约6993人民币)。...
Intel Core i7-4510U | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
联想 ThinkPad S5 Yoga 15 20DQ0038GE 变形本简短评测

联想 ThinkPad S5 Yoga 15 20DQ0038GE 变形本简短评测

瑜伽成为标准。 Yoga的概念可以在一款普通的15寸办公笔记本上获得成功吗?Yoga能够结合传统特性并同时带来更大的灵活性吗?失望离我们并不远。...
Intel Core i7-5500U | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
联想 ThinkPad Yoga 14 变形本简短评测

联想 ThinkPad Yoga 14 变形本简短评测

奢侈瑜伽。 联想推出的ThinkPad Yoga 14将Yoga的多变设计带到了商务用户的桌面上。在这个评测中,我们将会测试这台基于Broadwell处理器配备独立显卡的超极本是否适合办公使用。...
Intel Core i7-5500U | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
联想 ThinkPad Yoga 14 变形本简短评测

联想 ThinkPad Yoga 14 变形本简短评测

工作娱乐两不误。 12.5寸ThinkPad Yoga的成功理念现在延伸到了搭配GeForce独立显卡的14寸机型设计之中。联想的这款变形本可以适合办公室和家中的任何场合使用。这种多功能的设计可以替代传统的ThinkPad系列笔记本吗?...
Intel Core i5-4210U | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | 14.00" | 1.9 kg
Acer TravelMate P276-MG-56FU 笔记本电脑简短评测

Acer TravelMate P276-MG-56FU 笔记本电脑简短评测

全方位与游戏性。 Acer的这款全新17.3寸笔记本电脑既适合个人用户也适合商务用户。一颗强劲的Core i5处理器与快速的显卡加上优秀的电池续航时间对这两类用户都极具吸引力。...
Intel Core i5-4210U | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | 17.30" | 3 kg

Asus Zenbook UX303LN-R4141H: Intel Core i7-4510U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook UX303LN-R4141H 亚笔记本电脑简短评测

Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » 华硕 Transformer Book Flip TP500LN 变形本简短评测

HP Pavilion 15-p008ng: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » 惠普 Pavilion 15-p008ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Acer Aspire E5-571G-536E: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Acer Aspire E5-571G-536E 笔记本电脑简短评测

Lenovo IdeaPad Z50-70 (59427656): Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Z50-70 (59427656) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Lenovo Flex 2 14: Intel Core i3-4010U, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想 IdeaPad Flex 2 14 笔记本电脑简短评测

Asus Pro B551LG-CN009G: Intel Core i7-4650U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » 华硕 AsusPro B551LG-CN009G 笔记本电脑简短评测

MSI GP60-2PEi585: Intel Core i5-4200H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » 微星 GP60-2PEi585 笔记本电脑简短评测

Asus UX32LN: Intel Core i5-4200U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  Review » 华硕 Zenbook UX32LN-R4053H 超级本简短评测

HP Pavilion 15-P265Ur : Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-P265Ur

Lenovo Z70-80-FG006JBM: Intel Core i7-5500U, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Z70-80-FG006JBM

Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 15-20DQ003RGE: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 15-20DQ003RGE

Acer Aspire V3-572G-543S: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-572G-543S

HP Pavilion 15-p159nr: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-p159nr

Asus F555LN-XO010D: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus F555LN-XO010D

Asus X555LN-DM473H: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X555LN-DM473H

Dell Inspiron 15 3543-8208: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3543-8208

Asus K555LN-DM091D: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus K555LN-DM091D

Asus ZenBook UX303LN-R4359H: Intel Core i5-5200U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook UX303LN-R4359H

Lenovo Z70-80-FG008LGE: Intel Core i5-5200U, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Z70-80-FG008LGE

Asus ET2323I: Intel Core i7-5500U, 23.00", 9 kg
  External Review » Asus ET2323I

Lenovo Z50-70-59427408: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Z50-70-59427408

Asus Zenbook UX303LN-R4290P: Intel Core i7-5500U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX303LN-R4290P

Lenovo Ideapad Flex 2 Pro 15-80FL0019GE: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Flex 2 Pro 15-80FL0019GE

Asus UX303LN-DQ148P: Intel Core i7-4510U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus UX303LN-DQ148P

Dell Inspiron 17-5749: Intel Core i7-5500U, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17-5749

Acer Aspire VN7-571G-33J0: Intel Core i3-4030U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire VN7-571G-33J0

Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN-CJ035H: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN-CJ035H

Asus X555LN-XO022D: Intel Core i3-4030U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X555LN-XO022D

Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-571G-56NX: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V 15 Nitro VN7-571G-56NX

Lenovo Flex 2 14: Intel Core i3-4010U, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Flex 2 14

Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN-DN051H: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN-DN051H

Asus X550LN-XX030H: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X550LN-XX030H

Asus UX32LN: Intel Core i5-4200U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus UX32LN

Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN

Asus X555LN-XO112H: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X555LN-XO112H

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 2 14-59427350: Intel Core i3-4030U, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 2 14-59427350

Acer Aspire E5-572G-50FB: Intel Core i5-4210M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-572G-50FB

Lenovo IdeaCentre Horizon 27, Haswell: Intel Core i5-3210M, 27.00", 8.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaCentre Horizon 27, Haswell

Acer Aspire VN7-571G-55ZA: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire VN7-571G-55ZA

Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN-DN075H: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Transformer Book Flip TP500LN-DN075H

Asus ZenBook UX303LN-R4215H: Intel Core i5-4210U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook UX303LN-R4215H

Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 14: Intel Core i5-4210U, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 14

Asus VivoBook S451LN: Intel Core i5-4200U, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S451LN

HP Envy 15-k050sr: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-k050sr

Acer Aspire E5-571PG-624L: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-571PG-624L

Asus X550LN-XX031H: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.60"
  External Review » Asus X550LN-XX031H

Acer Aspire E5-571G-520X: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-571G-611H

Asus X555LN-XO113H: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus X555LN-XO113H

HP Pavilion 15-p006tx: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-p006tx

Asus K551LN: Intel Core i5-4200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus K551LN

Acer Aspire E5-571G-536E: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-571G-536E

Lenovo IdeaPad Z50-70: Intel Core i5-4210U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z50-70

Asus UX303LN-DB71T: Intel Core i7-4510U, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus UX303LN-DB71T

MSI GP60 2PE-222UK: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GP60 2PE-222UK

Acer Aspire E5-771G-71PT: Intel Core i7-5500U, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire E5-771G-51T2

Asus R453LN-WX085: Intel Core i3-4010U, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus R453LN-WX085

Asus ASUSPRO ADVANCED B551LG: Intel Core i7-4650U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ASUSPRO ADVANCED B551LG

HP Pavilion 15-J6Z61EA: Intel Core i7-4510U, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-J6Z61EA

MSI GP60 2PE-008RU: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GP60 2PE-008RU

Asus R510LN: Intel Core i3-4010U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus R510LN

MSI GP60-2PEi585: Intel Core i5-4200H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GP60-2PEi585

Asus Zenbook UX32LN-R4029H: Intel Core i7-4500U, 13.30", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook UX32LN-R4029H

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter