Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

Nvidia GeForce 920MX是一款用于笔记本电脑的入门级显卡,于2016年第一季度推出。与旧的920M相比,920MX现在是基于930MX的现代麦克斯韦芯片,但减少了265个着色器的数量(GM108)。根据我们的消息来源,5-12瓦的TDP和对DDR3和GDDR5的支持也被指定。

性能取决于所使用的图形存储器。在我们的测试中,DDR3版本比普通的GeForce 930M略慢(肯定比GeForce 920M快)。因此,GDDR5版本的性能可能略微超过930M。然而,这两个版本都不适合2017年的高要求游戏。要求不高的游戏,如《模拟人生4》,在中高设置下应该是可以玩的(见下文的基准测试)。

由于功耗低,GeForce 920MX也适用于轻薄型笔记本电脑。

GeForce 900M Series

GeForce 945M 512 @ 0.93 - 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5) 384 @ 0.95 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 5012 MHz
GeForce 940MX 384 @ 1.12 - 1.24 GHz64 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce 940M 384 @ 1.07 - 1.18 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 930MX 384 @ 0.95 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 930M 384 @ 0.93 - 0.94 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 920MX 256 @ 0.97 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 920M 384 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 910M 384 @ 0.64 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameN16V-GMR
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines256 - unified
Core Speed965 - 993 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, GDDR5
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, Verde Drivers, CUDA, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, GameWorks
Date of Announcement25.03.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.geforce.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.6 pt (2%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -90%
...
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
0.576 -10%
0.583 -9%
0.59 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
0.592 -7%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.61 -5%
0.612 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
0.617 -4%
0.627 -2%
Intel Iris Graphics 540
0.64 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
0.64
0.645 1%
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
0.65 2%
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
0.672 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
0.676 6%
0.681 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
0.695 9%
0.695 9%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
0.697 9%
0.704 10%
...
20.4 3088%
max:
33.3 5103%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
472 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
417 Points (1%)
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -73%
...
349 -16%
Intel HD Graphics 630
368 -12%
371.8 -11%
377 -10%
381 -9%
389.1 -7%
397 -5%
409.5 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
410 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
417
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
419.6 1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
442.5 6%
450.5 8%
452.3 8%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
471 13%
493 18%
AMD Radeon 610M
511 23%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
539 29%
550 32%
...
19434 4560%
max:
36259 8595%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 98596     avg: 110110     median: 110110 (11%)     max: 121624 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 49876     avg: 57473     median: 57473 (7%)     max: 65070 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5744     avg: 6545     median: 6545 (6%)     max: 7346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 7733     avg: 9114     median: 9113.5 (2%)     max: 10494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1154     avg: 1337     median: 1336.5 (2%)     max: 1519 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1282     avg: 1448     median: 1448 (2%)     max: 1614 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 73997     avg: 83643     median: 83642.5 (9%)     max: 93288 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1800     avg: 1993     median: 1983 (3%)     max: 2200 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1747     avg: 1823     median: 1835 (2%)     max: 1887 Points
171.8 -91%
...
1742 -4%
1749 -4%
1749 -4%
1757 -4%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
1784 -2%
1792 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
1793 -2%
1807 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
1819 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
1823
1831 0%
1843 1%
1846 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
1858 2%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
1891 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
1903 4%
1913 5%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
1916 5%
1926 6%
...
59943 3188%
max:
104201 5616%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584     avg: 7408     median: 7407.5 (2%)     max: 8231 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5850     avg: 6665     median: 6665 (4%)     max: 7480 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
6139 -8%
Intel HD Graphics 630
6208 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
6327 -5%
6414 -4%
6451 -3%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
6498 -3%
6557 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
6578 -1%
6661 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
6665
6673 0%
6763 1%
6770 2%
6846 3%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
6931 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
6943 4%
7015 5%
7078 6%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
7119 7%
...
132443 1887%
max:
170928 2465%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
30702 Points (16%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
21185 Points (23%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
19971 -6%
20171 -5%
20313 -4%
20551 -3%
20818 -2%
20861 -2%
20882 -1%
20968 -1%
21013 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
21185
AMD Radeon R7 M445
21189 0%
21266 0%
21287 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
21505 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
21611 2%
21991 4%
22463 6%
22649 7%
22740 7%
...
68064 221%
max:
87172 311%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 10781     avg: 12206     median: 12205.5 (16%)     max: 13630 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
8.7 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
21.2 fps (7%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
20.3 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 26.4     avg: 27.9     median: 27.9 (5%)     max: 29.4 fps
0.6 -98%
...
24.01 -14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
25.4 -9%
26 -7%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
26.1 -6%
Intel HD Graphics 630
26.6 -5%
27.3 -2%
27.56 -1%
AMD Radeon R9 M375
27.9 0%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
27.9
28.1 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
28.3 1%
28.32 2%
28.5 2%
28.65 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
29 4%
29.45 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
29.5 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
29.8 7%
...
532 1807%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2632     avg: 4406     median: 4366 (3%)     max: 6219 points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 36.81     avg: 47.1     median: 47.7 (3%)     max: 56.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 29.9     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (4%)     max: 35.4 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 42.8     avg: 47.4     median: 47.4 (1%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 55.7     avg: 62.9     median: 62.9 (4%)     max: 70 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 103.1     avg: 115.2     median: 115.2 (1%)     max: 127.3 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 210     avg: 230     median: 230 (1%)     max: 250 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 400     avg: 427     median: 427 (1%)     max: 454 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1066     avg: 1139     median: 1139 (1%)     max: 1212 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
23.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
76.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
30.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
53.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
43.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
25.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
110.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
62.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
121.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
80.4
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
58  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
46.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
56.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
46.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
135.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
87.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
49.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
52.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
34.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
90.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
29.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
13.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
29.4 34.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.2 22.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
25.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
54.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
31.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
27.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
40.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
38.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
91.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
51.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
97.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
26.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
83.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
170.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
60.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
65.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
44.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
58.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
22.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
171.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
176.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
54.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
42.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
76.9 77.4 107.7 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.8 43.1 55.7 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.8 35.7 48.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1 17.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
104.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
38  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
122.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
64.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
81.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
43.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
232.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
88.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
56.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Kingdom Come: Deliverance23.89.68.15.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark17.38.25
Fortnite76.721.214.511.4
Star Wars Battlefront 245.412.810.58.9
Need for Speed Payback30.415.312.211.6
Call of Duty WWII53.733.116.311.9
Assassin´s Creed Origins221086
Destiny 243.625.923.618
ELEX25.111.99.36.4
The Evil Within 217.99.28.16.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of War331397
FIFA 18110.463.854.250
F1 201741181513
Team Fortress 286816954
Dirt 462.425.2137.9
Rocket League121.543.729
Prey5822.317.514.3
Ghost Recon Wildlands27.611.2103
For Honor46.716.315.411.5
Resident Evil 756.426.513.96
Titanfall 246.333.613.812
Farming Simulator 17135.787.336.723.8
Battlefield 149.229.113.812.5
Civilization VI52.325.49.95.6
Deus Ex Mankind Divided20.814.884.9
Mirror's Edge Catalyst34.920.5
Overwatch90.460.327.315.4
Doom29.524.1
Ashes of the Singularity13.77.3
Need for Speed 201628.124.7
Hitman 201623.717.7
The Division32209.47
Far Cry Primal24119
XCOM 225.68.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider23.214.78.1
Rainbow Six Siege54.334.117.2
Just Cause 331.524.7
Star Wars Battlefront42.625.511.3
Assassin's Creed Syndicate18.815.9
Fallout 427.917.4
Call of Duty: Black Ops 340.222.3
Anno 220538.119.1
FIFA 1691.251.231.7
World of Warships97.565.929.7
Metal Gear Solid V6043.615.4
Mad Max26.214.6
Dota 2 Reborn83.36836.433.5
Batman: Arkham Knight22199
The Witcher 322.113.6
Dirt Rally170.344.422.6
GTA V60.752.512.5
Battlefield Hardline65.144.615.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition45.429.216.4
F1 201496794625
Alien: Isolation58.938.819.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor35.222.612.4
Sims 4171.463.434.1
GRID: Autosport176.668.430.714.9
Battlefield 454.537.82611
Metro: Last Light42.932.418.4
BioShock Infinite87474015
Tomb Raider104.252.630.614.6
Crysis 33822.215.9
Diablo III122.879.364.739.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim81.25743.123.3
StarCraft 2232.788.956.727.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
18
25
15
7
40
14
11
41
11
2
30
5







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 07:06:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#14 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 7026 +0.025s ... 0.052s

#16 got single benchmarks 7026 +0.026s ... 0.079s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.604s ... 0.683s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.683s

#20 Got 228 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.691s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.691s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.041s ... 0.732s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +1.877s ... 2.608s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.613s

#25 return log +0s ... 2.613s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 920MX graphics card

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15ISK-80XH01SLSP: Intel Core i3-6006U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15ISK-80XH01SLSP

Lenovo Ideapad 320s-14IKB-81BN002XMJ: Intel Core i5-8250U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320s-14IKB-81BN002XMJ

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV017PSP: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV017PSP

Asus K540LA-XX659T: Intel Core i3-5005U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K540LA-XX659T

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV01F9SP: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV01F9SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320S-14IKB-80X40056GE: Intel Pentium Gold 4415U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320S-14IKB-80X40056GE

Lenovo Ideapad 320S-14IKB-80X4005AGE: Intel Core i7-7500U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320S-14IKB-80X4005AGE

Asus K756UV-TY210T: Intel Core i7-7500U, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus K756UV-TY210T

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV014WGE: Intel Core i7-7500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV014WGE

Dell Inspiron 17-7779-3660: Intel Core i5-7200U, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17-7779-3660

Asus K541UV-XO451T: Intel Core i5-6198DU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K541UV-XO451T

Asus VivoBook Flip TP501UQ-CJ011T: Intel Core i7-6500U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Flip TP501UQ-CJ011T

Asus K756UV-TY096T: Intel Core i5-6200U, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus K756UV-TY096T

Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV013BGE: Intel Core i5-7200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB-80TV013BGE

Asus F541UV-XO242T: unknown, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus F541UV-XO242T

Asus F541UV-XX339T: unknown, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus F541UV-XX339T

Asus F541UV-XX149T: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus F541UV-XX149T

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter