Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M独立是一个快速的在2010年提出的中档笔记本电脑的图形卡。它是基于GF108核心,这是关系到Fermi架构。因此,支持DirectX 11和OpenGL 4.0。 GT 420M相比,卡的功能只有48的96个着色器核心。因此减速的表现应该明显低于GT 420M(都具有相同的时钟速率)。不过,Nvidia的分类卡的性能等级(的GeForce 310M是主流)。 GT 415M显存,(G)只支持DDR3,没有GDDR5。 GF108架构的GF108核心的GT 415M相关的GeFore GTX 480M的GF100核心,拥有96个着色器和一个128位内存总线,DDR3的。除内存控制器基本上可以被认为是减半的GF106 GF108。因此,老GT215(例如,GeForce GTS 350M的)或GT216(例如,GeForce GT 330M独立)内核的架构是没有可比性的。与GF100较小的GF104,GF106,GF108核心不同的是,不仅缩短了,但也有相当大的修改。相反的GF100,其目的是为专业应用,这些芯片的目标消费市场。它们的特点是着色器(3X16,而不是2X16),更多的纹理单元(8而不是4)每个流式多处理器(SM)和交换网板。由于尚有经调度程序(与3个着色器组),NVIDIA目前使用超标量执行更有效的使用量较高的着色器每个SM。理论上,着色器从而可以更有效地利用每个核心的性能得到改善。然而,在最坏的情况下,性能也差于GF100(及其前身)。 ECC内存保护,这是非常重要的专业应用软件,完全忽略和FP64硬件缩短(只有1/3的着色器FP64可以胜任自己的工作,而且相关的只有1/12的FP32的表现)。由于这些削减,大小的SM仅增长25%,尽管更高的着色器的数量和较大的经调度具有超标量调度功能。由于不同的着色器架构的着色器域和更高的时钟频率,核心数量不能直接相比,AMD的Radeon 5000系列(例如HD 5650)的核心。 GF104架构的详细信息。(和与之也GF106和GF108)被发现在桌面GTX 460的文章由Anandtech的。性能,因为GeForce GT 415M采用了全新的体系结构,具有类似的核心数较老的芯片的性能是没有可比性的。如旧的GT 330M(在我们的测试前的样品),GT 415M的性能,应该在下面,大约级的GeForce GT 320M /的Mobility Radeon HD 4570与GeForce GT 420M显示一个判决(TMR)的性能。功能的新颖的GF104/106/108芯片是通过HDMI支持的码流HD音频输出(蓝光)。一样的Radeon HD 5470,GT 415M可以将Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流明智的一个高保真接收器,没有质量损失。 GT415M提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术。视频处理器(VP4)支持的特征集C的GPU,因此能够完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1 / WMV9,H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。此外,GPU能够解码两个1080p视频流,同时(如蓝光图片,图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL的,和DirectCompute 2.1支持的GeForce GT 415M可以在一般计算的帮助。例如,流处理器能显着更快编码视频不是一个快速的CPU。此外,物理学计算可以通过GPU使用PhysX物理(如黑手党2“地铁2033”)。无负载时,芯片主频为50/100/135兆赫(芯片/ Shader /显存)分别在2D 200/400/325在3D模式以节省电源。此外,400M系列支持擎天柱从英特尔和Nvidia的GPU集成显卡之间自动切换。然而,笔记本电脑制造商需要实现它,它不能升级。

GeForce GT 400M Series

GeForce GT 445M 144 @ 0.59 GHz192 / 128 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GT 435M 96 @ 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce GT 425M 96 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce GT 420M 96 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce GT 415M 48 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameN11P-GV
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz
Shader Speed1000 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory Type(G)DDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Features
Optimus Support, PureVideo HD VP4, Blu-Ray 3D, Bitstream HD Audio, CUDA, DirectCompute, OpenCL, OpenGL 4.0, DirectX 11
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement03.09.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
433 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
379 Points (0%)
171.8 -55%
...
251.8 -34%
AMD Radeon HD 8180
268 -29%
301 -21%
310.6 -18%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
319.9 -16%
330.4 -13%
341.1 -10%
AMD Radeon HD 8210
344.5 -9%
349 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
379
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
389.9 3%
415 9%
415.3 10%
AMD Radeon HD 8250
422.5 11%
AMD Radeon HD 8240
427.5 13%
443 17%
453 20%
467 23%
469.1 24%
...
59943 15716%
max:
104201 27394%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
9378 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
4062 points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
4325 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
3922 points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
11 fps (4%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
203.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
94.6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
60.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
31.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
8.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
18.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
46.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
97.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11203.594.660.6
Risen31.315.38.8
Need for Speed Shift18.716.7
Colin McRae: DIRT 246.230.215.7
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare97.537.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1
1
2
2
1
3

1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 10. 16:29:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:29:51 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.036s ... 0.037s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.038s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1944 +0.013s ... 0.051s

#12 got single benchmarks 1944 +0.01s ... 0.061s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.196s ... 0.257s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.257s

#16 Got 13 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.259s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.259s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.261s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.114s ... 0.375s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.377s

#21 return log +0s ... 0.377s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 20-core GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter