Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

NVIDIA的GeForce GT 520MX是一款入门级的专用笔记本电脑的图形卡在2011年提出。它是基于GT 520M的GF119一样,但具有更高的核心和Shader时钟速率。使用DDR3,64位内存总线的显卡可能会成为一个瓶颈。架构的GF119拥有48个ALU,8个纹理单元和64位内存接口,为DDR3 VRAM。因此,它类似于一个半GF108(GeForce®(精视™)GT 540M),但已经与优化晶体管制造。光栅操作处理器(ROP)的差异保持同样的计算4。的GF119是smalles的芯片的费米生成用于低端笔记本电脑。作为一款入门级的卡片的性能,的GT 520MX有竞争反对在目前的Sandy Bridge处理器的英特尔HD Graphics 3000。由于更高的时钟速度,MX应该只稍微比HD 3000快,但显然还是超出了速度更快的GT 525M比GT 520M快。因此要求苛刻的游戏,如“孤岛危机2或黑手党2只运行在最低细节和决议流利。即使在高细节设置,播放要求不高的游戏沥FIFA 11或模拟人生3。至于其他的500M系列芯片的特点,520MX支持通过HDMI输出码流高清音频(蓝光)。这意味着该卡能够转移到高保真接收器Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流明智的,没有质量损失。的的GT520MX提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术,。视频处理器(VP5)支持的功能集D,因此GPU能够完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1 / WMV9,H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。相对于旧的VP4,VP5提供更快的解码,在低功耗,HD-SD转码的4K x 4K分辨率的H.264解码支持。此外,GPU能够解码两个1080p视频流,同时(如蓝光图片,图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL的,和DirectCompute 2.1的支持下,GeForce GT 520MX可帮助一般计算。例如,流处理器能显着更快编码视频不是一个快速的CPU。此外,可以从理论上做物理计算的GPU PhysX物理(如黑手党2“地铁2033”),但性能不会,这是足够的。

GeForce GT 500M Series

GeForce GT 555M 144 @ 0.53 - 0.75 GHz128, 192 Bit @ 785-900 MHz
GeForce GT 550M 96 @ 0.74 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 540M 96 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 525M 96 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520MX 48 @ 0.9 GHz64 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520M 48 @ 0.74 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 800 / 900 MHz
CodenameN12P-GVR
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed900 MHz
Shader Speed1800 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
FeaturesVerde Drivers, CUDA, Optimus, DirectCompute, OpenCL, DirectX11, OpenGL 4.1
Date of Announcement30.05.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 658     avg: 666     median: 666 (1%)     max: 674 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 593     avg: 597     median: 596.5 (1%)     max: 600 Points
171.8 -71%
...
522 -13%
522 -13%
531 -11%
AMD Radeon HD 8330
532 -11%
Intel UHD Graphics 600
558 -7%
576 -4%
582 -3%
584 -2%
585 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
597
599 0%
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
611 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8400
615 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
624 5%
Intel HD Graphics 4200
624 5%
632 6%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
641 7%
648 9%
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
650 9%
...
59943 9941%
max:
104201 17354%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2558     avg: 2620     median: 2619.5 (1%)     max: 2681 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2179     avg: 2201     median: 2200.5 (1%)     max: 2222 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -97%
...
2018 -8%
2031 -8%
2039 -7%
2073 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
2092 -5%
2098 -5%
2111 -4%
2156 -2%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
2196 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
2201
2203 0%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
2207 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8350G
2212 0%
2216 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
2220 1%
2222 1%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
2243 2%
2259 3%
2322 5%
...
132443 5917%
max:
170928 7666%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 13717     avg: 13769     median: 13782 (7%)     max: 13808 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
10556 Points (12%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
Intel HD Graphics 5000
9763 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
9963 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX SLI
9969 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI
9996 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
10256 -3%
10403 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
10417 -1%
10461 -1%
10550 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
10556
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
10585 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
10689 1%
AMD Radeon R5 M335
10717 2%
10786 2%
10949 4%
11125 5%
11140 6%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
11161 6%
11294 7%
...
68166 546%
max:
87172 726%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 5804     avg: 5900     median: 5899.5 (8%)     max: 5995 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5235     avg: 5296     median: 5296 (7%)     max: 5357 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
9.3 fps (2%)
0.6 -94%
...
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
7.8 -16%
8.1 -13%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
8.35 -10%
8.7 -6%
8.867 -5%
8.9 -4%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
9 -3%
9 -3%
9.1 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
9.3
9.585 3%
9.7 4%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
9.8 5%
9.9 6%
10.05 8%
10.1 9%
10.1 9%
10.3 11%
10.45 12%
...
532 5620%
0%
100%
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.5 Points (82%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.5     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (57%)     max: 4.7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4558     avg: 4655     median: 4655 (3%)     max: 4752 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 18.44     avg: 18.5     median: 18.5 (6%)     max: 18.5 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
146  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
97  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
75  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
36.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
54.2 55.3 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.7 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.3 31.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.8 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14 16.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
218  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
107  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
86  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
62.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
101.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
41.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
62.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
40.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
high 1024x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dishonored13.815.415.2
World of Tanks v842.615.113
Fifa 131469752
F1 2012393430
Borderlands 23325.320
Torchlight 224.312.6
Counter-Strike: GO756838
Darksiders II26.8
Sleeping Dogs4130.110.3
Risen 2: Dark Waters20.81410.8
Mass Effect 336.125.1
Anno 2070552113
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim312215
Battlefield 311.810.5
Fifa 1221810786
F1 2011664727
Deus Ex Human Revolution62.626.3
Dirt 3101.241.427
Call of Duty: Black Ops62.640.6
Battlefield: Bad Company 2413122
Crysis - GPU Benchmark21.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
8
5
2
9
6
3
13
3
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 08. 11:42:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.023s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.023s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2614 +0.012s ... 0.035s

#13 got single benchmarks 2614 +0.02s ... 0.056s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.27s ... 0.326s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.326s

#17 Got 60 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.33s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.33s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.341s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.456s ... 0.797s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.799s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.799s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter