Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M独立是一个比较快的中档笔记本电脑的图形卡,并到GeForce GT 425M的继任者。它是基于Fermi架构GF1​​08核心的一部分。因此,支持DirectX 11和OpenGL 4.0。相比,GT 425M,GT 525M核心时脉率增加了7%左右。有关GF108架构的GF108核心的GT 525M在GeFore GTX 480M的GF100核心,拥有96个着色器和一个128位内存总线,DDR3 VRAM。除了内存控制器,基本上可以被认为是GF108一个减半GF106。因此,老GT215(例如,GeForce GTS 350M的)或GT216(例如,GeForce GT 330M独立)内核的架构是没有直接的可比性。不同的是GF100,较小的GF104,GF106,GF108核心不仅缩短了,但也有相当大的修改。相反的GF100,其目的是为专业应用,后者的芯片消费市场为目标。它们的特点是着色器(3X16,而不是2X16),更多的纹理单元(8而不是4)和交换网板每流式多处理器(SM)。由于尚有经调度程序(与3个着色器组),NVIDIA现在使用超标量执行,以更有效地利用量较高的着色器每个SM。从理论上讲,每个核心的性能比前代产品大大提高了。在最坏的情况中,Fermi架构的性能也可以是差于预期。 ECC内存保护,这是非常重要的专业应用软件,完全忽略和FP64硬件缩短(只有1/3的着色器FP64能力,从而只有1/12的FP32的表现)。由于这些削减,大小的SM仅增长25%,尽管更高的着色器的数量和较大的经调度具有超标量调度功能。由于不同的着色器架构的着色器域和更高的时钟频率,核心数量的NVIDIA费米卡不能直接相比,AMD的Radeon 5000系列(例如HD 5650)的核心。的GF104架构(和推而广之,GF106和GF108)被发现在桌面GTX 460条Anandtech的详细信息。性能的GT 525M的游戏性能是相似的GT 425M核心时钟速率的不同之处仅7%。因此,GT 525M的游戏性能是足够的中等详细设置在现代游戏一样,“战地:叛逆连队2。要求不高的游戏,应该运行在高细节的设置。选择最佳分辨率为720p或由于性能有限。图表上的3D性能基准测试和比较,可以发现以下或专用的GT 425M基准页面上是一个伟大的来源,以及由于到双方GPU(图形处理器)之间的相似性。功能的新颖的GF104/106/108芯片是支持通过HDMI输出码流高清音频(蓝光)。 GT 525M的Radeon HD 5730相似,可以将Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流,没有质量损失一个高保真接收器。的GT525M提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术。视频处理器(VP4)支持的功能集C和允许GPU完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1/WMV9 ,和H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。此外,GPU能够解码两个1080p视频流,同时(如蓝光图片,图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL和DirectCompute 2.1的支持下,GeForce GT 525M,可以帮助一般计算。例如,数据流处理器可以编码视频大大快于现代CPU。此外,物理计算可以由GPU使用PhysX物理(例如,支持黑手党2或地铁2033)。根据NVIDIA 525M支持3D Vision。这使得笔记本电脑送3D内容,3D游戏,3D网络流,3D照片,3D蓝光射线到一个内置的3D功能的屏幕或外接3D电视,如果笔记本电脑制造商的支持。但是,此功能会自动禁用,如果笔记本电脑包括擎天柱。的功耗的GeForce GT 525M,GT 425M应该是相似的,因此适用于15“笔记本电脑。此外,500M系列支持擎天柱从英特尔和Nvidia的GPU集成显卡之间自动切换。 Nvidia的省电功能的实现完全依赖于笔记本电脑制造商。

GeForce GT 500M Series

GeForce GT 555M 144 @ 0.53 - 0.75 GHz128, 192 Bit @ 785-900 MHz
GeForce GT 550M 96 @ 0.74 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 540M 96 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 525M 96 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520MX 48 @ 0.9 GHz64 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520M 48 @ 0.74 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 800 / 900 MHz
CodenameN12P-GE
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines96 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz
Shader Speed1200 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1536 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption25 Watt
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement06.01.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 737     avg: 835     median: 901 (1%)     max: 937 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 652     avg: 743     median: 799 (1%)     max: 829 Points
171.8 -77%
...
650 -13%
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
650 -13%
656 -12%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G
678 -9%
685 -8%
700 -6%
Intel UHD Graphics 605
701 -6%
721 -3%
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
731 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
743
753 1%
Intel HD Graphics 4400
755 2%
756 2%
757 2%
777 5%
799 8%
819 10%
825 11%
841 13%
...
59943 7968%
max:
104201 13924%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3238     avg: 3750     median: 3839.5 (1%)     max: 4072 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 2373     avg: 2927     median: 3230 (2%)     max: 3258 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
25685 Points (27%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 14843     avg: 17618     median: 19070 (10%)     max: 19146 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 11799     avg: 13307     median: 13768 (15%)     max: 14509 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
12640 -5%
12762 -4%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870
12885 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
12932 -3%
12975 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GTS
13125 -1%
13125 -1%
13217 -1%
13284 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
13307
13441 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
13587 2%
13620 2%
13666 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
13775 4%
13817 4%
Intel HD Graphics 530
13920 5%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
13950 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
13952 5%
...
68064 411%
max:
87172 555%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 6069     avg: 6902     median: 7058.5 (9%)     max: 7588 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
min: 6792     avg: 7675     median: 7675 (10%)     max: 8558 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 9.9     avg: 11.5     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.3 fps
0.6 -95%
...
10.8 -6%
10.8 -6%
Intel HD Graphics 4400
10.87 -6%
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
10.9 -5%
11.1 -4%
11.13 -3%
11.3 -2%
11.4 -1%
11.4 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
11.53
11.9 3%
11.9 3%
12.06 5%
12.07 5%
12.3 7%
12.6 9%
12.7 10%
Intel HD Graphics 5000
12.97 12%
13.48 17%
...
532 4514%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 1.74     avg: 2.3     median: 2.4 (1%)     max: 2.78 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.69     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.84 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 4.9     avg: 5.7     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 6.38 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.95     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.02 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 2.07     avg: 4.1     median: 3 (2%)     max: 7.37 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.07     avg: 9.3     median: 9.2 (10%)     max: 9.65 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 7.18     avg: 8.2     median: 8.5 (4%)     max: 8.99 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 2.89     avg: 3.5     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 4.32 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.5     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (84%)     max: 6.6 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.7     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (72%)     max: 6.6 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3409     avg: 4441     median: 4531 (3%)     max: 5451 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 17.81     avg: 20.5     median: 22.4 (7%)     max: 22.74 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
41  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
51  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
53 77.7 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
36 48 54.6 56.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
32 40.8 44.9 45.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.5 26.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
303.9 327.1 367.8 413.8 ~ 353 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
126.8 155.9 173.7 182.8 ~ 160 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
83.7 105.3 111.7 114.7 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62.8 63 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
59.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
36.5 39.8 40.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
28.8 31 31.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6 18.8 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
161 175.3 190.9 200.3 ~ 182 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
31 33.9 41.6 42 47.9 59.2 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
25 26 29.7 30.7 34.5 41.4 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16 17.5 ~ 17 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
41.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
4.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
42 43 50.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
27 32.2 37.7 40 40.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
19 23.4 27.4 29 29.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.9 14.6 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 800x600
111.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
68 70 82.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
26.7 29.4 36.4 37.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.9 20 24.1 25.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3 16.5 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
101.5  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
45.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
33.3 37.6 48.5 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.2 27 36 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
52.1 67.6 93.4 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
44.9 58 68.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
28.6 34.8 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
126.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
154.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
66.5  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
44.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
99.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
48.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
200 223.1 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
80.6 95.6 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
55.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
25.5 31.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3974125
Crysis 25134.525.48.5
Call of Duty: Black Ops65494123
Fifa 1135316010463
Mafia 259.8393019
StarCraft 2182433117
Metro 203341.124.613.14.7
Battlefield: Bad Company 245352614
CoD Modern Warfare 2111.742.636.722.8
Risen73332216
Resident Evil 5101.545.8
Need for Speed Shift402921.5
Colin McRae: DIRT 271573314.7
Anno 1404126.223.9
F.E.A.R. 2154.266.544.521.9
Racedriver: GRID99.848.1
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare2128855.9
Call of Juarez Benchmark28
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
7
5
1
11
2
1
7
8
1
12

1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 24. 14:06:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:16:45 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.019s ... 0.02s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.021s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.021s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2063 +0.013s ... 0.034s

#13 got single benchmarks 2063 +0.029s ... 0.063s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.063s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.371s ... 0.433s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.433s

#17 Got 130 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.441s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.441s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.451s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.51s ... 0.961s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.963s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.963s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter