Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M独立显卡的笔记本电脑的快速中产阶级。根据不同的版本,它是基于GF108,GF116,GF106架构,不同的着色器数量,时钟速度和内存配置。它源于的Fermi一代和支持DirectX 11和OpenGL 4.0。版本(从最低到最高性能):144(GF106)核心709MHz,128Bit的GDDR5,例如: MSI GX780144核心590MHz(GF106),192Bit DDR3,例如:戴尔XPS 17,Alienware的M14x144核心590MHz(GF106),128位DDR3,例如:全球国际货运代理XMG A501 / A701(蓝天W150HRM / W170HN),的96个核心753MHz(GF108),128bit的GDDR5,例如:联想Y570p核心/ Y560p144核心(GF116),525 MHz的128位DDR3,例如: MEDION AKOYA P6812 GF106架构的GF106核心的GTX 555M GeFore GTX 480M的GF100核心,并提供相关的192个着色器和一个192位内存总线GDDR5。 GT 555M只提供了144着色器和一些变体和较小的内存总线和DDR3。除了内存控制器,基本上可以被认为是GF106一个减半GF104。因此,老GT215(例如,GeForce GTS 350M的)或GT216(例如,GeForce GT 330M独立)内核的架构是没有可比性的。不同的GF100,规模较小的GF104,GF106,GF108核心已经缩短,大大改进。相反的GF100,其目的是为专业应用,后者的芯片消费市场为目标。它们的特点是着色器(3X16,而不是2X16)和更多的纹理单元(8而不是4)每个流式多处理器(SM)和交换网板。仍然只有2经调度程序(与3个着色器组),NVIDIA目前使用超标量执行更有效的使用量较高的着色器每个SM。着色器在理论上,可以更有效地利用每个核心的性能可以提高。然而,这是值得注意的GF106的性能,也可以比GF100(及其前身)在最坏的情况更糟糕。 ECC内存保护,这是非常重要的专业应用软件,完全忽略和FP64硬件缩短(只有1/3的着色器FP64能力,从而只有1/12的FP32的表现)。由于这些削减,大小的SM仅增长25%,尽管更高的着色器的数量和较大的经调度具有超标量调度功能。由于不同的着色器架构的着色器域和更高的时钟频率,核心数量的Nvidia的芯片不能直接相比,AMD的Radeon 5000系列(例如HD 5830)的核心。的GF104架构(和推而广之,也GF106和GF108),可以发现在桌面GTX 460条Anandtech的详细信息。略微重新设计的GF114和GF116芯片,在2011年推出的芯片。由于以改变晶体管设计,时钟速率提高,同时保持或多或少的相同的功耗水平。性能GT 555M的性能高度依赖于版本的卡(见上文)。 3DMark 06的性能,例如,取值范围,(联想Ideapad Y570)从8857点到13000点(MSI GX780R)。 GT 555M的联想,因此对于所有意图和目的,基本上是一个快速的GeForce®(精视™)550M。平均定位在高端类GT 555M(144个着色器),使用户能够播放要求苛刻的游戏,在1366×768的高设置。只有地铁2033在较低的设置过程中要发挥我们的基准测试(见下文)。特点的GF104/106/108芯片的一个特点是支持通过HDMI输出码流高清音频(蓝光)。类似的Radeon HD 5730,GT 555M可以将Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流明智的一个高保真接收器,没有质量损失。 GT 555M提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术。视频处理器(VP4)支持的功能集C和允许GPU完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1/WMV9 ,和H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。此外,GPU能够同时解码两个1080p视频流(例如,蓝光图片,在图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL的,和DirectCompute 2.1的支持,GeForce GT 555M的可以帮助一般计算的。例如,数据流处理器可以编码视频大大快于现代CPU。此外,物理学计算可以通过GPU利用PhysX支持,如在黑手党2“地铁2033”。根据NVIDIA GT 555M支持3D立体幻镜™。送3D内容(3D游戏,3D网络流,3D照片,3D蓝光射线),它可以使笔记本电脑的内置3D功能的屏幕或外接3D电视的笔记本电脑制造商的支持,不配合时,擎天柱。相对高功耗的GeForce GT 555M适合较大的笔记本电脑14-17“。为了节省功耗,该卡支持的Optimus即使视频卡本身来自英特尔和Nvidia的GPU集成显卡之间的自动切换。支持此功能,它的实现是完全依赖于笔记本电脑制造商。

GeForce GT 500M Series

GeForce GT 555M 144 @ 0.53 - 0.75 GHz128, 192 Bit @ 785-900 MHz
GeForce GT 550M 96 @ 0.74 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 540M 96 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 525M 96 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520MX 48 @ 0.9 GHz64 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520M 48 @ 0.74 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 800 / 900 MHz
CodenameN12E-GE-B
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines144 - unified
Core Speed525 - 753 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed1180-1505 MHz
Memory Speed785-900 MHz
Memory Bus Width128, 192 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3,GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory3 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1162     avg: 1322     median: 1299 (2%)     max: 1673 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1010     avg: 1179     median: 1146 (1%)     max: 1467 Points
171.8 -85%
...
1141 -3%
1141 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
1143 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro K610M
1144 -3%
1147 -3%
1148 -3%
1152 -2%
1161 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
1175 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
1179
AMD Radeon R5 M230
1203 2%
1233 5%
1233 5%
1245 6%
1259 7%
1261 7%
1286 9%
Intel HD Graphics 520
1296 10%
1307 11%
...
59943 4984%
max:
106023 8893%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4752     avg: 5797     median: 5884 (2%)     max: 6462 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 4128     avg: 4847     median: 4997 (3%)     max: 5381 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
Intel HD Graphics 520
4547 -6%
4570 -6%
AMD Radeon R7 M340
4606 -5%
4645 -4%
4739 -2%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
4761 -2%
AMD Radeon R7 M260
4787 -1%
4804 -1%
4812 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
4847
4903 1%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
4937 2%
4956 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
5033 4%
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
5035 4%
5037 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
5058 4%
5059 4%
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
5072 5%
...
132443 2632%
max:
170928 3426%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 12299     avg: 14449     median: 14449 (15%)     max: 16599 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 23096     avg: 26418     median: 26329 (14%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13882     avg: 18199     median: 18607 (20%)     max: 19357 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
17043 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
17105 -6%
17192 -6%
17271 -5%
17513 -4%
17545 -4%
17784 -2%
18044 -1%
18136 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
18199
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
18414 1%
18466 1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
18522 2%
18829 3%
18903 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
18965 4%
19079 5%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
19100 5%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
19187 5%
...
68064 274%
max:
87172 379%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 8857     avg: 11156     median: 11579 (15%)     max: 13033 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8836     avg: 10453     median: 10568 (14%)     max: 11525 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 16.6     avg: 17.4     median: 17.1 (3%)     max: 18.7 fps
0.6 -97%
...
16.4 -6%
16.5 -5%
16.5 -5%
16.6 -4%
16.6 -4%
16.62 -4%
Intel HD Graphics 515
16.85 -3%
16.95 -2%
17.1 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
17.37
17.4 0%
17.65 2%
17.67 2%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
17.85 3%
17.9 3%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
18 4%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 5%
18.7 8%
18.8 8%
...
532 2963%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 1.86     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (1%)     max: 3.1 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.69     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.92 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 4.92     avg: 7.2     median: 6.8 (5%)     max: 10.19 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.1 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.85     avg: 8.2     median: 7.6 (6%)     max: 10.53 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 8.74     avg: 10.2     median: 10 (11%)     max: 12.27 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 11.12     avg: 12     median: 11.8 (6%)     max: 13.52 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 3.49     avg: 4.1     median: 4.2 (2%)     max: 4.61 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (87%)     max: 6.9 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 5.3     avg: 6.5     median: 6.9 (87%)     max: 6.9 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4316     avg: 5321     median: 5436 (4%)     max: 5950 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 26.61     avg: 32.2     median: 33.4 (12%)     max: 35.21 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
43.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
45.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
66.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
119.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
41.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
36.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Star Wars: The Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic

2011
low 1024x768
71.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
97.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
43 46 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
171.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
49.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
76  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
279.1 350.6 ~ 315 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
183.1 223.5 ~ 203 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
144.5 158.4 ~ 151 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
108  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
85  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
53  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
129.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
109 109 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
75 77 79 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
48.3 50 51 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.7 13 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
71.9 81 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
47.3 47.4 55.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
34.7 35 40.8 41.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7 12.3 12.9 13.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
72.7 81 111.7 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
64.7 66 83.5 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
54.7 56 67.6 69.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.6 42.9 43.2 47 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
323.2 406 434.8 459.3 ~ 406 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
199.1 210.2 219 247.1 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
59 129 133.5 151.5 171 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.8 96 101.8 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
67 71.1 73 80.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
55 55 56 56.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
43.4 45 45 45.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1 27 27.1 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
190 198.4 234.2 ~ 208 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
55.8 57 57.5 62.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
38 38.6 42.4 46.2 46.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 22.6 23.9 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
34 62.5 66.7 94.6 107.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
23 34.7 39.2 47.6 58.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
17.9 20.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 7.5 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
70.2 74 75.2 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
48 52.7 57.2 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
38.5 40 41 41.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.6 20 22.2 22.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
137.6 157.9 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
55.6 65.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.2 54.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.7 34.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
79.8 92.9 100.7 109.9 112 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
37 45.3 48 48.2 52 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
24.5 28.9 33.5 34.4 38 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 22.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
93.3 144.9 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
56.8 67.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
58.8 65.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.2 44.1 45 80.3 91 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
30.1 34.7 49.2 55.3 59 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.2 33.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
82.8 92.7 102.5 125 126.3 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
69.6 77 89.1 90.5 102 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
40.8 41.4 51 54.5 58.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 31.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
119.4 164 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
34.8 36.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
162 180.4 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
97.5 104.2 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
63.1 69.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.6 34.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
207.2 233.3 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
94 144.1 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
41.3 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Secret World43.834.121.18.1
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier34.816.27.8
Max Payne 345.341.912.69.9
Dirt Showdown66.661.437.112.9
Diablo III119.461.239.127.7
Risen 2: Dark Waters41.628.122.610.6
Mass Effect 3594827.2
Alan Wake36.224.610.6
Star Wars: The Old Republic71.835.221.1
Anno 207097.741.525.712.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim45362613.4
CoD: Modern Warfare 3171.377.146.527.1
Battlefield 349.232.324.59.8
Batman: Arkham City101763313
Fifa 1231520315196.8
F1 2011108855320
Deus Ex Human Revolution129.15119.8
Dirt 3109775013
Crysis 276503813
Call of Duty: Black Ops88716242
Fifa 1140621912996
Mafia 273564527
StarCraft 2208584223
Metro 20337341197
Battlefield: Bad Company 273534021
CoD Modern Warfare 2148615032
Risen99463222
Resident Evil 51196233.4
Need for Speed Shift62604632
Colin McRae: DIRT 2106864926
Anno 140414236
F.E.A.R. 21711016733
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare220119
Call of Juarez Benchmark43
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

8
16
9
3
11
12
2
7
18
3
2
24
6
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 05. 04:50:28

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:31:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.036s ... 0.037s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.038s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2055 +0.014s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 2055 +0.059s ... 0.111s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.408s ... 0.52s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.52s

#16 Got 262 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.538s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.538s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.019s ... 0.557s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +1.182s ... 1.739s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 1.743s

#21 return log +0s ... 1.743s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Arc 130V *
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter