Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

采用Max-Q设计的Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti是基于Turing架构(TU116芯片)的笔记本电脑移动图形卡。它专为轻薄型笔记本电脑而设计,比笔记本电脑的常规GTX 1660 Ti慢约10-15%(取决于散热能力)。根据规格,Max-Q型号的基频慢22%,睿频慢16%。

与更快的RTX 2000 GPU(例如RTX 2060)相比,1660Ti没有集成光线追踪或Tensor内核。性能与旧GTX 1070(Max-Q)相似,但降低的TGP为60瓦(笔记本电脑版本为80,台式机版本为115瓦)。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光追,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,也对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这使得每个时钟指令增加高达50%,能耗提高40%。

Nvidia规定功耗为60瓦TGP(总图形功率),因此比笔记本电脑的正常版(Max-P)1660Ti低20瓦。因此,Max-Q型号非常适合轻薄型游戏笔记本电脑。 TU116芯片采用台积电12nm FFN制成。

GeForce GTX 1600 Series

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G0
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed1140 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory6 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption60 Watt
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.9 pt (18%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -99%
...
5.1 -14%
5.22 -12%
5.28 -11%
5.28 -11%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
5.41 -8%
5.42 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
5.55 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
5.76 -2%
5.81 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
5.9
5.9 0%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
6.01 2%
6.48 10%
6.48 10%
6.52 11%
6.54 11%
6.56 11%
6.59 12%
7.21 22%
...
20.4 246%
max:
33.3 464%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 4547     avg: 5197     median: 5072 (15%)     max: 6395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 4867     avg: 5089     median: 5084.5 (13%)     max: 5440 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
3960 -22%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
4155 -18%
4209 -17%
4256 -16%
4372 -14%
4448 -13%
4546 -11%
4661 -8%
4687 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
5089
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
5132 1%
5151 1%
5177 2%
5278 4%
5464 7%
5637 11%
5653 11%
5702 12%
5830 15%
...
19434 282%
max:
36259 612%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 220799     avg: 314100     median: 306910 (31%)     max: 414592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 76153     avg: 110626     median: 110626 (13%)     max: 145099 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 16807     avg: 29350     median: 33027 (31%)     max: 39942 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38321     avg: 63736     median: 63086 (16%)     max: 89505 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 10103     avg: 11548     median: 11615 (20%)     max: 12739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 12903     avg: 13356     median: 13355 (15%)     max: 13870 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 59373     avg: 104094     median: 86295 (10%)     max: 166615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 12279     avg: 15364     median: 15913 (21%)     max: 17377 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 17010     avg: 17711     median: 17439 (15%)     max: 18653 Points
171.8 -99%
...
15642 -12%
15823 -11%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
15837 -11%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
16233 -8%
16564 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
17028 -4%
17113 -3%
17562 -1%
17690 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
17711
17889 1%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
18037 2%
19016 7%
19109 8%
19467 10%
19881 12%
20096 13%
20096 13%
20239 14%
...
59943 238%
max:
104201 488%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
31845 Points (9%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
34951 Points (19%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 -7%
32473 -7%
32473 -7%
33179 -5%
33321 -5%
33740 -3%
33810 -3%
33936 -3%
34680 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
34951
35209 1%
35269 1%
35807 2%
36137 3%
36214 4%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 4%
36405 4%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 5%
37644 8%
...
132443 279%
max:
170928 389%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 24029     avg: 28247     median: 25211 (33%)     max: 38536 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6820     avg: 9290     median: 8562.5 (6%)     max: 13213 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 49.83     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (20%)     max: 69.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 78.2     avg: 100.5     median: 96.9 (6%)     max: 130.7 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
110.2 fps (20%)
3.3 -97%
...
94.7 -14%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 -13%
96.8 -12%
Apple M3 8-Core GPU
101.7 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
102.9 -7%
104 -6%
106.3 -4%
108 -2%
109 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
110.2
118.5 8%
121.3 10%
126.4 15%
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
147 33%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
153 39%
161.4 46%
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
166 51%
178.7 62%
181.1 64%
...
536 386%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
253.8 fps (19%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
227.4 fps (26%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
345.8 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
360.6 fps (21%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
943 fps (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2141 Samples/s (8%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
4254 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
10027 points (11%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 77.6     avg: 86.3     median: 86.3 (12%)     max: 95 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 92     avg: 96.6     median: 96.6 (13%)     max: 101.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 94.2     avg: 104.8     median: 106.9 (24%)     max: 121 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4388     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (43%)     max: 0.537 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4822     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 0.578 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34     avg: 43.4     median: 43.7 (70%)     max: 53.8 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1501 MHz (59%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1062 MHz (42%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
55.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
57
low 1280x720
119  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
136.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
219  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
214.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
130.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
168.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
115.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
91.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
95.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
24.3
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
112.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83 114 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68 72 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65 66 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 51 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
147.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
145.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
139.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
87 116.5 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.1 81.5 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.9 54.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.5 42.3 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
158.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
155 183 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119 140 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106 117 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71 77 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144.1 209.4 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.5 93.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.7 57.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.1 41.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
146.4 154.7 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.9 76.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.7 65.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.2 64.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
59.6 87.9 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.7 83.2 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.3 64.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26 33.2 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
110 142 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80 87 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66 69 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 50 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
181.2 194.2 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.6 139.9 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.7 103.2 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.3 59.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
53.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
83.5 96.6 129.5 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.9 60 66.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.1 46.6 49.1 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.1 36.8 38.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144 144 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.3 133.9 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90.1 99.6 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89 99.6 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
94.3 117.4 152 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.6 82.9 102.6 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.9 77.5 92.2 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61 73 85 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
29.1
low 1280x720
115.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
48 64 90 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43 56 71 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39 51 60 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33 42 44 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
62 82 113 126 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 57 83 85 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52 53 74 75 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 49 64 67 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
66.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
68 103 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54 84 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53 79 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50 74 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
59
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
376.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
215.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60.6 68.8 93.7 102.3 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.5 62.9 80.4 88.1 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.8 55.4 67.8 75.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
125.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
78.4 106.4 131 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.3 70.3 74.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.9 50 54.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
138  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
91  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
206.7 247.4 ~ 227 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160.8 212.1 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
141.7 173.7 ~ 158 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
130.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
193.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
140.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
93.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
232.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
200.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
163.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
148.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93.3 113 119 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88.7 102.1 112 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.4 93.8 106 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.7 86.3 103 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
med (1/3) 1920x1080
93.3
low 1280x720
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
138.4 144.5 186.8 243 256.8 257.5 258.3 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.4 142.6 162.6 166.4 166.5 173.3 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.4 83.9 89.9 92.1 94.5 95.2 95.3 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.8 48.5 48.8 51.3 52.2 53.1 53.2 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
23.5
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
161.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
151.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
183.4 224.2 263.2 294 331.3 ~ 259 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
195.6 249.5 271.9 282 ~ 250 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
180.9 226.9 246.8 259.9 ~ 229 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102.3 107.4 119.2 126.3 130 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
343.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
322.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
296.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
166.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Flight Simulator 202055.149.437.125.3
Horizon Zero Dawn119786551
Death Stranding136.187.781.378.4
F1 202021913011279
Gears Tactics214.7130.279.956.1
Doom Eternal168.9101.795.493.4
Hunt Showdown176.881.263.3
Escape from Tarkov121.298.390.587.7
Red Dead Redemption 2115.171.747.229.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order91.578.172.4
Need for Speed Heat95.88373.966.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019135.28872.662.6
GRID 2019112.986.57258.7
Ghost Recon Breakpoint99706650
FIFA 20147.9145.4141139.3
Borderlands 3102775442
Control158.363.747.1
F1 201916913011274
Total War: Three Kingdoms177855641
Rage 2151746262
Anno 180074715530
The Division 2126846850
Dirt Rally 2.01881219658
Anthem53.648.948.846.4
Far Cry New Dawn97817871
Metro Exodus103604737
Apex Legends1441209594
Darksiders III135.685.877.472.8
Battlefield V12187797337.9
Call of Duty Black Ops 4115.287.984.683.1
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey67575040
Shadow of the Tomb Raider96706457
Monster Hunter World66.959.359.550.8
Far Cry 58669666230
World of Tanks enCore376.8215.9117.3
X-Plane 11.11817162
Kingdom Come: Deliverance125.691.777.353.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1056850
Fortnite13892.289.578.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War91827261
Rocket League227186158
Ghost Recon Wildlands130.478.172.441.5
Overwatch193.7140.7116
Ashes of the Singularity42.440.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider93.772.764.5
Rainbow Six Siege232.8200.1163.6148.8
Metal Gear Solid V606060
Dota 2 Reborn1081019488
Batman: Arkham Knight896951
The Witcher 3212154885030.9
GTA V161.3151.5114.659.6
BioShock Infinite259250229117
Tomb Raider343.8322.9296.9166.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
21
28

5
31
13

12
34
6
2
19
23
3




3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 23. 04:19:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:32:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#16 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 9832 +0.026s ... 0.053s

#18 got single benchmarks 9832 +0.031s ... 0.085s

#19 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.701s ... 0.786s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.786s

#22 Got 341 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.812s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.812s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.034s ... 0.847s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +2.024s ... 2.871s

#26 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.006s ... 2.877s

#27 return log +0s ... 2.877s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q graphics card

惠普光影精灵笔记本电脑评测:一台安静的游戏本

惠普光影精灵笔记本电脑评测:一台安静的游戏本

光影精灵系列并不是惠普最好的笔记本电脑的所在地,而光影精灵17是迄今为止我们从HP那里看到的更好的游戏笔记本电脑之一。 考虑到其价格范围,该系统非常安静,甚至时尚。...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.8 kg
华硕ROG Zephyrus G GA502DU (Ryzen 7 3750H, GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

华硕ROG Zephyrus G GA502DU (Ryzen 7 3750H, GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Zephyrus G GA502DU希望重新定义廉价游戏笔记本应该是什么?AMD罕见的H系列CPU与Nvidia GeForce Max-Q GPU的配对是我们期盼了很久的事。 它在1080p30或1080p60画质下提供了非常均衡的游戏体验,其体积与其他华丽的旗舰型号一样,但价格合理。...
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.1 kg

HP Envy 15-ep0017np: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0017np

HP Envy 15-ep0123tx: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0123tx

HP Envy 15-ep0813no: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0813no

MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-085: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-085

MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-032RU: Intel Core i7-1185G7, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Stealth 15M A11SDK-032RU

MSI Creator 15 A10SD-276ES: Intel Core i7-10875H, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Creator 15 A10SD-276ES

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0011ns: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0011ns

HP Envy 15-ep0060ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 15-ep0060ng

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU

HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0272ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0272ng

HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd1275ng: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd1275ng

Microsoft Surface Book 3 15: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Book 3 15

Microsoft Surface Book 3 15-SLZ-00005: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Book 3 15-SLZ-00005

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE001T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE001T

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE021T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IU-HE021T

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-AL011T: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-AL011T

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU-BQ015T: AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502DU-BQ015T

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-dk0045cl: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 15-dk0045cl

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng: AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng

HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Gaming Pavilion 15-dk0009ng

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01-23)