Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M SLI包括两个高端的DirectX 11的的GeForce GTX460M卡与SLI桥连接。因此,它提供了2个192的GF106芯片的核心。由于交替帧渲染(AFR),SLI解决方案可能会受到在低帧率的范围(约30fps)的微口吃。此外,2x1536 MB GDDR5不能加在一起,每个卡使用相同的日期,在图形存储器。 GF106架构的GF106核心的GTX 460M相关的GeFore GTX 480M的GF100核心,拥有192个着色器和一个192位内存总线GDDR5。除内存控制器,基本上可以被考虑的GF106一个减半GF104。因此,老GT215(例如,GeForce GTS 350M的)或GT216(例如,GeForce GT 330M独立)内核的架构是没有可比性的。不同的GF100,规模较小的GF104,GF106,GF108核心都被缩短和修改相当。在对比的GF100,其目的是为专业应用,这些GF10x的芯片消费市场为目标。它们的特点是着色器(3X16,而不是2X16),更多的纹理单元(8而不是4)流式多处理器(SM)和交换网板。由于尚有2经调度程序(与3个着色器组),NVIDIA现在使用超标量执行更有效的使用量较高的着色器每个SM从理论上讲,可以利用的着色,从而更有效地提高每个核心的性能。然而,在最坏的情况下的性能,因此不如GF100(及其前身)。 ECC内存保护,这是非常重要的专业应用软件,完全被省略,缩短FP64硬件(只有1/3的着色器FP64能力,从而只有1/12的FP32的表现)。由于这些削减,大小的SM仅增长25%,尽管更高的着色器的数量和较大的经调度具有超标量调度功能。由于不同的着色器架构的着色器域和更高的时钟频率,核心数量不能直接相比,AMD的Radeon 5000系列(例如HD 5850)的核心。的GF104架构(和推而广之,GF106和GF108)被发现在桌面GTX 460条Anandtech的详细信息。性能的SLI性能与最新的驱动程序(2010年年中),应该是15%到20%左右的速度比单一的GTX 460M高设置和决议的。因此,目前所有的游戏(如2011年)应在最高细节设置运行流利的抗锯齿和全高清分辨率,除地铁2033“孤岛危机”。一个新奇的的功能GF104/106/108的芯片支持HD音频比特流(蓝光)通过HDMI输出。类似的Radeon HD 5850,GTX 460M可以将Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流明智的一个高保真接收器,没有质量损失。的的GTX460M提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术,。所包含的视频处理器(VP4)支持的功能集C,因此,GPU能够完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1 / WMV9,H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。 X500测试仪能够解码VC-1编码的视频大象之梦约3-6%的CPU负载(根据任务管理器)。 H.264编码的大巴克兔子视频播放1-3%的CPU负载(包括1080p的视频)。此外,GPU能够解码两个1080p视频流,同时(如蓝光图片,图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL的,和DirectCompute 2.1的支持,GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M可用于一般计算。例如,数据流处理器可以编码视频可以大大快于许多现代的CPU。此外,物理学计算可以通过GPU使用PhysX物理(如黑手党2“地铁2033”)。一个单一的GTX 460M SLI组合的话,可以用专用的计算。根据NVIDIA的GTX显卡,支持3D立体幻镜从而使。它允许的笔记本电脑,3D内容发送到支持3D功能的屏幕或外接3D电视(3D游戏,3D网络流媒体,3D照片,3D蓝光)兼容。一个单一的GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M是假想的功耗约72瓦(TDP包括MXM主板和内存)。推而广之,GTX 460M SLI应该使用两次大的权力。然而,在一个单一的460M SLI设置,可以停用的驱动程序,以节省电力。如果空闲,每个芯片的时钟频率在50/100 MHz和200/400MHz(芯片/着色器),在2D模式和3D模式,分别以节省电力。类似的桌面GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460 SLI是基于GF104芯片,并提供更多的着色器核心在2x336核心。因此,桌面设置明显快于460M SLI,甚至470M的SLI图形处理解决方案。

GeForce GTX 400M Series

GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
CodenameN11E-GS
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed675 MHz
Shader Speed1350 MHz
Memory Speed1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2x1536 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
FeaturesOptimus Support, PureVideo HD VP4, 3D Vision, Bitstream HD Audio, CUDA, DirectCompute, OpenCL, OpenGL 4.0, DirectX 11, SLI Supported
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement03.09.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3412 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
3313 Points (3%)
171.8 -95%
...
AMD FirePro W5130M
3106 -6%
3131 -5%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
3180 -4%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
3220 -3%
3238 -2%
3249 -2%
3261 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
3288 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
3310 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
3313
AMD Radeon R9 M375
3314 0%
3392 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
3392 2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
3447 4%
3456 4%
3466 5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
3483 5%
3535 7%
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
3553 7%
...
59943 1709%
max:
106023 3100%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
14236 Points (4%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
13156 Points (7%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
11620 -12%
12199 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
12290 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce 945M
12567 -4%
12606 -4%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
12634 -4%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
12715 -3%
12907 -2%
13008 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
13156
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
13209 0%
13296 1%
13341 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
13403 2%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
13518 3%
13716 4%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
14047 7%
14050 7%
14096 7%
...
132443 907%
max:
170928 1199%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
61524 Points (32%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
25371 Points (28%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
24337 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
24437 -4%
24574 -3%
24750 -2%
24769 -2%
24809 -2%
24984 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
25031 -1%
25241 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
25371
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
26820 6%
26943 6%
27041 7%
27458 8%
27877 10%
28423 12%
28941 14%
29052 15%
29194 15%
...
61850 144%
max:
87172 244%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
18583 Points (24%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
47.2 fps (9%)
0.6 -99%
...
41.7 -12%
41.87 -11%
41.95 -11%
42.5 -10%
43.3 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
43.95 -7%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
44.6 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
45.1 -4%
45.2 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
47.2
47.6 1%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
47.7 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
48.15 2%
48.3 2%
48.5 3%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
51.3 9%
53 12%
54.2 15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
56.1 19%
...
532 1027%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
5.2 fps (4%)
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
6.8 fps (5%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
9.5 fps (10%)
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
17 fps (8%)
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
4.7 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5342 points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
38.9 fps (13%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
551  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
318.4  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
216.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
120.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
102.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
92.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
260  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
76.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
67.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 800x600
122.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
91.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
52  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
140.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
122.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
98.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
56.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 800x600
278.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
152.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
132.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
88.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
155.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
126.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
99.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
151.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
112.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
107.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
113.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
81.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
164.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
143.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
122.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
75.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
180.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
94.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
227.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
152.5  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
149.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
250.2  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
190.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
193.8  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
132.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
352.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
226.5  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
159.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
139.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
88.1  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
73.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
184.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
93.1  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
76.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
126.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
243.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 11551318.4216.8133.4
Mafia 2120.9102.992.166
StarCraft 226076.167.240.8
Metro 2033122.891.35218.5
Battlefield: Bad Company 2140.9122.298.256.7
CoD Modern Warfare 2278.9152.2132.288.3
Risen155.1126.399.963.5
Resident Evil 5151.9112.491.1
Need for Speed Shift107.6113.981.6
Colin McRae: DIRT 2164.8143.1122.975.4
Anno 1404180.994.6
F.E.A.R. 2227.7152.5149.391.2
Left 4 Dead250.2190.8
Far Cry 2193.8132.780.6
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare352.5226.5159.7
Crysis - GPU Benchmark139.988.173.925.4
Crysis - CPU Benchmark184.393.176.524.1
Call of Juarez Benchmark126.1
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark243.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



16


6
7

1
8
9
3
2
9
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 26. 04:00:25

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.034s ... 0.035s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.037s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#12 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 2019 +0.013s ... 0.05s

#14 got single benchmarks 2019 +0.008s ... 0.058s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.349s ... 0.406s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.407s

#18 Got 62 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.413s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.413s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.009s ... 0.422s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.624s ... 1.046s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.049s

#23 return log +0s ... 1.049s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter