Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

NVIDIA GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M是在2010年发布了高端笔记本电脑的图形卡。它是基于Fermi架构GF1​​06核心的一部分。因此,GPU支持DirectX 11和OpenGL 4.0。相比之下,只提供144芯GT 445M,GTX 460M提供所有的192个着色器的GF106核心。速度更快的GTX 470M基于GF104和288提供了更多的着色器核心。 GF106架构的GF106核心的GTX 460M相关的GeFore GTX 480M的GF100核心,拥有192个着色器和一个192位内存总线GDDR5。除了内存控制器,基本上可以被认为是GF106一个减半GF104。因此,老GT215(例如,GeForce GTS 350M的)或GT216(例如,GeForce GT 330M独立)内核的架构是没有可比性的。不同的GF100,规模较小的GF104,GF106,GF108核心不仅在尺寸减小,但也已大大改进。相反的GF100,其目的是为专业应用,这些芯片的目标消费市场。它们的特点是着色器(3X16,而不是2X16),更多的纹理单元(8而不是4)每个流式多处理器(SM)和交换网板。由于尚有经调度程序(与3个着色器组),NVIDIA目前使用超标量执行更有效的使用量较高的着色器每个SM。理论上,着色器从而可以更有效地利用每个核心的性能可以提高。然而,在最坏的情况下,性能也比的GF100和它的前辈的更糟糕。 ECC内存保护,这是非常重要的专业应用软件,完全忽略和FP64硬件缩短(只有1/3的着色器FP64可以胜任自己的工作,而且相关的只有1/12的FP32的表现)。由于这些削减,大小的SM仅增长25%,尽管更高的着色器的数量和较大的经调度具有超标量调度功能。由于不同的着色器架构的着色器域和更高的时钟频率,核心数的GTX 460M不能直接相比,AMD的Radeon 5000系列(例如HD 5850)的核心。的GF104架构(和推而广之,也GF106和GF108),可以发现在桌面GTX 460条Anandtech的详细信息。性能由于GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M采用了全新的体系结构,具有类似的核心数较老的芯片的性能是没有可比性的。相反的Radeon HD 5850,可以有选择地使用DDR3内存,192位内存总线相结合的GTX 460M GDDR5。此外,基于费米的芯片提供了更高的Tessellation(曲面细分)性能比DX11的Radeon HD 5000系列的芯片。我们跑了一组基准早期预样品的东芝Qosmio X500与740QM CPU。在合成基准测试,GTX 460M DDR3的Mobility Radeon HD 5850看齐。在实际的游戏测试和测试,性能比HD 5850 GDDR5平均。在某些情况下(例如,的Unigine天堂2.1和尘埃2演示),卡甚至击败了的Mobility Radeon HD 5870。平均而言,GTX 480M约8-18%的速度。可以在下面找到详细的基准测试和游戏的结果(包括图表)。功能的新颖的GF104/106/108芯片是支持通过HDMI输出码流高清音频(蓝光)。类似的Radeon HD 5850,GTX 460M可以将Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流,没有质量损失一个高保真接收器。的的GTX460M提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术,。视频处理器(VP4)支持的特征集C的GPU,因此能够完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1 / WMV9,H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。 X500笔记本测试仪,约3-6%的CPU负载(根据任务管理器)能够解码VC-1编码的视频大象之梦。 H.264编码的大巴克兔子视频播放1-3%的CPU负载(包括1080p的视频)。此外,GPU能够同时解码两个1080p视频流(例如,蓝光图片,在图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL的,和DirectCompute 2.1的支持,GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M可以使用一般的计算。例如,数据流处理器可以编码视频大大快于许多现代的CPU。此外,GPU利用PhysX物理运算可以通过支持(例如,黑手党2“地铁2033”)。例如,X500的GPU跑Fluidmark 3倍以上的速度比它的CPU(36与11 fps)的,在我们的测试中。根据NVIDIA的3D Vision支持上的GTX显卡。送3D内容(3D游戏,3D网络流,3D照片,3D蓝光射线),它可以使笔记本电脑的内置中启用3D屏幕或外接3D电视的笔记本电脑制造商的支持。非官方的GeForce GTX 460M,功耗约72瓦(TDP包括MXM主板和内存),这是水平的Mobility Radeon HD 5850 - 5870。如果没有负载下,该芯片被于50/100兆赫(芯片/着色器)和200/400在2D模式和3D模式下,分别提供时钟,以节省电力。此外,400M系列支持擎天柱从英特尔和Nvidia的GPU集成显卡之间自动切换。但是,其实现是依赖于制造商。目前(2010年)四核处理器,不安置了一个集成的GPU,我们将不会看到很多的Optimus设计与GTX 460M GPU(图形处理器)在2011年之前推出的Sandy Bridge。类似命名的桌面是基于GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460的GF104芯片,并提供了更多的着色器核心在336。因此,它是显着的速度比GTX 460M,甚至GTX 470M。

GeForce GTX 400M Series

GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
CodenameN11E-GS
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed675 MHz
Shader Speed1350 MHz
Memory Speed1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory1536 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
FeaturesOptimus Support, PureVideo HD VP4, 3D Vision, Bitstream HD Audio, CUDA, DirectCompute, OpenCL, OpenGL 4.0, DirectX 11, SLI Supported
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement03.09.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1788     avg: 1814     median: 1805 (2%)     max: 1861 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1598     avg: 1628     median: 1623 (1%)     max: 1692 Points
171.8 -89%
...
1577 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
1583 -3%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
1588 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
1597 -2%
1600 -2%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
1600 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
1602 -2%
1621 0%
1625 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
1628
AMD Radeon R5 M320
1652 1%
1656 2%
1671 3%
1674 3%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
1684 3%
1689 4%
Intel HD Graphics 630
1696 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
1703 5%
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
1708 5%
...
59943 3582%
max:
104201 6301%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6629     avg: 7617     median: 7507 (2%)     max: 8398 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6537     avg: 6763     median: 6709 (4%)     max: 7164 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
6327 -6%
6414 -5%
6451 -5%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
6498 -4%
6557 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
6578 -3%
6661 -2%
6665 -1%
6673 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
6763
6770 0%
6846 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
6931 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
6943 3%
7015 4%
7078 5%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
7119 5%
AMD Radeon 610M
7128 5%
7155 6%
...
132443 1858%
max:
170928 2427%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 33339     avg: 34874     median: 34874 (36%)     max: 36409 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 33712     avg: 35178     median: 35451 (19%)     max: 36383 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 17886     avg: 20171     median: 21131 (23%)     max: 21679 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
18903 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
18965 -6%
19079 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
19100 -5%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
19187 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
19268 -4%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
19383 -4%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
19694 -2%
19971 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
20171
20313 1%
20551 2%
20818 3%
20861 3%
20882 4%
20968 4%
21013 4%
21185 5%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
21189 5%
...
69623 245%
max:
87172 332%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
16957 points (22%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 11521     avg: 13112     median: 12942 (17%)     max: 14135 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 23.5     avg: 24     median: 23.9 (4%)     max: 24.7 fps
0.6 -98%
...
21.2 -12%
22 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
22.1 -8%
23.1 -4%
23.35 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
23.4 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
23.87 -1%
24 0%
24 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
24.01
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
25.4 6%
26 8%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
26.1 9%
Intel HD Graphics 630
26.6 11%
27.3 14%
27.56 15%
AMD Radeon R9 M375
27.9 16%
27.9 16%
...
532 2116%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 2.01     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (1%)     max: 2.12 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.75 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 3.75     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (4%)     max: 5.69 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.84     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 1.03 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 5.76     avg: 7     median: 7.2 (5%)     max: 8.03 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 5.21     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (8%)     max: 9.58 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 16.85     avg: 17     median: 17 (8%)     max: 17.1 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 3.24     avg: 3.9     median: 3.8 (2%)     max: 4.67 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7.1 (90%)     max: 7.1 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 5.7     avg: 6.9     median: 7.1 (90%)     max: 7.1 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3566     avg: 4942     median: 5312.5 (4%)     max: 5749 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 26.15     avg: 36.1     median: 36.2 (12%)     max: 41.49 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
189.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
108  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
73.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
102.9 106 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
70.8 71.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
51.4 53.2 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 18.1 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
83.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
78.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
58.5 75.8 86.3 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.2 47.8 55.7 55.7 56.5 59.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
543 664 ~ 604 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
301.6 320.6 ~ 311 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
194 222.6 ~ 208 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
123.5 130 132.1 133 136.2 136.3 ~ 132 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
53.6 92.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
50.2 67.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
46.7 51.2 56.3 62.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.9 33.7 33.9 34 34.4 34.7 34.8 39.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
172 193 216.6 ~ 194 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
66 73 83.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
57 61 65.4 68.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.4 31.5 31.6 31.9 32 34.5 36 47.3 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
88 115.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
53.1 54 55.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
24.3 25.2 30 30 35.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.6 9.9 10.5 12.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
80 87.3 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65 68.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.5 54.2 57.2 58 59.6 60.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.1 29 29.3 29.6 30.1 30.1 31 31.6 32 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
201.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
73.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
58.5 62.5 68.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.3 45.2 45.4 45.9 46 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
97.7 102.3 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
59.3 64 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
40.9 42.6 47.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.5 26.5 28 29.3 30.4 31 32.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
99  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
70.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.2 48.3 48.6 48.8 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
126.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
91.9 106.3 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
61 68 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.8 43 43.8 43.9 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
63.5 113 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
58.8 102.9 104.5 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
69.9 73.8 75.3 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.6 42.3 42.5 42.5 42.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
123  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
med. 1024x768
105  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
229.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
136.4  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
95.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.2 52 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
248  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
128  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
121.7  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
86.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.5 42.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
76  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
317  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
86.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
297.9 304.3 ~ 301 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
130.6 195.5 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
83 118.6 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
low 1024x768
54.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
49.2  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
48.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
92.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
70.2  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
50.7 52.6 54.6 55.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9 13 13 13.1 14.6 19.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
112.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
70.4  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
47.4 49.6 50.5 58.4 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.2 12.2 12.2 12.4 14.4 16.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
165  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
66  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
62.6 64 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
197  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
high 1280x1024
81  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
138  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
216  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
209  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
643  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt 3189.410873.6
Crysis 2104715218
Call of Duty: Black Ops83.778.27454
Fifa 11604311208132
Mafia 273595435
StarCraft 2194746335
Metro 2033102542910
Battlefield: Bad Company 284675730
CoD Modern Warfare 2201.973.26345
Risen100624427
Resident Evil 59970.248
Need for Speed Shift126.7996543
Colin McRae: DIRT 288897342
Anno 140412344
Sims 310561
F.E.A.R. 2229.4136.495.550
Left 4 Dead248128
Far Cry 2121.786.442
Crysis Warhead7625
Trackmania Nations Forever31786.531.7
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare301163101
Supreme Commander - FA Bench54.749.248.437.2
Crysis - GPU Benchmark92.670.25314
Crysis - CPU Benchmark112.470.45113
World in Conflict - Benchmark165666227
Call of Juarez Benchmark63
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark197
Quake 462
World of Warcraft81
Counter-Strike Source138
Doom 3216209
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo643
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
11
13

3
13
3
1
7
15
5
7
13
1
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 22. 14:03:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:32:24 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.024s ... 0.024s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.026s

#11 composed specs +0s ... 0.026s

#12 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#13 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 1902 +0.012s ... 0.038s

#15 got single benchmarks 1902 +0.047s ... 0.085s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.416s ... 0.501s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.501s

#19 Got 227 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.514s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.514s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.014s ... 0.528s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.818s ... 1.346s

#23 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 1.35s

#24 return log +0s ... 1.35s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter