Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M

NVIDIA GeForce®(精视™)GTX 470M是一个在2010年推出的高端笔记本电脑的图形卡。它是基于GF104核心的一部分的Fermi架构(GTX 480M更快的GF100核心,是基于把相对)。因此,GTX 470M支持DirectX 11和OpenGL 4.0的。 GF104架构的GF104核心的GTX 470M相关的GeFore GTX 480M的GF100核心,拥有384着色器和一个256位内存总线GDDR5。 GTX 470M,不过,只提供288核心的384和192位内存总线。的老GT215(例如,GeForce GTS 350M的)或,G92b(例如,GeForce®(精视™)GTX 285M)核心架构的GF104是没有可比性的。不像GF100中,较小的GF104,GF106,GF108核心不仅缩小尺寸时,但也有相当大的修改。相反的GF100,其目的是为专业应用,这些芯片的目标消费市场。它们的特点是着色器(3X16,而不是2X16),更多的纹理单元(8而不是4)每个流式多处理器(SM)和交换网板。由于尚有经调度程序(与3个着色器组),NVIDIA目前使用超标量执行更有效的使用量较高的着色器每个SM。理论上,着色器从而可以更有效地利用每个核心的性能得到改善。然而,在最坏的情况下,GTX 470M的性能也比的GF100和它的前辈的更糟糕。 ECC内存保护,这是非常重要的专业应用软件,完全忽略和FP64硬件减少(只有1/3的着色器FP64能力,从而只有1/12的FP32的表现)。由于这些削减,大小的SM仅增长25%,尽管更高的着色器的数量和较大的经调度具有超标量调度功能。由于不同的着色器架构的着色器域和更高的时钟频率,核心数量不能直接相比,AMD的Radeon 5000系列(例如HD 5850)的核心。的GF104架构的详细信息(从而也GF106和GF108),可以发现在桌面GTX 460条Anandtech的。性能由于GeForce®(精视™)GTX 470M采用了全新的体系结构,具有类似的核心数较老的芯片的性能是没有可比性的。相反的Radeon HD 5850,可以有选择地使用DDR3内存,192位内存总线相结合的GTX 470M GDDR5。此外,基于Fermi架构的DX11芯片的Radeon HD 5000系列的芯片提供了更高的Tessellation(曲面细分)性能。的GTX470M性能也应该是位以上的Mobility Radeon HD 5870的第一个测试显示甚至高于GTX 480M的性能得分。因此,所有的现代游戏2010年(除地铁2033“孤岛危机”)应该运行在最高细节设置很流利。功能的GF104/106/108芯片的一个新的特点是支持通过HDMI输出码流高清音频(蓝光)。类似的Radeon HD 5850,GTX 470M可以将Dolby True HD和DTS-HD比特流明智的一个高保真接收器,没有质量损失。 GTX 470M提供的PureVideo HD视频解码技术。视频处理器(VP4)支持的特征集C的GPU,因此能够完全解码MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4第2部分(MPEG-4 ASP - 例如,DivX或XviD),VC-1 / WMV9,H.264(VLD,IDCT,运动补偿,去块“)。此外,GPU能够同时解码两个1080p视频流(例如,蓝光图片,在图片)。通过CUDA,OpenCL的,和DirectCompute 2.1的支持,GeForce®(精视™)GTX 470M可以使用一般的计算。例如,数据流处理器可以编码视频大大快于许多现代的CPU。此外,GPU利用PhysX物理运算可以通过支持(例如,黑手党2“地铁2033”)。根据NVIDIA的GTX显卡,支持3D立体幻镜也被启用。送3D内容(3D游戏,3D网络流,3D照片,3D蓝光射线),它可以使笔记本电脑的内置中启用3D屏幕或外接3D电视的笔记本电脑制造商的支持。非官方的GeForce®(精视™)GTX 470M,功耗约75瓦(TDP包括MXM主板和内存),这是有关的Mobility Radeon HD 5870的水平。无负载时,芯片的时钟是50/100兆赫(芯片/着色器)和200/400 MHz的在2D模式和3D模式下,分别以节省电力。此外,400M系列支持擎天柱从英特尔和Nvidia的GPU集成显卡之间自动切换。然而,将取决于是否包含此功能在笔记本电脑上的笔记本电脑制造商。随着现代四核处理器(2010年),不安置了一个集成的GPU,我们将不会看到很多的擎天柱设计与GTX 470M在2011年之前推出的Sandy Bridge。类似命名的桌面是基于GeForce®(精视™)GTX 470的GF100芯片,并提供448着色器核心。因此,这是显着更快的比GTX 470M。相反,更具备媲美台式机在整体性能方面的GTX 470M GPU的GeForce GTS 450。

GeForce GTX 400M Series

GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
CodenameN11E-GT
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines288 - unified
Core Speed535 MHz
Shader Speed1070 MHz
Memory Speed1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement01.11.2010

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2162     avg: 2206     median: 2205.5 (3%)     max: 2249 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1970     avg: 2003     median: 2002.5 (2%)     max: 2035 Points
171.8 -91%
...
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
1916 -4%
1926 -4%
Qualcomm Adreno 685
1927 -4%
1934 -3%
Qualcomm Adreno 680
1936 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
1942 -3%
1969 -2%
1981 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
1985 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
2003
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
2004 0%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
2014 1%
2017 1%
2085 4%
2092 4%
2104 5%
2110 5%
2118 6%
2125 6%
...
59943 2893%
max:
106023 5193%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 9787     avg: 9801     median: 9800.5 (3%)     max: 9814 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 8420     avg: 8589     median: 8561 (5%)     max: 8787 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
7906 -8%
7990 -7%
7999 -7%
AMD Radeon R9 M375
8042 -6%
8081 -6%
Intel Iris Graphics 540
8220 -4%
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
8407 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
8492 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8850M
8538 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
8589
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
8607 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
8624 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
8764 2%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
8930 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
8994 5%
9070 6%
Intel Iris Graphics 550
9089 6%
9135 6%
9184 7%
...
132443 1442%
max:
170928 1890%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 41399     avg: 41763     median: 41762.5 (22%)     max: 42126 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 22248     avg: 23057     median: 23057 (25%)     max: 23866 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
21287 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
21505 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
21611 -6%
21991 -5%
22463 -3%
22649 -2%
22740 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
22798 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
22852 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
23057
23434 2%
23752 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
23810 3%
23823 3%
24001 4%
24337 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
24437 6%
24574 7%
24750 7%
...
61850 168%
max:
87172 278%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 16184     avg: 16509     median: 16562 (22%)     max: 16781 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 29.6     avg: 30.2     median: 30.2 (6%)     max: 30.8 fps
0.6 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
28.3 -6%
28.32 -6%
28.5 -6%
28.65 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
29 -4%
29.45 -2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
29.5 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
29.8 -1%
30.1 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
30.2
AMD FirePro W4170M
31.1 3%
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
31.4 4%
31.4 4%
32.57 8%
32.6 8%
33.3 10%
33.55 11%
33.7 12%
34.1 13%
...
532 1662%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (1%)     max: 2.02 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.68 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 5.85     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (4%)     max: 5.88 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 1.03     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.15 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 7.1     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (6%)     max: 7.74 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 9.49     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (10%)     max: 9.51 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 19.09     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (9%)     max: 19.19 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 4.19     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (2%)     max: 4.29 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (95%)     max: 7.8 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (95%)     max: 7.8 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5406     avg: 5409     median: 5409 (4%)     max: 5412 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 41.31     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (14%)     max: 41.99 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 800x600
84.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
77.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
77.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62.1 64.1 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
472.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
314.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
227.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
150 150.9 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
111.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
85  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
73.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.9 46.1 54.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
254.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
75.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.5 41.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 800x600
97.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
65.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
34.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 12.1 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
126.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
97.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
70.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.6 37.5 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 800x600
213.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
108.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
87.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
56.8 58.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
129.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
83.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38 38.2 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
155.8  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
98.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
109.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
88.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.4 55.7 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
167.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
143.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
96.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.4 53.9 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
175.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
66.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
192.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
131.7  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
109.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.2 58.2 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
218.5  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
164.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
168  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
113.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.6 50.6 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
275  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
158.5  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
105.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
119.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
78.7  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
63.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.3 16.6 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
141.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
81.3  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
61.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5 15.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
78  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
235  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty: Black Ops84.677.677.263
Fifa 11472.6314.3227.7150
Mafia 2111.88573.848
StarCraft 2254.392.975.741
Metro 203397.265.734.412
Battlefield: Bad Company 2126.397.270.737
CoD Modern Warfare 2213.7108.287.858
Risen129.483.654.938
Resident Evil 5155.898.960.6
Need for Speed Shift109.688.756
Colin McRae: DIRT 2167.1143.996.554
Anno 1404175.266.3
F.E.A.R. 2192.2131.7109.858
Left 4 Dead218.5164.6
Far Cry 2168113.651
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare275158.5105.7
Crysis - GPU Benchmark119.478.763.816
Crysis - CPU Benchmark141.181.361.416
Call of Juarez Benchmark78
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark235
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
13


10
4

2
14
3
3
9
3
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 25. 06:07:57

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.038s ... 0.039s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.04s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.041s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.041s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#12 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.041s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 1951 +0.014s ... 0.055s

#14 got single benchmarks 1951 +0.01s ... 0.065s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.35s ... 0.416s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.416s

#18 Got 81 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.422s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.422s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.431s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.668s ... 1.1s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.103s

#23 return log +0s ... 1.103s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter