Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

在2014年3月发布的NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M 是一款支持DirectX 11的高端笔记本显卡。它基于28纳米制程的GK104芯片(Kepler架构),但使用了更高的核心频率。在2014年春天,它是市场上最快的笔记本显卡。 架构 Kepler架构替代的是最早应用于笔记本电脑的GeForce 400M系列显卡中的Fermi架构核心。GK104 Kepler核心提供8个着色器模块,名为SMX,它们运行于和中心核心同样的频率下。在GTX 880M中,所有8个着色器模块均开放,提供总共1536个CUDA核心和128个TMU。它可以支持最高8GB DDR5显存,和256位的显存位宽。 性能 由于有更高的核心频率,它的运算性能相比GeForce GTX 780M有了约15%的提升。不过由于显存位宽并未提高,平均性能的提升相对有限。我们的基准测试成绩显示,实际的性能提升约为10%,使得GTX 880M在2014年春发布时是最快的移动显卡。这款显卡有足够的性能在全高清分辨率和高设置下流畅运行2013和2014年的大型游戏。 特性 它的功能包括了对4个显示器输出的支持。另外,最高3840x2160分辨率的高清显示器可以通过DisplayPort 1.2或HDMI 1.4a连接(如果可用)。高清的音频,如杜比TrueHD和DTS-HD,可以通过比特流模式经由HDMI端口传输。不过,由于大多数的笔记本会使用Optimus技术,CPU的集成显示核心可能会对显示接口有直接的控制,这可能会限制Nvidia Kepler显卡的一些附加的功能。 第五代的PureVideo HD视频处理器(VP5)同样集成于GK104核心之中,提供了对HD视频的硬解码支持。它对通常的编码格式,如MPEG-1/2, MPEG-4 ASP, H.264和 VC1/WMV9,提供了高达4K分辨率硬解码的支持,而对VC1和MPEG-4则提供最高1080p分辨率硬解码的支持。两个视频源可以被同时平行解码,提供了对类似于画中画的功能的支持。另一个新的特点是配备了一个类似于Intel的QuickSync的视频编码引擎,它可以被NVENC API调用。 GTX 800M系列的新特性包括了Battery Boost技术(帮助在运行游戏时获得更长的电池续航时间),Shadowplay(支持游戏内视频录制)和Game Stream(使电脑游戏可以通过Nvidia Shield游戏机运行)。 功耗 GeForce GTX 880M的功耗应较GTX 780M相似或略低,热设计频率为100W。因此,只有大型的桌面式笔记本电脑可以对GTX 880M的大功耗提供支持。

GeForce GTX 800M Series

GeForce GTX 880M SLI 3072 @ 0.95 GHz2x 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 860M SLI 1280 @ 1.03 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 880M 1536 @ 0.95 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 870M 1344 @ 0.94 GHz192 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 860M 640 @ 1.03 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
GeForce GTX 850M 640 @ 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 - 5000 MHz
CodenameN15E-GX-A2
ArchitectureKepler
Pipelines1536 - unified
Core Speed954 MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption103 Watt
Transistor Count3.5 Billion
technology28 nm
FeaturesBattery Boost, GameStream, ShadowPlay, GPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, SLI, GeForce Experience
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement12.03.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.7 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
2.27 -16%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.32 -14%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
2.34 -13%
2.34 -13%
2.45 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.5 -7%
2.58 -4%
2.62 -3%
2.68 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.69
2.71 1%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.8 4%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.8 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.89 7%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.91 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 11%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
3.01 12%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 12%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.03 13%
...
20.4 658%
max:
33.3 1138%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
268706 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 103806     avg: 109151     median: 109151 (13%)     max: 114496 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 18199     avg: 19062     median: 19151 (18%)     max: 19781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38938     avg: 39963     median: 39891 (10%)     max: 41259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5252     avg: 5457     median: 5482.5 (9%)     max: 5577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5825     avg: 6060     median: 6101 (7%)     max: 6251 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 105465     avg: 166979     median: 135032 (15%)     max: 262047 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7816     avg: 8296     median: 8319.5 (11%)     max: 8514 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 8114     avg: 8553     median: 8578 (7%)     max: 9003 Points
171.8 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
7944 -7%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
7970 -7%
8067 -6%
8129 -5%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
8133 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
8148 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
8289 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
8553
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 3%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 3%
9448 10%
9523 11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
9569 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9591 12%
9603 12%
AMD FirePro W7170M
9708 14%
...
59943 601%
max:
104201 1118%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 26554     avg: 27835     median: 28022 (8%)     max: 28920 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 27851     avg: 29214     median: 29582 (16%)     max: 29698 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
25293 -13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
25664 -12%
AMD FirePro W7170M
25898 -11%
26569 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
27315 -7%
AMD Radeon 680M
27350 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
27921 -4%
28186 -4%
28693 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
29214
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
29448 1%
29844 2%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
29938 2%
30252 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
30786 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 8%
31800 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 11%
32473 11%
...
132443 353%
max:
170928 485%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 28118     avg: 29037     median: 29036.5 (38%)     max: 29955 Points
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 80.7     avg: 81.4     median: 81.4 (27%)     max: 82.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
74.1 fps (33%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 100.4     avg: 104     median: 104 (20%)     max: 107.5 fps
0.6 -99%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
86 -17%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
86.1 -17%
86.1 -17%
87.2 -16%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
88.8 -15%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
95.8 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
96.8 -7%
97 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
101.2 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
104
107.1 3%
AMD FirePro W7170M
112.5 8%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
114.5 10%
120 15%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
125.9 21%
135.1 30%
149.7 44%
150 44%
151.3 45%
...
532 412%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 4.81     avg: 13.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 30.4 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 1.47     avg: 2     median: 1.5 (0%)     max: 3.14 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 14.17     avg: 22.9     median: 18.7 (4%)     max: 35.77 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 1.79     avg: 7.2     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 17.92 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 17.33     avg: 29.6     median: 20.2 (5%)     max: 51.2 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 2.2     avg: 15.2     median: 21 (19%)     max: 22.46 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 20.22     avg: 54.8     median: 71 (28%)     max: 73.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 15.14     avg: 16.1     median: 16.3 (3%)     max: 16.89 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6772     avg: 9780     median: 10451 (7%)     max: 12116 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.4     avg: 60.9     median: 60.3 (20%)     max: 68.6 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.7     avg: 101.3     median: 101.4 (6%)     max: 119.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
65 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
480 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
899 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4916 points (5%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
134  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
104  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Disabled 4xAF 1920x1080
67.8
low 1280x720
185  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
159  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
146
low 1280x720
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
93.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1920x1080
65
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
55.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
25.6
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
244  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
208  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
165
low 1280x720
56.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 2xAF 1920x1080
25.1
low 1280x720
73.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 4x AF Off AA 1920x1080
43.4
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
55.3
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
230  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
198  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
124
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
79.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1920x1080
47
low 1280x720
82.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 1920x1080
46.8
low 1280x720
62.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
57.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off 4xAF 1920x1080
45.7
low 1280x720
97.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1920x1080
41.7
low 1280x720
85  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
54
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
74.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TrilinearAF 1920x1080
57.2
low 1024x768
84.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
203.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
137  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
78.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
69.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
161  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
111.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
110.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
120.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
134.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
241  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
222.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
160.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
73.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
145.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
81  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
94.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
289.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
134.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
132.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
122.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
173  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
144.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
91.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
118.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
104.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
70.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
123.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
83.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
143.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
94.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
127  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
64.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
86.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
207.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
178  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
177.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
108.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
280.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
227.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
189.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
150.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
99.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.8 81.6 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.7 73.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
35.5 89.7 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.3 92.9 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.9 43.4 52.7 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.3 54.7 54.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
195.5 226 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
119.8 139.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.3 113.4 114.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.7 70 76.8 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
62.5 88.1 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
53.1 74.3 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.5 40.9 44.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.3 30.9 32.9 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
59.9 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
59.8 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.8 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.7 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
87.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
76  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Titanfall

Titanfall

2014
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
55.7 62.6 89 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.5 62.3 77 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.1 53.5 59 59.6 71 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.8 40 40.3 41 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
108.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
91.6 104.4 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
79.8 88.5 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
66 66.4 71.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.9 46.8 46.8 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
152.8 181 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125.7 149 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
105.8 112.1 125 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.4 46.2 51 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
107 109 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92 94 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
471  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
347  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
334  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
294  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
245  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
175.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
146.4 152 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.4 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
72.7 73.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
63.8 65.2 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57 58 66.2 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.4 53.1 54.3 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
119.7 119.8 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
114 118.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.1 99.8 105.7 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
55.4 56.8 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.8 54.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 46.5 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.4 24.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
126.8 145.1 220.6 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
101 107.1 194.8 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96.7 98.2 187.4 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.6 76.2 86.2 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
98.1 106.5 112 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90 97.7 104 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
75.2 75.9 76.6 78 93 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.2 42 42.4 42.6 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
189.2 210 217.1 ~ 205 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
158.5 166 178.8 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
122.4 151 152 156.4 160.4 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.6 64 65.6 65.8 108.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
100  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
85 120.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 80.1 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
337 342.6 ~ 340 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
248.2 250 ~ 249 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
163.3 164 167.5 170 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.2 73.6 74 74.2 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
135.6 137.6 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112.4 113 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.2 81.5 81.7 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.1 33.2 33.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
116.2 116.6 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.9 106.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
81.8 83.9 84.4 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.7 35.7 35.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
58 64.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.9 59.1 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.9 49.3 52.9 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.9 38 46.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
218.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
204.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
156.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
170.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
147.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
137.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
129.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
128.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
128.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
127.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
151  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
108  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
113.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.2 61.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8 49.1 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
157.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
94.6 97.9 119.3 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.8 40 40.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
103.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
90.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
193  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
117  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
med. 1366x768
220.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
135.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
176.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
165.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
95.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
228  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
205  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
136  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Total War: Shogun 2

Total War: Shogun 2

2011
low 1024x768
220.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
106.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
CPU 1280x1024
29.8
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
150.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
147.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
140.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1360x768
171.7  fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
135.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Titanfall 213410450.846.915.4
Farming Simulator 1718515911881.844
Battlefield 114093.845.54415
Mafia 355.634.520.3
FIFA 1724420814614154.5
Deus Ex Mankind Divided56.939.82311.7
No Man's Sky73.461.438.716.814.2
Mirror's Edge Catalyst12481.24033.211.8
Overwatch23019896.154.530.4
Doom79.469.441.337.4
Need for Speed 201682.277.242.431.714.2
Hitman 201662.457.425.924.211.5
The Division97.270.630.124.8
Far Cry Primal8546413014
XCOM 274.742.627.612.5
Rise of the Tomb Raider84.955.936.332.314.6
Rainbow Six Siege203.613778.856.524.9
Just Cause 378.469.544.840.117.6
Star Wars Battlefront161111.555.948.717.5
Assassin's Creed Syndicate70.760.340.816.613.4
Fallout 4110.473.942.635.414.9
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3120.284.142.538.413.4
Anno 2205134.877.839.88.816.7
FIFA 16241222.2160.273.1
Metal Gear Solid V6059.959.959.126.2
Mad Max145.376.667.924.1
Batman: Arkham Knight8171433014
The Witcher 394.458.434.218.7
Dirt Rally289.8134.810251.641.3
GTA V132.1122.362.726.8
Battlefield Hardline173144.17345.9
Evolve91.383.255.748.6
The Crew60606048.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition118.699.344.431
Far Cry 4104.495.950.540.3
Assassin's Creed Unity70.358.332.223.9
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare123.883.761.539.8
Civilization: Beyond Earth143.394.360.353.6
F1 2014132127120102
The Evil Within64.163.346.4
Ryse: Son of Rome86.175.140.137.4
Alien: Isolation207.3178101.268.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor177.6108.96348.3
Fifa 15280.8227.9189.3
Sims 4150.999.68173
Risen 3: Titan Lords63644655
GRID: Autosport21113010870
Watch Dogs75644231
Wolfenstein: The New Order60606059
The Elder Scrolls Online92.587.17657.5
Titanfall60606059.8
Thief69655840
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag62595735
X-Plane 10.25108.95228.522.4
Call of Duty: Ghosts98846847
Battlefield 416713711448
F1 201311811510893
Fifa 14471347334294
Total War: Rome II245175.514937
Saints Row IV73656053
Dota 212011697
Company of Heroes 256544625
GRID 216413412778
Metro: Last Light106978042
BioShock Infinite20516814872
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm12310010364
Tomb Raider34024916674
Crysis 31371138133
Far Cry 31161018336
Hitman: Absolution61575040
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2218.9204.5156.5105.2
Medal of Honor: Warfighter170.4147.9137.459.5
Dishonored129.2128.8128.9127.4
Borderlands 215111210894
Guild Wars 2113.96046
Sleeping Dogs157.8153.110438
Dirt Showdown103.195.190.577.9
Diablo III19312511784
Anno 2070220.3135.5122.5
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim176.2165.295.164.3
Batman: Arkham City22820513694
Total War: Shogun 2220.8106.773
Mafia 2150.3147.1140.9118.7
Metro 2033171.7135.241.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
37
41

13
41
27
5
30
31
16
12
44
20
6



18
4
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 07. 22:15:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.019s ... 0.02s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.02s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 5185 +0.022s ... 0.042s

#13 got single benchmarks 5185 +0.032s ... 0.074s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.494s ... 0.568s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.568s

#17 Got 489 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.584s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.584s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.051s ... 0.635s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +2.608s ... 3.243s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.007s ... 3.25s

#22 return log +0s ... 3.25s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M graphics card

微星 GT72 笔记本电脑简短评测

微星 GT72 笔记本电脑简短评测

肌肉男。 冷静运行,超级RAID,矩阵屏幕:微星为了形容GT72用了很多形容词。我们将测试这款全新的游戏本是否名实相副。这款高端设备又能否与来自华硕,Alienware和Clevo的产品一争高下呢?...
Intel Core i7-4710HQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 17.30" | 3.8 kg
技嘉 P25X v2 笔记本电脑简短评测

技嘉 P25X v2 笔记本电脑简短评测

个性演员。 尽管大部分笔记本生产商都在它们的15寸产品中使用GeForce GTX 870M,技嘉却独树一帜地为P25X v2配备了Nvidia的顶级显卡。同时其他的功能(蓝光刻录机、mSATA固态硬盘等)也显示了它的高端定位。请阅读我们的评测以了解这款笔记本是否真的值2000欧元(约15860人民币)的价码。...
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | 15.60" | 2.8 kg

MSI GT70-2PE16SR231B: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70-2PE16SR231B

MSI GT70 2PE-2089RU: Intel Core i7-4710MQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-2089RU

MSI GT70 2PE-1200NL: Intel Core i7-4940MX, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-1200NL

MSI GT72 2PE-006FR Dominator Pro: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72 2PE-006FR Dominator Pro

Asus G750JZ-T4079H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4079H

MSI GT72 2PE-072UK: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72 2PE-072UK

MSI GT72-2PE16SR231BW: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72-2PE16SR231BW

MSI GT70 2PE-1862UK: Intel Core i7-4810MQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-1862UK

Gigabyte P25X v2: Intel Core i7-4810MQ, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte P25X v2

MSI GT72 2PE-005FR: Intel Core i7-4710HQ, 17.00", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GT72 2PE-005FR

Asus G750JZ-T4023H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.3 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4023H

Asus G750JZ-T4110H: Intel Core i7-4860HQ, 17.30", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4110H

MSI GT60 2PE-495RU: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT60 2PE-495RU

Asus G750JZ-T4039D: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4039D

Asus G750JZ-T4089H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.8 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4089H

Asus G750JZ-T4024H: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-T4024H

Alienware 17 (GTX 880M): Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 17.30", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware 17 (GTX 880M)

MSI GT60 2PE Dominator Pro: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT60 2PE Dominator Pro

MSI GT70 2PE-1051FR Dominator Pro: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 17.30", 3.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GT70 2PE-1051FR Dominator Pro

MSI GT60-2PE16H11B: Intel Core i7-4800MQ, 15.60", 3.5 kg
  External Review » MSI GT60-2PE16H11B

Asus G750JZ-XS72: Intel Core i7-4700HQ, 17.30", 4.5 kg
  External Review » Asus G750JZ-XS72

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter