Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Nvidia GeForce MX250是专用于笔记本电脑的入门级移动图形卡。它与前代产品GeForce MX150 /台式机GeForce GT 1030基于相同的Pascal GP108芯片,但具有更高的频率。与MX150一样,MX250有两种版本,正常的25瓦版本(设备ID:1D13)和低功率的10瓦TDP(设备ID:1D25)和降低的性能(具有10W的MX150降低了32%频率)。 GDDR5内存接口现在还支持高达3.5 GHz = 7 GHz的有效速度(高于3 GHz)。

GP108芯片是三星(LPP)14 nm FinFET工艺制造,并提供了许多新功能,包括对DisplayPort 1.4,HDMI 2.0b,HDR的支持以及改进的H.265视频解编码和编码(PlayReady)。 3.0)。但是,由于需要至少3 GB的图形内存,因此无法运行带Netflix的4K HDR。与较大的Pascal芯片相比,GP108不支持用于VR和G-Sync的同时多投影(SMP)。完整的改进项目和新的Pascal台式机GPU可在我们专门的Pascal架构文章里找到。

由于提高了核心频率(25瓦版本的Boost高达+ 3%,并且内存速度更快),新的MX250应该比旧的MX150稍强。基准测试表明性能增加了5%。新游戏只能在低设置下流畅地运行(有关游戏和基准,请参阅MX150的页面)。

GeForce MX200 Series

GeForce MX250 384 @ 1.52 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX230 256 @ 1.52 - 1.53 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G2
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines384 - unified
TMUs32
ROPs16
Core Speed1518 - 1582 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 effective = 1502 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth48.1 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption10/25 Watt
technology14 nm
PCIe3.0
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Nvidia Optimus
Date of Announcement20.02.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.geforce.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.6 pt (5%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -96%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
1.479 -9%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
1.504 -7%
1.541 -5%
1.543 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
1.545 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1.545 -4%
1.545 -4%
1.61 0%
1.614 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1.617
1.628 1%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
1.629 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
1.636 1%
1.653 2%
1.662 3%
AMD FirePro M6100
1.695 5%
1.72 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
1.724 7%
1.771 10%
...
20.4 1162%
max:
33.3 1959%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 980     avg: 1186     median: 1220.5 (4%)     max: 1308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 881     avg: 1070     median: 1103 (3%)     max: 1169 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -89%
...
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
956 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
971 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
991 -7%
995 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
999 -7%
1008 -6%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1012 -5%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
1050 -2%
1067 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1070
AMD Radeon Pro 555
1078 1%
AMD Radeon Pro 455
1118 4%
1136 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
1148 7%
1156 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P600
1162 9%
1172 10%
unknown
1257 17%
1281 20%
...
19434 1716%
max:
36259 3289%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 100071     avg: 213047     median: 235421 (24%)     max: 252549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 22385     avg: 68911     median: 78819 (9%)     max: 81895 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 8009     avg: 13380     median: 13121 (12%)     max: 17955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 13805     avg: 21491     median: 21545 (5%)     max: 23863 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2726     avg: 3201     median: 3244.5 (5%)     max: 3567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2939     avg: 3531     median: 3660 (4%)     max: 3885 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 42088     avg: 80269     median: 86686 (10%)     max: 101192 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7949 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3930     avg: 4666     median: 4850 (6%)     max: 5302 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3585     avg: 4404     median: 4633 (4%)     max: 4942 Points
171.8 -96%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P520
4150 -6%
4191 -5%
AMD FirePro W5170M
4197 -5%
4229 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
4230 -4%
4333 -2%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
4338 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
4348 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
4380 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4404
AMD Radeon Pro 450
4502 2%
4554 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
4634 5%
NVIDIA Quadro P600
4655 6%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
4698 7%
4699 7%
4735 8%
4787 9%
4894 11%
...
59943 1261%
max:
104201 2266%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 16135     avg: 16488     median: 16487.5 (5%)     max: 16840 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 15626     avg: 15925     median: 15924.5 (9%)     max: 16223 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
14890 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
14938 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
15016 -6%
15029 -6%
15307 -4%
15409 -3%
15471 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
15552 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
15629 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
15925
16234 2%
16462 3%
17631 11%
AMD Radeon Pro 460
17700 11%
AMD Radeon Pro 560
17782 12%
17897 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
18067 13%
18096 14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
18431 16%
...
132443 732%
max:
170928 973%
0%
100%
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
56769 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 22246     avg: 25429     median: 25428.5 (33%)     max: 28611 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
17 fps (5%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
43.6 fps (14%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
43.7 fps (19%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
58.9 fps (11%)
0.6 -99%
...
53 -10%
54.2 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
56.1 -5%
56.6 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
56.7 -4%
57.1 -3%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
58.2 -1%
58.6 -1%
58.8 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
58.9
59 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
62.3 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
62.7 6%
63 7%
63.2 7%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
63.5 8%
65.2 11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
68.7 17%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
68.9 17%
...
532 803%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
16.7 fps (4%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
2.1 fps (0%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
16.7 fps (4%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
18.1 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
3 fps (1%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
1.1 fps (1%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
10.6 fps (4%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
9.2 fps (2%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
27.9 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
34.8 fps (9%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.1 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.7 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
10.9 fps (2%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
49.5 fps (6%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
26.7 fps (4%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
26.3 fps (3%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
27.7 fps (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3683     avg: 5523     median: 6469 (5%)     max: 6839 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 65.6     avg: 73.5     median: 69.6 (23%)     max: 85.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 48.5     avg: 96.8     median: 99.6 (6%)     max: 114.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
33.3 fps (6%)
3.3 -90%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
22 -34%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
22.1 -34%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
23.4 -30%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
24 -28%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
24.3 -27%
AMD Radeon 540X
24.9 -25%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
26.8 -20%
27 -19%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
29.56 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
33.3
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
33.4 0%
AMD Radeon 660M
33.5 1%
34.74 4%
37.4 12%
42.4 27%
44.4 33%
44.86 35%
45 35%
45.07 35%
...
536 1510%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
79 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 66     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (7%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 105.3     median: 105.3 (2%)     max: 109.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 141.2     median: 141.2 (6%)     max: 146.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 265     avg: 268.6     median: 268.6 (2%)     max: 272.2 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 505     avg: 629     median: 629 (2%)     max: 753 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 895     avg: 1173     median: 1172.5 (2%)     max: 1450 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 2804     avg: 2806     median: 2806 (3%)     max: 2808 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.4     avg: 43.3     median: 41.3 (6%)     max: 49 Watt
051015202530354045Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36     avg: 42.5     median: 43 (6%)     max: 48 Watt
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 34.7     avg: 49.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 59.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.1851     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (20%)     max: 0.2968 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.25     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (23%)     max: 0.2917 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 33.5     avg: 39.3     median: 39.1 (63%)     max: 47 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1481     avg: 1586     median: 1579 (62%)     max: 1683 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 549     avg: 1038     median: 1200 (48%)     max: 1571 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
64.8
low 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
5.8
low 1920x1080
10.6 (!)  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
27.7 (!)
low 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
91.8
low 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
23
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
40.3
low 1920x1080
75.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
61.4
low 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
20.5
low 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.4
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
17.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
34.2
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
14.2
low 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.5
low 1920x1080
4.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1280x720
5.7
low 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
19.3
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
55.7
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
30.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
57.2
low 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
13.2
low 1920x1080
32.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
62.1
low 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
23.2
low 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
21.5
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
30.4
low 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
39.1
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
9
low 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
21.7
low 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
13.9
low 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
20.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
46
low 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
30.1
low 1920x1080
23.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
39.4
low 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
18.8
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
32
low 1920x1080
6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
8.5
low 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
19.1
low 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
28.2
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
72.6
low 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
59.8
low 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
38.7
low 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
44.9
low 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
24
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
24
low 1920x1080
43.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80.3
low 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
33.1
low 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
20.1
low 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
49
low 1920x1080
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
25.4
low 1280x720
87.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
56.9
low 1280x720
47  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
27
low 1280x720
38  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
23
low 1280x720
76.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
48.2
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
20.6
low 1280x720
16  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12.4
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
33.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
18.6
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
90.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
59.1
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
20.1
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
45.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
30
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
high 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
42.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
41.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
131.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
103.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
67.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
75.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
28 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
31.8 34.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.2 15.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
74 80 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35 38 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
157.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
65.7 99.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 35.5 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.8 23.4 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.5 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
52.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
69.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
20.9 21.6 30.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13 13.7 15.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
25.6 29.4 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.2 22.5 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.7 41.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.7 20.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 18.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
36.6 41.7 43.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.2 23.3 23.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.6 18.4 19.4 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3 15.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
65.2 66.6 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.4 25.2 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 20.3 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
36 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16 19 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
120 123 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.4 88.2 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.8 85.7 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
50.2 52.9 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.9 20.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.8 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
41 42.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.7 14 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.4 10.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
66 73 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30 31 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25 27 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 17 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
71.2 78.2 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.8 23.3 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9 10.7 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2 6.2 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
30.6 32.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2 21.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1 19.4 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.6 18.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
43.3 56.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.2 22.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.9 13.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.2 7.7 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
46 48 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19 20 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
81.4 89.7 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.6 29.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.8 22.2 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6 11.1 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
15.4 34.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.7 16.9 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.5 14.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1 13.1 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40 43 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
27.8 29.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3 8.1 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.8 6.8 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
57 59 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24.4 25.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.6 19.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 19 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
40.7 45.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.3 28.9 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.4 19.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
95.7 110 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.9 32.1 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.7 21.8 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
36.2 40.4 59.9 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 24 27.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.8 18.6 22.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.8 14 18.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
12.1
low 1280x720
163  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
34.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
54.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
40 41 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 14 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
52  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
24 38 46 48 53 53 55 56 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7 14 17 18 18 18 19 19 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12 12 13 13 13 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9 9 9 10 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
32
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
71.3 80.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.7 30.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.9 23.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.7 16.9 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
65 65 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33 37 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
51.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
38 45 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 19 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 17 18 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 16 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
26
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
339.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
18.8 40.5 44.3 47.7 49.2 54.2 55.3 55.6 56.6 58.8 59.5 59.5 59.9 60.1 64.3 64.8 73.6 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.8 19.8 33.1 38.7 39.8 40.8 41.1 42.8 42.9 42.9 45.5 46.2 46.3 48.2 48.3 52.2 57 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.8 35.5 36.4 37.5 37.9 37.9 39.3 40 40 41.6 41.8 42.5 43 43.8 44.4 45.8 52.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
50.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.7 35.7 36.7 37.7 41 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.4 16.6 18.3 19 19.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9 11 12 12.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
79.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
62.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
53.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
57.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
28.4
low 1280x720
175.4 176 182.9 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77 91.2 109 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.1 60.8 80 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
139.3
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
108  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
50.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
82.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
123.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
62.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
166.4 171.7 ~ 169 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
112.2 122.5 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.5 58 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.4 35 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x768
34.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
53.1 70.6 71 74.9 78.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39 39.9 40 43.7 46.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.2 21 24 24.1 24.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.5 18.1 19.4 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
123.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
136.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
110.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
71 77 89.2 99.5 102 102.4 108 108 110 112 112.3 113 114 114.4 115.3 115.6 118 118 118 129 131 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.8 36.5 39.5 79.5 86.2 88.6 89 90.5 92 92.6 94.4 95 96.2 98.7 99 99 102 102.7 102.9 105.4 109 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.6 35.8 56.9 59 59.7 60.7 60.8 61.3 62.2 62.3 64 66.4 67 67.3 68 69 71.3 74.8 75 75.5 77.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8 12.8 48.3 48.8 52.7 52.9 54.1 54.7 56 56.9 57 57.7 59.7 60 60.3 60.7 63.1 63.8 64.2 66 67.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
47.4 49.9 50 52 55.4 56.4 58 58.3 58.8 59.2 59.5 62.1 62.3 63.5 64.5 64.6 65 65 66.7 66.9 67.1 67.6 68.1 70 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
30 30 31.5 32.9 33 33 33.5 33.8 34.1 34.5 34.7 34.9 35.8 35.9 36 36 36.2 36.5 36.8 36.8 36.9 37 37.9 38 38.6 38.7 40 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16.3 18 18 18 18.1 18.3 18.8 19.1 19.4 19.8 20 20.4 20.4 20.6 20.8 21 21 21 21 21 21 21.2 21.5 21.9 21.9 22.4 23.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9 9.8 10.3 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.7 10.9 11 11 11.2 11.4 11.7 11.9 12 12 12 12 12.2 12.5 12.6 13 14.5 16 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
109 110.4 123.9 127.5 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.4 96.7 100.9 115.9 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 37.6 38.4 41.5 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9 16.1 18.6 18.6 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
82.1
94.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
80.9
92.9
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
66.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
44.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
68  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
133.9 166 175.5 179.1 180.2 189.7 191.8 192.9 194.7 197 197.7 203 208 212.3 ~ 187 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
98.4 99.4 99.7 105.6 107 109.2 110 111.4 112 112.2 114.5 114.6 116.4 117.5 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
84 86.6 87.3 88.3 93 94 94.2 94.4 96.3 96.9 97 98.1 99.7 100.5 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32.3 32.9 33.7 34.2 34.8 35 35.1 35.3 37.1 37.6 37.8 37.8 38 38.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ready or Not34.827.826.514.4
The Finals3121.818.511
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora3.1
EA Sports WRC10.6
Total War Pharaoh45.628.216.4
Assassin's Creed Mirage15
EA Sports FC 2422.9
Counter-Strike 275.14124.317.2
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty11.99.035.044.16
Baldur's Gate 315.3
Lies of P17.716.616.59.5
Starfield9.82
Armored Core 613.710.2
Immortals of Aveum4.24
Atlas Fallen9.05
F1 2323.22013.78.12
Diablo 430.526.524.522.2
Star Wars Jedi Survivor7.39
Dead Island 232.527.521.115.2
Resident Evil 4 Remake12.9
Company of Heroes 314.1
Sons of the Forest2010.7
Atomic Heart26.619.57.41
Returnal8
Hogwarts Legacy14.57.68
Dead Space Remake7.93
The Witcher 3 v4.0028.220.77.83
High On Life2414.411.6
The Callisto Protocol23.913.910
Need for Speed Unbound14.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 20221815
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection6.02
A Plague Tale Requiem13.1
The Quarry19.414.110.4
F1 2229.628.12011
Vampire Bloodhunt37.826.824.417.6
Ghostwire Tokyo20.315.513.913.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands20.8137.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.614.110.6
Elex 216.2
GRID Legends43.326.422.415.3
Elden Ring21.411.2
Dying Light 212.69.6
Rainbow Six Extraction281915
God of War14.812.55.65
Farming Simulator 2287.43323.4
Forza Horizon 5471713
Riders Republic381612
Back 4 Blood76.927.62423.5
Far Cry 630.313.810.3
Alan Wake Remastered1610.2
New World33.314.312.4
F1 202190.928.122.213
Monster Hunter Stories 284.252.647.2
Days Gone33.415.7
Outriders45.627.320.215.5
Hitman 314.4
Yakuza Like a Dragon42.415.915.8
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla2413
Dirt 541.313.48.2
FIFA 21131.376.170.954.4
Star Wars Squadrons103.34636.633.4
Mafia Definitive Edition361513.8
Serious Sam 467.29.796.75
Crysis Remastered75.1328.23
Flight Simulator 202026116.6
Horizon Zero Dawn291311
Death Stranding33151414.2
F1 202077372616
Valorant157.9117.7115.3
Gears Tactics83282013
Doom Eternal35.9
Hunt Showdown52.618.214
Escape from Tarkov69.129.222.122
Red Dead Redemption 224149.86.2
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order282118.1
Need for Speed Heat38181615.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201941231714
GRID 201966241711.8
Ghost Recon Breakpoint37181712
FIFA 20122858162.5
Borderlands 352191310.2
Control421410
F1 201970312616
Total War: Three Kingdoms7522106
Rage 232181514
Anno 18005020137
The Division 24720139
Dirt Rally 2.086292211
Anthem2514129
Far Cry New Dawn42211817
Metro Exodus29875.3
Apex Legends58252018
Just Cause 443271915.9
Darksiders III103302218.6
Battlefield V46241915
Farming Simulator 1916363.438.6
Hitman 234.717.315.813
Call of Duty Black Ops 454.620.91816.4
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey4119137
Forza Horizon 472312416
FIFA 195245.742.940.1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider4716139
Strange Brigade76292216
F1 201865352616
Monster Hunter World51.117.517.313
The Crew 243.920.219.516.5
Far Cry 543191616
World of Tanks enCore339.175.129.2
X-Plane 11.11544139
Kingdom Come: Deliverance50.721.918.712.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark371811
Fortnite14055.425.222
Star Wars Battlefront 279.125.421.818.7
Destiny 262.532.230.325.1
ELEX53.925.420.615.6
Middle-earth: Shadow of War64271915
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)57.328.423.218.7
Rocket League1789264
Prey10846.236.430.1
Ghost Recon Wildlands50.121.218.34.5
For Honor82.628.826.921
Resident Evil 711853.932.127
Civilization VI123.362.222.720.3
Overwatch1691175433
Ashes of the Singularity34.616.15.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider70422319
Rainbow Six Siege123.190.350.231.9
World of Warships136.4110.972.947.9
Dota 2 Reborn108876254
The Witcher 361352012
GTA V1181023815
Thief66.847.544.321
Battlefield 488686329.9
Dota 21018864
BioShock Infinite1871099436
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
44
46
32
12
83
19
15
86
12
8
66
9
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 04:22:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.027s ... 0.029s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9561 +0.028s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 9561 +0.094s ... 0.151s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.151s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +1.013s ... 1.164s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.164s

#13 Got 897 rows for game benchmarks. +0.051s ... 1.216s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.216s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.083s ... 1.298s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +4.228s ... 5.527s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.009s ... 5.536s

#18 return log +0s ... 5.536s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX250 graphics card

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T

华硕VivoBook S14 S433FL笔记本电脑评测:多彩的坚固机身

华硕在视觉上为VivoBook S14增添色彩,提供具有多种颜色选择的耐用设备。 此外,还有各种功能,其中有些自相矛盾的地方。 我们的评测会告诉您VivoBook S14还提供什么。...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
华为MateBook X Pro 2020笔记本电脑评测:有性能释放问题的超极本

华为MateBook X Pro 2020笔记本电脑评测:有性能释放问题的超极本

华为更新了MateBook X Pro,新型号配备了Intel Comet Lake CPU和Nvidia GeForce GPU。 不幸的是,性能相对较差,并且独显性能甚至不如有些核显。...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | 13.90" | 1.3 kg
联想ThinkPad T490笔记本电脑评测:WQHD HDR面板在测试中表现出色,但在办公笔记本中意义有限

联想ThinkPad T490笔记本电脑评测:WQHD HDR面板在测试中表现出色,但在办公笔记本中意义有限

像之前的ThinkPad X1 Extreme一样,14英寸的ThinkPad T490也有了具有100%AdobeRGB色彩空间覆盖率的高分辨率WQHD面板。 出色的图像质量带来了亮面屏和增加的功耗。...
Intel Core i7-8565U | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
MSI Modern 15 A10RB笔记本电脑评测:Dell XPS 15青春版

MSI Modern 15 A10RB笔记本电脑评测:Dell XPS 15青春版

Modern 15适合预算不高的用户,他们需要比典型的超极本更强大的功能,而又不会在配备Core H CPU和GeForce GTX GPU的高端产品上花费过多。...
Intel Core i7-10510U | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | 15.60" | 1.6 kg
MSI Modern 14 A10RB笔记本电脑评测:比看起来还轻

MSI Modern 14 A10RB笔记本电脑评测:比看起来还轻

微星为内容创作者提供的最新中端办公笔记本电脑提供了Comet Lake-U,GeForce MX250显卡和经过良好校准的14英寸1080p显示器,不到900美元的价格,重量仅为1.2千克。它的优点很明显,但是它的一些缺点也很明显。...
Intel Core i5-10210U | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | 14.00" | 1.2 kg

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 惠普Pavilion 14笔记本电脑评测:时尚的全能手,屏幕也很亮

Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkPad T590商务笔记本电脑评测:大而轻,屏幕差劲。

Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkPad T490(i7, MX250, 低功耗FHD)笔记本电脑评测

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » 华为Matebook 14 (i7-8565U, GeForce MX250) 笔记本电脑评测

HP 15s-du1031tx: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15s-du1031tx

Huawei Matebook D 14, i5-10210U MX250: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Huawei Matebook D 14, i5-10210U MX250

Asus VivoBook S15 S533FL-BQ057T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533FL-BQ057T

Dell Latitude 14 5411-WJ40N: Intel Core i7-10850H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 14 5411-WJ40N

Huawei MateBook X 2020 i5: Intel Core i5-10210U, 13.90", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X 2020 i5

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB180T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB180T

HP EliteBook 850 G7, i7-10510U MX250: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP EliteBook 850 G7, i7-10510U MX250

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB181: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB181

Huawei MateBook 13 2020 MX250 i7: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 13 2020 MX250 i7

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 14, i5-10210U MX250: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook 14, i5-10210U MX250

Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29

Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-51TG-G2: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-51TG-G2

Asus VivoBook S15 S533FL-BQ024T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533FL-BQ024T

Asus ZenBook 13 UX334FLC-A3167T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UX334FLC-A3167T

HP Pavilion 15-cs3022ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cs3022ns

Asus VivoBook S15 S533F-LBQ536T: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S533F-LBQ536T

Acer Swift 3 SF314-58G-77JX: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-58G-77JX

MSI Modern 15 A10RB: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A10RB

Huawei MateBook 13 2020 MX250: Intel Core i5-10210U, 13.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 13 2020 MX250

Acer Aspire 5 A514-52G-7045: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-52G-7045

MSI Prestige 14 A10RB: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10RB

MSI PS42 Modern 8RA-280XES: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI PS42 Modern 8RA-280XES

HP Pavilion 14-ce3013tx: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-ce3013tx

Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IML-81NG00A3GE: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IML-81NG00A3GE

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7: Intel Core i7-10510U, 13.90", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2020 i7

HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng

Dell Inspiron 14 7490-D0R43: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 7490-D0R43

Asus VivoBook S14 S432FL-EB074T: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S432FL-EB074T

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB008T: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB008T

Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BQ049T: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BQ049T

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T

MSI Modern 14 A10RB: Intel Core i7-10710U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RB

HP Pavilion 14-ce3005ns: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-ce3005ns

Acer Swift 5 Pro SF514-54GT-54PK: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 Pro SF514-54GT-54PK

Asus VivoBook A512FL, i5 10210U, MX250: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook A512FL, i5 10210U, MX250

Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BN184T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BN184T

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL: Intel Core i5-8265U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL

Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FLC-A5131R: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FLC-A5131R

Asus ZenBook 14 UX431FL-AM049T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX431FL-AM049T

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-663XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RB-663XES

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-762S: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-762S

Xiaomi RedmiBook 13, i5-10210U: Intel Core i5-10210U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook 13, i5-10210U

Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G-54PC: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G-54PC

MSI Modern 14 A10RB-665XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RB-665XES

Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL-81NE0040GE: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL-81NE0040GE

Asus Zenbook Pro Duo UX481FL-BM044T: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Pro Duo UX481FL-BM044T

Asus ZenBook 13 UX334FL-A4137T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UX334FL-A4137T

Lenovo Yoga S740-14IIL-81RS0016GE: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga S740-14IIL-81RS0016GE

Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL-BM039R: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Duo UX481FL-BM039R

Dell Vostro 14 5490: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 14 5490, i7-10510U, MX250

Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-51TG-792V: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P6 TMP614-51TG-792V

HP Pavilion x360 14-dh0226ng: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion x360 14-dh0226ng

Asus VivoBook 14 X412FL-EB151T: Intel Core i5-8265U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 X412FL-EB151T

Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-7604: Intel Core i7-10510U, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A317-51G-7604

Asus VivoBook S15 S512FL-BQ279T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S512FL-BQ279T

Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BN010T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BN010T

Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2019, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook 14 2019, i7-8565U

Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-70SY: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 5 SF514-54GT-70SY

Asus Zenbook 14 UX434FL-A6015T: Intel Core i5-8265U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 UX434FL-A6015T

Acer Aspire 5 A514-52G-516T: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A514-52G-516T

Acer Swift 3 SF314-56G-79D1: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF314-56G-79D1

Asus ZenBook 14 UX431FL-AN012T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX431FL-AN012T

Dell Inspiron 15 7590 2-in-1: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 7590 2-in-1

Asus VivoBook S15 S532F: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S532F

Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BN011T: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S532FL-BN011T

HP Envy 13-aq0003ng: Intel Core i7-8565U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-aq0003ng

Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IWL-81N800CPGE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IWL-81N800CPGE

Asus VivoBook 15 A512FL: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 A512FL

Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T

Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G-7895: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G-7895

Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL, i7-8565U

Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL-81NE003XGE: Intel Core i5-8265U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IWL-81NE003XGE

Asus ZenBook Edition 30 UX334FL, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Edition 30 UX334FL, i7-8565U

Asus VivoBook S14 S431FL, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S14 S431FL, i7-8565U

Asus VivoBook S15 S531FL, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook S15 S531FA, i7-8565U

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX481: Intel Core i7-9750H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX481

HP Envy 13-aq0005ng: Intel Core i7-8565U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-aq0005ng

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2019, i7-8565U: Intel Core i7-8565U, 13.90", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2019, i7-8565U

Huawei MateBook 14-KLV-W29B: Intel Core i7-8565U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14-KLV-W29B

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2019, i5-8265U: Intel Core i5-8265U, 13.90", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook X Pro 2019, i5-8265U

Huawei MateBook 14, i5 (KLV-W19): Intel Core i5-8265U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14, i5 (KLV-W19)

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter