Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Nvidia GeForce MX450(N18S-G5,N18S-G5-B,N18S-LP代号)是笔记本电脑专用的入门级移动图形卡。它使用与GeForce GTX 1650相同的TU117芯片,但减少了64位的内存总线。此外,MX450是首款支持PCIe Gen 4 x4的移动GPU。

当前有四个具有不同规格和性能的不同版本:

N18S-G5-B:GBD-128封装,1395-1575 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,28.5 W

N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1395-1575 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,25 W

N18S-G5:GB2E-64封装,1395-1575 MHz,GDDR5 3501 MHz,25 W

N18S-LP:GB2E-64封装,720-930 MHz,GDDR6 5001 MHz,12 W

尤其是LP =低功耗型号比典型的25瓦型号慢得多。

25瓦GDDR6 N18S-G5应该比GeForce GTX 1050快20%,但当然要低于GTX 1650(Max-Q)。因此,要求苛刻的游戏(例如“地平线零黎明”)应运行最低设置。 F1 2020等要求不高的游戏可以中高设置和全高清运行。

TU117芯片是台积电(TSMC)12nm工艺制造的,由于功耗较低(TGP指定为12至28.5 W),因此也适用于轻薄笔记本电脑。通常,它打算用作基于Tiger Lake-U的笔记本电脑的附加图形卡。

GeForce MX300 Series

GeForce MX450 896 @ 1.4 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce MX350 640 @ 1.35 - 1.47 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 384 @ 1.53 - 1.59 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines896 - unified
TMUs56
ROPs16
Core Speed1395 - 1575 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth80 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Transistor Count4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
technology12 nm
PCIe4.0
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, PCIe 3.0, GameWorks
Date of Announcement01.08.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
2.1 pt (6%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -97%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
1.814 -13%
1.829 -12%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1.836 -12%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
1.866 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
1.907 -9%
1.931 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
2.06 -1%
2.07 -1%
2.07 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
2.09
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
2.11 1%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
2.12 1%
AMD Radeon 660M
2.14 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
2.23 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2.24 7%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
2.26 8%
2.27 9%
2.27 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.32 11%
...
20.4 876%
max:
33.3 1493%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1204     avg: 1995     median: 2099 (6%)     max: 2586 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1086     avg: 1796     median: 1900 (5%)     max: 2300 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -94%
...
1495 -17%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
1614 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
1615 -10%
1616 -10%
1672 -7%
1699 -5%
1724 -4%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
1735 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
1788 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
1796
1810 1%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
1814 1%
1864 4%
1989 11%
2021 13%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2046 14%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2049 14%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2062 15%
2070 15%
...
19434 982%
max:
36259 1919%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 302347     avg: 330908     median: 335125 (34%)     max: 365909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 29368     avg: 50045     median: 48270.5 (6%)     max: 85281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 14229     avg: 18957     median: 18399 (17%)     max: 27571 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 25467     avg: 29167     median: 27570 (7%)     max: 33806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4131     avg: 4649     median: 4306 (7%)     max: 6833 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4336     avg: 4869     median: 4725 (5%)     max: 5753 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 29374     avg: 57100     median: 54872.5 (6%)     max: 88274 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 11448     avg: 13149     median: 12794.5 (6%)     max: 15557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3693     avg: 4040     median: 3830 (4%)     max: 4597 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 20702     avg: 20744     median: 20743.5 (8%)     max: 20785 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6745     avg: 8101     median: 8068 (10%)     max: 9885 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6341     avg: 8129     median: 8250 (7%)     max: 9580 Points
171.8 -98%
...
7536 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
7590 -7%
7662 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
7692 -5%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
7793 -4%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
7808 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
7944 -2%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
7970 -2%
8067 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
8129
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
8133 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
8148 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
8289 2%
AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
8323 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
8387 3%
8553 5%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
8656 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
8781 8%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
8851 9%
...
59943 637%
max:
104201 1182%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
22831 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
21740 Points (12%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
20547 -5%
AMD Radeon 660M
20571 -5%
20575 -5%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
20876 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
21102 -3%
21237 -2%
21394 -2%
21679 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
21687 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
21740
NVIDIA Quadro P620
21759 0%
22986 6%
23042 6%
23092 6%
23936 10%
23989 10%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
24205 11%
24335 12%
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
24457 12%
...
132443 509%
max:
170928 686%
0%
100%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
20.5 fps (6%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
57.2 fps (19%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
53.9 fps (24%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
86.1 fps (16%)
0.6 -99%
...
73.9 -14%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M
75.8 -12%
76.8 -11%
78.5 -9%
82.2 -5%
82.5 -4%
83.8 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
86 0%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
86.1 0%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
86.1
87.2 1%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
88.8 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
95.8 11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
96.8 12%
97 13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
101.2 18%
104 21%
107.1 24%
AMD FirePro W7170M
112.5 31%
...
532 518%
0%
100%
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 84.6     avg: 127     median: 130 (8%)     max: 150 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
44.4 fps (8%)
3.3 -93%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
26.8 -40%
27 -39%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
29.56 -33%
33.3 -25%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
33.4 -25%
AMD Radeon 660M
33.5 -25%
34.74 -22%
37.4 -16%
42.4 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
44.4
44.86 1%
45 1%
45.07 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
48.1 8%
48.6 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
49.5 11%
AMD Radeon 680M
52 17%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 18%
53.4 20%
...
536 1107%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
118.3 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
104.3 fps (11%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
156.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
209 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
411 fps (3%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
235 fps (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
492 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
986 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4104 points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 30.9     avg: 54.9     median: 59.5 (8%)     max: 68.8 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.4     avg: 54     median: 53.4 (7%)     max: 69.7 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 39.2     avg: 56     median: 55.6 (12%)     max: 73.5 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2829     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (35%)     max: 0.571 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.2984     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (33%)     max: 0.627 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 37.6     avg: 41.2     median: 40.5 (65%)     max: 46.3 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1039     avg: 1292     median: 1292 (51%)     max: 1545 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
min: 879     avg: 1228     median: 1228 (49%)     max: 1577 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
15.5
low 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
31
low 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
28
low 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
91.9
low 1920x1080
87.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
97.4
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
38.2
Steam Deck 1280x720
16.4
low 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
5.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
17.9
low 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
30.3
low 1920x1080
45.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
75.8
low 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
36.3
low 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
60
low 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
47.4
low 1920x1080
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
39.4
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
60
low 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
20.6
low 1920x1080
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.7
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280x720
94.7
low 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46.5
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
54.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
120
low 1920x1080
96.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
111.6
low 1920x1080
32.7 38.2 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.8 32.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.8 31.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.9 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
65.3
low 1920x1080
37.2 38.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.7 27.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14 15.8 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.5 13.4 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
87.7
low 1920x1080
30.1 33.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.8 21.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7 13.5 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
45.9
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
6.7 23.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
33.6
low 1920x1080
67.7 88.1 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
45.8 62 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.7 53.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.9 33.4 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80.9
low 1920x1080
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19 31.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.2 30.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.1 26.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
46
low 1920x1080
22 25.7 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.7 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.8 16.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
37.5
low 1920x1080
54 94 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 39 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 40 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16 18 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
98
low 1920x1080
25.8 32.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.4 26.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.5 8.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
40.3
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
10.7
0 (!)
med. 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
19.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
139.4
low 1280x720
4.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
20.4
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 40 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
40
56
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28 39 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23 29 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
40
52
low 1280x720
128.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.3 46.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.4 35.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26.7 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
77
73.8
low 1280x720
25.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.3 16.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.8 13.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12.6
20.4
FIFA 22

FIFA 22

2021
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1920x1080
121
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
41.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.9 32 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1 21.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.5 12.5 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
8.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
33.7
30.4
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
6.9 13.5 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.3 11 ~ 9 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
11.1
19.3
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
115 161 174 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40 53 57.7 58.7 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 37 45.8 46.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1920x1080
82
89
92.1
low 1280x720
136  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
63.4 83 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.7 72.9 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.9 58.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
72.2
92.5
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
60.3 77.7 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.7 29.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23 26.7 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 15.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
38.5
51.3
low 1280x720
88.7 90 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.6 64.9 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
24.6 42.2 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13 22.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.4 20.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
10.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920x1080
17.7
28
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
52.6 80 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.8 31.9 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7 25.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16 22.5 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
33.8
51.3
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
53.9 79.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.7 41.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20 30.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 26.9 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
17.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
40
55.6
low 1280x720
33.9 34.2 35.5 39.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.6 14 14.5 17.5 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.3 9.4 9.7 11.4 ~ 10 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.2 4.1 ~ 4 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
25.9
low 1280x720
41 47 65 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 18 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11 12 21 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 11 19 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
66.9 91.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.8 34.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24.9 33.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.7 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
53.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
20.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
23 33 51 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6 10 17 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5 6 13 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
75.7 92.8 94.2 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.6 25.8 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.8 16.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 11.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
8.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43 49.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 26.8 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
16 20 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6 7.6 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
4.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
135  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
93.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
75.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
146  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
53.9 71.9 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.3 33 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7 29.9 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
77.6 86.4 96.6 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
10.8 14.1 19 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
7.1 10.8 14.1 ~ 11 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
85.9 108 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31 32.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12.4 17 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.8 61 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
17.3 22.7 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.7 14.8 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
27
38.5
low 1280x720
37 51 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 24 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
49.2 55.5 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8 25.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.6 25.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20.4 23.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
79.7 121 126 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53 54.5 57 57.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38.1 39.4 39.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 23.7 24.1 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
142 187.2 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.3 72 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.7 48.7 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.7 30.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
54.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
76.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.5 63 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.6 25.8 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
39 51.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
27.7 42 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.6 35.7 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
70.8 79.5 80.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
28.6 31.7 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3 18.5 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3 13.2 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
51.3
45.4
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
70.8 74.8 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.8 24.7 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15 15.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
101.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
59.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
81.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
56 74 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
134.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
89.4 99.1 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
44.9 53.2 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.9 41.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.4 31.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
74.4 81 99 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30 31.9 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21 23.8 26 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 19 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
54
71
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
61.4 104 106 106 106 124.8 127 127 134 135 135 137.7 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.6 40.5 40.6 40.9 47.7 49.6 49.6 53 53.1 53.1 53.2 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.2 34.2 35.4 35.6 36.1 36.9 42.4 44.8 46.2 46.3 46.6 46.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.9 21.6 25 25.2 26 27.7 32.1 32.2 33.1 33.1 36 36.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
13.1 22.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47 63 71 72 73 91 94 96 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24 32 33 34 34 36 41 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26 27 28 29 30 35 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24 26 27 27 28 33 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19 20 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
41
52
52
low 1280x720
49.9 58.4 62.7 62.8 64.9 64.9 65 68.8 70.4 71.5 78.3 79.6 84.9 86.5 86.8 87.2 87.3 88.3 91.2 94.9 98.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
38.2 41.4 51.3 51.3 53.4 53.4 53.7 54.6 58 60.6 63.5 63.9 64.9 68.3 73.4 73.5 74.1 76.6 77.9 81.6 87.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.4 39.6 41.4 44.4 45.1 47 48.5 50.9 51.2 57.4 57.7 59.2 59.3 62.6 62.8 65.6 65.7 66 67.4 71.4 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.1 41.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
27.6 51.5 51.5 52.8 54.1 55.1 55.7 56.2 58.3 58.3 58.8 60.3 65.3 69.3 69.5 72.2 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25 25.1 25.3 25.5 25.5 26 27.5 27.7 31.6 32.9 33 33.4 34.5 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.7 13.8 14.9 15 16.1 16.2 17.8 18 18 21.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
9.2 12.5 13.5 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
2.8  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
122.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
36.1 100.9 101 104 109 119 123 123 125 125 126 130 130.1 131 133 135.6 136 136 137 139 144 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.5 90.5 91.5 92.8 95.3 103 109 110 110 111 112 115 115 117 118 118.3 119 121 122.6 126 133 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.4 46.7 75.3 80.7 82.5 85.1 86 86.6 87.2 87.5 87.6 88.6 91.5 92 95.6 102 103 103.1 104 106 115 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9 42.7 75.2 75.3 77.7 78.6 79.3 79.4 80.2 80.7 81.6 81.9 82.1 82.9 84 87.7 95.5 96.1 97.4 104.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
92.6 98.1 98.5 99.3 103 107 112 112 121.4 124.9 136 140 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
34 53.8 55.3 57.8 58 58.5 59 59.9 62.4 65 69.7 71 76.8 81.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21 28.1 30.7 30.8 32.1 32.5 33 33 33 34 35 39.7 42.2 42.8 43.5 46 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.2 17.7 17.7 18 18 18.6 19.9 19.9 20 22.9 23 23.1 23.6 23.8 24.3 24.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
37.2
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
115 118 125 143.3 151 154 165 172 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
95.8 101 109 113 130.2 135 141 154 160 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.6 50 51.2 51.5 51.7 51.8 52.2 53 66.3 68.1 68.3 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 22.8 23 23.4 23.6 23.8 23.9 28.4 30.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.9 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
100.7
120
107
135
76.6
78.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
102.3
113
108
141
83.4
83.4
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2431.925.720.413.4
Horizon Forbidden West11.6
Skull & Bones212113
Assassin's Creed Mirage1815
EA Sports FC 245857.356.455.9
Counter-Strike 287.56734.821.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty22.6148.127.09
Baldur's Gate 311.35.94
Dead Space Remake17.115.76.37
The Witcher 3 v4.0045.832.424.914.1
High On Life29.415.81412.4
The Callisto Protocol34.21587.4
Need for Speed Unbound28.721.413.5
Spider-Man Miles Morales22.92117.611.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202237331517
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection9.738.415.835.51
A Plague Tale Requiem22.618.312.48.51
FIFA 2357.442.137.833.9
The Quarry3021.114.99.31
F1 2254.749.23622.2
Vampire Bloodhunt96.559.350.733.4
Ghostwire Tokyo3529292511.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands38251512
Cyberpunk 2077 1.63222137.6
Elex 21510.76.62
GRID Legends7854462923.812.8
Elden Ring3225242113.5
Dying Light 22418149.4
Rainbow Six Extraction74343317
God of War292283.09
Halo Infinite08.6
Farming Simulator 22795524.219.2
Battlefield 20424.517.84.4
Forza Horizon 572342613
Riders Republic623426228
Back 4 Blood128.3473230
Alan Wake Remastered25.51311
FIFA 2211210375.8
New World41.62921118.7
Deathloop27.71095.81
F1 202115052395.37
Monster Hunter Stories 213673655228.4
Days Gone6928251210.3
Mass Effect Legendary Edition895741.2
Resident Evil Village33181814.710.3
Outriders6628221917.9
Hitman 36736252217.7
Cyberpunk 2077 1.03615104
Immortals Fenyx Rising5120151312
Yakuza Like a Dragon7930292517.9
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War53.920.818.7
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla36118117
Dirt 588231398.6
Watch Dogs Legion46251874.67
FIFA 2113593.789.175.9
Star Wars Squadrons14664.557.754.2
Mafia Definitive Edition63292619.3
Serious Sam 4871511
Crysis Remastered9732159.92
Flight Simulator 20204820137.86
Horizon Zero Dawn44252187
Death Stranding5224232215
F1 2020109553923
Gears Tactics16563432820.2
Doom Eternal54.5
Hunt Showdown76.629.222
Red Dead Redemption 2542310.9
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order45353125.9
Borderlands 377301813
Control732315
Total War: Three Kingdoms101.434.2147.5
Rage 259.310.59.5
Anno 180081.74022.711.8
The Division 265352617
Far Cry New Dawn64343128
Metro Exodus34.817.211.3
Apex Legends134.655.239.335.5
Battlefield V9449383022.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider8533241713
Strange Brigade11747392918
Far Cry 57633292820
X-Plane 11.1176635541
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark572916122.8
Fortnite122.861.339.324.6
Dota 2 Reborn121108888032
The Witcher 3112623521
GTA V143127542511
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
17
27
29
10
45
27
11
1
55
22
4
52
9
3
27
2

3
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 01:19:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10349 +0.026s ... 0.053s

#10 got single benchmarks 10349 +0.062s ... 0.116s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.756s ... 0.871s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.872s

#14 Got 857 rows for game benchmarks. +0.094s ... 0.965s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.965s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.051s ... 1.017s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +3.151s ... 4.167s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.008s ... 4.175s

#19 return log +0s ... 4.175s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX450 graphics card

GeForce MX450正在落伍。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U敞篷车评测

GeForce MX450正在落伍。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U敞篷车评测

几年前,AMD Zen+Nvidia MX超极本听起来不错,但现在已经太晚了,Zen 3+CPU已经有了更快、更小、更高效的集成Radeon 680M。不过,如果你不介意增加重量和厚度,GeForce MX450还是不错的。...
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 15.60" | 1.9 kg
华硕ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W配备3K-OLED和Nvidia MX 450

华硕ZenBook 14X OLED评测。游戏和强烈的3K色彩

华硕已经走得更远了。这款14英寸的产品将MX450易于调节的图形性能与可扩展的Tiger Lake Core i7相结合。除此之外,它还有一个丰富多彩的3K宽屏OLED。这有什么需要改进的地方吗?...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED回顾。一款拥有强大CPU能力的副笔记本

联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED回顾。一款拥有强大CPU能力的副笔记本

可选的是,联想还提供了其紧凑的14英寸Yoga Slim 7 Pro副笔记本,配有OLED显示屏和专用的GeForce MX450。同时,在这一配置中,你也不必没有一个非常强大的AMD Ryzen 9处理器。...
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
华硕Zenbook 14X UX5400E

华硕Zenbook 14X OLED预生产单元回顾。这是很有冲击力的颜色!

华硕的14英寸笔记本电脑结合了令人惊叹的OLED显示屏和一流的外壳,既结实又高质量。由于MX450和来自英特尔的Tiger Lake SoC,性能也应该很好。继续阅读,了解我们对预产型号的喜欢和不喜欢之处。...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
戴尔Inspiron 15 5518笔记本电脑在审查。CPU的速度变慢了

戴尔Inspiron 15 5518笔记本电脑在审查。CPU的速度变慢了

Inspiron 15 5518提供Core i5-11300H处理器,GeForce-MX450 GPU和8GB工作内存。后者在单通道模式下工作。积极的一面。这款笔记本提供非常好的电池运行时间,并为两个NVMe SSD提供空间。...
Intel Core i5-11300H | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | 15.60" | 1.8 kg

Dell Inspiron 13 5310-NJ24J: Intel Core i5-11300H, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » 戴尔Inspiron 13 5310评论。更多的图形,更多的电池寿命

HP Envy 17-cg: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » 惠普Envy 17 cg1356ng评论。一台大型多媒体笔记本电脑

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6: Intel Core i5-11300H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6的回顾。16英寸全能型产品,电池寿命良好

Asus Zenbook Flip 15 UM562UG-AC018WS: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Flip 15 UM562UG-AC018WS

HP Envy 17-ch1056nf: Intel Core i7-1195G7, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-ch1056nf

Dell Inspiron 15 5510, i7-11390H MX450: Intel Core i7-11390H, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5510, i7-11390H MX450

Dell Inspiron 15 5518-NP37P: Intel Core i5-11320H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5518-NP37P

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14IHU5-82NH002QGE: Intel Core i7-11370H, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14IHU5-82NH002QGE

Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-59GP: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-59GP

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9

Dell Latitude 15 5521, i5-11500H MX450: Intel Core i5-11500H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Dell Latitude 15 5521, i5-11500H MX450

MSI Modern 14 B11SB, i5-1135G7 MX450: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB, i5-1135G7 MX450

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400EG, i5-1135G7: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400EG, i5-1135G7

HP Envy 13-ba1002ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1002ns

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon 14ACN6, 5800U: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Carbon 14ACN-6, 5800U

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH5-82NK001PSB: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ARH5-82NK001PSB

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E

HP Envy 13-ba1012ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1012ns

HP Pavilion 15-eg0006ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0006ns

HP Pavilion 15-eg0007ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0007ns

HP Envy 17-ch0000ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-ch0000ns

MSI Prestige 15 A11SB-449: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 15 A11SB-449

HP Pavilion 15-eg: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 15-eg0025cl

MSI Modern 14 B11SB-008ES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB-008ES

MSI Modern 15 A11SB-011ES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A11SB-011ES

Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450

HP Envy 17-cg1000ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1000ns

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2021, i7-1165G7 MX450: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2021, i7-1165G7 MX450

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450: Intel Core i5-11300H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15, i5-11300H MX450

HP Pavilion 14-dv0005ns: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0005ns

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ITL05-82FE005QGE: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ITL05-82FE005QGE

MSI Modern 14 B11SB-009XES: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 B11SB-009XES

HP Envy 13-ba1033tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 13-ba1033tx

HP Pavilion 14-dv0065tx: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0065tx

HP Pavilion 14-dv0067tx: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion 14-dv0067tx

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro

HP Envy 17-cg1490nd : Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1490nd

Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG

MSI Modern 15 A11SB-039RU: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A11SB-039RU

HP Envy 17-cg1279ng: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg1279ng

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q508U: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
   » Nvidia GeForce MX系列在与AMD Radeon 680M的竞争中举步维艰

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter