Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

用于笔记本电脑的NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050(GN20-S7)是一款用于笔记本电脑的快速中端游戏显卡。RTX 2050基于现代安培GA107芯片(与RTX 3050一样),该芯片采用8纳米三星工艺(8N)制造。与类似的GeForce MX570相比,RTX2050提供Raytracing和DLSS支持。

与旧的Geforce RTX 2060 Mobile相比,2050提供了更多的着色器(2048),但内存总线(64位)大大减少。它有不同的版本,其TGPs从30瓦到45瓦不等。最大提升时钟范围为1155至1477 MHz。它具有高达4GB的GDDR6显存(14Gbps,最大吞吐量为112GB/s)。

由于大大减少了显存总线,移动RTX 2050的游戏性能应明显低于RTX 2060。首批基准测试将快速版本定位为略高于GeForce GTX 1650,与GeForce MX570处于同一水平。然而,由于Tensor核心的存在,支持DLSS的游戏可以提供明显的性能优势。

GeForce RTX 2000 Series

NVIDIA Titan RTX 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 2048 @ 1.48 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN20-S7
ArchitectureAmpere
Pipelines2048 - unified
Core Speed1477 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption30-45 Watt
technology8 nm
FeaturesDLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement17.12.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
4 pt (12%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
3.44 -13%
3.5 -12%
3.53 -11%
3.59 -9%
3.65 -8%
3.74 -6%
3.74 -6%
3.78 -5%
3.85 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3.96
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 3%
4.09 3%
4.11 4%
4.23 7%
4.28 8%
4.39 11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
4.46 13%
4.51 14%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
4.53 14%
...
20.4 415%
max:
33.3 741%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1230     avg: 3461     median: 3529 (10%)     max: 4326 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1072     avg: 3155     median: 3220.5 (9%)     max: 3938 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2864 -9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -8%
2993 -5%
2995 -5%
2998 -5%
3075 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -2%
3123 -1%
3139 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3155
3197 1%
3231 2%
3242 3%
3269 4%
3324 5%
3364 7%
3430 9%
3492 11%
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
3505 11%
...
19434 516%
max:
36259 1049%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23186     avg: 29670     median: 26385 (25%)     max: 40781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 47225     avg: 57528     median: 58068 (14%)     max: 66365 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 7230     avg: 8117     median: 7959.5 (13%)     max: 9475 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 8249     avg: 9219     median: 8964.5 (10%)     max: 10621 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 112270     avg: 137604     median: 143152 (16%)     max: 151843 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 8064     avg: 8136     median: 8135.5 (9%)     max: 8207 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9246     avg: 12457     median: 12222.5 (16%)     max: 15542 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10598     avg: 12801     median: 12495 (11%)     max: 15411 Points
171.8 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 -7%
11915 -7%
11984 -6%
12066 -6%
12289 -4%
12467 -3%
12479 -3%
12583 -2%
12797 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12801
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 3%
13515 6%
13524 6%
13581 6%
13714 7%
14014 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
14140 10%
14147 11%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 12%
...
59943 368%
max:
104201 714%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 40973     avg: 46821     median: 46821 (14%)     max: 52669 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 42344     avg: 45988     median: 45987.5 (25%)     max: 49631 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
40134 -13%
40146 -13%
40643 -12%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 -8%
42967 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 -5%
43587 -5%
44188 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
45988
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
46624 1%
46945 2%
47209 3%
47227 3%
49207 7%
51344 12%
51396 12%
52230 14%
52733 15%
...
132443 188%
max:
170928 272%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 38036     avg: 39263     median: 39263 (51%)     max: 40490 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 126     avg: 148.3     median: 147 (22%)     max: 175 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 76     avg: 90.8     median: 87 (32%)     max: 110 Seconds
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
67 fps (18%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
11.9 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
40.4 fps (9%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
30.3 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
129.9 fps (15%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
5.7 fps (2%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
96 fps (14%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
64.1 fps (7%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
90.9 fps (16%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
23.4 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
31 fps (20%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
58.7 fps (36%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6856 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
141.5 fps (47%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 142.3     avg: 166     median: 159.8 (9%)     max: 211 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 36.93     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (16%)     max: 42.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 83.53     avg: 93.2     median: 93.2 (17%)     max: 102.8 fps
3.3 -96%
...
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -20%
78.4 -16%
78.8 -15%
80.5 -14%
84.6 -9%
87.1 -7%
87.5 -6%
89.3 -4%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
93.2
94.7 2%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 3%
96.8 4%
Apple M3 8-Core GPU
101.7 9%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
102.9 10%
104 12%
106.3 14%
108 16%
109 17%
...
536 475%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 213.05     avg: 231.7     median: 231.7 (17%)     max: 250.3 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 198.63     avg: 216.2     median: 216.2 (24%)     max: 233.8 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
443.2 fps (26%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
950 fps (8%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 153.5     avg: 163.7     median: 163.7 (1%)     max: 173.8 fps
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 42076     avg: 43667     median: 43444.5 (13%)     max: 45703 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 40112     avg: 41614     median: 41279 (12%)     max: 43451 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1165 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2690 Samples/s (5%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 8754     avg: 9237     median: 9236.5 (10%)     max: 9719 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49.4     avg: 61.5     median: 54.8 (8%)     max: 91.6 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.1     avg: 60.8     median: 59.9 (8%)     max: 79.4 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 49.3     avg: 64.5     median: 60.4 (13%)     max: 85 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4614     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (46%)     max: 0.55 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4987     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 0.57 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 57.6     avg: 65.6     median: 65.6 (21%)     max: 73.5 Watt
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 54.4     avg: 63.2     median: 63.2 (8%)     max: 72 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
0.3 fps per Watt (40%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2     avg: 43.9     median: 45.4 (73%)     max: 47 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1290 MHz (51%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

Call of Duty Black Ops 6

2024
low 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
35.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
22.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
20.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
16.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
8.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
3.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
2.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
1.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
37.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
26.2
low 1920x1080
35.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
59.7
low 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
75
low 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
81.4
low 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
60.5
Palworld

Palworld

2024
low 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
111.3
med. 1920x1080
264  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
195  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
184.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
120.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
74.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
107.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
76.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
50.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
190
low 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
30
low 1920x1080
33.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
78
low 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
29.1
low 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
35.7
low 1920x1080
80.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
92.9
low 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
52
ultra 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
74.7
low 1920x1080
31.6 43.3 44.2 47.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.3 33.4 34.3 36.4 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 26.7 27.6 29.2 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.2 22.6 23 24.7 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
48.4
66.3
70.6
Steam Deck 1280x720
63.3
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
20.2
17.8
low 1920x1080
41.2 55.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.2 35.8 43.7 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30 31.8 37.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28 30.9 37 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
82
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
68.6
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
51
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
24.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
30.7
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
16.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
132
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
95.1
med. 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
57.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
85.5
low 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
42.3
low 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
39
low 1920x1080
38.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
57.7
med. 1920x1080
35.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
48.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
24 34.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21 30.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
17 24.1 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
33
med. 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
30.8 41 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.8 32.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.4 26 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.8 22.1 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
66.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
46.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
111.3
RT Ultra Preset / On FXAA 1920x1080
7
low 1920x1080
77.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
101.5
low 1920x1080
46.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
41.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
52  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10 (!)  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
25.1 32 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.2 27.3 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
32.2
low 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
71 95.5 107.4 167.7 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.8 69 93.4 106.6 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.6 56 68.5 92.7 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.2 16 21.1 59 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
111.2
181.9
low 1920x1080
115.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
74.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
32.2 45.5 49 49 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.5 41 42 42.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.1 28.1 30 31 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.8 25 25 27.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
49.5
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
46.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
100.6 104 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
70.4 80.8 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
61.4 67.9 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.2 49.5 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
50.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
37 59.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29 44.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.7 26.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
72.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
138.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
76  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
67  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
82.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
81  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
73.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
57.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
77.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
190.7 229 248 ~ 223 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
105.6 130.6 137.5 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.2 99.5 107.6 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.1 44.1 52.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27 28.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
94.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
69.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
55.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
53.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
64  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
202  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
111.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
93.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
123  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
130.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
65.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
64.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
43.1
low 1280x720
68.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
48.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
112.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
143.1 157.9 164.7 170.6 170.8 173 175.7 196.9 197.9 198.7 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.5 67.4 73.1 74.2 75.7 76.1 77.2 86.8 87.6 89.7 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.7 55.4 60.9 60.9 62.6 63.6 64.5 71.5 72.1 74 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.2 48 53.3 54.6 55.6 56.5 62.8 63.1 65.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
81 93 107 118 141 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39 53 59 68 78 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
35 52 53 62 71 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
34 49 49 60 66 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35 39 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
44
low 1280x720
87.6 91 95.7 97.8 98.7 99 104 107.9 117 128.2 139.6 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.4 78.9 80.9 81.6 83.7 83.9 86.5 88.7 93.6 106.4 115.3 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59.4 60.2 62 67.3 68.1 69.6 71.8 75.5 82.3 90.1 92.6 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51.7 58.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
52.6 68.1 77.9 85 90.5 94 101.3 103.1 109.1 112.6 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
32.3 40 45.8 49 49.9 49.9 51.7 55.3 60.8 61 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
24.8 28.2 33.3 34.5 35 35.3 35.7 39.3 41.8 42.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
20.5 25 29 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
130.3 134.4 140.9 143.3 149.1 150.3 159.1 159.3 161.8 167.4 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.9 115.9 119.5 123.5 125.8 132.8 134.8 143.6 146.2 153.9 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.9 97.9 108.2 109.7 109.9 119.5 120.1 130.9 138.1 140 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.1 90.2 98.6 103 104.2 110.6 112.6 121.2 129.6 130.1 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34 54.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
142.1 145 175.7 177 216 217 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
65 72.1 84.2 98.4 106.3 106.4 139 141 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46.7 48.7 56.4 57.7 58.2 59.1 77 78 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
24.3 29 32.5 32.7 33.4 33.7 34 38.3 39.6 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
145.8 150.7 153.3 156.4 156.7 157.7 159.8 176.4 179.1 183.2 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
135.1 139.3 150.8 151.7 153.1 153.3 156.7 171.4 175.3 175.8 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74 77.2 79.3 89.4 90.2 91.8 97.1 97.5 108.1 111.5 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.6 39.8 40.2 44.8 45.4 45.6 47.8 50.3 52.9 55.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
125.7
150.3
143.7
168.4
140.2
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
127.4
149.7
174.9
158.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 640372519
Until Dawn35.522.114.910.6
God of War Ragnarök43.634.231.727.4
Final Fantasy XVI17.416.41514.1
Space Marine 236.831.330.622.7
Star Wars Outlaws22.920.816.28.74
F1 2490504910
Senua's Saga Hellblade 23.712.491.621
Ghost of Tsushima37.427.218.514.6
Dragon's Dogma 215.814.5
Horizon Forbidden West35.426.915.19.87
Last Epoch91.764.853.840.2
Skull & Bones53473323
Helldivers 250.419.418.817.4
Enshrouded3429.92419.9
Palworld57.24837.535
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown264195184.1
Ready or Not120.786.174.551.5
The Finals107.776.467.850.9
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora20171210
EA Sports WRC33.82720.414.9
Alan Wake 217.815.313.8
Lords of the Fallen19.215.410.9
Total War Pharaoh80.750.429.519
Assassin's Creed Mirage36312514
EA Sports FC 2443.2
Counter-Strike 27467.146.332.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty42322521
Baldur's Gate 348383332
Lies of P37.533.128.525.9
The Crew Motorfest333024
Starfield24.621.415.913.6
Armored Core 642.635.93229.6
Immortals of Aveum22.71714.3
Atlas Fallen52.242.929.7
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart18.817.916.7
F1 2354.850.836.911.3
Diablo 448.642.838.834.5
Star Wars Jedi Survivor21.820.119.1
Dead Island 257.446.231.425.4
The Last of Us31.223.818.313.3
Resident Evil 4 Remake25.219.217.19.16
Company of Heroes 338.53526.528.2
Sons of the Forest35.934.133
Atomic Heart48.729.529.1
Returnal26292621
Hogwarts Legacy34.525.918.6
Dead Space Remake362923207.4
The Witcher 3 v4.0066.746.218.815.8
High On Life77.541.234.628.2
The Callisto Protocol46.2534.95
Need for Speed Unbound5427.919
Spider-Man Miles Morales41.63229.6
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 202252181510
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection29251312.9
A Plague Tale Requiem3325.521.3
FIFA 2356474036
The Quarry50.736.930.723.6
F1 2211082682512
Vampire Bloodhunt115.877.772.865.8
Ghostwire Tokyo53.751.550.845
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands74.659.237.829.5
Cyberpunk 2077 1.644372724
Elex 246.536.732.429.6
GRID Legends10276654939.423.3
Elden Ring50.143.13934.9
Dying Light 234.928.523.5
Rainbow Six Extraction88706642
God of War42.6483723
Halo Infinite72.554.840.737.5
Farming Simulator 22138.289.363.152.6
Forza Horizon 5111625318
Riders Republic76493833
Guardians of the Galaxy67484745
Back 4 Blood15582.465.865.3
Far Cry 681514327
Alan Wake Remastered73.657.849.7
Deathloop77.939.530.122.4
F1 202122312591442811
Monster Hunter Stories 294.491.289.772.5
Days Gone724944.532.6
Mass Effect Legendary Edition69.867.9
Resident Evil Village9064.457.947.9
Outriders55.334.633.530.3
Hitman 313268.35953.8
Yakuza Like a Dragon53.143.542.638.8
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla7242217
Dirt 5
Watch Dogs Legion64463918
Star Wars Squadrons202114111.293.5
Mafia Definitive Edition60.74238.8
Serious Sam 412342.831.928.4
Crysis Remastered130.865.425.320
Flight Simulator 202064.125.718.713.2
Death Stranding68.354.249.848.3
Gears Tactics16484.255.135.6
Doom Eternal121.586.9
Hunt Showdown112.25143
Strange Brigade17577645646.5
Far Cry 51085955523718
X-Plane 11.11106897355
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark8950352513.4
Dota 2 Reborn15013111510744
The Witcher 31791026033
GTA V162156924637.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
12
35
32
14
23
52
21
4
40
43
16
1
53
30
5
1
5
4
1
4
2

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 09:33:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.029s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.001s ... 0.031s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.031s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 11108 +0.028s ... 0.059s

#26 got single benchmarks 11108 +0.051s ... 0.11s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.11s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.914s ... 1.024s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.024s

#30 Got 682 rows for game benchmarks. +0.093s ... 1.117s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.117s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.068s ... 1.186s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +3.668s ... 4.853s

#34 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.009s ... 4.863s

#35 return log +0s ... 4.863s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile graphics card

宏碁 Aspire 16 2024 评测:没有多媒体屏幕的多媒体全能王

宏碁 Aspire 16 2024 评测:没有多媒体屏幕的多媒体全能王

2024 Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2 售价 899 欧元,将低功耗的当前一代酷睿 7 150U 与老化的 RTX 2050 搭配使用。这款笔记本电脑旨在成为一款经济型全能多媒体笔记本电脑。在这篇评测中,我们将讨论宏碁是否成功实现了这一目标。...
Intel Core 7 150U | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
华硕 ExpertBook B3 评测:运行时间长达 11 小时的强大办公笔记本电脑

华硕 ExpertBook B3 评测:运行时间长达 11 小时的强大办公笔记本电脑

ExpertBook B3 拥有适中的排放、较长的运行时间、两个内存插槽、强大的计算能力和 Thunderbolt 4。由于配备了GeForce RTX 2050,这款 14 英寸笔记本电脑可以胜任对 GPU 要求较高的任务和游戏。正面:华硕为这款设备提供三年保修服务。...
Intel Core i7-1355U | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 14.00" | 1.7 kg
惠普 ProBook 450 G10 评测: GeForce 办公笔记本内的 RTX 功能

惠普 ProBook 450 G10 评测: GeForce 办公笔记本内的 RTX 功能

惠普的这款商务笔记本电脑拥有低排放、长运行时间、两个内存插槽和不错的输入设备。由于配备了GeForce RTX 2050,该设备还可以执行对 GPU 要求较高的任务。价格约为 750 美元起。...
Intel Core i7-1355U | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
配备GeForce RTX 2050 的宏碁 Aspire 5 AN515-58GM (2023) 笔记本电脑评测

宏碁 Aspire 5 A515-58GM 评测:配备仿游戏 GPU 的办公笔记本电脑

宏碁 Aspire 5(2023)是一款办公笔记本电脑,由于安装了 RTX 2050 游戏 GPU,所以售价要高得多。在这篇详细的评测中,您可以了解到这一配方是否造就了一款值得拥有的全能型产品。与前代产品相比,这款笔记本电脑拥有两个内存组、雷电 4 以及多项改进。...
Intel Core i7-1355U | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
惠普Envy 17笔记本电脑评论: GeForce GPU在多媒体笔记本电脑的优雅4K显示屏上的发挥

惠普Envy 17笔记本电脑评论: GeForce GPU在多媒体笔记本电脑的优雅4K显示屏上的发挥

在一个简单的情况下,一个具有高4K分辨率的大显示屏,加上英特尔第12代的计算能力,32GB的DDR4内存,以及一个专用的GeForce GPU - 惠普Envy 17-cr0079ng包听起来很有趣。在我们的Notebookcheck测试中发现,这款多媒体笔记本电脑在实践中是否也能让用户信服。...
Intel Core i7-1255U | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 17.30" | 2.6 kg

LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G: Intel Core i7-1260P, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » LG Gram 17评测--超轻的17英寸笔记本电脑,配备适度的dGPU

Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8: Intel Core i5-1240P, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  Review » 宏碁Aspire 5 A515-57G笔记本电脑评测:RTX 2050的表现疲软

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » 联想ThinkBook 16 G4+评测。优秀的多媒体笔记本电脑,功率大

Honor MagicBook 14 2022: Intel Core i5-12500H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Honor MagicBook 14 2022回顾。配备RTX 2050的多媒体笔记本电脑

Acer Nitro V15 ANV15-41, RTX 2050: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro V15 ANV15-41, RTX 2050

Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2: Intel Core 7 150U, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 16 A16-51GM-77G2

Asus Vivobook 14X K3405ZF: Intel Core i5-12500H, 14.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14X K3405ZF

Asus ExpertBook B3 B3604CVF: Intel Core i7-1355U, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B3 B3604CVF

Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CVF: Intel Core i7-1355U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CVF

Asus VivoBook 16X K3605ZF, i5-12450H: Intel Core i5-12450H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 16X K3605ZF, i5-12450H

Dell Inspiron 16 5630: Intel Core i7-1360P, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 16 5630

HP Victus 15-fb1000AX: AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fb1000AX

Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15ACH16, R5 5500H RTX 2050: unknown, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15ACH16, R5 5500H RTX 2050

MSI GF63 Thin 12UCX: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GF63 Thin 12UCX

HP Victus 15-fa1100tx: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 15-fa1100tx

Asus VivoBook 16X K3605ZF: Intel Core i7-12650H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 16X K3605ZF

Medion Erazer Crawler E30e: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Crawler E30e

Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM, i7-1355U: Intel Core i7-1355U, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM, i7-1355U

Acer Aspire 7 A715-76G, i5-12450H RTX 2050: Intel Core i5-12450H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 7 A715-76G, i5-12450H RTX 2050

Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM: Intel Core i5-13420H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF: Intel Core i5-11400H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HF

HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh1299nr: Intel Core i7-1355U, 14.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh1299nr

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF: Intel Core i5-11400H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming FX506HF

LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G: Intel Core i7-1260P, 17.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17Z90Q-E.AD78G

HP Envy 17-cr0079ng: Intel Core i7-1255U, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cr0079ng

HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0032TX: Intel Core i7-1255U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0032TX

HP Envy x360 15-ew0170nd: Intel Core i7-1255U, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ew0170nd

Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 14IAP7, i7-1260P RTX 2050: Intel Core i7-1260P, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 14IAP7, i7-1260P RTX 2050

HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0001nf: Intel Core i7-1255U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Plus 14-eh0001nf

Honor MagicBook 14 2022: Intel Core i5-12500H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Honor MagicBook 14 2022

Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-705U: Intel Core i7-1260P, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-705U

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP: Intel Core i7-12700H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G4+ IAP

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15 2022, i7 RTX 2050

   » 小米刷新红米笔记本Pro 15 2022,CPU更强大,价格降低

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-04- 4)