Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

采用Max-Q设计的NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080是移动RTX 2080的低功耗版,具有降低的频率和功耗。因此,它适用于轻薄的游戏笔记本电脑。它基于台式机和移动版相同的TU104芯片,并提供2944个着色器和8 GB GDDR6内存,并有256位(12 GHz)带宽。

目前看来,将有两个版本,一个低功耗80瓦版本,频率在735-1095 MHz之间,一个更强的90瓦版本,频率在990-1230 MHz之间。

与常规RTX 2080相比,频率不是唯一的区别。针对Max-Q版本的驱动针对效率进行了优化(而非性能;仅针对Max-Q型号进行了优化),电压被限制在1V,配有高端散热以及针对风扇噪声的40 dB限制进行了的优化(并进行频率调整以确保始终如此)。

特征

TU104芯片以12 nm FinFET工艺制造,并包括深度学习超级采样(DLSS)和实时光线追踪(RTRT)等功能,与基于Pascal架构的旧GPU相比,它们应结合起来可创造出更逼真的照光照效果(如果游戏支持)。 RTX 2080还支持DisplayPort 1.4,同时还支持HDMI 2.0b,HDR,同时多投影(SMP)和H.265视频编码/解码(PlayReady 3.0)。

性能

RTX 2080 Max-Q应该比普通的移动版RTX 2070强一点。它应该能够以高特效在4k画质下运行所有硬件要求高的游戏。但是,光线追踪功能可能会大大降低帧率。

GeForce RTX 2000 Series

NVIDIA Titan RTX 4608 @ 1.35 - 1.77 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop) 4352 @ 1.35 - 1.55 GHz352 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop) 3072 @ 1.65 - 1.82 GHz256 Bit @ 15500 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop) 2944 @ 1.52 - 1.71 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile 3072 @ 1.37 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile 2944 @ 1.38 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) 2560 @ 1.61 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop) 2304 @ 1.41 - 1.62 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile 2560 @ 1.14 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14002 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 3072 @ 0.98 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) 2176 @ 1.47 - 1.65 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.44 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q 2944 @ 0.74 - 1.1 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop) 1920 @ 1.32 - 1.62 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 2560 @ 0.93 - 1.16 GHz256 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q 2304 @ 0.89 - 1.19 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile 1920 @ 0.96 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.98 - 1.19 GHz192 Bit @ 11000 MHz
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 2048 @ 1.48 GHz64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameN18E-G3-A1 MAX-Q TU104
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines2944 - unified
Core Speed735-990 - 1095-1230 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption80-90 Watt
Transistor Count13.6 Billion
technology12 nm
FeaturesNVLink, DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor, 650 Watt system power recommended
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
9.1 pt (27%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -99%
...
7.61 -17%
7.66 -16%
7.8 -15%
8.03 -12%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
8.16 -11%
8.23 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
8.74 -4%
9.01 -1%
9.1 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
9.14
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
9.22 1%
9.41 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
9.45 3%
9.89 8%
10.2 12%
10.4 14%
10.7 17%
11.2 23%
11.2 23%
...
20.4 123%
max:
33.3 264%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6399     avg: 7609     median: 7484 (22%)     max: 8604 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 6464     avg: 7903     median: 7923 (21%)     max: 8844 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -99%
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6764 -14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
6867 -13%
7129 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
7284 -8%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
7432 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7445 -6%
7651 -3%
7812 -1%
7864 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7903
8057 2%
8189 4%
8210 4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8238 4%
8316 5%
8689 10%
8700 10%
8798 11%
8989 14%
...
19434 146%
max:
36259 359%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 364184     avg: 413236     median: 425550 (43%)     max: 444648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 166342     avg: 280059     median: 342495 (40%)     max: 377016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 25513     avg: 35405     median: 34287 (32%)     max: 50705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38256     avg: 111063     median: 117764 (29%)     max: 129506 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 15962     avg: 17836     median: 17504 (29%)     max: 22184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 18048     avg: 20658     median: 20703 (23%)     max: 23032 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 69036     avg: 274353     median: 300340 (33%)     max: 419228 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19220     avg: 21052     median: 21067 (27%)     max: 23774 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 23386     avg: 27852     median: 27973 (24%)     max: 30910 Points
171.8 -99%
...
24213 -13%
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
25100 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
25371 -9%
25737 -8%
25775 -7%
25897 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
26602 -4%
26816 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27104 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27852
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28106 1%
28641 3%
28692 3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
29416 6%
29447 6%
29663 7%
30499 10%
31142 12%
32331 16%
...
59943 115%
max:
104201 274%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
51930 Points (15%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
60439 Points (33%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
51344 -15%
51396 -15%
52230 -14%
52733 -13%
52917 -12%
53510 -11%
54830 -9%
58792 -3%
60089 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
60439
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
62557 4%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
62862 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
63088 4%
63137 4%
64680 7%
66003 9%
66376 10%
66735 10%
68082 13%
...
132443 119%
max:
170928 183%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 36228     avg: 37369     median: 37613 (49%)     max: 38435 Points
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
69.5 fps (17%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
11.4 fps (2%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
95.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
39.7 fps (10%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
8.9 fps (8%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
52.2 fps (21%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
90.2 fps (15%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
174.7 fps (31%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
89.3 fps (24%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
20.3 fps (2%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
95.5 fps (21%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
55.9 fps (12%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
16 fps (5%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
177.1 fps (26%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
128 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
176.5 fps (31%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6820     avg: 9275     median: 8197.5 (6%)     max: 13884 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 73.1     avg: 77.2     median: 78.4 (26%)     max: 80 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 107.8     avg: 120.4     median: 119.7 (7%)     max: 138.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
326 fps (35%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2006 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5110 Samples/s (9%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
14673 points (16%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
129 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
131 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 130     avg: 161.4     median: 161 (35%)     max: 185.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4198     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (44%)     max: 0.534 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 40.5     avg: 48     median: 48 (77%)     max: 56.6 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 915     avg: 1241     median: 1260 (49%)     max: 1455 MHz
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1003 MHz (40%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
156  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
140  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
184  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
94.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
85.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
171.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
62.6
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
213.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
187.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
120.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
214.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
208.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
197.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
197.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
128.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
231.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
188  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
165  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
224.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
204.2 206.6 ~ 205 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
111 112.2 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.5 96.1 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.9 93.3 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
98.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
77.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84 93 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69 77 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
157.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
116.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.1 143 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.3 85.1 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anthem

Anthem

2019
low 1280x720
84.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.1 86.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.4 78.9 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
101 110 116 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
88 95 98 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82 90 92 94 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74 81 82 85 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
116.7 121.7 150 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.7 94.6 97 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.2 66.4 72.1 75 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.8 54 58.4 59 59 62 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
40.7
49.8
49
low 1280x720
143.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111.8 130 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.9 128 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
137 140 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
103 104 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98.1 101 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
67.6 69.9 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.5 39.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
137  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.5 126 130 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
84.5 94.3 110 121 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.4 84.8 103 112 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
75.2 82.6 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29.8 37.8 42.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
131 143 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121 130 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
112 116 122 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
91.2 91.6 98.2 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.4 52.5 57.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset DXR 1920x1080
59.5
57.4
62.4
med. 1920x1080
144 161 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130 141 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121 131 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
107 113 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
med. 1920x1080
77.9 78.8 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.3 70.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.1 69.1 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65.3 66 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
140 142 151 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128 132 138 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
125 128 131 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83.8 91.4 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.4 41.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
68 81 87 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64 72 76 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53 56 59 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46 48 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30 32 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
med. 1920x1080
203 271 272 ~ 249 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
186 223 254 ~ 221 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
182 219 248 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
211 237 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
161 188 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114 131 132 133 142 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80 84 91 102 103 110 118 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78 82 89 97 99 105 111 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71 75 78 84 87 94 99 105 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57 58 61 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33 33 37 40 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
med. 1920x1080
169 178 ~ 174 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
130 136 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102 102 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
86 87 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
51 56 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
117 123 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105 111 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
84.8 90.9 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52.5 58.4 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27.1 29.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.4 39.9 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
114 122 123 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94 101 103 107 109 109 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68 88 97 97 99 99 106 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66 84 92 93 93 95 100 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72 79 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34 40 44 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
82.9 91 101.9 108 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68.9 80.5 89.2 97.4 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.8 67.2 74.8 81.6 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.5 51.8 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
115 118 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.5 90.5 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
64.9 68.4 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
50.2 52.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.7 27.5 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
125.2 127.4 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100.1 100.7 103 103 106 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74 75.9 77.3 79.7 81.4 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.7 35.9 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
med. 1920x1080
139 143 147 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128 138 140 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116 121 136 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
97.7 105 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
46.7 50.4 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
143 145 160 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
129 131 140 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110 111 117 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76.5 80.9 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.3 42.7 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
111 118 127 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108 112 120 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104 111 115 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
88.2 95.6 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.2 54.3 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65 80 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62 69 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
61  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
med. 1920x1080
117 120 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112 115 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.7 99 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.2 68.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33 35.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
150 157 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119 125 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93 99 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset TAA 2560x1440
66
72
low 1280x720
160.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
190 207 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
174 175 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
133 139 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.4 51.5 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
med. 1920x1080
212 225 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150 164 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
102 105 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
248.7 249 ~ 249 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
239.3 247.7 248 249 ~ 246 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
218 218.5 248 248.4 ~ 233 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
112 123 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
248.1
Prey

Prey

2017
med. 1920x1080
142 142 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
140 141 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
139 139 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63.4 69.5 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
89.8 94.4 105 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
87 89.8 98.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57.2 57.7 58 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.1 42 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
267.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163 165.2 166 171 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156 156.5 158 164 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
122 123.4 130 131 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.9 57.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
352 360 ~ 356 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
194 220 ~ 207 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
163 182 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
58.6 65.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
98.8 109 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92.8 94 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.4 61.1 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
134 146 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
129 134 ~ 132 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
65  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
103 107 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.7 63.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.4 40.6 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
120 121 135 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110 113 123 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.6 50.2 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
high 1920x1080
238 289 292 ~ 273 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
178 179 196 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
102 111 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Doom

Doom

2016
high 1920x1080
131 134 ~ 133 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
127 129 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
71.1 79.3 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x768
82.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
high 1920x1080
113 117 127 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
93 93.9 100 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
45.6 51.7 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
196.4 215 223.3 239.5 246 253.4 ~ 229 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
163.6 165.7 174.7 176.7 182.8 185 ~ 175 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
131.9 138.8 139 139.8 143.8 146.5 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108.6 109 113.1 124 126 126 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
152 210 230 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
148 201 217 ~ 189 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
90.8 98.2 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
132.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
126.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
119.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
172  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
161  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
134  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
255 263.4 273.9 274.5 277.6 279 286.3 287.9 292.5 294.7 295.5 299 305.4 325 326.6 ~ 289 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
192.7 215.2 215.4 216 217.2 221.1 222.4 225.7 227.6 230.3 234 236.6 237.3 239.3 258.7 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.3 125.5 135 136 138 138.2 139 142 144.2 144.5 145 145.1 146.6 146.6 149.6 151 152.2 153.2 179.9 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.7 66.9 73.1 75.4 75.7 76.5 76.9 77.4 77.5 77.6 78 78.3 80.3 80.7 81 81.2 81.3 81.7 85.3 87.4 90.8 92.7 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
39.6 50.6 53 53.3 57.6 65.5 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
140 171 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
135.3 166 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115.4 144 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
62.6 77.2 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
166
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
173
low 1280x720
276.8 280.1 297.6 306.4 307.6 312.6 314.6 316.8 323.8 326.9 330 331.1 349.6 350.6 396.1 ~ 321 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
197.5 246.7 268 271 273 273.1 280.2 282.2 283.4 285.6 289.6 295 306 311.9 337.3 ~ 280 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
172.5 187.8 232.3 239.6 251.7 252.1 252.3 254.1 255.1 262 263.6 272 278 284.1 285.9 321 ~ 254 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118.9 137.6 156.9 161.5 163.7 164.7 165.6 165.7 166 166 166.5 170 176.5 177.7 179 189.5 ~ 164 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom Eternal156140138134
Hunt Showdown184134121
Escape from Tarkov121121120117
Red Dead Redemption 2121102.672.845.6
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order94.584.282.3
Need for Speed Heat85.66663.657.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019171.5126.7104.990.6
GRID 2019213.5187.6120.781.3
Ghost Recon Breakpoint105959271
FIFA 20214.6208.1197.7197.1
Borderlands 3128.8110.884.767.1
Control231.992.871.9
F1 2019188165137114
Total War: Three Kingdoms224.8126.188.865.5
Rage 22051129593
Anno 180098.593.977.741.2
The Division 213297897326
Dirt Rally 2.0157.8116.11227631.2
Anthem84.573.7797326.4
Far Cry New Dawn10994908136
Metro Exodus12990685720.9
Apex Legends143.7137.112111936
Just Cause 41391041006940
Darksiders III137120102957937
Battlefield V1371261179454
Farming Simulator 19153136126110
Hitman 27871686638.2
Call of Duty Black Ops 41441331288841
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey7971564731
FIFA 19249221216224175
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1309894875936
F1 20181741331028754
Monster Hunter World120108885528
The Crew 26060606039
Far Cry 512010493897639
X-Plane 11.1196847044
Kingdom Come: Deliverance11790675127
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark1261037834
Fortnite14313512410149
Star Wars Battlefront 21491331137941
Need for Speed Payback1191131109251
Assassin´s Creed Origins8273666139
ELEX119114966634
Middle-earth: Shadow of War1541229642
Ark Survival Evolved160.987.963.543.9
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)19917513650
Dirt 4219157104
Rocket League249246233118
Prey14214113966
Ghost Recon Wildlands96925841
For Honor267.216615912755
Resident Evil 735620717362
Dishonored 21049358
Battlefield 114013265
Deus Ex Mankind Divided1056239
Mirror's Edge Catalyst12511548
Overwatch273184107
Doom13312875
Ashes of the Singularity82.580.781.3
The Division1199649
Rise of the Tomb Raider22917514011852.4
Rainbow Six Siege19718995
Dota 2 Reborn144.9132.2126.4119.6
Batman: Arkham Knight17216113492
The Witcher 32892261447953
GTA V1561511307074
BioShock Infinite321280254164
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


7
29


27
32


34
33

7
39
15

4
14
1
5
30
8
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 16:03:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.028s ... 0.03s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.032s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 9621 +0.03s ... 0.062s

#26 got single benchmarks 9621 +0.059s ... 0.121s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.988s ... 1.109s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.11s

#30 Got 726 rows for game benchmarks. +0.049s ... 1.159s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.159s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.043s ... 1.202s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +2.747s ... 3.948s

#34 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.007s ... 3.955s

#35 return log +0s ... 3.955s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q graphics card

Alienware外星人m17 R2笔记本电脑评测:让i9显得值得

Alienware外星人m17 R2笔记本电脑评测:让i9显得值得

经过重新设计的Alienware m17 R2在迄今为止最薄的系列中最薄的机身中装配了Core i9-9980HK CPU和GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q GPU。 我们原本希望通过一般般的性能来控制散热,但是即使对于高端游戏笔记本电脑,该系统也以其比平均更快的性能使我们感到惊讶。...
Intel Core i9-9980HK | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.6 kg
雷蛇灵刃17 Pro笔记本电脑评测

雷蛇灵刃17 Pro笔记本电脑评测

尽管需几次尝试,但雷蛇终于精心制作了一款近乎完美的Blade笔记本电脑,并且是其尺寸类别中最好的游戏笔记本电脑之一。 这款最新的Blade Pro功能扔掉了了前几代产品很多不重要的功能,实现了更轻,更小,更高效,更简化的游戏体验,让每个人——不仅仅是Razer粉丝——都能欣赏的来。...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.8 kg
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG (i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG (i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

微星给了新GS65更强的CPU和GPU,更高的刷新率和更大的触摸板,使得使用更舒适。然而,20000多元的售价,我们的期望可不低。...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2 kg
雷蛇灵刃15进阶版(i7-9750H,RTX 2080 Max-Q,FHD)笔记本电脑评测

雷蛇灵刃15进阶版(i7-9750H,RTX 2080 Max-Q,FHD)笔记本电脑评测

仅过了了一年时间,雷蛇就继续通过新的CPU,Wi-Fi和显示选项将Blade 15推向极限。这款新的第9代英特尔和RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU相比较过去的第8代英特尔和RTX 2070 Max-Q SKU性能提升了多少?...
Intel Core i7-9750H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
外星人m17 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q, 4K UHD) 笔记本电脑评测

外星人m17 (i9-8950HK, RTX 2080 Max-Q, 4K UHD) 笔记本电脑评测

23%更薄,37%更小,40%更轻。 Alienware m1解决了Alienware 17系列的所有尺寸和重量问题,但仍然缺少一些辅助功能,如背光触控板,单键RGB照明,和更多的接口。...
Intel Core i9-8950HK | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 17.30" | 2.6 kg

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » 华硕Zephyrus S GX531GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » 联想Legion Y740-17ICH (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Acer Predator Triton 500: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » 宏碁掠夺者Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) 笔记本电脑评测

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GXR-HG113R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX701GXR-HG113R

HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0004ur: Intel Core i9-9880H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0004ur

Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE

Alienware m15 R2-N00AWm15R210: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware m15 R2-N00AWm15R210

MSI P75 Creator 9SG-1013NL: Intel Core i9-9880H, 17.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI P75 Creator 9SG-1013NL

MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR

Alienware m17 R2, i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R2, i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q

HP Omen X2S 15-dg0901ng: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » HP Omen X2S 15-dg0901ng

MSI GT76 Titan 9SG-225ID: Intel Core i9-9900K, 17.30", 4.2 kg
  External Review » MSI GT76 Titan 9SG-225ID

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GXR-AZ044R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX531GXR-AZ044R

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75C9: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-75C9

Alienware m17 R2-C7XD9: Intel Core i9-9980HK, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 R2-C7XD9

HP Omen 15-dh0009ng: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP Omen 15-dh0009ng

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GXR-H6081R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX701GXR-H6081R

Alienware m15 R2 P87F: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware m15 R2 P87F

Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg-81UH0020GE: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg-81UH0020GE

Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-9750H, 16.10", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701-EV020T: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701-EV020T

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-74JA: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-74JA

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q, Core i7-8750H: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q, Core i7-8750H

Origin PC EVO17-S 2019 (i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q): Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EVO17-S 2019 (i7-9750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR-EV013R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR-EV013R

MSI GS65 Stealth-666: Intel Core i9-9880H, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI GS65 Stealth-666

MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q

Origin PC EVO16-S (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q): Intel Core i7-8750H, 16.10", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EVO16-S (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX-EV021R: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX-EV021R

Acer ConceptD 7: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 7

MSI GS65 8SG-005: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GS65 8SG-005

Alienware m15-565K7: Intel Core i9-8950HK, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Alienware m15-565K7

Alienware m17 P37E: Intel Core i9-8950HK, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware m17 P37E

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q

Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICHg-81HH001NGE: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICHg-81HH001NGE

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX-EV064T: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX-EV064T

Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9: Intel Core i9-8950HK, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX-ES036R: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX-ES036R

Gigabyte Aero 15 Y9-9UK4720P: Intel Core i9-8950HK, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aero 15 Y9-9UK4720P

Acer Predator Triton 500: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 500

Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX

MSI GS65 8SG-055: Intel Core i7-8750H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI GS65 8SG-055

MSI GS75 8SG Stealth: Intel Core i7-8750H, 17.30", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI GS75 8SG Stealth

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-01-22)