Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA ION 2

NVIDIA ION 2

NVIDIA®(英伟达™)ION™(翼扬™)2(GT218-ION-A3 / GT218-ILV A3)是新的PineTrail凌动处理器(例如,N450,D510,D410宣布,2009年12月)生成一个专门的图形卡。而ION2则是基于GT218芯片(专用内存(相对于老ION芯片组,这是一个图形卡)的GeForce 305M,310M)。的PineTrail芯片组的限制,它只能与PCIe 1X连接。因此,该芯片的性能是比一个类似的GeForce G210M例如的慢ION 2有三个版本,不同的内核速度和着色器核心。 10“上网本ION的ION芯片在10”上网本的PineTrail原子只提供了8着色器核心,时钟频率为405 MHz的。根据NVIDIA的表现应该仍是第一代ION相似。 6瓦的功耗是相当低的,因此完全适合于小型上网本。 12“上网本ION的12个”版本所有功能的GT218芯片和16个内核,主频为475 MHz的。应高于老ION平台的性能。台式机和上网本ION桌面版更高的时钟频率为535 MHz,没有权力限制必须得到满足。在3DMark03中,第一的netbooknews.de基准上一个样本的8着色器核心版本宏碁Aspire532克的在3000点左右。这将是明显慢于一个ION上网本。的相对低的结果可以解释由早期的样品和在PCIe 1个总线。不过,相比一个GMA 3150的性能是好了很多。由于集成的GMA 3150图形是相当有限的Atom CPU(速度慢的3D性能,没有高清视频加速,没有数字显示器输出),ION 2的目的地址这些薄弱点。它提供了一个更好的3D性能(数字)显示器输出(HDMI接口,DisplayPort,DVI和VGA),拥有PureVideo HD(因为Flash 10.1也为互联网视频,在HD)和CUDA使用GPU的计算能力的视频加速。上网本ION 2个版本还支持Optimus的专用(ION)和集成的GMA 3150显卡之间自动切换。因此,没有GPU的负载应该是平等的非ION上网本电池的使用时间。但HDMI端口始终触发使用的ION卡,GMA 3150的端口不能被使用。原子系统的功耗6-12瓦的TDP是相当高的,但ION 2切换(带集成的GMA 3150),还可以导致高的电池运行时间。

CodenameGT218-ION-A3, GT218-ILV-A3
ArchitectureGT2xx
Pipelines16 - unified
Core Speed405 / 475 / 535 MHz
Shader Speed? / 1100 / ? MHz
Memory Speed790 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2, DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption6/12 Watt
technology40 nm
Date of Announcement10.01.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 696     avg: 715     median: 724 (0%)     max: 725 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 600     avg: 622     median: 601 (0%)     max: 664 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -90%
...
363 -42%
414 -33%
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
465 -25%
466 -25%
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
512 -18%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
515 -17%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4530
560 -10%
564 -9%
584 -6%
NVIDIA ION 2
622
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
635 2%
NVIDIA GeForce G 105M
646 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
690 11%
695 12%
AMD Radeon HD 8180
695 12%
736 18%
739 19%
750 21%
769 24%
...
132443 21193%
max:
170928 27380%
0%
100%
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 5470     avg: 5858     median: 5539.5 (6%)     max: 6882 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3362     avg: 5342     median: 5718.5 (3%)     max: 6569 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2227     avg: 3385     median: 3817 (4%)     max: 3961 Points
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -96%
...
3127 -8%
3153 -7%
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
3195 -6%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
3207 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600
3241 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
3265 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
3270 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
3290 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3372 0%
NVIDIA ION 2
3385
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
3435 1%
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
3495 3%
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
3587 6%
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT
3587 6%
3593 6%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5200
3629 7%
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600
3708 10%
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800
3800 12%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470
3854 14%
...
68166 1914%
max:
87172 2475%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
2699 points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 1155     avg: 1822     median: 1963 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 +
3DMark 06
2488 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 3.7     avg: 4.4     median: 4.3 (54%)     max: 5.6 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.2     avg: 3.5     median: 3.3 (41%)     max: 4.7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 326     avg: 972     median: 1027 (1%)     max: 1266 points
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
25.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 800x600
12.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
13 31 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
23 42.7 57 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
16 26.5 29 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1024x768
22.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
26 33.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
9.8 15 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
17  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
9.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
30.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
44 48.6 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
24.4 27 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
11.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
low 640x480
25.8  fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
21.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
StarCraft 225.3
CoD Modern Warfare 212.36
Anno 140422
Sims 34124
Left 4 Dead25.1622.5
Trackmania Nations Forever3012
Crysis - GPU Benchmark179.6
Crysis - CPU Benchmark199.5
World in Conflict - Benchmark235
Call of Juarez Benchmark4.1
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark30.7
World of Warcraft462611.6
Counter-Strike Source25.821.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
8
3

5


5
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 09. 05:13:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1609 +0.012s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 1609 +0.013s ... 0.053s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.27s ... 0.323s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.323s

#12 Got 31 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.327s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.327s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.333s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.226s ... 0.559s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.562s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.562s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter