Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Nvidia RTX 3500 Ada Generation是一款用于笔记本电脑的高端专业显卡,拥有 5,120 个 CUDA 核心和 12 GB ECC GDDR6 显存。这款显卡于 2023 年问世,采用台积电的 5 纳米工艺和 Nvidia 的 Ada Lovelace 架构,实现了出色的性能和适中的功耗。

从硬件上看,RTX 3500 是一款缩小版的 GeForce RTX 4070(台式机)的缩减版。因此,它使用了相同的 AD104 芯片,在 QHD 1440p 下运行三 A 级游戏几乎没有困难。

Quadro 系列显卡的 BIOS 和驱动程序与GeForce 显卡不同,主要针对专业用途而非游戏。产品设计、大规模计算、模拟、数据挖掘、全天候运行和认证驱动程序--如果这些听起来耳熟能详,那么 Quadro 显卡一定会让你满意。

架构与功能

与采用安培架构的旧显卡相比,Ada Lovelace 带来了一系列改进。这不仅仅是更好的制造工艺和更多的 CUDA 内核(从 10,752 个内核增加到 16,384 个内核),还有大量的底层改进,包括更大的二级缓存、通过简化透明和非透明评估实现的优化光线追踪程序以及其他变化。当然,这些显卡可以编码和解码一些最广泛使用的视频编解码器,包括 AVC、HEVC 和 AV1;它们还支持大量 Nvidia 技术,包括 Optimus 和 DLSS 3。

RTX 3500 配备 40 个第三代 RT 内核、160 个第四代 Tensor 内核和 5,120 个 CUDA 内核。将这些数字乘以 1.15,得到的结果与桌面版 RTX 4070 如出一辙:分别为 46、184 和 5888。在其他方面,该显卡配备了 12 GB 192 位宽(可选 ECC)GDDR6 显存,吞吐量约为 432 GB/s。这里出现纠错电路的事实证明,RTX 3500 确实是面向专业用户的。

与基于安培的显卡一样,RTX 3500 也使用了 PCI-Express 4 协议。支持 8K SUHD 显示器,不过,DP 1.4a 视频输出有可能成为系统的瓶颈。

性能

虽然截至 2023 年 8 月,我们还没有测试过采用 RTX 3500 Ada Generation 的单个系统,但我们有 RTX 4070(台式机)的大量性能数据,该显卡的性能比 RTX 3500 Ada Generation 高出约 20%。基于这些数据,我们完全可以期待 RTX 3500 的表现:

  • Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA 得分约为 30 秒
  • 3DMark 11 GPU 得分为 45,000 左右
  • GTA V(1440p - 可能的最高设置,16 倍自动对焦,4 倍 MSAA,FXAA)中至少达到 90 帧/秒
  • 《赛博朋克 2077》中至少达到 50 帧/秒 (1440p - 高设置、超 RT、"优质 "DLSS)

Nvidia 的营销材料提到了 23 TFLOPS 的性能,比 RTX 3000 Ada 代的 20 TFLOPS 性能提高了 15%。

您的情况可能会有所不同,这取决于您笔记本电脑的散热解决方案有多好,以及 RTX 3500 的 TGP 功耗目标有多高。还有一点值得一提,启用 ECC RAM 模式似乎会将应用程序和游戏可用的显存减少多达一千兆字节。

功耗

Nvidia 不再将笔记本显卡分为 Max-Q 和非 Max-Q 两种型号。取而代之的是,笔记本电脑制造商可以根据自己的需要自由设置 TGP,有时这个范围会大得惊人。RTX 3500 就是这种情况,推荐的最低值仅为 60 W,而最高值则高达 140 W(很可能包括动态提升),高出两倍多。围绕 RTX 3500 构建的最慢系统很容易比最快系统慢 50%。这就是我们在采用最新GeForce RTX 显卡的消费级笔记本电脑上看到的差距。

最后但并非最不重要的一点是,RTX 3500 所采用的改进型 5 纳米工艺(台积电 4N)可在 2023 年中期实现非常不错的能效。

RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines5120 - unified
Raytracing Cores40
Tensor / AI Cores160
Theoretical Performance23 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth432 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pageimages.nvidia.com
PredecessorRTX A3000 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
239.1 fps (35%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
103.1 fps (26%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
23.7 fps (21%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
192.3 fps (77%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
215.4 fps (58%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
437 fps (49%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
361.4 fps (53%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
382.8 fps (43%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
317 fps (18%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
9608 points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
175.5 Watt (25%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
192.6 Watt (24%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
121.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
101.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
60.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
123.4
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
45.8
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
11.9
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
67.6
low 1920x1080
164.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
136.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
118.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
228  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
223  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
182.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
306
low 1920x1080
232.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
195.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
411  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
296  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
235  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
223  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
159.2  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
78.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
med. 1920x1080
133  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
127  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
109  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
137.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
110.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
92.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
97.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
54.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
201  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
177.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
153.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
134.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
184.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
181  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
170.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
97.5 99.7 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
59.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
48.6
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
179.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
184.9
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty121.2113.1101.890.360.221.3
Baldur's Gate 3164.8136.2118.6117.380.241.2
F1 22228223182.872.948.324
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands232.5195.4137.9109.374.441.6
Strange Brigade411296235223159.278.6
Far Cry 513313512710962
X-Plane 11.11144.6137.8110.992.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark200167.6128.997.554.2
Dota 2 Reborn201177.7162.1153.9134.4
GTA V184.3181170.1115.59959.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



9


1
9


3
7


5
3

1
6
1
2
4
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 12:30:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.029s ... 0.029s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#10 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.032s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#12 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11605 +0.013s ... 0.044s

#14 got single benchmarks 11605 +0.011s ... 0.055s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.611s ... 0.666s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.666s

#18 Got 56 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 0.698s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.698s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.704s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.518s ... 1.222s

#22 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 1.225s

#23 return log +0s ... 1.225s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-11-26)