Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA®(英伟达™)Quadro 2000M是一家专业工作站显卡基于Fermi架构的(很可能是GF104和GF106)。它提供了相同的着色器,如GeForce®(精视™)GTX 460M,但只有128位内存总线,DDR3内存。特别是缓慢的DDR3内存可能是一个瓶颈的GPU的Quadro系列产品提供认证的驱动程序,为专业CAD,DCC,医学,或可视化领域的应用,如稳定性和性能进行了优化。 OpenGL的性能,例如,应该是明显比类似规格的GeForce图形卡。可以访问着色器/ CUDA核心,使用DirectX 11和OpenGL 4.1图形渲染和DirectCompute,OpenCL的,AXE,和CUDA通用的计算。由于新的Fermi核心,2000M提供高性能的通用计算。此外,NVIDIA的Quadro 2000M是新的立体解决方案由NVIDIA,NVIDIA®(英伟达™)3D立体幻镜™Pro兼容。之间自动切换处理器的图形卡的Quadro 2000M支持NVIDIA®(英伟达™)Optimus。为特定型号的笔记本电脑是实施该技术的笔记本电脑供应商的依赖。的Quadro 2000M规定为55瓦的TDP,因此最适合15.6英寸或更大的笔记本电脑。

Quadro M Series

Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermi
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz
Shader Speed1100 MHz
Memory Speed900 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption55 Watt
technology40 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement22.02.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1416     avg: 1422     median: 1421 (2%)     max: 1428 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1259     avg: 1261     median: 1261 (1%)     max: 1263 Points
171.8 -86%
...
1161 -8%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
1175 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G
1179 -7%
1179 -7%
AMD Radeon R5 M230
1203 -5%
1233 -2%
1233 -2%
1245 -1%
1259 0%
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
1261
1286 2%
Intel HD Graphics 520
1296 3%
1307 4%
1328 5%
1346 7%
1349 7%
1350 7%
Intel HD Graphics 530
1355 7%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
1361 8%
...
59943 4654%
max:
104201 8163%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6608     avg: 6634     median: 6633.5 (2%)     max: 6659 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5391     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (3%)     max: 5430 Points
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
5188 -4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
5243 -3%
5243 -3%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
5324 -2%
5366 -1%
5369 -1%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
5372 -1%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
5382 -1%
5410 0%
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
5411
5452 1%
5560 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
5573 3%
5594 3%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
5595 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
5631 4%
5698 5%
5717 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
5735 6%
...
132443 2348%
max:
170928 3059%
0%
100%
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
21287 Points (23%)
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
133.4 -99%
...
20551 -3%
20818 -2%
20861 -2%
20882 -2%
20968 -1%
21013 -1%
21185 0%
AMD Radeon R7 M445
21189 0%
21266 0%
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
21287
NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
21505 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
21611 2%
21991 3%
22463 6%
22649 6%
22740 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
22798 7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
22852 7%
23057 8%
...
68166 220%
max:
87172 310%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 11575     avg: 11659     median: 11656 (15%)     max: 11747 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.1     avg: 17     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19.8 fps
0.6 -96%
...
15.9 -6%
16.2 -4%
16.4 -3%
16.5 -3%
16.5 -3%
16.6 -2%
16.6 -2%
16.62 -2%
Intel HD Graphics 515
16.85 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
16.95
17.1 1%
17.37 2%
17.4 3%
17.65 4%
17.67 4%
AMD Radeon R7 M270
17.85 5%
17.9 6%
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
18 6%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 8%
...
532 3039%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 19.28     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (12%)     max: 19.32 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 22.13     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (13%)     max: 22.52 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 32.8     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (25%)     max: 33.4 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 9.45     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (11%)     max: 9.83 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 45.28     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (34%)     max: 45.96 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.8     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (45%)     max: 42.93 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 17.84     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (9%)     max: 17.96 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 27.08     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (14%)     max: 27.69 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5671 points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 38.3     avg: 38.4     median: 38.4 (13%)     max: 38.44 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 800x600
86.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
75  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
71.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
92  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
71  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
59.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
165 243 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
82  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23 37 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1366x768
64.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
200.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
74.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
59.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
36 43 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
269  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
93  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty: Black Ops86.77571.741.7
Fifa 119259
Mafia 2927159.135.1
StarCraft 2204824530
Battlefield: Bad Company 264.646.922.8
CoD Modern Warfare 2200.374.859.537.6
Anno 14046240
Sims 32699347.89
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
3


6

5
2
1
6







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 08. 11:18:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Dec 2024 05:31:35 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.018s ... 0.019s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.019s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.02s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.021s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.022s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.022s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#23 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 2435 +0.012s ... 0.035s

#25 got single benchmarks 2435 +0.011s ... 0.045s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.295s ... 0.341s

#28 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.341s

#29 Got 29 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.344s

#30 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.344s

#31 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.348s

#32 benchmarks composed for output. +0.209s ... 0.557s

#33 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.559s

#34 return log +0s ... 0.559s

No reviews found for this graphics card.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter