Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)

用于笔记本电脑的Nvidia Quadro T1000是基于Turing架构(TU117芯片)的专业移动图形卡。与消费类GTX 1650相比,Quadro T1000具有更少的CUDA内核/着色器(768比896)。 Quadro T2000使用相同的TU117芯片,但具有全部1024个内核(是T1000的2倍),因此性能要强得多。该芯片基于台积电的12nm FinFET制造。

Turing一代不仅为RTX卡引入了光追,而且还优化了内核和缓存的体系结构。根据Nvidia的说法,CUDA内核现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,以提高现代游戏中计算繁重的工作负载的性能。此外,也对缓存进行了重新设计(新的统一内存体系结构的缓存是Pascal的两倍)。与Pascal相比,这使得每个时钟指令增加高达50%,能耗提高40%。

与更快的Quadro RTX卡不同,T1000和T2000不具有光线追踪和Tensor内核。

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q1
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines768 - unified
Core Speed1395 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption50 Watt
technology12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement27.05.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.9 pt (12%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 -11%
3.44 -11%
3.5 -9%
3.52 -9%
3.59 -7%
3.65 -5%
3.74 -3%
3.74 -3%
3.78 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85
3.95 3%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.08 6%
4.09 6%
4.11 7%
4.21 9%
4.28 11%
4.39 14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
4.46 16%
4.51 17%
...
20.4 430%
max:
33.3 765%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3006     avg: 3348     median: 3474 (10%)     max: 3565 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2834     avg: 3123     median: 3261 (9%)     max: 3273 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2805 -10%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -9%
2864 -8%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -7%
2993 -4%
2995 -4%
2998 -4%
3075 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3123
3136 0%
3139 1%
3197 2%
3231 3%
3242 4%
3269 5%
3324 6%
3364 8%
3430 10%
...
19434 522%
max:
36259 1061%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
375510 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
122046 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 23601     avg: 25273     median: 25273 (24%)     max: 26945 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 48965     avg: 53629     median: 53628.5 (13%)     max: 58292 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6812     avg: 7589     median: 7783 (13%)     max: 8173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7558     avg: 8347     median: 8727 (10%)     max: 8757 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 86096     avg: 111211     median: 111211 (12%)     max: 136326 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10211     avg: 11241     median: 11592 (15%)     max: 11919 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10407     avg: 11305     median: 11377 (10%)     max: 12132 Points
171.8 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 -9%
10498 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -7%
10730 -5%
10774 -5%
10818 -4%
10952 -3%
11119 -2%
11171 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
11305
11314 0%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 1%
11796 4%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 5%
11915 5%
11984 6%
12066 7%
12289 9%
12432 10%
...
59943 430%
max:
104201 822%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
31509 Points (9%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
33740 Points (18%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
30252 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
30786 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
31451 -7%
31800 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
32349 -4%
32473 -4%
32473 -4%
33179 -2%
33321 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
33740
33810 0%
33936 1%
34680 3%
34951 4%
35209 4%
35269 5%
35807 6%
36137 7%
36214 7%
...
132443 293%
max:
170928 407%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 33809     avg: 35034     median: 35033.5 (46%)     max: 36258 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 36.7     avg: 39.3     median: 39.3 (12%)     max: 41.9 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
110.3 fps (37%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
101.1 fps (45%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 136.9     avg: 149.7     median: 149.7 (28%)     max: 162.4 fps
0.6 -100%
...
97 -35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
101.2 -32%
104 -31%
107.1 -28%
AMD FirePro W7170M
112.5 -25%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
114.5 -24%
120 -20%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
125.9 -16%
135.1 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
149.7
150 0%
151.3 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
154.3 3%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
155.3 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
163.2 9%
164.2 10%
199.4 33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
224.2 50%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
236.1 58%
...
532 255%
0%
100%
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
113.8 fps (28%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
82.7 fps (12%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
40.3 fps (9%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 24.99     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (8%)     max: 34.8 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 47.5     avg: 56.3     median: 56.3 (15%)     max: 65.1 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 5.79     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (6%)     max: 7.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 75     avg: 79.5     median: 79.5 (32%)     max: 83.9 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 82.4     avg: 87.7     median: 87.7 (14%)     max: 93 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 85.5     avg: 93.8     median: 93.8 (16%)     max: 102.1 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 89.2     avg: 99.7     median: 104.4 (28%)     max: 105.6 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 127.8     avg: 136.4     median: 133.1 (15%)     max: 148.4 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 35.27     avg: 40.4     median: 40.2 (9%)     max: 45.71 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 33.45     avg: 41.7     median: 41.6 (9%)     max: 50.1 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 101     avg: 109.6     median: 113.3 (13%)     max: 114.6 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 12     avg: 15.1     median: 15.6 (5%)     max: 17.8 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 99.9     avg: 108.6     median: 109.5 (16%)     max: 116.3 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 121.3     avg: 130     median: 130.5 (15%)     max: 138.3 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 83.9     avg: 94.8     median: 98.5 (17%)     max: 101.9 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
78.8 fps (15%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
132.7 fps (22%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
19.2 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
134.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
15.6 fps (10%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
67.5 fps (33%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
33.6 fps (20%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
45.3 fps (14%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6818 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
124 fps (41%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 166     avg: 182.6     median: 185.7 (11%)     max: 196 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.7     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
89.3 fps (16%)
3.3 -96%
...
65.5 -27%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 -19%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 -17%
78.4 -12%
78.8 -12%
80.5 -10%
84.6 -5%
87.1 -2%
87.5 -2%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
89.3
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
91 2%
93.2 4%
94.7 6%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
96 8%
96.8 8%
Apple M3 8-Core GPU
101.7 14%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
102.9 15%
104 16%
106.3 19%
...
536 500%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
225.8 fps (17%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 145.6     avg: 154.9     median: 154.9 (17%)     max: 164.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 220.2     avg: 243.6     median: 243.6 (5%)     max: 267 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 315.3     median: 315.3 (18%)     max: 361.6 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 575     avg: 660     median: 659.5 (5%)     max: 744 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1375     avg: 1410     median: 1409.5 (5%)     max: 1444 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2567     avg: 2768     median: 2768 (5%)     max: 2969 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 5376     avg: 5966     median: 5965.5 (6%)     max: 6555 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
88.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
93.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 83     avg: 89     median: 89 (20%)     max: 95 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3684     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (37%)     max: 0.4566 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (33%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.9     avg: 37.3     median: 37.3 (60%)     max: 37.7 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1237 MHz (49%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1543 MHz (61%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
190.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
150  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
134.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
87.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
67.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
96.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
125.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
208  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
171.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
148.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
117.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
38  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
85
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
136.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
42.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
118 178 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73 105 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 92 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 79 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
182.3 189 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.4 62.5 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5 39.1 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.7 25.6 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
123.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
69.6 94.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
52.8 73.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.2 45.2 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 23.1 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39 61 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36 48 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 35 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
185.2 232.8 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.7 100.5 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.7 79.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.3 42.5 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
143.7 144 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73.8 92.7 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.8 69 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
55.9 68.7 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61.5 138.1 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.2 76.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.8 66.6 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35 59.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
182.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
57 82 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
40 55 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 50 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29 29 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 19

FIFA 19

2018
low 1280x720
148  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
110.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
88 101 111 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
46 56.7 58 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40 50 54.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
35 45 46 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
93
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
107  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
71
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
491.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
199.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
79.7 91 108 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.2 78 96 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.1 69 80.1 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
93.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
56.1 77.4 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.9 49.2 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1 34 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
246.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
150.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
163.4 199.8 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
66.7 77.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.9 74.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.8 56.7 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
136.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
86  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
190.3 244.3 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
159.6 197.9 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111.6 139.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97.9 117.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
134 141.4 151 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115 124.8 136 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
113 113.6 123 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
106 106.7 115 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
156.2 189 190.7 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
94.1 114 115.9 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.7 62.8 62.9 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.9 35 37.9 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
170.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
148.3
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
150.5
low 1280x720
280.4 316.4 ~ 298 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
210 241 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
184.7 216.3 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72.9 86.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Gears Tactics190.991.858.443.5
Doom Eternal1507864.3
Hunt Showdown134.15144.4
Escape from Tarkov121.487.967.856
Red Dead Redemption 287.946.729.919.4
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order67.357.650.4
Need for Speed Heat8660.551.946.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201996.761.250.844
GRID 2019125.476.865.242.8
Ghost Recon Breakpoint93534732
FIFA 20208171.3160.3148.9
Borderlands 3117.958.73828.5
Control136.842.431.2
F1 2019148897764
Total War: Three Kingdoms186613825
Rage 2123.755.245.745.1
Anno 180082634122
The Division 2111504232
Dirt Rally 2.0209917239
Far Cry New Dawn77484643
Metro Exodus93.343.431.925.5
Apex Legends144836362
Battlefield V100605247
Farming Simulator 19182.4106.786.366.5
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey70484329
FIFA 19148119.2113.5110.8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider100544842
Far Cry 5107625753
World of Tanks enCore491.9199.377.1
X-Plane 11.11938069
Kingdom Come: Deliverance93.749.340.530.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark674633
Rocket League246.4150.7117
Ghost Recon Wildlands9447.243.924.2
For Honor182726953
Rise of the Tomb Raider136.28653.443.8
Rainbow Six Siege217179125108
Dota 2 Reborn14212511710947.9
The Witcher 31791085935
GTA V170.1153.993.841.7
BioShock Infinite29822620180
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


17
23

14
20
7
1
23
13
3
7
19
8
1




1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 19. 00:47:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:32:18 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.028s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 9860 +0.027s ... 0.055s

#24 got single benchmarks 9860 +0.019s ... 0.073s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#26 min, max, avg, median took s +0.965s ... 1.039s

#27 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.039s

#28 Got 233 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 1.054s

#29 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.054s

#30 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.029s ... 1.084s

#31 benchmarks composed for output. +1.408s ... 2.491s

#32 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.496s

#33 return log +0s ... 2.496s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) graphics card

联想ThinkPad P1 2019笔记本电脑评测:GPU变强CPU变弱的超薄工作站

联想ThinkPad P1 2019笔记本电脑评测:GPU变强CPU变弱的超薄工作站

联想已将其第二代超薄高端ThinkPad P1工作站推向市场。 搭载包括基于Turing的最新Nvidia Quadro GPU,更亮的显示选项以及最新的Intel处理器。 但是,Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 2在所有方面都显示出CPU性能的某些弱点。...
Intel Core i7-9850H | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 15.60" | 1.7 kg

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7-2C9X7EA: Intel Core i7-10750H, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Fury 17 G7-2C9X7EA

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC314-72P-75P3: Intel Core i7-10750H, 14.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC314-72P-75P3

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G1T-H8004R: Intel Core i7-9750H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro X W730G1T-H8004R

Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P-767Y: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P-767Y

Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN002VMX: Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QN002VMX

Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P (i7-9750H, Quadro T1000): Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 5 Pro CN515-71P (i7-9750H, Quadro T1000)

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 20QT000LMH : Intel Core i7-9750H, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 20QT000LMH

Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QNS00Q00: Intel Core i5-9400H, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P53-20QNS00Q00

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 40-core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter