Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA RTX A500笔记本GPU或A500移动版是一款用于移动工作站的专业显卡。它基于GA107 Ampere芯片,性能比GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU要慢。它提供2,048个CUDA、16个Raytracing和64个Tensor核心,搭配64位内存总线。它有20-60瓦(TGP)的不同型号,具有不同的时钟速度(和性能)。该GPU支持eDP 1.4b连接内部显示器,支持DisplayPort 1.4和HDMI 2.1的外部连接。

不再有Max-Q变体(以前用于低功率变体),但每个OEM可以选择实施Max-Q技术(动态提升、WhisperMode)。

在相同的TGP水平下,笔记本电脑的原始性能应该比GeForce RTX 3050慢。这两款GPU都在很大程度上依赖于良好的冷却和高TGP以获得良好的性能。在类似的功耗水平下,RTX A500应该明显比旧的T500和T550快。 

GA107芯片提供2.560个FP32 ALU,其中一半还可以执行INT32指令(即1280个INT32 ALU)。有了Ampere,所有着色器仍然可以执行FP32或INT32指令。据Nvidia称,该芯片上的光线追踪和张量核心也得到了改进。A500只能使用2048个CUDA核心。安培芯片还包括一个改进的第五代视频编码器(用于H.264和H.265的NVENC)和一个第七代解码器(用于现在包括AV1在内的各种格式)。

GA107芯片由三星以8纳米(8N)制造,这还不能完全跟上台积电的7纳米节点(例如,AMD使用的,也用于专业的GA100安培芯片)。

RTX A Series

RTX A5500 Laptop GPU 7424 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU 5888 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU 6144 @ 1.22 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU 4096 @ 1.08 - 1.56 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A2000 3328 @ 0.56 - 1.2 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU 2560 @ 0.89 - 1.69 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU 2048 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGA107
ArchitectureAmpere
Pipelines2048 - unified
Raytracing Cores16
Tensor / AI Cores64
Theoretical Performance7.3 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth112 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
technology8 nm
PCIe4
Date of Announcement30.03.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagenvdam.widen.net

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
3.4 pt (10%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 -11%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
3.01 -10%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 -10%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.03 -10%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.06 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 -4%
3.24 -4%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.24 -4%
3.3 -2%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.36
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 2%
3.44 2%
3.5 4%
3.53 5%
3.59 7%
3.65 9%
3.74 11%
3.74 11%
...
20.4 507%
max:
33.3 891%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3127     avg: 3273     median: 3273 (9%)     max: 3419 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2873     avg: 2995     median: 2994.5 (8%)     max: 3116 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -96%
...
2472 -17%
2601 -13%
2717 -9%
2766 -8%
2805 -6%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2827 -6%
2864 -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
2908 -3%
2993 0%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2995
2998 0%
3075 3%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
3094 3%
3123 4%
3139 5%
3155 5%
3197 7%
3231 8%
3242 8%
...
19434 549%
max:
36259 1111%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27001     avg: 28765     median: 28764.5 (27%)     max: 30528 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46927     avg: 48496     median: 48495.5 (12%)     max: 50064 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6899     avg: 6955     median: 6954.5 (12%)     max: 7010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7578     avg: 7598     median: 7597.5 (9%)     max: 7617 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
88367 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11213     avg: 11289     median: 11288.5 (15%)     max: 11364 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10748     avg: 10818     median: 10818 (9%)     max: 10888 Points
171.8 -98%
...
9950 -8%
10005 -8%
AMD Radeon 680M
10018 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
10020 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
10259 -5%
10498 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
10569 -2%
10730 -1%
10774 0%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
10818
10952 1%
11119 3%
11171 3%
11305 5%
11314 5%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
11461 6%
11796 9%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
11893 10%
11915 10%
...
59943 454%
max:
104201 863%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
40923 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
39319 Points (21%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
36391 -7%
36405 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
36812 -6%
37644 -4%
37785 -4%
38502 -2%
38910 -1%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 0%
39213 0%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
39319
40134 2%
40146 2%
40643 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 8%
42967 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 11%
43587 11%
44188 12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 15%
...
132443 237%
max:
170928 335%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
40862 Points (53%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
126.4 fps (31%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
88.4 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
31.8 fps (7%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
76.9 fps (21%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
88 fps (35%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
108.2 fps (18%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 127.43     avg: 129.5     median: 129.5 (35%)     max: 131.64 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 145.61     avg: 153.2     median: 153.2 (17%)     max: 160.83 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 31.69     avg: 34.6     median: 34.6 (8%)     max: 37.51 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 73.93     avg: 78.3     median: 78.3 (16%)     max: 82.72 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 121.4     avg: 123.5     median: 123.5 (14%)     max: 125.67 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 20.53     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (7%)     max: 22.26 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 120.07     avg: 121.6     median: 121.6 (18%)     max: 123.09 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 146.08     avg: 154.4     median: 154.4 (17%)     max: 162.65 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 80.81     avg: 84     median: 84 (15%)     max: 87.19 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k +
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p +
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
79.9 fps (16%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 139.98     avg: 148.5     median: 148.5 (24%)     max: 157.04 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 27.58     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (19%)     max: 28.96 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 143.05     avg: 143.6     median: 143.6 (16%)     max: 144.17 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 20.44     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (14%)     max: 22.29 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 50.44     avg: 61.4     median: 61.4 (30%)     max: 72.31 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 34.65     avg: 36.9     median: 36.9 (22%)     max: 39.09 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 32.99     avg: 35.4     median: 35.4 (11%)     max: 37.79 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
98.2 fps (10%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
11.9 fps (11%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
66.7 fps (11%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
37.6 fps (18%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
12.9 fps (8%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
17.1 fps (7%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6844 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
212.8 fps (70%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 232     avg: 247     median: 247 (14%)     max: 262 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
64.7 fps (12%)
3.3 -95%
...
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
52.4 -19%
53.4 -17%
59.4 -8%
61.4 -5%
62.5 -3%
62.7 -3%
62.7 -3%
62.8 -3%
63.8 -1%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
64.7
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
64.8 0%
65.5 1%
Apple M1 7-Core GPU
72.4 12%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
74.3 15%
78.4 21%
78.8 22%
80.5 24%
84.6 31%
87.1 35%
...
536 728%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
166.1 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
174.1 fps (20%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
232.7 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
321.7 fps (19%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
554 fps (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 40215     avg: 41313     median: 41313 (12%)     max: 42411 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 20666     avg: 30177     median: 30176.5 (8%)     max: 39687 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1023 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2268 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8197 points (9%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 49.1     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (7%)     max: 54.3 Watt
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
54.5 Watt (8%)
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
56.5 Watt (12%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
58.1 Watt (7%)
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
46 dB(A) (74%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
82.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
71.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
27.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1920x1080
23.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
28.1
low 1920x1080
80.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
104.7
low 1920x1080
76.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
58.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
104.5
low 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
21.9
low 1920x1080
24.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Max. Performance 1280x720
60.8
low 1920x1080
39.8 43.3 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.1 32.1 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.6 25.1 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.6 20.4 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
4.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
69.8
60.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
4.8
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
17.5
0
12.6
low 1920x1080
39.2 39.9 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
30.8 34.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.2 31.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
25.8 30.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
63.2
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
171.2
low 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
19.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
23.8
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
92.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
157.6
low 1920x1080
66.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
107.6
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
168.9 183.5 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.9 76.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.9 62.5 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.6 54.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
81 83 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51 57 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
46 50 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44 44 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
113.3 117.7 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89.2 98 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73.9 81.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
78.6 90.4 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44.2 45.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.4 32.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
157.7 160.4 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
130.5 131.1 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96.2 111.9 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
91.6 104.8 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
134.6 174.5 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
81.6 104.1 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.4 56.8 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3 31.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
173.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
161.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
13.8
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
156.5
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
162.7
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2482.471.932.911.7
Ghost of Tsushima34.627.519.114.1
Dragon's Dogma 223.614.5
Alone in the Dark80.168.658.643.8
Last Epoch76.758.249.333.3
Helldivers 219.512.81210.9
Enshrouded24.418.714.38.28
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty4232242010.44.29
Baldur's Gate 34033292817.8
F1 235756.343.110.96.63
Hogwarts Legacy2319.610.65.43
F1 2292.585.257.816.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands66.253.536.227.6
Strange Brigade17676625439.2
Far Cry 582544844
X-Plane 11.111169478
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark85453223.3
Dota 2 Reborn15913110498
The Witcher 3155935529
GTA V173.3161.789.742.929.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
4
8
4
4
7
6
2
7
9
4
11
5
1
5
1

1


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 14:15:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.027s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.028s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.028s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#14 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 +0.026s ... 0.054s

#16 got single benchmarks 11322 +0.02s ... 0.074s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.074s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +1.044s ... 1.118s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.118s

#20 Got 113 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 1.139s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.139s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 1.151s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.782s ... 1.933s

#24 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.004s ... 1.937s

#25 return log +0s ... 1.937s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU graphics card

惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G11 笔记本电脑评测:配备 Nvidia RTX A500 显卡的 Core Ultra 升级版

惠普 ZBook Firefly 14 G11 笔记本电脑评测:配备 Nvidia RTX A500 显卡的 Core Ultra 升级版

该机型可配置从酷睿 Ultra 5 125U 到酷睿 Ultra 7 165H 的第 14 代 CPU。不过,很明显,该机型在设计时更多考虑的是 U 系列 CPU,而不是要求更高的 H 系列。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H | NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 英特尔笔记本电脑评测:小型 OLED 工作站,无续航能力

联想 ThinkPad P14s G4 英特尔笔记本电脑评测:小型 OLED 工作站,无续航能力

联想 ThinkPad P14s 是最小的 ThinkPad 工作站。ThinkPad P14s Gen 4 英特尔版有一些有趣的功能,但由于采用了 OLED 屏幕,电池续航时间受到了影响,而且散热系统也被内部组件压得喘不过气来。...
Intel Core i7-1370P | NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU | 14.00" | 1.5 kg

HP ZBook Firefly 16 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 16 G11

HP ZBook Firefly 14 G11: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 14 G11

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4, i7-1370P: Intel Core i7-1370P, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4, i7-1370P

HP ZBook Firefly 16 G10, i7-1355U: Intel Core i7-1355U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 16 G10, i7-1355U

Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4: Intel Core i5-1340P, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G4

HP ZBook Firefly 16 G10: Intel Core i7-1365U, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Firefly 16 G10

Dell Precision 15 3580: Intel Core i7-1360P, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Precision 15 3580

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter