Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU

Nvidia T1200笔记本电脑GPU(或笔记本电脑用Quadro T1200)是基于Turing体系结构(TU117芯片)的专业移动显卡。 与消费者GTX 1650 Ti相比,Quadro T1000的CUDA核心/着色器较少(768比896)。 Quadro T2000采用相同的TU117芯片,但配备了所有1024核(2倍至T1000),速度非常快。 该芯片由TSMC的12nm FinFET制造。T1200与新的安培RTXA工作站卡(如高速Nvidia RTXA2000)一起作为Quadro T1000的刷新而引进。

35~95瓦特(TGP)的时钟速度(和性能)不同。 GPU支持DisplayPort 1.4和HDMI 2.1用于外部连接。

Max-Q 变体(以前用于低功耗变体)已不存在,但所有 OEM 都可以选择实施 Max-Q 3.0 技术(动态 Boost、WhisperMode)。

Turing 一代不仅引入了 RTX 卡的光跟踪,还优化了核心和高速缓存的体系结构。 据Nvidia介绍,CUDA核心现在可以同时执行浮点和整数运算,从而提高现代游戏中计算负荷较大的工作负载的性能。

此外,缓存被重新加工 (新的集成内存体系结构,其高速缓存是 Pascal的两倍 )。 因此,与Pascal相比,每时钟指令最多可增加50%,能效提高40%。 与高速 Quadro RTX 卡不同,T1000 和 T2000 不具有光线跟踪和张量核心。

如果配置为低速35W,则T1200也适用于轻薄笔记本电脑。

Quadro Turing Series

Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified
TMUs64
ROPs32
Tensor / AI Cores64
Core Speed855 - 1425 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed10000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
technology12 nm
PCIe4.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4
Features3.7 TFLOPS SP max. performance, DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x8, 192 GB/s memory bandwidth, Max-Q Technologies 3.0 optional
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement12.04.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3497     avg: 3775     median: 3891 (11%)     max: 3937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 3229     avg: 3492     median: 3595 (10%)     max: 3651 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 27580     avg: 29050     median: 29050 (27%)     max: 30520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 46125     avg: 50827     median: 50827 (13%)     max: 55529 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8351     avg: 8972     median: 9255 (16%)     max: 9310 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9030     avg: 9810     median: 10134 (11%)     max: 10266 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11917     avg: 13347     median: 13779 (18%)     max: 14344 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 12142     avg: 13714     median: 14387 (12%)     max: 14614 Points
171.8 -99%
...
12460 -9%
12479 -9%
12583 -8%
12797 -7%
12801 -7%
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
13160 -4%
13515 -1%
13524 -1%
13581 -1%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
13714
13924 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
14140 3%
14147 3%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
14302 4%
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14412 5%
14428 5%
14692 7%
14725 7%
15135 10%
...
59943 337%
max:
104201 660%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
44135 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
43587 Points (24%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -100%
...
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
39191 -10%
39213 -10%
39319 -10%
40134 -8%
40146 -8%
40643 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P4000
42370 -3%
42967 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
43525 0%
NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU
43587
44188 1%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
45346 4%
45988 6%
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
46624 7%
46945 8%
47209 8%
47227 8%
49207 13%
51344 18%
...
132443 204%
max:
170928 292%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
38139 Points (50%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 120     avg: 126.4     median: 128.5 (34%)     max: 130.7 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 150     avg: 160.8     median: 161.3 (18%)     max: 171.1 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 45.1     avg: 47.9     median: 46.8 (10%)     max: 51.8 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 49.9     avg: 52.8     median: 53.6 (11%)     max: 55 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 120     avg: 127.2     median: 127.8 (15%)     max: 133.8 fps
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 18     avg: 18.9     median: 19.3 (6%)     max: 19.41 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 124     avg: 131.6     median: 132.9 (19%)     max: 138 fps
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 149     avg: 163.3     median: 169.4 (19%)     max: 171.6 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 94     avg: 102.3     median: 105.4 (18%)     max: 107.5 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 82.8     avg: 88.8     median: 91.2 (18%)     max: 92.3 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 151     avg: 161.4     median: 164.1 (27%)     max: 169.1 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 22.7     avg: 24.2     median: 24.9 (16%)     max: 24.99 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 133     avg: 143.1     median: 144.9 (16%)     max: 151.4 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 18     avg: 18.9     median: 19.3 (13%)     max: 19.45 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 73.4     avg: 77.4     median: 78.7 (39%)     max: 80.1 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 38.2     avg: 40.4     median: 41.4 (25%)     max: 41.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 43     avg: 47.8     median: 50.1 (16%)     max: 50.2 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 206     avg: 235.3     median: 216.8 (13%)     max: 283 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1199 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2370 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
7416 points (8%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.3     avg: 84.6     median: 92.8 (13%)     max: 94.7 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 73.2     avg: 85.9     median: 91.9 (13%)     max: 92.5 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 98.9     avg: 100.2     median: 99.6 (22%)     max: 102 Watt
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3255     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (33%)     max: 0.3815 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.3968     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (34%)     max: 0.4536 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.6     avg: 43.4     median: 46.8 (75%)     max: 46.8 dB(A)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
121.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
50.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
44.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
171.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
96.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 22

FIFA 22

2021
low 1280x720
175  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
61  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
12  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
84  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
39.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
86  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
222  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
268  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
208 218 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84 94 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.5 77 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59.3 67 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
107 110 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60 69 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53 64 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
51 60 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
96.2 105 109 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5 85.3 94 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.8 66.8 75.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
88 102 103 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.5 56.5 56.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35 37 39 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26 26.6 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
133.3 155 157 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
116.5 131 138 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
107.8 114 128 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100.4 107 116 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
109  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
195 198 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
125 127 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
59 71 72 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
33.2 36.7 38 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
166 169.9 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152 158.5 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.7 94.9 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.5 52.3 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
352.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
235.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
207.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Vampire Bloodhunt121.872.969.969.5
Ghostwire Tokyo50.747.344.641.2
Elex 243.139.334.229.6
GRID Legends1037361.745.7
Elden Ring52.94739.536.8
Dying Light 236.125.721.2
Farming Simulator 22171.996.670.161.2
Riders Republic93504140
Far Cry 68658544726
FIFA 2217512111911176
F1 202116410689.553.639
Resident Evil Village114.364.357.949.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.06133272214
Immortals Fenyx Rising8455444026
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla7747282118
Dirt 5125564512
Watch Dogs Legion6654471912
Mafia Definitive Edition8443.439.2
Horizon Zero Dawn8860504332
Death Stranding8668615940
F1 2020222109906345
Gears Tactics268101664632
Borderlands 39962433323
Shadow of the Tomb Raider96594839
Strange Brigade21389736347
Far Cry 510965595641
X-Plane 11.11103866952.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark98543726
Dota 2 Reborn148129117108109
The Witcher 31971266736
GTA V168155925037.4
BioShock Infinite352.2235.8207.988.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
16
12
1
13
13
5
3
15
13
1
5
16
7
7
8
1

1
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 21. 20:51:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.029s ... 0.031s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.032s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 10683 +0.014s ... 0.046s

#24 got single benchmarks 10683 +0.015s ... 0.061s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#26 min, max, avg, median took s +0.699s ... 0.76s

#27 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.76s

#28 Got 181 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.779s

#29 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.779s

#30 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.02s ... 0.799s

#31 benchmarks composed for output. +1.424s ... 2.222s

#32 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.005s ... 2.227s

#33 return log +0s ... 2.227s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU graphics card

联想ThinkPad P15v G2。经济实惠、功能强大的15英寸商务工作站,配备Core i7-11800H和Nvidia T1200

联想ThinkPad P15v G2笔记本电脑评论。经济实惠的商务工作站

联想的ThinkPad P15v G2是一款价格低廉的15英寸工作站,在相当纤薄的格式下有4K显示屏选项。它不仅快速、安静和坚固,而且还提供可接受的电池运行时间、非常好的输入设备、快速的Wi-Fi 6和扩展选项。 ...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.3 kg
联想ThinkPad P1 G4笔记本电脑评论。BIOS更新提供更多的CPU性能

联想ThinkPad P1 G4笔记本电脑评论。BIOS更新提供更多的CPU性能

在我们对ThinkPad P1 G4的第一次审查中,Tiger Lake CPU的性能存在问题。然而,我们现在观察到最新的BIOS版本在性能上有了明显的改善,CPU的性能现在与蒸气室模型的性能相当。...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
联想ThinkPad P1 G4笔记本电脑--工作站版的X1 Extreme G4评测

联想ThinkPad P1 G4笔记本电脑--工作站版的X1 Extreme G4评测

联想通过第四代ThinkPad P1推出了一款全新的设备,包括一个16:10宽高比的16英寸显示屏和更新的硬件。P1 G4也让人对即将推出的ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4有了初步了解,它采用了相同的机箱。...
Intel Core i7-11800H | NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 1.8 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3, i7-12700H T1200: Intel Core i7-12700H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G3, i7-12700H T1200

Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC315-73P-73QS: Intel Core i7-11800H, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel Pro CC315-73P-73QS

HP ZBook Power G8, i9-11950H T1200: Intel Core i9-11950H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP ZBook Power G8, i9-11950H T1200

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop *
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter