蓝天P570WM笔记本准系统测评

The gigantic casing reaches a weight of a good 6 kilograms (13.2 pounds). The nearly 1.5 kilogram (3.3 pound), power supply will also always be carried along because the battery runtime of about one hour is very tight. A weight of 8 to 9 kilograms (17.6 to 19.8 pounds) is quickly achieved along with a few peripherals and a bag. In return, the user gets a very rigid and solidly built chassis. Nothing can be dented or twisted. The feet are solid and provide enough space to the surface, which ensures proper air circulation. The battery is fastened with three screws. It should not be removed in stationary use because one of the feet needed for a secure placement is mounted to it.

The wrist rest is coated with brushed metal and enhances the otherwise dull plastic casing. The transparent status bar with LED icons between the keyboard and screen is also appealing.

On the other hand, the display lid twists easily and, depending on the ambient light, its black high-gloss finished frame can get annoying. Reflections, fingerprints and micro-scratches can hardly be prevented on this surface. The display's hinge keeps the screen firmly in position and would even do a decent job on the move.

巨大的外壳达到一个良好的6公斤（13.2磅）的重量。近1.5公斤（3.3磅），电源也总是被带走，因为大约一个小时的电池运行时间很紧。 8〜9公斤（17.6至19.8磅）的重量很快取得有几个外设和一个袋子。作为回报，用户得到了一个非常刚性和扎实的底盘。没有什么可以削弱或扭曲。脚是固体的表面，以确保适当的空气流通，并提供足够的空间。电池有三个螺丝固定。不应该被删除，因为需要一个安全的放置脚被安装到它的固定使用。

涂有金属拉丝腕托和提高，否则沉闷的塑料外壳。透明键盘和屏幕之间的LED图标状态栏也有很大的吸引力。

另一方面，显示屏盖扭曲容易，取决于周围环境的光线，它的黑色高光面框可以得到烦人。也很难被反射，指纹和微划痕防止在该表面上。显示器的铰链保持在屏幕上牢牢掌握在位置上移，甚至会做一份体面的工作。

Schenker offers two different Full HD screens for the XIRIOS W712. The glossy option allegedly offers a color space (gamut) of 90%. Looking at the review of Schenker XMG U702, this probably relates to the Adobe RGB color space. The other rates of the desktop replacement were just as compelling with an average brightness of 227 cd/m2 and a contrast of 595:1. Unfortunately, the surface is extremely reflective, which has a very limiting effect on some application fields. We had the matte alternative in our test model. It did not include any specs about color gamut or other qualities.

全球国际货运代理提供了两种不同的全高清屏幕为XIRIOS W712。据称，光泽选项提供了90％的色彩空间（色域）。寻找于辛克XMG U702检讨，这可能涉及到Adobe RGB色彩空间。其他的台式机替代品的一样引人注目，227流明的平均亮度和595:1的对比度。不幸的是，表面上是极其反射，其中有一个非常有限的一些应用程序信息的影响。我们有磨砂的替代，在我们的测试模型。它不包括任何关于色域规格或其他素质。

The screen comes from LG Philips and already convinces in the brightness assessment. With rates of 368 cd/m² in the lower right up to 421 cd/m² in the upper center, the test model's brightness is very high. We calculated an average of 394 cd/m² and the illumination reached decent 87%. The eight available brightness levels only allow a coarse adjustment up to level 3 (206 cd/m²). Level 1 provides 44 cd/m² and level 2 equals 110 cd/m². The screen does not offer a range around 150 cd/m², which is usually well-suited to indoor use.

The matte surface and the high maximum brightness ensure consistently good legibility outdoors. Relaxed work is even possible on bright summer days. The maximum brightness is also available in battery mode. The only shortcoming is the short battery runtime, which enormously restricts outdoor use without an outlet.

We ascertained a contrast of 523:1, which supplies much richer colors and deeper black than the still often used standard screens. Pictures, movies and games look very attractive and the looks are only excelled on higher quality IPS or RGB LED screens.

The sum of reproducible colors comes very close to the sRGB color spectrum. Unusual for white LED screens, it lacks coverage in the cyan-blue range. However, green, yellow and orange clearly exceed the sRGB color space target. Approximately 80% basically remain when only considering the intersection.

屏幕来自LG飞利浦已经说服的亮度评估。率368坎德拉/平方米在右下421坎德拉/平方米的上部中央，测试模型的亮度是非常高的。我们394坎德拉/平方米计算的平均照度达到了体面的87％。 8个可用的亮度水平只允许一个粗调达3级（206坎德拉/平方米）。 1级提供44坎德拉/平方米，2级等于110坎德拉/平方米。屏幕左右的范围内不提供150坎德拉/平方米，这通常是非常适合于室内使用。

磨砂表面和最大的高亮度确保一贯良好的户外可读性。轻松的工作，甚至可以在明亮的夏天天。也可在电池模式下的最大亮度。唯一的缺憾是没有出口，这极大地限制了户外使用的电池运行时间短。

我们确定了523:1的对比度，提供更丰富的色彩，更深的黑色比仍然经常使用的标准画面。图片，电影和游戏看起来非常有吸引力，只擅长于高品质IPS或RGB LED大屏幕的外观。

再现的色彩和sRGB色彩频谱相当接近。不寻常的白光LED屏幕，它缺乏覆盖在青蓝范围。然而，绿色，黄色和橙色显然超出sRGB色彩空间的目标。约80％，基本保持路口时，只考虑。

Intel's Xeon E5-2680 desktop processor has eight cores and can process up to 16 threads at the same time using the Hyperhreading technology. The clock increases up to 3500 MHz in single-thread tasks and thus ensures a better CPU capacity. This theoretical, high performance is achieved with an enormously high thermal design power of 130 Watts for laptop conditions.

According to Schenker's spec list, our CPU does not feature Turbo Boost contrasting the actual possibilities. The clock is allegedly limited to 2.7 GHz and thus waives on a not insignificant share of performance. In fact, the tools we used displayed clock rates of up to 3.1 GHz. That is exactly between the default clock of 2.7 GHz and the maximum of 3.5 GHz. This ultimately corresponds to a limited, but not completely omitted Turbo Boost.

The impact of this restriction is seen in the single-thread tests that would directly benefit from a high Turbo Boost. The scores in Cinebench R10 (32-bit, single-thread) of 4100 points and in SuperPi 32m of 12 seconds, for example, clearly lag behind Intel's Core i7 3820QM CPU (3800 MHz). It achieves over 5100 points and finishes the SuperPi calculation in only 9.4 seconds. We converted MP3 files to AAC format using iTunes in the practical test. The Xeon CPU achieved an x38.7 speed and thus places itself between two mobile Core i5 CPUs. The clock difference of 700 MHz consequently shows its effect in single-thread tasks and results in a bitter defeat for the desktop behemoth compared with mobile alternatives with a high clock.

The tide turns in operations that can distribute their workload over as many computing cores as possible. For example, 26801 points were achieved in Cinebench R10 32-bit multi-core and the wPrime 1024 calculation finished after 130 seconds. The currently fastest mobile CPU, Intel Core i7 3940XM, only achieves 20501 points and needs 220 seconds for the wPrime task. Thus, a performance gain of approximately 25% to 60% in favor of the desktop CPU is ascertained.

We converted two videos using Cyberlink's MediaEspresso with the Xeon E5-2680 CPU in the practical test. Here we observed that the 16 threads are not used for achieving the maximum performance, but rather for keeping the overall processor load at a minimum. The low processor capacity of roughly 20% is completely unusual for converting using only the CPU. This task was always performed with far over 90% in our previous tests with mobile processors, which can also lead to a more or less big speed advantage depending on the video format. Whether the Xeon E5-2680 CPU is the right choice for personal requirements is decisively dependent on whether or not the used software can benefit from the 16 possible threads. More comparison data can be found in our detailed CPU benchmark list.

We could not induce a CPU or power supply throttling even after several hours of full load. The CPU's performance remained continuously stable. We recorded a virtually identical result on battery power (11.94 points) as in AC mode (11.94 points) in Cinebench R11.5.

英特尔的Xeon E5-2680桌面处理器具有八个内核，最多可处理16个线程在同一时间使用Hyperhreading技术。时钟上升到3500 MHz在单线程任务，从而确保更好的CPU能力。这一理论，实现高性能笔记本电脑的条件与一个极其高的热设计功耗为130瓦。

我们的CPU据对辛克的规格列表，不具有睿频加速对比的实际可能性。据称至2.7 GHz时钟，从而放弃了不小的份额表现。事实上，我们使用的工具显示的时钟速率高达3.1 GHz的。这正是在预设时脉为2.7 GHz和3.5 GHz的最大之间。这最终对应有限的，但不能完全省略了涡轮增压。

这个限制的影响，被认为是在单线程测试，将直接受益于高涡轮增压。在CINEBENCH R10分数（32位，单绪）4100点和12秒的SuperPi 32M，例如，明确落后英特尔酷睿i7 3820QM处理器（3800兆赫）。它实现了逾5100点，并完成SuperPI的计算仅为9.4秒。我们的MP3文件转换为AAC格式在实际测试使用iTunes。至强CPU实现x38.7速度，从而将自己置于两个移动酷睿i5的CPU之间。因此为700 MHz的时钟差异显示出其效果，在失败的痛苦移动的替代品相比，具有高时钟为桌面庞然大物单线程任务和结果。

潮变成了操作，可以分发他们的工作量尽可能尽可能多的计算核心。例如，达到26801点，在CINEBENCH R10 32位多核wPrime的1024计算完成后130秒。目前最快的移动CPU，Intel酷睿i7 3940XM，只达到20501点，wPrime的任务，需要220秒。因此在台式机CPU的青睐，约25％到60％的性能增益是确定的。

我们两个视频转换的Xeon E5-2680 CPU在实际测试使用Cyber​​Link的MediaEspresso。在这里，我们观察到16个线程不用于实现最大的性能，而是保持在最低限度的整体的处理器负载。大约20％的处理器容量低是完全不寻常的，用于将只使用CPU。始终执行这项任务的90％，远远超过了我们以前的测试与移动处理器，这也导致到更多或更少的大速度快的优势，根据视频格式。至强E5-2680 CPU无论是对个人的要求是正确的选择是果断地依赖或不使用的软件是否可以从16个可能的线程中受益。我们详细的CPU基准列表中可以找到更多的比较数据。

我们不能诱导的CPU或电源供应器，节流，即使经过几个小时的满负荷。 CPU的性能保持持续稳定。我们记录了几乎相同的结果在电池供电（11.94点），在AC模式（11.94点）的Cinebench R11.5。

Nvidia's Quadro K5000M achieved the scores of comparable GeForce models in the usual consumer graphics benchmarks. It was 20460 points in 3DMark Vantage and 115180 points in 3DMark 11. Thus, the performance is between Nvidia's GeForce GTX 675M and Nvidia's GeForce GTX 680M, as anticipated. Disadvantages due to the optimized Quadro driver are therefore not to be expected.

In the OpenGL tests, like Cinebench R11.5 or Heaven 3.0 OpenGL, it achieved 76 fps and 43.5 fps. These results also correspond to the expected performance and are located in the high-end range.

Video converting via CUDA and MediaEspresso did not exhibit a speed advantage compared with other Nvidia graphics engines. The results of various high-performance Quadro graphics cards are all very close. Consequently, it would be rather unnecessary to turn to this highest-performance version for this application field.

The graphics unit is throttled on battery power and only achieves just below 40% of its actual performance. In contrast to 76 fps, only 30 fps were achieved in Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL Shading. In return, the clock did not throttle even after several hours of full load in AC mode.

NVIDIA的Quadro K5000M实现可比GeForce模型的分数在平时消费的图形基准。它是在3DMark Vantage中，在3DMark11和115180点20460点。因此，性能是NVIDIA的GeForce GTX675M和NVIDIA的GeForce GTX 680M，如预期之间。由于优化的Quadro驱动程序的缺点，因此并不可以预期的。

在OpenGL的测试，喜欢的Cinebench R11.5或天堂3.0的OpenGL，实现每秒76帧和43.5帧。这些结果也对应于所预期的性能，并位于在高端的范围内。

通过CUDA和MediaEspresso的视频转换速度上的优势并没有表现出比其他Nvidia图形引擎。各种高性能Quadro显卡的结果都非常接近。因此，这将是不必要的，而此应用领域本最高性能的版本。

图形单元节流电池供电，并且只有达到低于40％，其实际表现。 76 fps的相反，只有30帧，实现在CINEBENCH R11.5 OpenGL着色。作为回报，时钟没有油门甚至几个小时后，在AC模式下满负荷。

Schenker's XIRIOS W712 workstation is an extremely powerful laptop. The processor and graphics performance range on a high-end level and can currently only be surpassed in a few areas by alternative configurations. Beyond that, the performance output is always stable even during long periods of full load and does not throttle. The user only has to count with a noticeably reduced graphics performance on battery power.

The basic equipment and the configuration options are very good and provide the user with many individually determinable features. It is not a matter of course that most components are accessible and thus easy to maintain and will likely appeal to many potential buyers.

The matte Full HD screen pleased with overall very good qualities in the test. However, it does not feature the wide viewing angles of an IPS screen and does not completely cover the sRGB color spectrum.

In return, this workstation does not sport typical business features, such as an integrated Smartcard reader or a real docking port.

In principle, the high weight can be tolerated in a workstation that is mostly stationary. The extremely high power consumption and the resulting miserable battery runtime could be more restrictive in some situations. The XIRIOS W712 can only be used for an hour without its power supply.

However, the biggest criticism and the biggest restriction is the comparatively high noise development in all load scenarios. The competition completely based on components made for mobile devices do an audibly better job.

Users who can accept these restrictions will get a high-performance workstation with many good and very good qualities. It is also quite attractively priced compared with similar contenders.

辛克XIRIOS的W712工作站是一个非常强大的笔记本电脑。目前的处理器和图形性能上的高端水平范围，可以只在少数几个领域超越替代配置。除此之外，总是稳定的性能输出，即使在长时间满负荷，而且不限制。用户只需拥有计数明显减少电池供电的显卡性能。

基本设备和配置选项的都非常好，并且为用户提供许多个别厘定功能。这当然不是一个问题，大多数组件访问，从而易于维护，可能会吸引到许多潜在的买家。

磨砂全高清屏幕高兴在测试中总体很不错的素质。然而，它并没有配备宽视角的IPS屏幕，而无法完全涵盖sRGB色彩频谱。

作为回报，这个工作站不运动的典型业务功能，如集成的智能卡阅读器或一个真正的对接端口。

原则上，是可以容忍的高权重的工作站中，大多是静止的。极高的功耗和悲惨的电池运行时间可能是在某些情况下更严格的。该XIRIOS W712只能用于一个小时没有电源。

然而，最大的批评和最大的限制是比较高的噪音在所有负载情况下的发展。完全基于组件为移动设备的竞争，做一个更好的工作出声。

谁可以接受这些限制的用户将得到一个高性能的工作站，与许多好和非常好的素质。它也颇有吸引力的价格与同类竞争者相比。