Notebookcheck Logo

东芝PortégéR930-13F亚笔记本电脑测评

Inexpensive Portégé. 惠普的EliteBook,戴尔的Latitude,联想的ThinkPad T系列和东芝的Portégé。我们回顾了较厚的R930后ultrabook的伴侣Z930相同的外形尺寸。便宜777欧元(〜$1051)?
Windows Business
Toshiba Portege R930-13F: Rare review unit - the inexpensive Core-i3 version is hard to find at retailers.
Toshiba Portege R930-13F: Rare review unit - the inexpensive Core-i3 version is hard to find at retailers.

For the original German review, see here.

"A showcase of technology for the ultimate in mobility". That is the headline for the Portégé devices on the Toshiba homepage. Slim and lean are the Z-devices, for example the Portégé Z930 Ultrabook (1,300 Euros/~$1759) we reviewed a little while ago. Because business users like portsstandard processors and docking stations, the manufacturer also offers a heavyweight 13.3-inch device. Our R930-13F review unit is by far the cheapest version of the family. For the Core i3-2370M with a 320 GB hard drive and without UMTS/HSDPA the retailer wants almost 800 Euros (~$1082). Not a bad offer since the more expensive version R930-11C starts at 1,000 Euros (~$1353). The most expensive i7/SSD version is 2,150 Euros (~$2909).

If the performance is not the most important thing customers could get a cheap, docking-capable, lightweight 13-inch business device. Can the Portégé R930 actually compete with the noble EliteBooks, the robust Latitudes and the legendary ThinkPads? Find out in our in-depth review.

Plenty of competition can be found reviewing business capable 13 and 14-inch devices. There are many models under 1,000 Euros (~$1353). Higher priced devices are (mostly) not listed due to better clarity (EliteBooks are therefore dropped).

13-inch

·        Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E330 (i3-2370M, 558 Euros/~$755)

·        Fujitsu LifeBook S792 (i5/i7, starting at 1,135 Euros/~$1535)

·        Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E335 (AMD E2-1800, 459 Euros/~$621)

·        Dell Vostro 3360 (i5-3317U, 599 Euros/~$810)

14-inch

·        Acer TravelMate P643-MG (GT 640M, i5-3210M, 899 Euros/~$1216)

·        Lenovo ThinkPad T430u (GT 620M, i5-3317U, 950 Euros/~$1285)

·        Dell Latitude E6430 (i5-3320M, 797 Euros/~$1078)

·        Lenovo ThinkPad L430 (i5-3210M, 659 Euros/~$892)

·        Dell Latitude E5430 (i5-3360M, 700 Euros/~$947)

·        HP ProBook 6470b (i5-3320M, starting at 800 Euros/~$1082)

·        Lenovo ThinkPad Edge S430 (GT 620M, i5-3210M, 739 Euros/~$1000)

·        Dell Vostro 3460 (GT 630M, i5-3210M, 558 Euros/~$755)

对于的德国原装审查,在这里看到。

“展示技术,最终在流动性”。这是为Portege设备对东芝网页标题。体型和精益的Z设备的Portege Z930的Ultrabook(1,300的欧元/〜1759美元),例如,我们回顾了一小会儿前。由于企业用户,如端口,标准的处理器和对接站,制造商也提供了一个重量级的13.3英寸的设备。我们的R930-13F审查的单位是迄今为止最便宜的版本的家庭。对于酷睿i3-2370M,320 GB硬盘驱动器,并没有UMTS / HSDPA零售商希望近800欧元(〜$ 1082)。不是一个坏的报价R930-11C在1000欧元(〜$ 1353)开始以来更昂贵的版本。最昂贵的i7/SSD的版本是2,150欧元(〜$ 2909)。

如果性能不是最重要的客户可以得到便宜,对接能力,轻量级的13英寸商用设备。 PORTEGE R930能否真正竞争与高贵EliteBooks的的,强大的纬度和传说中的ThinkPad笔记本?找出我们深入审查。

检讨业务13和14英寸的设备,可以找到大量的竞争。有很多车型在1000欧元(约$ 1353)。价格较高的设备(主要)由于未列出更好的清晰度(EliteBooks的,因此下跌)。

13英寸

·联想的ThinkPad Edge E330(酷睿i3-2370M,558欧元/〜755美元)

·富士通LifeBook S792(睿i5/i7,开始在1,135欧元/〜1535美元)

·联想的ThinkPad Edge E335(AMD E2-1800,459欧元/〜621美元,)

·戴尔Vostro成就3360(酷睿i5-3317U,599欧元/〜810美元,)

14英寸

·宏基TravelMate P643-MG(GT 640M,酷睿i5-3210M,899欧元/〜1216美元,)

·联想ThinkPad T430u(950欧元/〜1285美元,GT 620M,酷睿i5-3317U)

·戴尔Latitude E6430(酷睿i5-3320M,797欧元/〜1078美元,)

·联想ThinkPad L430(酷睿i5-3210M,659欧元/〜892美元,)

·戴尔Latitude E5430(酷睿i5-3360M,700欧元/〜947美元,)

·惠普ProBook 6470b(i5-3320M的,开始在800欧元/〜1082美元)

·联想的ThinkPad Edge S430(GT 620M,酷睿i5-3210M,739欧元/〜千美元)

·戴尔Vostro成就3460(GT 630M,酷睿i5-3210M,558欧元/〜755美元,)

Case

Durable surfaces, matte brushed black
Durable surfaces, matte brushed black
Chrome-cover made of plastic, joint bounces at the base (mounting)
Chrome-cover made of plastic, joint bounces at the base (mounting)
Only the memory (2 slots) and the 2.5-inch hard drive can be removed.
Only the memory (2 slots) and the 2.5-inch hard drive can be removed.

The subnotebook with a weight of 1.4 kilograms (~3.1 pounds) is a bit lighter than the already lightweight 1.47 kilogram (~3.2 pound) predecessor from 2011. The usual weight for 13-inch business devices is between 1.6 and 1.8 kilograms (~3.5 and 4.0 pounds). Surprise: Toshiba still does not put the runtimes at risk and attaches a 6-cell battery (66 Wh).

A crucial factor in the combination of low weight and appropriate stability is the magnesium case. The surfaces are still stabilized with the help of a honeycomb structure (inside). Due to the low thickness of the material, weight can be saved without compromising the stability. That is the theory, in reality most of the surfaces are resistant to pressure (palm rest, bottom area).

Underneath the DVD drive however the surfaces can be noticeably dented. The cover surface is resistant to fingerprints because of the brushed finish. The flexibility of the cover is very high yet design related. The panel was mounted flexibly so no color distortion can be seen if pressure is applied to the cover or if it is bent. All the Satellite and Portégé Z-/R-devices have the lightweight characteristics in common

The stability of the magnesium plastic compound structure is good considering the low weight. Especially the base unit cannot be bent with two hands. The two silver-colored hinge covers are attached pretty wobbly. Underneath is a small yet tight joint that almost completely avoids any display teetering.

The magnesium surface is slightly brushed. The cover and palm rest have the feel of brushed aluminum (high, hard knocking noise). All the surfaces are matte but without much grip.

Only the hard drive and the two RAM slots are accessible with the R930. One RAM slot is empty. The memory controller can handle up to 16 GB.

亚笔记本,重量为1.4公斤(约3.1磅)已经轻量级1.47公斤(约3.2磅),从2011年的前身有点轻。通常的13英寸商务设备的重量是1.6和1.8公斤(约3.5磅和4.0磅)。惊喜:东芝仍然没有把运行时,在风险和重视了6芯电池(66瓦)。

低体重和适当的稳定相结合的一个关键因素是镁合金外壳。的表面仍然稳定的蜂窝结构体(内)的帮助。由于低的材料的厚度,重量可以被保存而不损害的稳定性。是这样的理论,在现实中,大多数的表面耐压力(掌托,底部区域)。

然而下方的DVD驱动器的表面可以明显凹陷。盖表面耐指纹,因为磨砂处理。盖的灵活性是非常高的,但设计有关。面板灵活安装,可以看出,如果压力被施加到盖,或者如果它是弯曲的,所以没有色彩失真。共同所有卫星和的PortégéZ-/R-devices的,具有轻量化的特点

良好的镁塑料复合结构的稳定性,考虑到较低的重量。特别是不能用两只手的弯曲的基本单元。两个银色铰链盖附着相当摇摇晃晃。下面是一个小而紧密的联合,几乎完全避免任何显示摇摇欲坠。

镁合金表面稍微刷。顶盖和掌托拥有拉丝铝(高,硬的敲击声)的感觉。所有的表面是磨砂的,但没有太多的抓地力。

只有硬盘驱动器和两个内存插槽都与R930访问。一个内存插槽是空的。内存控制器可以处理高达16 GB。

Features

Docking port for the Toshiba Port Replicator A3838E-1PRP (~ 180 Euros)
Docking port for the Toshiba Port Replicator A3838E-1PRP (~ 180 Euros)

The optical drive is usually a must in the business sector, only the less expensive 13-inch competitors waive it (TP Edge E335Vostro 3360). The 14-inch devices except the T430u ultrabook are equipped with it. The DVD drive takes the place of potential ports especially since the back has no ports. The manufacturer is inventive with the location of the card reader above and the ExpressCard54 slot half below the optical drive. That leads to a bulky right side.

On the left side is the rare eSATA port. Before USB 3.0, external hard drives via eSATA were the benchmark when it came to speed. There are still many eSATA hard drives in offices or households that require an adaptor to work with USB 3.0 ports. The business favored DisplayPort is unfortunately not included, only VGA and the consumer oriented HDMI.

The docking port at the bottom creates the atmosphere of a real business machine. The Port Replicator PA3838E-1PRP (market price ~180 Euros/~$244) can be used with the R930 and the predecessor R830 (2011). It offers six additional USB ports (2 x USB 3.0) and a serial port.

光盘驱动器通常是一个必须在工商部门,只有更便宜的13英寸的竞争对手放弃它,Vostro成就3360(TP边缘E335)。 T430u的Ultrabook除了配备了14英寸的设备。 DVD驱动器潜在的端口需要的地方,特别是因为后面没有端口。制造商发明的位置上面的读卡器以及ExpressCard54插槽下方的光学驱动器的一半。导致笨重的右侧。

在左边是罕见的eSATA端口。 USB 3.0之前,通过eSATA外置硬盘为基准,当它来到加快。还有许多在办公室或家庭需要一个适配器与USB3.0端口的eSATA硬盘驱动器。企业青睐,不幸的是,DisplayPort是不包括在内,只有VGA和面向消费者的HDMI。

在底部的对接端口创建一个真正的商业机器的气氛。端口复制器PA3838E-1PRP(市场价格〜〜180欧元/244)可用于R930和R830(2011)的前身。它提供6个额外的USB端口(2×USB3.0)和串行端口。

Front: no ports
Front: no ports
Left side: Power, VGA, eSATA/USB 2.0 combination, USB 3.0, HDMI
Left side: Power, VGA, eSATA/USB 2.0 combination, USB 3.0, HDMI
Back: no ports
Back: no ports
Right side: card reader, DVD multi burner, Audio: headphones & microphone, USB 3.0, Ethernet RJ45, Kensington Lock
Right side: card reader, DVD multi burner, Audio: headphones & microphone, USB 3.0, Ethernet RJ45, Kensington Lock

Communication

Next to Gigabit-Ethernet and Intel Draft-N-WLAN the Portégé only has Bluetooth 4.0. That is different with the more expensive versions; a broadband modem is mandatory with the high-priced R930. The Centrino Wireless-N 2230 is a mainstream WLAN with support of the 5-GHz band (2x2, dual stream). But the transmitting quality is not very good; at a distance of 40 meters (~131 feet) the R930 loses the connection to the router. This is a bad result similar to the consumer IdeaPad U510 (also Wireless-N 2230). With a distance of three and ten meters (~10 and 33 feet/upper floor) the reception quality is 5 and 3 bars respectively. Outside the building it drops to 1 bar and a few steps further the signal is completely lost. The transmitting power of the router (Fritz!Box) is reduced to 50%.

The webcam has a resolution of 1280x1024 pixels. During recording a blue LED next to the camera indicates activity. The picture quality, especially in low light situations, is not outstanding but sufficient for Skype conferences. The video refresh rate is low, movements appear jerky. Under good light conditions (daylight) the webcam surprises with low noise and reasonable sharp contours.

Security

Fingerprint reader (between the mouse buttons), a Kensington lock and a spill-resistant keyboard are included. Further functions are invisible: Execute Disable Bit (XD-Bit), BIOS with Computrace support, Intel Anti-Theft, TPM (Trusted Platform Module) and hard disk protection with 3D sensor. Most security features can be configured with the Toshiba Assist-Tool. Here, for example, the boot authentication can be activated. On the other side HWSetup enables detailed settings for devices or the processor (e.g. deactivate LAN port or DVD drive).

Accessories

Recovery DVDs for Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) have to be created on your own with the Recovery Media Creator. Furthermore there is a hidden hard disk partition with the factory state. Included are a small manual and a quick start guide. Preinstalled are several Toshiba tools (e.g. Cooling-Diagnostics etc.) and applications like Nero 11 (Multimedia Suite Essential). This suite includes a burning application, backup tools and recovery applications, but no DVD player.

Warranty

The warranty period is 24 months (On-site pickup in Germany and Austria). For that the device has to be registered via TEMPRO-tool (Warranty, Support, Service and Help). That is quickly done because TEMPRO knows the model and serial number. Extensions for three or four years are 64  and 109 Euros (~$87 and $147) respectively.

沟通

下一步千兆以太网和英特尔的Draft-N-WLAN的Portégé只拥有蓝牙4.0。这是与更昂贵的版本不同,与高价的R930宽带调制解调器是强制性的。迅驰无线-N 2230是一种主流的无线局域网,支持5 GHz频段(2×2,双码流)。但传输质量不是很好,在距离40米(〜131英尺)的R930路由器的连接断开。这是一个糟糕的结果给消费者的IdeaPad U510(无线-N 2230)相似。随着距离为3米和10米(约10英尺和33英尺/上层)的接收质量是5和3个酒吧。楼外下降至1巴几步进一步信号完全丢失。的路由器(Fritz!盒)的发射功率被减少到50%。

网络摄像头,分辨率为1280x1024像素。在录制过程中,摄像头旁边蓝色LED指示活动。画面质量,尤其是在光线不足的情况​​下,是并不出众,但足以为Skype会议。视频刷新率低,动作显得生涩。在良好的光线条件下(白天)摄像头惊喜,噪音低,合理的锋利的轮廓。

安全

一个指纹识别器(鼠标按钮之间),Kensington安全锁和防泼溅键盘。进一步的功能是无形的:执行禁止位(XD位),支持的Computrace的BIOS,英特尔防盗,TPM(可信平台模块)与3D传感器和硬盘保护。大多数安全保护功能,可以配置与东芝辅助工具。在此,例如,启动验证可以被激活。在另一侧的硬件设置使设备或处理器(例如,停用LAN端口或DVD驱动器)的详细设置。

饰品

恢复Windows 7专业版(64位)的DVD上创建自己的恢复媒体造物主。此外,还有一个隐藏的硬盘分区与出厂状态。其中包括一个小手册及快速入门指南。预装的几个东芝如Nero 11(基本)多媒体套件工具(如冷却诊断等)和应用程序。这套件包括刻录应用程序,备份工具和恢复应用程序,但没有DVD播放机。



保修期为24个月(上门取件,在德国和奥地利)。对于TEMPRO工具(保修,支持,服务和帮助)注册通过该设备。这是很快就干了,因为的TEMPRO知道型号和序列号。三年或四年的扩展是64和109欧元(约$ 87和147)。

Optical indicator of the 3D sensor
Optical indicator of the 3D sensor
HDD protection via drop sensor
HDD protection via drop sensor
Docking Station Utility
Docking Station Utility
light 65-Watts-power supply unit
light 65-Watts-power supply unit
Manual, no DVDs
Manual, no DVDs
Toshiba Assist: Log-On Configuration
Toshiba Assist: Log-On Configuration
Assist: Hardware Setup
Assist: Hardware Setup
Assist: CPU Clock
Assist: CPU Clock

Input Devices

Keyboard

The keys remain (almost) completely identical to the predecessor Portégé R830. They are detached and have a firm stroke. The surface is smooth but still convenient to use. With moist palms it can come to an unpleasant slipping effect. The keys are accurate to use due to the large key spacing although they have no conical curvature.

The limited key travel of the R830 was fixed by Toshiba. For a subnotebook input the keys now have a comparatively large travel. Unfortunately the unclear pressure point remains, under which the feedback suffers during typing. Business inputs with the ThinkPad Edge E330 or Vostro 3360 avoid such a weakness. We consider the layout successful, the arrow keys are separate, the Picture Up/Down keys, Del and Pos1/End are reasonably on the right side.

Touchpad

The multi-touch touchpad (Synaptics V7.5) is pretty large (9.8 cm/~3.9 inches diagonally), matte and has horizontal and vertical scroll bars that are not visibly indicated. The glossy buttons are very unsatisfying to use. The reason is the limited travel as well as the glossy and chrome-like surface. Users have the continuous impression they are wiping an empty butter dish.

The clicking noise is very quiet. Considerably better touchpads can be found with the ThinkPad Edge E330 / E335 (Dual-Pointing, touchpad + pointing stick) or the Vostro 3360. The Edge-models already have a click pad without separate mouse buttons.

键盘

密钥仍然几乎完全一致的PortégéR830的前身。他们被分离,有一个坚定的行程。表面光滑,但仍方便使用。有了湿润的手掌,它可以来一个不愉快的滑动效果。的键是准确的使用由于键间距大,虽然他们没有锥形曲率。

固定由东芝R830的主要旅游有限。对于一个小型笔记本电脑输入键现在有一个比较大的旅游。不幸的是,不明朗的压力点仍然存在,根据反馈在打字过程中遭受。商务的ThinkPad Edge E330或Vostro成就3360的输入,避免这样一个弱点。我们认为布局成功,箭头键是分开的,在图片上/下键,德尔和Pos1/End是合理的右侧。

触摸板

多点触控的触摸板(Synaptics的V7.5)是相当大的(9.8厘米/〜3.9英寸),磨砂,具有水平和垂直滚动条,没有明显表示。光滑的按钮是非常不满意的使用。其原因是有限行程以及光泽和铬等表面。用户有持续的印象,他们是一个空抹黄油盘。

点击噪音非常安静。可以找到相当好的触摸板的ThinkPad Edge E330/ E335(双指点,触摸板+指点杆)或Vostro成就3360。边缘模型已经有一个触摸板,没有单独的鼠标按钮。

Keyboard: in total a good feedback, weak pressure point
Keyboard: in total a good feedback, weak pressure point
Touchpad: limited key travel, greasy surface
Touchpad: limited key travel, greasy surface

Display

The matte 13.3-inch panel is not better than the 13- and 14-inch competition below 1,000 Euros (~$1353). The quality is, except for the higher brightness (luminance), similar to cheaper consumer displays. It is doubtful that the HD resolution of 1366x768 pixels complies with the premium segment. Even the higher-priced R390 uses the same panel without any other display options.

Among its competitors, we identify the ThinkPad L430, which comes to the customer with WXGA++ (1600x900) for under 800 Euros (~$1082). The brightness is similarly high but the contrast is just as bad. The HP ProBook 6470b also offers WXGA++ for 800 Euros (we could not review this panel yet). With the Dell Latitude E5430 we have to pay more than 1,200 Euros (~$1623) for a higher resolution (very good luminance), for the Latitude E6430 it is even 1,500 Euros (~$2029).

磨砂的13.3英寸面板是不优于13 - 14英寸的竞争低于1000欧元(〜$1353)。的质量,除了较高的亮度(亮度),类似的廉价的消费类显示器。为1366×768像素的高清分辨率,这是值得怀疑的符合溢价段。即使是价格较高的R390使用在相同的面板,没有任何其他显示选项。

在其竞争对手中,我们确定,这涉及到客户的ThinkPad L430 WXGA+(1600×900),800欧元(〜$1082)下。亮度是同样高,但对比同样糟糕。惠普ProBook6470b还提供WXGA++为800欧元(我们不能检讨此面板)。我们要付出更高的分辨率超过1200欧元(〜$1623)(很不错的亮度),甚至1500欧元(约$2029)的Latitude E6430戴尔Latitude E5430。

302
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
233
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Type Unknown tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 281.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 69 %
Center on Battery: 190 cd/m²
Contrast: 165:1 (Black: 1.74 cd/m²)37.76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
54.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.71% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)

The R930 panel lacks sophisticated qualities like color consistency and coverage of the sRGB color spectrum. sRGB and AdobeRGB are clearly missed (picture 1 and 2). But even premium business ultrabooks like the HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (picture 3) are often not better. The ultrabook model Protégé Z930 has obviously the same matte panel (each type unknown); the color spectrum seems to be identical (picture 4).

A wide spectrum of representable colors is interesting for professional picture editing, but not so much for business customers. They would prefer a high contrast, which would bring better colors and sharper contours. This is not the case (165:1) with the R930 and its competitors (13 and 14-inch). Even the formerly mentioned WXGA++ notebooks have a similarly low contrast. We cannot evaluate the quality of the higher resolution display of the Latitude E6430, since we only reviewed the HD version.
R930

面板缺乏精良的品质,如色彩一致性和覆盖sRGB色彩频谱。 sRGB和AdobeRGB的明确错过(图1和2)。但是,即使保费业务等ultrabooks的:的惠普EliteBook开本9470米(图3)往往不是更好。门生Z930 Ultrabook的模型有明显相同的磨砂面板(每个类型未知);色彩频谱似乎是相同的(图4)。

表示颜色的宽谱有趣的是专业的图片编辑,但没有这么多为企业客户。他们宁愿高对比度,这将带来更好的色彩和更清晰的轮廓。这是不与R930和它的竞争对手(13和14英寸)的情况下(165:1)。即使以前提到的WXGA ++的笔记本电脑有一个类似的低对比度。我们不能评估的质量,因为我们只审查高清版的Latitude E6430具有更高的分辨率显示。

ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. AdobeRGB(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. AdobeRGB(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. sRGB(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. sRGB(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. HP 9470m HD(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. HP 9470m HD(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. Toshiba Port. Z930 HD(t)
ICC Toshiba Port. R930 vs. Toshiba Port. Z930 HD(t)

The six pictures below show the CalMAN-color analysis with the i1 Pro 2 photo spectrometer, in each case before and after calibration. Measured with the manufacturers' default color profile we see a noticeable weakness with the grayscale presentation. Especially the middle tones show a DeltaE (2000) of 20 (average 17.86). After the calibration the DeltaE minimizes to 5.67 (average, see picture 4). Noticeable: with 9,097 K the white point is clearly shifted in the blue area. The calibration pushes back the blue cast (colors are getting visibly warmer) and sets the white point to 7,038 K.

Depending on the brightness setting the Gamma value is between 1.8 at 10% brightness and the target value 2.2 at maximum brightness. The calibration shifts that to 1.9. The saturation is too weak. Far off the DeltaE of 5 are blue, green and red. The blue cast is a disadvantage of many displays equipped with White LEDs. Discrepancies become visible to the human eye with a DeltaE value of 3 and more. With the calibration the saturation gets considerably better but the blue cast remains. 

下面的六张图片显示的卡尔曼色分析与I1 Pro 2的照片谱仪,在每种情况下校准前后。测量制造商的默认颜色配置文件,我们可以看到一个明显的弱点与灰度介绍。尤其是中间色调显示一个的DeltaE值(2000),20(平均17.86)。校准后,显示的DeltaE值减少至5.67(平均,参见图4)。引人注目:9,097 K的白点是清楚的蓝色区域转移。校准推回偏蓝(颜色越来越明显回暖),并设置白点到7,038 K

根据亮度设定Gamma值是10%的亮度和最大亮度的目标值2.21.8之间。校准转移,为1.9。饱和度是太弱了。离谱的DeltaE5是蓝色,绿色和红色。偏蓝许多显示器配备了白光LED的缺点。的差异变得可见DeltaE值值有3个及3个以上的人的眼睛。随着校准的饱和度得到大大好转,但,偏蓝仍然。

Grayscale (uncalibrated)
Grayscale (uncalibrated)
Color management  (uncalib.)
Color management (uncalib.)
Saturation (uncalib.)
Saturation (uncalib.)
Grayscale (calibrated)
Grayscale (calibrated)
Color management (calib.)
Color management (calib.)
Saturation (calib.)
Saturation (calib.)

The only advantage of the R930 panel: The high brightness that remains constant when using the battery. The brightness distribution is very bad with 69%. On homogeneous areas spotting is due to poorly illuminated areas and is visible to the eye (white LED background light). Our pictures were taken in daylight to the detriment of the R930 with a reduced brightness of around 125 cd/m². Depending on the energy profile the brightness reduces to 125 up to 190 cd/m². The 13.3-inch device has no ambient light sensor.

R930面板唯一的好处:在使用电池时,保持恒定的高亮度。与69%的亮度分布是非常糟糕的。同质区域,点状出血是由于光线照明领域,是可见的眼(白色LED背景光)。我们的照片拍摄在日光损害R930约125坎德拉/平方米降低亮度。根据能源配置的亮度降低到125,达到190坎德拉/平方米。 13.3英寸的设备有没有环境光传感器。

Front view, cloudy
Side view, indirect light (cloudy)
Outdoor use
Side view, max. luminance (cloudy)

The horizontal viewing angles only remain stable up to around 45 degrees. From above or below (vertical) the prospects are gloomy: colors heavily invert with 10 degrees, writing is sufficiently readable up to 35 degrees. For illustration purposes we show the viewing angles in the following picture. To avoid these negative effects customers have to choose a device with IPS or PLS panel (Samsung). None of the mentioned 13 and 14-inch competitors has such a display.

R930面板唯一的好处:在使用电池时,保持恒定的高亮度。与69%的亮度分布是非常糟糕的。同质区域,点状出血是由于光线照明领域,是可见的眼(白色LED背景光)。我们的照片拍摄在日光损害R930约125坎德拉/平方米降低亮度。根据能源配置的亮度降低到125,达到190坎德拉/平方米。 13.3英寸的设备有没有环境光传感器。

Viewing angles Toshiba Portégé R930-13F
Viewing angles Toshiba Portégé R930-13F

Performance

Toshiba's 13.3-inch device is equipped with an Intel Core i3-2370M (2 x 2.4 GHz). The dual-core CPU has no Turbo Boost but at least has Hyperthreading. The integrated Intel HD 3000 graphics and the DDR3 memory controller complete the package. The Core i3 from the Sandy Bridge generation (2010) is already outdated. The Ivy Bridge processors have replaced this generation mid-2012. The higher-priced R930 are based on Ivy Bridge, in particular the Core i5-3210M or i7-3520M. Now we realize why the price of our review sample is so low (775 Euros/~$1048). This i3 works in devices starting at 500 up to 700 Euros (~$676 up to $947), for example the ThinkPad L430 (version).

As usual it is equipped with 4,096 MB DDR3 memory in one of the two available slots (1 x 4,096 MB module). The hard drive is a 320 GB Toshiba MK3261GSYN running at 7,200 rpm.

东芝13.3英寸的设备,配备了英特尔酷睿i3-2370M(2×2.4千兆赫)。双核CPU有没有涡轮增压,但至少有超线程。集成Intel HD3000显卡和DDR3内存控制器,完成封装。代(2010年)的Sandy Bridge酷睿i3已经过时。 Ivy Bridge的处理器已经取代了这一代2012年年中。基于Ivy Bridge的,尤其是价格较高的R930酷睿i5-3210M或i7-3520M。现在我们意识到为什么我们的审查样本的价格是如此之低(775欧元/〜1048美元)。 i3的设备开始在500至700欧元(约$676上升至947美元),例如在ThinkPad L430(版本)。

像往常一样,它配备了4,096 MB DDR3内存在两个可用插槽(1×4,096 MB模块)。硬盘是320 GB东芝MK3261GSYN运行在7200转。

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo GPUZ HD 4000
DPC Latenzen Idle OK
DPC Latenzen Idle WLAN Off/On OK
System information Toshiba Portégé R930-13F

Processor

The Sandy Bridge i3 processor has a relatively high clock with 2.4 GHz. What is the performance difference to the Core i5 alternative 3210M, often used by the competition? TravelMate P643-MGThinkPad L430ThinkPad Edge S430 and Vostro 3460 are in unison 25% ahead of our R930. Remarkable: Low-Voltage alternatives like the cheaper Dell Vostro 3360, with an i5-3317U, are on the same level when it comes to multi-core processing.

The difference is higher for the GPU performance, here the old HD 3000 is clearly limiting. The ThinkPad L430 is 45% faster (HD 4000). With dedicated graphics (TravelMate P643-MGVostro 3460ThinkPad T430u) performance advantages of up to 291% are possible. In this case Asus uses an excellent graphics card (GT 640M) for an office device.

The battery use has no impact on the performance; all Cinebench R11.5 results were identical to the plugged-in results. We verified a steady clock of 2.4 GHz during the CPU benchmarks (no turbo with the i3). The HD 3000 seems to be throttled by Toshiba, the clock under load never went beyond 650 MHz. Based on the nomenclature the GPU can reach a clock of up to 1,350 MHz.

Sandy Bridge的酷睿i3处理器,配备2.4 GHz的时钟具有比较高的。酷睿i5,经常使用的竞争替代3210M的性能差异是什么? TRAVELMATE P643-MG方面,ThinkPad L430的ThinkPad Edge S430和Vostro成就3460是异口同声的25%,我们提前R930。显着的:便宜的戴尔Vostro成就3360,酷睿i5-3317U低电压的替代品,如,在同一水平上,当它涉及到多核心处理。

所不同的是GPU(图形处理器)性能高的在旧的HD3000显然是限制性的。而ThinkPad L430是快了45%(HD 4000)。专用的图形(TRAVELMATE P643-MG方面,ThinkPad T430u,Vostro成就3460)高达291%的性能优势,是可能的。在这种情况下,华硕采用了出色的图形卡(GT640M)的办公设备。

电池的使用有没有对性能的影响;所有的Cinebench R11.5结果插入的结果是相同的。我们验证了一个稳定的2.4 GHz的时钟在CPU基准(没有涡轮的i3)。 HD 3000似乎到由东芝节流,从来没有超过650 MHz的时钟负载下。命名法的基础上,GPU可以达到高达1350 MHz的时钟。

CB R11.5 Multi end 2,4 GHz
CB R11.5 Multi end 2,4 GHz
CB OpenGL 650 MHz despite performance mode
CB OpenGL 650 MHz despite performance mode
CB R11.5 Multi start 2,4 GHz
CB R11.5 Multi start 2,4 GHz
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F
2.29 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E330 NZS4RGE
2.31 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T430u
2.39 Points +4%
Dell Vostro 3360
2.4 Points +5%
Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk
2.84 Points +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad L430
2.88 Points +26%
HP ProBook 6470b-B5W83AW
3.06 Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge S430
2.87 Points +25%
Dell Vostro 3460
2.88 Points +26%
Dell Latitude E5430
3.26 Points +42%
Dell Latitude E6430
3.09 Points +35%
Fujitsu LifeBook S792
5.59 Points +144%
OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value)
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F
9.26 fps
Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E330 NZS4RGE
9.72 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T430u
14.21 fps +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E335 NZT5YGE 33555YG
8.5 fps -8%
Dell Vostro 3360
15.07 fps +63%
Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk
36.24 fps +291%
Lenovo ThinkPad L430
13.43 fps +45%
HP ProBook 6470b-B5W83AW
13.58 fps +47%
Dell Vostro 3460
28.67 fps +210%
Dell Latitude E5430
18.06 fps +95%
Dell Latitude E6430
13.81 fps +49%
Fujitsu LifeBook S792
19.76 fps +113%

Legend

 
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F Intel Core i3-2370M, Intel HD Graphics 3000, Toshiba MK3261GSYN
 
Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E330 NZS4RGE Intel Core i3-2370M, Intel HD Graphics 3000, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT007-9ZV142
 
Lenovo ThinkPad T430u Intel Core i5-3317U, NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M, Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS
 
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E335 NZT5YGE 33555YG AMD E2-1800, AMD Radeon HD 7340, 320 GB - 7200 rpm
 
Dell Vostro 3360 Intel Core i5-3317U, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT007-9ZV142
 
Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk Intel Core i5-3210M, NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M, Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 HTS547575A9E384
 
Lenovo ThinkPad L430 Intel Core i5-3210M, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
 
HP ProBook 6470b-B5W83AW Intel Core i5-3320M, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Hitachi HTS727550A9E364
 
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge S430 Intel Core i5-3210M, NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630
 
Dell Vostro 3460 Intel Core i5-3210M, NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M, Seagate Momentus 7200.4 ST9500423AS
 
Dell Latitude E5430 Intel Core i5-3360M, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Seagate Momentus Thin ST320LT007-9ZV142
 
Dell Latitude E6430 Intel Core i5-3320M, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Seagate Momentus 7200.4 ST9500423AS
 
Fujitsu LifeBook S792 Intel Core i7-3612QM, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Micron RealSSD C400-MTFDDAC256MAM
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
3904 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
8337 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
2808 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
9.26 fps
Help

System Performance

The PCMark Vantage benchmark resulted in an overall score of 5,506 points. That is 20 to 45% behind the competition and the notebooks do not even have to be equipped with a fast SSD. If an SSD is in use like with the LifeBook S792 (+183%), then our R930 has absolutely no chance. The PCMark HDD score shows additional performance of up to 36% in particular cases, overall only +4 to +8%. What adds up as a disadvantage for the R930 is the low CPU performance on the one hand and the weak and low clocked HD 3000 on the other hand. The PCMark 7 stopped the pass over and over again so we cannot give you any results.

导致整体得分为5,506分的PCMark Vantage基准。这后面的比赛是20至45%的笔记本电脑甚至没有配备一个快速的SSD。如果SSD是使用像的LifeBook S792(+183%),那么,我们的R930绝对没有机会。硬盘的PCMark得分显示在特定的情况下,高达36%的额外的性能,整体只有+4+8%。一方面,弱者和低主频HD3000另一方面CPU性能低什么加起来R930的缺点是。 PCMark7的停止通一遍又一遍的,所以我们不能给你任何结果。

4.5
Windows 7 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
6.8
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
5.9
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
4.5
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
6.1
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.9
PCMark Vantage Result
5506 points
Help
PCMark Vantage - 1024x768 Result (sort by value)
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F
5506 Points
Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E330 NZS4RGE
5991 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E335 NZT5YGE 33555YG
2529 Points -54%
Dell Vostro 3360
6650 Points +21%
Acer TravelMate P643-MG-53214G75Mikk
6556 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad L430
7082 Points +29%
HP ProBook 6470b-B5W83AW
7256 Points +32%
Dell Vostro 3460
7297 Points +33%
Dell Latitude E6430
7461 Points +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge S430
7653 Points +39%
Dell Latitude E5430
8011 Points +45%
Fujitsu LifeBook S792
15603 Points +183%

Mass Storage

The 320 GB hard drive from Hitachi works pretty fast, although it is a conventional HDD (7,200 rpm). It reaches 79 MB/sec for sequential reading (HD Tune). The CrystalDiskMark as a second test determines 89 MB/sec (different test routine compared to HD Tune). The HDD score of the PCMark Vantage is 3,859 points (sub-score). That is far less than SSDs in our review units (14,000 up to 20,000 points, e. g. XMG A501). A 3D sensor prevents any damage during mobile use; it parks the heads (reading/writing) in case of shock.

日立320 GB硬盘驱动器的工作原理相当快的,尽管它是一个传统的HDD(7200转)。它达到79 MB /秒顺序读取(HD Tune的)。第二次测试CrystalDiskMark的决定89 MB /秒(不同的测试程序相比,HD Tune的)。 PCMark Vantage的HDD得分是3,859点(分成绩)。这是远远低于固态硬盘在我们的审查单位(14,000至20,000点,如XMG A501)。三维传感器移动使用过程中防止任何损害;公园头(读/写)在遇到震动。

HD-Tune: 260 MB/s (seq. r.)
HD-Tune: 260 MB/s (seq. r.)
Crystal Disk Mark: 471 MB/s (seq. r.)
Crystal Disk Mark: 471 MB/s (seq. r.)
TOSHIBA MK3261GSYN 7200 RPM 320 GB
TOSHIBA MK3261GSYN 7200 RPM 320 GB
Toshiba MK3261GSYN
Transfer Rate Minimum: 31.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 115.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 86.9 MB/s
Access Time: 17.1 ms
Burst Rate: 110.4 MB/s
CPU Usage: 1 %

Graphics

To determine the gaming capabilities we use the 3DMark06 benchmark. The result is very low with only 2,477 points due to the single-channel memory and the throttled clock of the HD 3000. That is 30% below comparable systems with HD 3000 graphics and a Core i3 (ThinkPad Edge E330ProBook 4340s). Gaming is not possible at all with the HD 3000. Even less demanding games like FIFA 13 only run smoothly with medium details. If you want an office notebook with gaming power the Acer TravelMate P643-MG (+327%) with a GeForce GT 640M is the best compromise, followed by the Vostro 3460 (+263%) with a GT 630M.

要确定的游戏功能,我们使用3DMark06的基准。其结果是非常低的2477点,由于单声道的内存和HD3000节流时钟。这是30%,低于同类系统的HD 3000显卡和酷睿i3(的ThinkPad Edge E330,4340s PROBOOK)。游戏是不可能在所有的HD3000。即使要求不高的游戏,如FIFA13平稳运行与中型细节。如果你想游戏电源的办公笔记本宏基TravelMate P643-MG(+327%)是最好的妥协,Vostro成就3460(+263%)与GT630M的GeForce GT640M。

3DMark 06 Standard Score
2477 points
Help
lowmed.highultra
StarCraft 2 (2010) 72 14 7
Diablo III (2012) 27 15 13
Fifa 13 (2012) 62 36 17

Emissions

System Noise

Air intake bottom
Air intake bottom

Without high load, for example browsing the web or working with Outlook, the system noise is pretty steady at 33 dB (A). However what we hear and measure is not the fan but the obtrusive humming of the 7200 rpm hard drive. A silent SSD would be very convenient for the R930. The fan never turns off completely.

With continuous maximum load for the processor and the integrated HD 3000 the fan eventually gets louder than the HDD. We measure up to 43.6 dB (A), no matter whether it is the mid-level load of 3DMark06 or a stress test with Prime95 (CPU) and FurMark (GPU).

All in all the behavior of the cooling is okay, yet the ambient noise of the fast spinning HDD was distracting after only a short time. Our i3-system gets the rating "Good" from the Cooling-Diagnostics-Tool by Toshiba (tested with 20 minutes of load)

如果没有高负荷,例如浏览网页或使用Outlook,系统噪音在33分贝(A)是相当稳定的。但是我们听到和措施是没有风扇,但突兀的嗡嗡的7200转硬盘。一种无声的SSD会很方便的R930。风扇从来没有完全关闭。

随着连续最大负载为处理器和集成的HD3000风扇最终得到胜于​​硬盘。我们测量到43.6分贝(A),无论是否是中级负载的的3DMark06测试或压力测试Prime95测试(CPU)和FurMark进行(GPU)。

所有所有冷却的行为是好的,但快速旋转的硬盘驱动器的环境噪声只有很短的时间后分心。我们的酷睿i3-系统获得“良好”评级从冷却诊断工具由东芝(20分钟的负载测试)

Noise Level

Idle
32.8 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB(A)
DVD
37.8 / dB(A)
Load
43.7 / 43.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm distance)

Temperature

Stress-end: 2.4 GHz
Stress-end: 2.4 GHz
Stress-start: 2.4 GHz (Prime95 & Furmark)
Stress-start: 2.4 GHz (Prime95 & Furmark)

There is not much to criticize in regards to the unit warming-up; the palm rest and keyboard are always in the tolerable range below 45 degrees Celsius (113 degrees Fahrenheit). During idle and office-use most of the areas remained lukewarm (about 30 degrees Celsius/86 degrees Fahrenheit). The bottom reaches 36 degrees Celsius (96.8 degrees Fahrenheit) at some spots.

The peak temperatures during the stress test are much higher with 49 degrees Celsius (120.2 degrees Fahrenheit, top/bottom). This is not surprising for a light case. It can heat up (lack of mass) and cool down again very quickly. The palm rest remains lukewarm all the time; here we measure a maximum value of 32 degrees Celsius (89.6 degrees Fahrenheit). During several hours of stress test HWinfo determined 81 degrees Celsius (177.8 degrees Fahrenheit) for the processor at the most (steady clock @2.4 GHz).

没有太多的批评单位变暖方面,掌托和键盘总是在容忍的范围低于45度摄氏(华氏113度)。在空闲和办公用大部分地区依然不冷不热(约30度Celsius/86华氏度)。底部达到摄氏36度(华氏96.8度),在一些景点。

在压力测试中的峰值温度远高于摄氏49度(华氏120.2度,顶部/底部)。轻的情况下,这并不奇怪。它可以升温缺乏群众和,再次降温速度非常快。掌托依然冷淡所有的时间,在这里,我们测量的最大值摄氏32度(华氏89.6度)。在几个小时的压力测试,另外HWiNFO确定摄氏81度(华氏177.8度)(稳定[email protected] GHz)的处理器。

Max. Load
 48.6 °C44 °C38.5 °C 
 40.7 °C42 °C35.8 °C 
 36.7 °C37.7 °C34.6 °C 
Maximum: 48.6 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
41.1 °C48.8 °C47 °C
39.9 °C43.1 °C43.8 °C
37.3 °C38.6 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 48.8 °C
Average: 41.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  54 °C | Room Temperature 23.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-360
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.7 °C / 99.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-9.4 °C / -17 F).

Speakers

The stereo speakers are on the left and right side above the keyboard. Their sound is treble-focused, thin and has almost no bass. For music playback we recommend the use of external speakers or headphones. Almost rare are the separate microphone and headphone jacks. Many notebooks use a combined port so existing speaker/microphones have to be used with a y-adaptor.

立体声扬声器键盘上方的左侧和右侧。他们的声音是高音重点,薄,几乎没有低音。对于音乐播放,我们建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。几乎难得的是独立的麦克风和耳机插孔。许多笔记本电脑使用现有扬声器/麦克风组合端口,因此必须使用Y形适配器。

Energy Management

Energy Consumption

The energy consumption shows a big difference between idle and high load (CPU+IGP). This is typical for Intel Core processors of the last few years. The Core i3 can be very efficient without Turbo Boost, even if it still belongs to the 32nm generation (2010). The idle consumption of the Portégé is between 6.5 Watts (energy-saving, lowest brightness) and 10.6 Watts (maximum performance, highest brightness). 3DMark06 (HD 3000 + CPU) requires 45 Watts. During the stress test both the Core i3 and the graphics are working. In this case we measure 50 Watts. The small 65 Watt power supply unit (337 grams/~0.74 pounds, including cord) is sufficient.

能源消耗显示闲置和高负荷(CPU+ IGP)很大的区别。这是典型的英特尔酷睿处理器,在过去几年。酷睿i3是非常有效的,没有涡轮增压,即使它仍然属于32奈米世代(2010年)。空闲的Portégé消费6.5瓦(节能,最低亮度)和10.6瓦(最高性能,最高亮度)之间。 3DMark06测试(HD 3000+ CPU)需要45瓦。在压力测试酷睿i3和图形工作。在这种情况下,我们测量50瓦。小的65瓦电源单元(337克/〜0.74英镑,包括线)就足够了。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.5 / 9.6 / 10.6 Watt
Load midlight 45.6 / 50.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 960

Battery Runtime

The runtime of 7:21 hours compensates for the bad speakers and the noisy hard drive. Noticeable: The 66 Wh battery is no high-capacity power battery. This time is reached in the WLAN test, in which we load web sites via script with reduced brightness. It also contains video playback. In favor of the R930 we had to adjust the brightness to 117 cd/m² (dim 3 steps). This was closest to our target value of 150 cd/m. 2 steps resulted in 186 cd/m² (center), the disadvantage would have been too big. Disadvantage: The charging time for the battery was very high with 4:30 hours.

7:21小时的运行时间补偿的坏扬声器和嘈杂的硬盘驱动器。明显:66瓦时电池是大容量动力电池。达到这个时间是在WLAN测试中,我们通过脚本加载网站亮度降低。它还包含视频播放。赞成的R930,我们不得不把亮度调整到117坎德拉/平方米(昏暗的3个步骤)。这是最接近目标值150 CD/平方米。 2个步骤导致186坎德拉/平方米(中心),缺点本来太大。缺点:电池的充电时间为4:30小时的非常高。

Charging: 271 min.
Charging: 271 min.
WLAN-runtime: 441 min
WLAN-runtime: 441 min
minimal runtime: 103 min
minimal runtime: 103 min
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 25min
WiFi Surfing
7h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 43min

Verdict

Toshiba offers a practical addition to the Portégé Z930 ultrabook with the Portégé R930 series. The target group is likely users who do not like the few ports of ultrabooks in general and the Z930 in particular. The decision between the Z- and the R-model is not a matter of price; the bulky R930 is by no means a cheap economy model.  

Our review unit is a small rarity and exception with a price of 775 Euros (~$1048). With an Intel Core i3-2370M and without UMTS/HSDPA the Portégé R930-13F (PT330E-038004GR) is rarely found for sale. More common are the Core i5 versions with 3G modem that are at least 1,000 Euros (~$1353) without exception. Because input devices, base unit, display and the design remain the same, the question of the inexpensive entry to the high-priced business world came up since the Toshiba Portégé devices are the equivalent to the Dell Latitude and the HP EliteBook devices.

All in all we are disappointed by the handy and lightweight 13.3-inch R930. It shines with the battery runtime (7:21 hours) and the convenient keyboard. But we wonder why the manufacturer still integrates (Z830Z930, Satellite R830, Tecra R840, Satellite R850) the same touchpad with its greasy buttons with almost no travel at all. HP and Dell offer flexible, rubberized buttons with good travel in this price category. Even the less expensive ThinkPad Edge E130/E135 in the student price range (300-400 Euros/~$406-$541) has a mouse replacement with much stronger feedback.

Point two of the criticism is the unstable and cheap finish of the hinges and their covers. The flexible and thin display cover is a design related concession. The base unit is no role model in the matter of stability either, the area around the optical drive can be heavily dented when lifting and handling the device.

Point three is the TN-display. Although it is matte and bright, the contrast and viewing angles are very poor. An IPS panel, at least in higher price categories, would be heavily appreciated by every customer.

The strengths of the Portégé R930-13F are the low weight (1.4 kilograms/~3.1 pounds), the good connectivity (ExpressCard54, docking port), the long battery runtime and the good standard performance. Customers cannot always find these with the 13-inch alternatives. Especially the weight is much higher with often shorter runtimes. We consider the following 13.3-inch devices as suitable alternatives because of the better input devices and the higher stability in total.

·        Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E330 (i3-2370M, 558 Euros/~$755)

·        Fujitsu LifeBook S792 (i5/i7, starting at 1,135 Euros/~$1535)

There are some very interesting 14-inch alternatives in terms of price. From 700 to 900 Euros (~$947 to $1218) you will get a Core i5 in any case. The TravelMate P643-MG even has a powerful GT 640M. All these 14-inch devices have a docking port! But all the alternatives (13-/14-inch) have one weakness in common: A display with pale colors and small viewing angles.

·        Acer TravelMate P643-MG (GT 640M, i5-3210M, 899 Euros/~$1216)

·        Dell Latitude E6430 (i5-3320M, 797 Euros/~$1078)

·        Lenovo ThinkPad L430 (i5-3210M, 659 Euros/~$892)

·        Dell Latitude E5430 (i5-3360M, 700 Euros~$947)

·        HP ProBook 6470b (i5-3320M, starting at 800 Euros/~$1082)

东芝提供了一个实用的除了的PortégéR930系列的PortégéZ930 Ultrabook的。目标群体是有可能的用户谁不喜欢一般及特别Z930超极少数港口。 Z-R-模型之间的决定是不是价格的问题,绝不是一个便宜的经济模型笨重的R930。

我们的审查单位,价格为775欧元(〜$ 1048)是一个小型的稀有性和例外。随着英特尔酷睿i3-2370M,没有UMTS / HSDPA的Portege R930-13F(PT330E 038004GR)很少发现出售。更常见的是酷睿i5与3G调制解调器的版本至少1000欧元(〜$ 1353),无一例外。由于输入设备,基本单元,显示和设计保持不变,廉价的条目的高价的商业世界的问题上来以来,东芝Portégé设备是相当于戴尔纬度惠普EliteBook设备。

所有的一切,我们感到失望的方便和轻巧的13.3英寸R930。它闪耀着电池的使用时间(7:21小时)和方便的键盘。但是,我们不知道为什么制造商还是集成(Z830,Z930,卫星TECRA R840,R830,R850卫星)相同的触摸板与油腻按钮,几乎没有旅行。惠普和戴尔提供灵活的橡胶按钮,具有良好的旅行,在这个价格类别。即使较便宜的ThinkPad Edge E130/E135在学生价范围(300-400欧元/〜$ 406 - 541),有一个鼠标替代强得多反馈。

批评的两个点是不稳定的和便宜的铰链完成,封面上。灵活的和薄的显示屏盖是一家集设计相关特许。基本单元是没有榜样,要么在这个问题上的稳定性,周围区域的光盘驱动器可以严重削弱起重及装卸设备。

第三点是在TN显示器。虽然它是磨砂和明亮的,对比度和可视角度都非常差。 IPS面板,至少在更高的价格类别,将受到每一位顾客的赞赏。

的Portege R930-13F的优势是低体重(1.4公斤/ 3.1磅),良好的连接(ExpressCard54,对接端口),电池运行时间长和良好的性能标准。客户并不总是可以找到这些与13英寸的替代品。特别是,与通常短的运行时间的重量要高得多。我们认为合适的替代品,因为更好的输入设备和更高的稳定性,总以下的13.3英寸的设备。

·联想的ThinkPad Edge E330(酷睿i3-2370M,558欧元/〜755美元)

·富士通LifeBook S792(睿i5/i7,开始在1,135欧元/〜1535美元)

有一些非常有趣的14英寸的替代品在价格方面。从700到900欧元(约$ 9471218美元),你会得到一个在任何情况下,酷睿i5。 TRAVELMATE P643-MG甚至有一个强大的GT 640M。所有这些器件具有14英寸的对接端口!但是,所有的替代品(13-/14-inch)有一个共同的弱点:苍白的颜色和小视角的显示。

·宏基TravelMate P643-MG(GT 640M,酷睿i5-3210M,899欧元/〜1216美元,)

·戴尔Latitude E6430(酷睿i5-3320M,797欧元/〜1078美元,)

·联想ThinkPad L430(酷睿i5-3210M,659欧元/〜892美元,)

·戴尔Latitude E5430(酷睿i5-3360M,700欧元〜947美元,)

·惠普ProBook 6470b(i5-3320M的,开始在800欧元/〜1082美元)

Courtesy of ...
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: long runtimes, many ports, poor display
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: long runtimes, many ports, poor display
Please share our article, every link counts!
In Review:  Toshiba Portégé R930-13F
In Review: Toshiba Portégé R930-13F, Courtesy of:

Specifications

Toshiba Portégé R930-13F
Processor
Intel Core i3-2370M 2 x 2.4 GHz, Sandy Bridge
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, Type Unknown, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM76 (Panther Point)
Storage
Toshiba MK3261GSYN, 320 GB 
, 7200 rpm
Soundcard
HD Audio
Connections
1 Express Card 54mm, 1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 eSata, Audio Connections: Line out, microphone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: Schock Sensor HDD
Networking
Intel 82579V Gigabit Network Connection (10/1000MBit/s), Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
MATSHITA DVD-RAM UJ8B2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 316 x 227
Battery
66 Wh Lithium-Ion, 10,8 V 6-cell, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 9 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1,3 MP
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, Recovery Media Creator, Network, Media Controller, Webcam, Diagnostics-cooling, Fan-test, HDD SSD Alert, Eco Utility, HWSetup, Password, BatteryManager, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.403 kg, Power Supply: 337 g
Price
800 Euro

 

Toshiba puts every Portégé in a simple box.
Toshiba puts every Portégé in a simple box.
certainly had no impact to the conception of the R930.
certainly had no impact to the conception of the R930.
It is a 13-inch device for the sophisticated business user,
It is a 13-inch device for the sophisticated business user,
who does not want to trade ports (picture: eSATA, USB 3.0, HDMI)
who does not want to trade ports (picture: eSATA, USB 3.0, HDMI)
are the hard drive (standard 2.5-inch)
are the hard drive (standard 2.5-inch)
and two RAM slots.
and two RAM slots.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: The annoying 7200 rpm hard drive attracted attention. In idle it produces more noise than the fan.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: The annoying 7200 rpm hard drive attracted attention. In idle it produces more noise than the fan.
With the large battery the R930 works for over 7 hours in the practical WLAN-test with reduced brightness.
With the large battery the R930 works for over 7 hours in the practical WLAN-test with reduced brightness.
The small 65 Watts PSU can therefore remain at the office.
The small 65 Watts PSU can therefore remain at the office.
Including the cord it only weighs 337 gram.
Including the cord it only weighs 337 grams.
The performance of the system is reasonable. Unfortunately the monotonous humming of the 7200 rpm hard drive is a constant companion and makes more noise than the fan.
The performance of the system is reasonable. Unfortunately the monotonous humming of the 7200 rpm hard drive is a constant companion and makes more noise than the fan.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: The Core-i3 version (Sandy Bridge) is rare. The performance is far behind its Core i5/i7 siblings.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: The Core-i3 version (Sandy Bridge) is rare. The performance is far behind its Core i5/i7 siblings.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: Unpleasant – A good keyboard combined with very bad touchpad buttons.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: Unpleasant – A good keyboard combined with very bad touchpad buttons.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: The glossy surface is greasy and the button travel is almost non existant.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: The glossy surface is greasy and the button travel is almost non existent.
The lower height of the Portégé Z930 ultrabook and its low weight
The lower height of the Portégé Z930 ultrabook and its low weight
Low weight and simple surfaces are characteristic for the R-series.
Low weight and simple surfaces are characteristic for the R-series.
The 13.3-inch device with Core i3 and without HSDPA modem is the most inexpensive R-series Portégé (under 800 Euros).
The 13.3-inch device with Core i3 and without HSDPA modem is the most inexpensive R-series Portégé (under 800 Euros).
These special keys open the web browser or switch between internal and external display.
These special keys open the web browser or switch between internal and external display.
This key deactivates the touchpad, very convenient during writing.
This key deactivates the touchpad, very convenient during writing.
The webcam has a resolution of 1,280 x 720, exposure of the pictures is not high enough and results in noise.
The webcam has a resolution of 1,280 x 720, exposure of the pictures is not high enough and results in noise.
The version with Core-i3 processor is hard to find in online shops.
The version with Core-i3 processor is hard to find in online shops.
At the bottom of the R930
At the bottom of the R930
is the connector for professional docking stations.
is the connector for professional docking stations.
We remove the 66 Wh Lithium-Ion battery to get a look inside the laptop.
We remove the 66 Wh Lithium-Ion battery to get a look inside the laptop.
Underneath these two covers
Underneath these two covers
The keys suffer a bit due to the unclear pressure point but stroke and travel are good.
The keys suffer a bit due to the unclear pressure point but stroke and travel are good.
The touchpad has a pleasant low friction, but the almost non existant button travel provides a bad feedback.
The touchpad has a pleasant low friction, but the almost non existant button travel provides poor feedback.
and performance against Low-Voltage-CPUs and limitations.
and performance against Low-Voltage-CPUs and limitations.
Even with prices above 1,000 Euros the manufacturer does not attach importance
Even with prices above 1,000 Euros the manufacturer does not attach importance
to noble boxes, complex foils and separate folding boxes for the PSU. We approve with that.
to noble boxes, complex foils and separate folding boxes for the PSU. We approve of that.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: Light but limited stability. The chassis is supported by a honeycomb structure on the inside.
Toshiba Portégé R930-13F: Light but limited stability. The chassis is supported by a honeycomb structure on the inside.

Similar Devices

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

东芝 Portege Z30t-B1320W10 笔记本电脑简短评测
HD Graphics 5500, Core i7 5600U, 13.30", 1.326 kg
东芝 Satellite Z30-B 笔记本电脑简短评测
HD Graphics 5500, Core i5 5200U, 13.30", 1.2 kg
东芝 Portégé R30-A-15C 笔记本电脑简短评测
HD Graphics 4600, Core i7 4600M, 13.30", 1.412 kg
东芝 Satellite U940-101 超级本测评
HD Graphics 4000, Core i5 3317U, 14.00", 1.72 kg

Devices from the same Manufacturer

东芝 Portégé X30 (i7-7600U, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测
HD Graphics 620, Kaby Lake i7-7600U, 13.30", 1.043 kg
东芝 Portégé X20W (7600U, 512 GB) 变形本简短评测
HD Graphics 620, Kaby Lake i7-7600U, 12.50", 1.024 kg

Links

Price Comparison

Pros

+ 耐用的表面
+ 重量轻,良好的运行时间
+ 键盘具有良好的反馈
+ 许多端口,包括。基座
+ 明亮,亚光面板

Cons

- 塑料感
- 哼着硬盘驱动器
- 细腻,灵活盖
- 点点鼠标按钮旅游
- 对比度低,小视角

Shortcut

What we like

The low weight and reasonable stability of the base (honeycomb structure) are still unrivaled in the 13-inch business class. Consider the business capable port variety including the DVD drive. The runtime does not suffer from the weight, just the opposite.

What we miss

An option for a high quality IPS panel with rich colors and better viewing angles. At least for versions over 1,000 Euros.

What surprises us

For years all Portégé R-devices have the same small hinges and slippery mouse buttons with very little travel. When does the manufacturer react?

The competition

13-inch: Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E330 (i3 2370M), Fujitsu LifeBook S792 (i5/i7), Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E335 (AMD E2-1800), Dell Vostro 3360 (i5 3317U)

14-inch: Acer TravelMate P643-MG (GT 640M, i5 3210M), Lenovo ThinkPad T430u (GT 620M, i5 3317U), Dell Latitude E6430 (i5 3320M), Lenovo ThinkPad L430 (i5 3210M), Dell Latitude E5430 (i5 3360M), HP ProBook 6470b (i5 3320M), Lenovo ThinkPad Edge S430 (GT 620M, i5 3210M), Dell Vostro 3460 (GT 630M, i5 3210M)

Rating

Toshiba Portégé R930-13F - 01/23/2013 v3 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch

Chassis
77%
Keyboard
80%
Pointing Device
76%
Connectivity
75%
Weight
92%
Battery
89%
Display
65%
Games Performance
56%
Application Performance
88%
Temperature
73%
Noise
79%
Add Points
80%
Average
78%
80%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 东芝PortégéR930-13F亚笔记本电脑测评
Sebastian Jentsch, 2013-05- 9 (Update: 2018-05-15)