Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Qualcomm Adreno 610是用于中端智能手机和平板电脑（主要基于Android）的移动图形卡。 它包含在Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoC中，并基于Adreno 600架构（例如Adreno 630，应该与软件完全兼容）。

在综合基准测试中，Adreno 610处于旧的Adreno 510和Adreno 512/612之间

GPU支持现代标准，例如Vulkan 1.0（根据Wikipedia），OpenGL ES 3.2，OpenCL 2.0和DirectX 11（FL 11_1）。

Adreno 600 Series

Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology11 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement09.04.2019
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 1050 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 15403     avg: 22761     median: 24487.5 (2%)     max: 25351 Points
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 975     avg: 1855     median: 1827.5 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1295     avg: 1759     median: 1746.5 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
+ 36 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 267     avg: 1171     median: 1175 (5%)     max: 1597 Points
+ 45 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 240     avg: 1034     median: 1032 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
+ 45 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
ARM Mali-T720
91.7 -91%
...
ARM Mali-T830 MP3
643 -38%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
766 -26%
Qualcomm Adreno 508
797 -23%
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
816 -21%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
841 -19%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
854 -17%
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
863 -17%
Qualcomm Adreno 510
867 -16%
Qualcomm Adreno 612
1030 0%
Qualcomm Adreno 610
1034
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
1146 11%
Qualcomm Adreno 418
1207 17%
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
1213 17%
Qualcomm Adreno 512
1237 20%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
1251 21%
PowerVR GM9446
1470 42%
Qualcomm Adreno 613
1591 54%
Qualcomm Adreno 430
1777 72%
Qualcomm Adreno 616
1825 76%
...
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
36299 3411%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1400     avg: 1836     median: 1797 (16%)     max: 2222 Points
+ 38 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1270     avg: 1713     median: 1691 (10%)     max: 2095 Points
+ 37 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 854     avg: 1210     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1905 Points
+ 45 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 726     avg: 1040     median: 1021 (3%)     max: 1394 Points
+ 45 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 205     avg: 408.6     median: 425.5 (0%)     max: 634 Points
+ 33 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 100     avg: 120.1     median: 122 (0%)     max: 141 Points
+ 22 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.1     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (1%)     max: 1.5 fps
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
PowerVR GE8100
0.314 -89%
...
Qualcomm Adreno 506
1.22 -57%
PowerVR GE8320
1.403 -50%
ARM Mali-T880 MP2
1.5 -47%
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
1.629 -42%
Qualcomm Adreno 508
1.825 -35%
ARM Mali-G57 MP1
2.061 -27%
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
2.113 -25%
Qualcomm Adreno 509
2.356 -17%
ARM Mali-T880 MP4
2.467 -13%
Qualcomm Adreno 610
2.828
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
2.912 3%
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
3.074 9%
Qualcomm Adreno 512
3.167 12%
ARM Mali-G52 MP2
3.315 17%
PowerVR GM9446
3.5 24%
Qualcomm Adreno 612
3.56 26%
Qualcomm Adreno 613
4 41%
Qualcomm Adreno 616
5.225 85%
PowerVR GXA6850
5.3 87%
...
Apple M3 10-Core GPU
118.5 4090%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
536 18853%
0%
100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
+ 47 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 9.3     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16 fps
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 19.5     median: 19 (1%)     max: 24 fps
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 24     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (0%)     max: 45 fps
+ 34 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 23743     avg: 39171     median: 38601 (4%)     max: 53821 Points
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 343     avg: 346     median: 346 (0%)     max: 349 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
577 points (0%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (6%)     max: 21734 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (22%)     max: 20711 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.25     avg: 3.4     median: 3 (1%)     max: 6.42 Watt
+ 12 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
25.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra Ultra
26.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
42 59 ~ 51 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
40  fps    + Compare
ultra
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
26.3 27.7 37 37 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
15  fps    + Compare
ultra
11 13.1 14 15 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 38.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med.
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 29.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact321513
Armajet52
PUBG Mobile302525
Arena of Valor3838
Dead Trigger 262
Asphalt 9: Legends3020
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 20. 04:25:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:31:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.022s ... 0.023s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.023s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.024s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.024s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.024s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.024s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#20 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#21 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.025s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.025s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.025s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0.015s ... 0.041s

#26 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.123s ... 0.163s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.163s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.424s ... 0.587s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.587s

#30 Got 109 rows for game benchmarks. +0.022s ... 0.61s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.61s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.614s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +0.227s ... 0.841s

#34 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.844s

#35 return log +0s ... 0.844s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm Adreno 610 graphics card

三星Galaxy A05s

三星Galaxy A05s 评测--配备 90 赫兹屏幕的廉价智能手机

2024 年最便宜的三星智能手机名为Galaxy A05s。这款 6.7 英寸设备的官方售价为 159 欧元，具备日常使用所需的一切功能，但功能不多。我们将在测试中了解这是否足以让竞争对手望尘莫及。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 6.70" | 194 g
小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片：Florian Schmitt

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 智能手机评测--一款拥有令人印象深刻的显示屏、售价约 200 美元的手机

红米-Note-13 系列中最便宜的机型继续采用明亮的 120Hz AMOLED 显示屏，除此之外，它还拥有不错的功能，售价约为 200 美元。然而，竞争在不断加剧。最新款的中端经典机型还能跟得上吗？...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 6.67" | 188.5 g
Onyx Boox Tab X - 图片：Florian Schmitt

Onyx Boox Tab X 评测--适合大型任务的电子墨水平板电脑？

13.3 英寸的 Onyx Boox Tab X 是市场上最大的电子墨水平板电脑之一。得益于Android 操作系统，它提供了应用程序支持，因此可以使用多种应用程序。点击这里查看我们的综合测试结果。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 13.30" | 570 g
缟玛瑙 Boox Note Air 3

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 评论：漂亮的电子墨水平板电脑，支持应用程序，甚至黑白两色

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 配备了笔输入、Android 操作系统和时尚的金属外壳，旨在赢得那些希望购买功能强大的电子墨水平板电脑的买家的青睐。我们很喜欢之前的彩色显示屏版本，现在我们来看看黑白 E-Ink Carta 显示屏版本是否同样令人信服。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 10.30" | 430 g
Onyx Boox Palma

Onyx Boox Palma 评测--配备电子墨水显示屏和摄像头的掌上平板电脑

Onyx Boox Palma 外型酷似手机，但缺乏移动通信等基本功能。因此，它更像是一个非常方便的电子书阅读器，支持Android 应用程序，甚至还有一个小型摄像头。在我们的测试中了解一下 Palma 的功能。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | 6.13" | 170 g

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » 小米红米 Pad SE 平板电脑评测--不是改进，而是降级？

Onyx Boox Page: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 7.00", 0.2 kg
  Review » Onyx Boox Page 评论 -Android- 便捷电子墨水平板电脑上的应用程序

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.30", 0.4 kg
  Review » Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C 评测 - 配备彩色显示屏、支持手写笔的电子墨水平板电脑Android

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米Redmi Note 12评论：具备120赫兹AMOLED和1,200尼特的智能手机，价格低于200美元

Huawei MatePad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  Review » 华为MatePad SE平板电脑评测--价格小，电池小

Oppo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36", 0.4 kg
  Review » Oppo Pad Air平板电脑评测 - 良好的扬声器和充足的电池

Honor Pad 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 12.00", 0.5 kg
  Review » Honor Pad 8平板电脑评论。12英寸平板电脑，价格便宜

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G42智能手机评论。700尼特的OLED轻量级，价格便宜

Xiaomi Redmi 10C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  Review » 小米红米10C智能手机评测--入门级手机的色彩还原度很高

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G52智能手机评测--经济实惠的90Hz OLED手机，带立体声和50MP

Honor X8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor X8评测 - 经济实惠的中档智能手机，配备64MP摄像头

Huawei Nova 9 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  Review » 华为Nova 9 SE评论。拥有108MP摄像头的别致智能手机

Oppo A76: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  Review » 奥普A76评测--光影下的美丽手机

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  Review » Redmi Note 11日评论。小米智能手机配备90赫兹OLED显示屏和1000尼特，价格绝对便宜

Realme 9i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  Review » realme 9i智能手机评测--带立体声扬声器的经济实惠的中档机型

Honor 50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  Review » Honor 50 Lite评论。入门级的智能手机，拥有厚实的64MP摄像头

Motorola Defy: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Defy智能手机评测--实惠的户外手机，有趣的设计

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G Pro智能手机评测：廉价手写笔

Nokia 5.3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  Review » Nokia 5.3智能手机评测：简版安卓手机

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G8智能手机评测：千元价位的全能相机

Motorola Moto G8 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  Review » 摩托罗拉Moto G8 Power智能手机评测：续航足够，相机优秀

Oppo Reno11 FS: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno11 FS

Honor X7c: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.77", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X7c

Vivo V40 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V40 Lite

HMD Vibe: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » HMD Vibe

Realme 12 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 12 Lite

Honor Pad X8a: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad X8a

Oppo A3x 2024: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A3x 2024

Realme 13 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 13 4G

Realme 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme 12 4G

Huawei Nova 12 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 12 SE

Vivo V30 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V30 Lite

Oppo A60: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A60

Huawei Nova 12i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 12i

Realme C67 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme C67 4G

Motorola Moto G Play 2024: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Play 2024

Honor X8b: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X8b

Vivo Y27s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.64", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y27s

Realme C67 5G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.72", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Realme C67

Honor X7b: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X7b

Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad 2024: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Xiaoxin Pad 2024

Nokia C210: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia C210

Huawei Nova 11 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11 SE

Samsung Galaxy A05s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A05s

Huawei Enjoy 60X: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Enjoy 60X

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 13

Honor Pad X9: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 11.50", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad X9

Huawei Nova Y91: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.95", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Y91

Huawei Nova 11i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 11i

Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

Vivo Y36: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.64", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y36

Huawei Nova 10 Youth: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 10 Youth

Chuwi HiPad Max: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Chuwi HiPad Max

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 12

Huawei Nova 10 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 10 SE

Huawei MatePad SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.40", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Huawei MatePad SE

Oppo A77s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A77s

Motorola Moto Tab G62: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.60", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto Tab G62

Motorola Moto G32: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G32

Vivo Y22s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y22s

Oppo Reno8 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno8 4G

Huawei Nova Y90: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova Y90

Honor Pad 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 12.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Honor Pad 8

Oppo Pad Air: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 10.36", 0.4 kg
  External Review » Oppo Pad Air

Motorola Moto G42: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G42

Xiaomi Redmi 10 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10 Power

Vivo iQOO U5x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO U5x

Honor X7: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.74", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X7

Honor X8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X8

Oppo F21 Pro 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F21 Pro 4G

Honor X9 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.81", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor X9 4G

Motorola Moto G52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G52

TCL 10 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.47", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 10 Plus

Vivo Y55 2022: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y55 2022

Oppo Reno7 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno7 4G

Oppo K10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.59", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo K10

Xiaomi Redmi 10C: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.71", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 10C

Realme 9 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9 4G

Oppo A76: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A76

Huawei Nova 9 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei nova 9 SE

Vivo Y21e: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y21e

Vivo Y33T: unknown, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y33T

Oppo A36: unknown, 6.56", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A36

Oppo A11s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A11s

Vivo Y21T: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y21T

Vivo Y32: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y32

Oppo Reno6 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Reno6 Lite

Vivo Y20T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20T

Crosscall Action-X5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 5.45", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Crosscall Action-X5

Realme 9i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme 9i

Oppo A95 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A95 4G

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 11

Honor 50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Honor 50 Lite

Oppo F19s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F19s

Vivo Y11s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y11s

Huawei Nova 8i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Huawei Nova 8i

Chuwi HiPad Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.80", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi HiPad Pro

TCL 20S: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20S

Lenovo K13 Note: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K13 Note

Motorola Defy: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Defy

TCL 20L+: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20L+

TCL 20L (20 Lite): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20L (20 Lite)

TCL 10L: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 10L

Oppo F19: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F19

TCL 20 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.82", 0.2 kg
  External Review » TCL 20 SE

Oppo A74: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.43", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A74

Motorola Moto G10 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G10 Power

Lenovo K12 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K12 Pro

Motorola Moto G10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G10

Motorola Moto G30: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G30

Vivo Y31: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y31

Motorola Moto G Play 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Play 2021

Motorola Moto G Power 2021: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.60", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Power 2021

Lenovo Tab P11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Tab P11

Lenovo K12 Note: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo K12 Note

Xiaomi Redmi 9T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9T

Vivo Y51: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.58", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y51

Motorola Moto G9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.80", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G9 Power

Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi 9 Power

Nokia 5.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 5.4

OnePlus Nord N100: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Nord N100

Vivo X50 Lite: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X50 Lite

Vivo Y70: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y70

Xiaomi Poco M3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Poco M3

Realme Narzo 20A: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme Narzo 20A

Oppo A53s: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A53s

Oppo F17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo F17

Motorola Moto E7 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto E7 Plus

Vivo V20 SE: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.44", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V20 SE

Realme C17: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » realme C17

Vivo Y20s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20s

Nokia 3.4: Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 6.39", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 3.4

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020): Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 10.40", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4 (2020)

Oppo A53: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A53

HTC Desire 20 Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » HTC Desire 20 Pro

Motorola Moto G9 Play: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G9 Play

Vivo Y20: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20

Vivo Y20i: unknown, 6.51", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y20i

Motorola Moto G9: unknown, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G9

Motorola Moto G Pro: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Pro

Motorola Moto G Fast: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Fast

Vivo U3x: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.35", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo U3x

Nokia 5.3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.55", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Nokia 5.3

Oppo A92: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A92

Oppo A72: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A72

Oppo A52: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A52

Vivo Y50: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.53", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo Y50

Sony Xperia 10 II: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.00", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Sony Xperia 10 II

Motorola Moto G8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G8

Motorola Moto G Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Power

Motorola Moto G Stylus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G Stylus

Oppo A11: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A11

Oppo Realme 5i: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.52", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme 5i

Motorola Moto G8 Power: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.40", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G8 Power

Vivo V17: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.38", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo V17

Oppo Realme 5s: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme 5s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T

Motorola Moto G8 Plus: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto G8 Plus

Xiaomi Mi CC9e : Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.01", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi CC9e

Oppo A5 2020: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A5 2020

Vivo U10: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.35", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo U10

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.30", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi Note 8

Oppo A9 2020 (A11x): Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo A9 2020 (A11x)

Oppo Realme 5: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.50", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Realme 5

Xiaomi Mi A3: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, 6.09", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Mi A3

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » 新的全球小米Redmi Note 12系列细节泄露

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Arc B580

Class 3

A18 Pro GPU *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
A18 GPU *
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Class 4

A10 Fusion GPU
Mali-G77 MP11 *
Xclipse 530
Mali-G77 MP9 *
Mali-G76 MP16 *
Mali-G610 MP6 *
Mali-G610 MP4 *
Adreno 644 *
Adreno 643 *
Adreno 642 *
Mali-G610 MP3 *
Mali-G615 MP2 *
Adreno 642L *
Adreno 710 *
Adreno 640 *
Maleoon 910 *
Mali-G76 MP12 *
Mali-G76 MP10 *
Mali-G68 MP5 *
Mali-G57 MP6 *
Mali-G57 MP5 *
Adreno 540 *
Mali-G72 MP18 *
Mali-G71 MP20 *
Mali-G72 MP12 *
Mali-G71 MP8
PowerVR GM9446
Adreno 530
PowerVR GXA6850
GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600
Mali-T880 MP12
Mali-G76 MP4 *
Mali-T760 MP8
Mali-G71 MP2 *
Adreno 430
Mali-G72 MP3 *
VideoCore VII *
Mali-G68 MP4 *
Mali-T880 MP4
Mali-G52 MP6 *
Mali-G68 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP2 *
Mali-G52 MP1 *
Mali-T760 MP6
Mali-T880 MP2
PowerVR GX6450
Adreno 420
Adreno 620 *
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57 MP4 *
Mali-G57 MP3 *

Class 5

Adreno 418
Adreno 619 *
Adreno 619L *
Adreno 618 *
Mali-G57 MP2 *
Mali-G57 MP1 *
Adreno 616 *
Mali-G51 MP4 *
Adreno 613 *
Adreno 612 *
Adreno 610 *
Adreno 512 *
Adreno 510 *
Adreno 330
PowerVR G6430
PowerVR GX6250
PowerVR G6400
Mali-T628 MP6
Mali-T760 MP4
SGX554MP4
Mali-T628 MP4
Adreno 509 *
Adreno 508 *
Adreno 506 *
GE8322 / IMG8322 *
Adreno 505 *
Adreno 504 *
Mali-T860 MP2
Mali-T830 MP3
Mali-T604 MP4
PowerVR G6200
Adreno 405 *
Mali-T830 MP2

Class 6

SGX543MP4 *
Mali-T624
Adreno 320 *
Mali-T760 MP2
PowerVR GE8320 *
PowerVR GE8300 *
PowerVR GE8100 *
Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-450 MP4
Mali-T830 MP1
SGX543MP3 *
SGX543MP2 *
SGX545
SGX544MP2 *
Mali-T720 MP2
SGX544 *
Adreno 308
Adreno 306
Adreno 305
Adreno 304
Mali-T720
GC7000UL
Adreno 302
Adreno 225 *
GC4000 *
Mali-400 MP4 *
VideoCore-IV *
Adreno 220 *
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
Mali-400 MP2 *
Mali-400 MP *
SGX540 *
Adreno 205 *
Adreno 203 *
GC800 *
SGX535
SGX531
SGX530
Adreno 200 *
Mali-200 *

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter